Political Memory: Directive on patentability of "computer-implemented inventions" (software patents), 1st reading, Results in Detail for France {{#icon:FR.png|France}}
Rank |
MEP |
Final score |
Amendments 52, 54/rév, 68 |
Amendments 29, 41, 59 |
Amendment 69 |
Amendments 55/rév., 97, 108, 1st part |
Amendment 16, 1st part |
Amendment 16, 2nd part |
Amendment 16 (paragraph 2) |
Amendment 70 |
Amendment 60 |
Amendment 72 |
Amendment 76, 1st part |
Amendment 76, 2nd part |
Amendment 71, 1st part |
Amendment 71, 2nd part |
Amendment 81 |
Amendments 34, 115 |
Amendment 74 |
Amendment 75 |
Proposition modifiée |
Résolution
|
26 |
Bruno GOLLNISCH {{#icon:NI.png|NI|11|Software_patents_directive_1st_reading_details_NI}} |
100.0 |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
against |
against |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
for |
against |
for |
for |
against |
against |
against |
against
|
33 |
Carl LANG {{#icon:NI.png|NI|11|Software_patents_directive_1st_reading_details_NI}} |
100.0 |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
against |
against |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
for |
against |
for |
for |
against |
against |
against |
against
|
56 |
Francis WURTZ {{#icon:GUE.png|GUE/NGL|11|Software_patents_directive_1st_reading_details_GUE}} |
100.0 |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
against |
against |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
for |
against |
for |
for |
against |
against |
against |
against
|
61 |
Véronique MATHIEU {{#icon:PPE.png|PPE-DE|11|Software_patents_directive_1st_reading_details_PPE}} |
99.2 |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
against |
against |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
for |
abst. |
for |
for |
against |
against |
against |
against
|
68 |
Christine DE VEYRAC {{#icon:PPE.png|PPE-DE|11|Software_patents_directive_1st_reading_details_PPE}} |
98.5 |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
against |
abst. |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
for |
against |
for |
for |
against |
against |
against |
against
|
89 |
Hélène FLAUTRE {{#icon:Verts.png|Verts/ALE|11|Software_patents_directive_1st_reading_details_Verts}} |
93.9 |
for |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
against |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
for |
against |
for |
for |
against |
against |
against |
against
|
92 |
Marie Anne ISLER BÉGUIN {{#icon:Verts.png|Verts/ALE|11|Software_patents_directive_1st_reading_details_Verts}} |
93.9 |
for |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
against |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
for |
against |
for |
for |
against |
against |
against |
against
|
101 |
Gérard ONESTA {{#icon:Verts.png|Verts/ALE|11|Software_patents_directive_1st_reading_details_Verts}} |
93.9 |
for |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
against |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
for |
against |
for |
for |
against |
against |
against |
against
|
121 |
Alain LIPIETZ {{#icon:Verts.png|Verts/ALE|11|Software_patents_directive_1st_reading_details_Verts}} |
92.4 |
for |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
against |
for |
for |
for |
for |
- |
for |
against |
for |
for |
against |
against |
against |
against
|
135 |
Philippe MORILLON {{#icon:ALDE.png|ALDE|11|Software_patents_directive_1st_reading_details_ALDE}} |
89.4 |
for |
for |
against |
for |
against |
against |
abst. |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
against |
against |
for |
for |
against |
against |
against |
against
|
136 |
Paul Marie COÛTEAUX {{#icon:IND.png|IND/DEM|11|Software_patents_directive_1st_reading_details_IND}} |
89.0 |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
against |
against |
abst. |
for |
abst. |
for |
against |
for |
against |
for |
for |
against |
- |
against |
against
|
138 |
Daniel COHN-BENDIT {{#icon:Verts.png|Verts/ALE|11|Software_patents_directive_1st_reading_details_Verts}} |
88.3 |
for |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
against |
- |
for |
for |
for |
against |
for |
against |
for |
for |
against |
against |
against |
against
|
162 |
Marielle DE SARNEZ {{#icon:ALDE.png|ALDE|11|Software_patents_directive_1st_reading_details_ALDE}} |
