Directive Terrorisme/Amendements LIBE/en : Différence entre versions

De La Quadrature du Net
Aller à la navigationAller à la recherche
(Page créée avec « The recital 7a in the directive is originally about the definition of the public provocation to terrorist acts and writes it down in all the actions that have to be fought... »)
(Page créée avec « * [https://wiki.laquadrature.net/Fichier:Texte_initial_commission_CELEX_52015PC0625_EN_TXT.pdf Text of the European Commission ], December 2015 * [https://wiki.laquadratur... »)
 
(10 révisions intermédiaires par le même utilisateur non affichées)
Ligne 1 : Ligne 1 :
 
<languages />
 
<languages />
−
'''Extension of surveillance measures in comprimise amendements [COMP] in the Terrorism Directive'''
+
'''Extension of surveillance measures in compromise amendments [COMP] in the Terrorism Directive'''
 +
 
 +
* [https://wiki.laquadrature.net/Fichier:Texte_initial_commission_CELEX_52015PC0625_EN_TXT.pdf Text of the European Commission ], December 2015
 +
* [https://wiki.laquadrature.net/Fichier:Rapport_Hohlmeier.pdf Text of the rapporteure Monika Hohlmeier], April 2016
 +
* [https://wiki.laquadrature.net/Fichier:20160422Draft_compromise.pdf "Compromise" Amendments], 22 April 2016
 +
* [https://wiki.laquadrature.net/Fichier:20160523Updated_Compromises.pdf "Compromise" Amendment], 23 May 2016
 +
* [https://wiki.laquadrature.net/Fichier:20160530_Updated_Compromises_TerrorDV.pdf "Compromise" Amendment], 27 May 2016
  
 
== [COMP 6] Recital 7a: "Removing illegal content"==
 
== [COMP 6] Recital 7a: "Removing illegal content"==
Ligne 6 : Ligne 12 :
 
The recital 7a in the directive is originally about the definition of the public provocation to terrorist acts and writes it down in all the actions that have to be fought in the anti terror directive.
 
The recital 7a in the directive is originally about the definition of the public provocation to terrorist acts and writes it down in all the actions that have to be fought in the anti terror directive.
  
−
Dès le rapport Hohlmeier, la possibilité de bloquer l'accès à des sites ou des pages sur Internet faisant l'apologie du terrorisme est introduite. Cette mesure, inscrite dans la loi française depuis 2014, a pourtant fait la preuve de son inefficacité opérationnelle et des nombreuses atteintes aux droits fondamentaux et notamment des droits à la liberté d'expression et à l'information, qu'elle engendre. Pour autant elle est introduite sans garantie suffisantes par la rapporteure.
+
Since the Hohlmeier report, the ability to block access to websites or pages on the Internet advocating terrorism is introduced. This measure, inscribed in French law since 2014, has demonstrated its operational inefficiency and numerous human rights abuses including the rights to freedom of expression and information. However, it is in the directive without any sufficient guarantees from the rapporteur.
  
−
Les versions suivantes de cet amendement de compromis, non seulement ne reviennent pas sur cette mesure de blocage, mais y ajoutent une mesure sortie du rapport de l'eurodéputée Rachida Dati sur la «&nbsp;prévention de la radicalisation et du recrutement de citoyens de l'Union par des organisations terroristes&nbsp;» du 3 novembre 2015. Ce rapport préconise que les États puissent attaquer pénalement les sociétés de services sur Internet et les réseaux sociaux qui ne répondraient pas favorablement à une requête exercée par une «&nbsp;autorité publique&nbsp;», sans que la nature de cette autorité publique soit précisée, ce qui laisse la possibilité de demandes de retrait sans aucune garantie procédurale et aucune transparence.
+
The following versions of this compromise amendment, not only do not come back on this blocking measure, but add another one from MEP Rachida Dati report (3 November 2015)  on "preventing radicalization and recruitment of European Union citizens by terrorists organizations". This report recommends that Member States could be criminally sue Internet service companies and social networks that do not respond favourably to a request exercised by a "public authority" without the nature of the public authority being specified, which leaves the possibility of withdrawal requests without any procedural guarantees and no transparency.
  
