EPLA resolution details LU

English

Français

Political Memory: Resolutions on European Patent Litigation Agreement (EPLA), Results in Detail for Luxembourg {{#icon:LU.png|Luxembourg}}

Rank	MEP	Final score	résolution	am. 8	am. 5	am. 10	par. 2	cons. A	cons. B	résolution_RC B6-0522/2006 - Brevets
53	Claude TURMES {{#icon:Verts.png\|Verts/ALE\|11\|EPLA_resolution_details_Verts}}	100.0	for	for	for	for	for	against	against	against
465	Erna HENNICOT-SCHOEPGES {{#icon:PPE.png\|PPE-DE\|11\|EPLA_resolution_details_PPE}}	5.6	against	against	against	against	for	for	for	for
510	Astrid LULLING {{#icon:PPE.png\|PPE-DE\|11\|EPLA_resolution_details_PPE}}	5.6	against	against	against	against	for	for	for	for
546	Lydie POLFER {{#icon:ALDE.png\|ALDE\|11\|EPLA_resolution_details_ALDE}}	5.6	against	against	against	against	for	for	for	for
577	Jean SPAUTZ {{#icon:PPE.png\|PPE-DE\|11\|EPLA_resolution_details_PPE}}	5.6	against	against	against	against	for	for	for	for
611	Robert GOEBBELS {{#icon:PSE.png\|PSE\|11\|EPLA_resolution_details_PSE}}	1.4	against	against	against	against	-	for	for	for

résolution: Resolution from PSE, Verts/ALE and GUE/NGL rejecting EPLA - recommendation: for, coefficient: 4
am. 8: Deletion of "accessing to Munich Convention" - recommendation: for, coefficient: 3
am. 5: Opinion from ECJ examined by Parliament for the need of transparency and democracy - recommendation: for, coefficient: 3
am. 10: Opinion from ECJ - recommendation: for, coefficient: 2
par. 2: Opinion from legal service of the European Parliament - recommendation: for, coefficient: 1
cons. A: considérant impliquant qu'une solution sur les litiges doit être trouvée à court terme - recommendation: against, coefficient: 3
cons. B: Recital recalling the need of an efficient, competitive, cost-efficient and accessible patent system - recommendation: against, coefficient: 2
résolution_RC B6-0522/2006 - Brevets: Compromise resolution between EPP and PSE - recommendation: none