84.8 |
for |
for |
against |
for |
against |
against |
abst. |
for |
for |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
for |
for |
against |
against |
against |
against
|
175 |
Jean-Claude MARTINEZ {{#icon:NI.png|NI|11|Software_patents_directive_1st_reading_details_NI}} |
79.5 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
against |
against |
against |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
for |
against |
for |
for |
against |
against |
against |
against
|
185 |
Ari VATANEN {{#icon:PPE.png|PPE-DE|11|Software_patents_directive_1st_reading_details_PPE}} |
76.5 |
against |
against |
for |
for |
against |
against |
for |
for |
for |
for |
for |
abst. |
for |
against |
for |
for |
abst. |
for |
for |
for
|
197 |
Thierry CORNILLET {{#icon:ALDE.png|ALDE|11|Software_patents_directive_1st_reading_details_ALDE}} |
72.7 |
against |
against |
against |
for |
against |
against |
abst. |
for |
for |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
for |
for |
against |
against |
against |
against
|
222 |
Marie-Arlette CARLOTTI {{#icon:PSE.png|PSE|11|Software_patents_directive_1st_reading_details_PSE}} |
62.1 |
against |
against |
for |
for |
against |
against |
for |
for |
for |
for |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
for |
for |
for |
for |
for
|
226 |
Catherine GUY-QUINT {{#icon:PSE.png|PSE|11|Software_patents_directive_1st_reading_details_PSE}} |
62.1 |
against |
against |
for |
for |
against |
against |
for |
for |
for |
for |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
for |
for |
for |
for |
for
|
230 |
Martine ROURE {{#icon:PSE.png|PSE|11|Software_patents_directive_1st_reading_details_PSE}} |
62.1 |
against |
against |
for |
for |
against |
against |
for |
for |
for |
for |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
for |
for |
for |
for |
for
|
239 |
Béatrice PATRIE {{#icon:PSE.png|PSE|11|Software_patents_directive_1st_reading_details_PSE}} |
60.6 |
against |
against |
for |
for |
for |
against |
for |
for |
for |
for |
for |
for |
for |
for |
for |
for |
for |
for |
for |
for
|
250 |
Gilles SAVARY {{#icon:PSE.png|PSE|11|Software_patents_directive_1st_reading_details_PSE}} |
56.4 |
against |
against |
for |
for |
against |
against |
for |
- |
for |
for |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
for |
for |
for |
for |
for
|
255 |
Harlem DÉSIR {{#icon:PSE.png|PSE|11|Software_patents_directive_1st_reading_details_PSE}} |
56.1 |
against |
against |
for |
for |
for |
against |
for |
for |
for |
for |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
for |
for |
for |
for |
for
|
258 |
Bernard POIGNANT {{#icon:PSE.png|PSE|11|Software_patents_directive_1st_reading_details_PSE}} |
56.1 |
against |
against |
for |
for |
for |
against |
for |
for |
for |
for |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
for |
for |
for |
for |
for
|
259 |
Michel ROCARD {{#icon:PSE.png|PSE|11|Software_patents_directive_1st_reading_details_PSE}} |
56.1 |
against |
against |
for |
for |
for |
against |
for |
for |
for |
for |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
for |
for |
for |
for |
for
|
330 |
Pervenche BERÈS {{#icon:PSE.png|PSE|11|Software_patents_directive_1st_reading_details_PSE}} |
42.8 |
against |
against |
for |
against |
against |
against |
for |
for |
- |
for |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
against |
for |
for |
for |
for
|
440 |
Dominique VLASTO {{#icon:PPE.png|PPE-DE|11|Software_patents_directive_1st_reading_details_PPE}} |
25.4 |
against |
against |
against |
- |
for |
- |
for |
against |
against |
abst. |
abst. |
abst. |
against |
against |
against |
for |
abst. |
for |
abst. |
abst.
|
494 |
Joseph DAUL {{#icon:PPE.png|PPE-DE|11|Software_patents_directive_1st_reading_details_PPE}} |
20.1 |
against |
against |
against |
against |
for |
for |
for |
against |
against |
abst. |
abst. |
abst. |
against |
against |
abst. |
for |
abst. |
for |
for |
for
|
505 |
Marie-Hélène DESCAMPS {{#icon:PPE.png|PPE-DE|11|Software_patents_directive_1st_reading_details_PPE}} |
18.9 |
against |
against |
against |
against |
for |
for |
for |
against |
against |
abst. |
abst. |
abst. |
against |
against |
against |
for |
abst. |
for |
abst. |
abst.
