Discussion:Telecoms Package compromise-amendments 080912 : Différence entre versions

De La Quadrature du Net
Aller à la navigationAller à la recherche
Ligne 1 : Ligne 1 :
AM4 raises a concern. If on one hand it establishes that services providers are not entitled to determine what is a lawful content, service or application, one the other hand, the task of determining what must be considered as lawful shall be the "task of relevant authorities of the member state".
+
AM4 raises a concern.  
 +
 
 +
If on one hand it establishes that services providers are not entitled to determine what is a lawful content, service or application, one the other hand, the task of determining what must be considered as lawful shall be the "task of relevant authorities of the member state".
 
Such "relevant authorities" can be of any type and not necessarily judicial authorities. Only the judge should be deemed to qualify a content, service or application.
 
Such "relevant authorities" can be of any type and not necessarily judicial authorities. Only the judge should be deemed to qualify a content, service or application.
In this context the proposed amendment should make a direct reference to the judge by replacing the term "relevant athorities" by "judicial powers"
+
In this context the proposed amendment should make a direct reference to the judge by replacing the term "relevant authorities" by "judicial powers"

Version du 15 septembre 2008 à 22:33

AM4 raises a concern.

If on one hand it establishes that services providers are not entitled to determine what is a lawful content, service or application, one the other hand, the task of determining what must be considered as lawful shall be the "task of relevant authorities of the member state". Such "relevant authorities" can be of any type and not necessarily judicial authorities. Only the judge should be deemed to qualify a content, service or application. In this context the proposed amendment should make a direct reference to the judge by replacing the term "relevant authorities" by "judicial powers"