Political Memory: Directive on patentability of "computer-implemented inventions" (software patents), 1st reading, Results in Detail for group Groupe des Verts/Alliance libre européenne {{#icon:Verts.png|Groupe des Verts/Alliance libre européenne}}
Rank |
MEP |
Final score |
Amendments 52, 54/rév, 68 |
Amendments 29, 41, 59 |
Amendment 69 |
Amendments 55/rév., 97, 108, 1st part |
Amendment 16, 1st part |
Amendment 16, 2nd part |
Amendment 16 (paragraph 2) |
Amendment 70 |
Amendment 60 |
Amendment 72 |
Amendment 76, 1st part |
Amendment 76, 2nd part |
Amendment 71, 1st part |
Amendment 71, 2nd part |
Amendment 81 |
Amendments 34, 115 |
Amendment 74 |
Amendment 75 |
Proposition modifiée |
Résolution
|
47 |
Frithjof SCHMIDT {{#icon:DE.png|Germany |
Software_patents_directive_1st_reading_details_DE}} |
100.0 |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
against |
against |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
for |
against |
for |
for |
against |
against |
abst. |
abst.
|
80 |
Hiltrud BREYER {{#icon:DE.png|Germany |
Software_patents_directive_1st_reading_details_DE}} |
93.9 |
for |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
against |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
for |
against |
for |
for |
against |
against |
against |
against
|
81 |
Kathalijne Maria BUITENWEG {{#icon:NL.png|Netherlands |
Software_patents_directive_1st_reading_details_NL}} |
93.9 |
for |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
against |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
for |
against |
for |
for |
against |
against |
against |
against
|
89 |
Hélène FLAUTRE {{#icon:FR.png|France |
Software_patents_directive_1st_reading_details_FR}} |
93.9 |
for |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
against |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
for |
against |
for |
for |
against |
against |
against |
against
|
90 |
Monica FRASSONI {{#icon:IT.png|Italy |
Software_patents_directive_1st_reading_details_IT}} |
93.9 |
for |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
against |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
for |
against |
for |
for |
against |
against |
against |
against
|
91 |
Friedrich-Wilhelm GRAEFE zu BARINGDORF {{#icon:DE.png|Germany |
Software_patents_directive_1st_reading_details_DE}} |
93.9 |
for |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
against |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
for |
against |
for |
for |
against |
against |
against |
against
|
92 |
Marie Anne ISLER BÉGUIN {{#icon:FR.png|France |
Software_patents_directive_1st_reading_details_FR}} |
93.9 |
for |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
against |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
for |
against |
for |
for |
against |
against |
against |
against
|
93 |
Pierre JONCKHEER {{#icon:BE.png|Belgium |
Software_patents_directive_1st_reading_details_BE}} |
93.9 |
for |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
against |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
for |
against |
for |
for |
against |
against |
against |
against
|
94 |
Jean LAMBERT {{#icon:GB.png|United Kingdom |
Software_patents_directive_1st_reading_details_GB}} |
93.9 |
for |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
against |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
for |
against |
for |
for |
against |
against |
against |
against
|
96 |
Caroline LUCAS {{#icon:GB.png|United Kingdom |
Software_patents_directive_1st_reading_details_GB}} |
93.9 |
for |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
against |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
for |
against |
for |
for |
against |
against |
against |
against
|
101 |
Gérard ONESTA {{#icon:FR.png|France |
Software_patents_directive_1st_reading_details_FR}} |
93.9 |
for |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
against |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
for |
against |
for |
for |
against |
against |
against |
against
|
105 |
Heide RÜHLE {{#icon:DE.png|Germany |
Software_patents_directive_1st_reading_details_DE}} |
93.9 |
for |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
against |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
for |
against |
for |
for |
against |
against |
against |
against
|
108 |
Bart STAES {{#icon:BE.png|Belgium |
Software_patents_directive_1st_reading_details_BE}} |
93.9 |
for |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
