Telecoms package directives 2nd reading details LT
From La Quadrature du Net
Jump to navigationJump to searchPolitical Memory: Directives reforming the EU's regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services (telecoms package), 2nd reading, Results in Detail for Lithuania {{#icon:LT.png|Lithuania}}
Rank | MEP | Final score | am. 103rev bloc n° 1 | am. 103rev art. 20.1.b.1 | ams. 101=111=117 | ams. 102=112=118 | ams. 62=94=104=119 | ams. 96=106=120 | am. 103rev art. 33.3 | am. 18 | ams. 95=105=114 | am. 1 bloc 1 + ams 11, 12 | ams. 3=7 | am. 1 art. 8.4.g | ams. 1 art. 8.4.h=2=5=6=9 | ams. 4=8 |
---|
- am. 103rev bloc n° 1: Trilogue compromise. - recommendation: against, coefficient: 3
- am. 103rev art. 20.1.b.1: Information in contracts about traffic management policies. - recommendation: against, coefficient: 2
- ams. 101=111=117: No discrimination in traffic management policies. - recommendation: for, coefficient: 4
- ams. 102=112=118: Regulatory powers against discriminated traffic management policies. - recommendation: for, coefficient: 2
- ams. 62=94=104=119: Guarantee of access to content, services and application (am. 166 in 1st reading). - recommendation: for, coefficient: 4
- ams. 96=106=120: Deletion of cooperation between ISP and industries promoting lawful contents. - recommendation: for, coefficient: 2
- am. 103rev art. 33.3: Promotion of cooperation between ISP and industries promoting lawful contents. - recommendation: against, coefficient: 2
- am. 18: Promotion of cooperation between ISP and industries promoting lawful contents. - recommendation: against, coefficient: 1
- ams. 95=105=114: Deletion of cooperation between ISP and industries promoting lawful contents. - recommendation: for, coefficient: 1
- am. 1 bloc 1 + ams 11, 12: Report voted in ITRE committee and recitals about fundamental rights from trilogue compromise. - recommendation: for, coefficient: 2
- ams. 3=7: Guarantee of access and distribution of any content/application/service. - recommendation: for, coefficient: 3
- am. 1 art. 8.4.g: Ability of access and distribution of content/application/service of users' choice. - recommendation: against, coefficient: 3
- ams. 1 art. 8.4.h=2=5=6=9: Obligation for a ruling by judicial authorities before applying any restriction to end-users' fundamental rights, except for public security, preventing from 3-strikes approach (am. 138 in 1st reading). - recommendation: for, coefficient: 5
- ams. 4=8: Transparency of traffic management policies. - recommendation: for, coefficient: 2