|
510 |
Janelly FOURTOU {{#icon:ALDE.png|ALDE|11|Software_patents_directive_1st_reading_details_ALDE}} |
18.9 |
against |
against |
against |
against |
for |
for |
for |
against |
against |
abst. |
abst. |
abst. |
against |
against |
against |
for |
- |
for |
for |
for
|
515 |
Françoise GROSSETÊTE {{#icon:PPE.png|PPE-DE|11|Software_patents_directive_1st_reading_details_PPE}} |
18.9 |
against |
against |
against |
against |
for |
for |
for |
against |
against |
abst. |
abst. |
abst. |
against |
against |
against |
for |
abst. |
for |
for |
for
|
524 |
Alain LAMASSOURE {{#icon:PPE.png|PPE-DE|11|Software_patents_directive_1st_reading_details_PPE}} |
18.9 |
against |
against |
against |
against |
for |
for |
for |
against |
against |
abst. |
abst. |
abst. |
against |
against |
against |
for |
abst. |
for |
for |
for
|
547 |
Margie SUDRE {{#icon:PPE.png|PPE-DE|11|Software_patents_directive_1st_reading_details_PPE}} |
18.9 |
against |
against |
against |
against |
for |
for |
for |
against |
against |
abst. |
abst. |
abst. |
against |
against |
against |
for |
abst. |
for |
for |
for
|
Show details for all MEPs
- Amendments 52, 54/rév, 68: Reject the directive - recommendation: for, coefficient: 4
- Amendments 29, 41, 59: Stated Purpose of directive: limits of patentability with respect to automated data processing - recommendation: for, coefficient: 4
- Amendment 69: Definition of technical contribution excluding processing, handling, and presentation of information - recommendation: for, coefficient: 5
- Amendments 55/rév., 97, 108, 1st part: Definition of a technical field by the use of controllable forces of nature - recommendation: for, coefficient: 5
- Amendment 16, 1st part: Definition of a computer-implemented invention - recommendation: against, coefficient: 4
- Amendment 16, 2nd part: Definition of inventive step by a technical contribution - recommendation: against, coefficient: 4
- Amendment 16 (paragraph 2): Requirement of a technical contribution to meet the inventive step requirement - recommendation: against, coefficient: 4
- Amendment 70: Definition of a technical contribution by constitution of a a new teaching on cause-effect relations in the use of controllable forces of nature - recommendation: for, coefficient: 5
- Amendment 60: Exclusion of computer-implemented solutions from patentability when they improve efficiency in the use of resources within the data processing system - recommendation: for, coefficient: 5
- Amendment 72: Inadmissibility of patent claims on a computer program, alone or on a data medium - recommendation: for, coefficient: 4
- Amendment 76, 1st part: No infringement when a patented technique is used for the purpose of interoperability - recommendation: for, coefficient: 4
- Amendment 76, 2nd part: Limitation of the absence of infringement by the three-steps test when a patented technique is use for the purpose of interoperability - recommendation: against, coefficient: 4
- Amendment 71, 1st part: Monitoring of directive with regard to SMEs' innovation - recommendation: for, coefficient: 1
- Amendment 71, 2nd part: Research of solutions to ease access to patents for SMEs - recommendation: against, coefficient: 2
- Amendment 81: Parlementary control of EPO - recommendation: for, coefficient: 3
- Amendments 34, 115: Delete a recital allowing patentability of algorithms - recommendation: for, coefficient: 4
- Amendment 74: Recital requiring that source code be include in a patent description - recommendation: against, coefficient: 2
- Amendment 75: Recital recalling patentability principles that exclude inventions belonging to public domain, implying that some software can be considered in this way and therefore could be patentable - recommendation: against, coefficient: 2
- Proposition modifiée: Proposition as amended - recommendation: none
- Résolution: Position of the European Parliament in first reading as stated in the previously amended proposition - recommendation: none
Back to results for France