against |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
for |
against |
for |
for |
against |
against |
against |
against
|
113 |
Johannes VOGGENHUBER {{#icon:AT.png|Austria |
Software_patents_directive_1st_reading_details_AT}} |
93.9 |
for |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
against |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
for |
against |
for |
for |
against |
against |
against |
against
|
121 |
Alain LIPIETZ {{#icon:FR.png|France |
Software_patents_directive_1st_reading_details_FR}} |
92.4 |
for |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
against |
for |
for |
for |
for |
- |
for |
against |
for |
for |
against |
against |
against |
against
|
138 |
Daniel COHN-BENDIT {{#icon:FR.png|France |
Software_patents_directive_1st_reading_details_FR}} |
88.3 |
for |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
against |
- |
for |
for |
for |
against |
for |
against |
for |
for |
against |
against |
against |
against
|
147 |
Joost LAGENDIJK {{#icon:NL.png|Netherlands |
Software_patents_directive_1st_reading_details_NL}} |
87.9 |
for |
for |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
for |
against |
for |
for |
against |
against |
against |
against
|
190 |
Elisabeth SCHROEDTER {{#icon:DE.png|Germany |
Software_patents_directive_1st_reading_details_DE}} |
73.5 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
for |
against |
against |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
for |
against |
for |
for |
against |
against |
against |
against
|
Show details for all MEPs
- Amendments 52, 54/rév, 68: Reject the directive - recommendation: for, coefficient: 4
- Amendments 29, 41, 59: Stated Purpose of directive: limits of patentability with respect to automated data processing - recommendation: for, coefficient: 4
- Amendment 69: Definition of technical contribution excluding processing, handling, and presentation of information - recommendation: for, coefficient: 5
- Amendments 55/rév., 97, 108, 1st part: Definition of a technical field by the use of controllable forces of nature - recommendation: for, coefficient: 5
- Amendment 16, 1st part: Definition of a computer-implemented invention - recommendation: against, coefficient: 4
- Amendment 16, 2nd part: Definition of inventive step by a technical contribution - recommendation: against, coefficient: 4
- Amendment 16 (paragraph 2): Requirement of a technical contribution to meet the inventive step requirement - recommendation: against, coefficient: 4
- Amendment 70: Definition of a technical contribution by constitution of a a new teaching on cause-effect relations in the use of controllable forces of nature - recommendation: for, coefficient: 5
- Amendment 60: Exclusion of computer-implemented solutions from patentability when they improve efficiency in the use of resources within the data processing system - recommendation: for, coefficient: 5
- Amendment 72: Inadmissibility of patent claims on a computer program, alone or on a data medium - recommendation: for, coefficient: 4
- Amendment 76, 1st part: No infringement when a patented technique is used for the purpose of interoperability - recommendation: for, coefficient: 4
- Amendment 76, 2nd part: Limitation of the absence of infringement by the three-steps test when a patented technique is use for the purpose of interoperability - recommendation: against, coefficient: 4
- Amendment 71, 1st part: Monitoring of directive with regard to SMEs' innovation - recommendation: for, coefficient: 1
- Amendment 71, 2nd part: Research of solutions to ease access to patents for SMEs - recommendation: against, coefficient: 2
- Amendment 81: Parlementary control of EPO - recommendation: for, coefficient: 3
- Amendments 34, 115: Delete a recital allowing patentability of algorithms - recommendation: for, coefficient: 4
- Amendment 74: Recital requiring that source code be include in a patent description - recommendation: against, coefficient: 2
- Amendment 75: Recital recalling patentability principles that exclude inventions belonging to public domain, implying that some software can be considered in this way and therefore could be patentable - recommendation: against, coefficient: 2
- Proposition modifiée: Proposition as amended - recommendation: none
- Résolution: Position of the European Parliament in first reading as stated in the previously amended proposition - recommendation: none
Back to results for group Groupe des Verts/Alliance libre européenne