−
Dans la dernière version de l'amendement, la notion d'autorité publique disparaît, laissant encore plus ouverte la possibilité de demandes abusives de retrait ou de blocage de contenu sur Internet. Le droit au procès équitable et à l'action judiciaire n'est pas clairement défini pour les citoyens.  
+
In the latest version of the amendment, the notion of public authority disappears, leaving more open the possibility of abusive requests for withdrawal or blocking of online content. The right to fair trial and to legal action is not clearly define for citizens.  
  
 
<gallery>
 
<gallery>
−
Fichier:Recital 7 texte commission.jpg|Version 1 : texte de la Commission européenne
+
Fichier:Recital 7 texte commission.jpg|Version 1 : text of the European Commission
−
Fichier:Recital 7 rapport Hohlmeier.jpg|Version 2 : rapport HOHLMEIER  
+
Fichier:Recital 7 rapport Hohlmeier.jpg|Version 2 : report HOHLMEIER  
−
Fichier:Recital 7 23 mai.jpg|Version 3 : Amendements de "compromis", 23 mai 2016
+
Fichier:Recital 7 23 mai.jpg|Version 3 : Compromise Amendment 23 May 2016
−
Fichier:Recital 7 31 mai.jpg|Version 4 : Amendements de "compromis", 31 mai 2016
+
Fichier:Recital 7 31 mai.jpg|Version 4 : Compromise Amendment 31 May 2016
 
</gallery>
 
</gallery>
  
−
== [COMP 9] Considérant 15a : "Investigative tools" ==
+
== [COMP 9] Recital 15a: "Invetigative tools" ==
  
−
Ce considérant ajouté par l'amendement de compromis 9 [COMP 9] s'attache aux moyens autorisés pour les investigations antiterroristes.  
+
This recital added by the compromise amendement 9 [COMP 9] relates on means used by antiterror investigations.  
  
−
Inexistant dans le texte initial de la Commission européenne, il a été rajouté par la rapporteure Monika Holhmeier et n'a pas cessé d'être renforcé à chaque évolution du texte. Prévu au départ pour accorder à la lutte antiterroriste les mêmes moyens que contre le crime organisé, '''il a été aggravé pour autoriser les intrusions les plus larges en matière de surveillance électronique, interception de communications, captation audio ou vidéo, dans les lieux publics ou privés, ainsi que les recherches financières et bancaires'''.  
+
Not present in the original text of the European Commission, it was added by the rapporteur Monika Holhmeier and has continued to be strengthened with each evolution of the text. Originally planned to grant to the fight against terrorism the same means than against organized crime, '''it was worsen to allow the widest intrusions in electronic surveillance, interception of communications, audio capture or video, in public or private places, as well as the financial and banking searches'''.  
  
−
Tel quel, il légitimerait les législations antiterroristes ou de surveillance les plus extrémistes de l'Union européenne.  
+
As it, it would legitimize the most extreme anti-terror laws or surveillance measures of the European Union.  
  
 
<gallery>
 
<gallery>
−
Fichier:Recital 15-1.jpg|Version 1 : rapport HOHLMEIER
+
Fichier:Recital 15-1.jpg|Version 1 : report HOHLMEIER
−
Fichier:Recital 15-2.jpg|Version 2 : amendements "de compromis", fin avril 2016
+
Fichier:Recital 15-2.jpg|Version 2 : Compromise Amendment end April 2016
−
Fichier:Recital 15-3.jpg|Version 3 : amendements "de compromis", 23 mai 2016
+
Fichier:Recital 15-3.jpg|Version 3 : Compromise Amendment 23 May 2016
 
</gallery>
 
</gallery>
  
  
 
[[Catégorie:Directive Terrorisme]]
 
[[Catégorie:Directive Terrorisme]]

Version actuelle datée du 31 mai 2016 à 18:35

Autres langues :
English • ‎français

Extension of surveillance measures in compromise amendments [COMP] in the Terrorism Directive

[COMP 6] Recital 7a: "Removing illegal content"

The recital 7a in the directive is originally about the definition of the public provocation to terrorist acts and writes it down in all the actions that have to be fought in the anti terror directive.

Since the Hohlmeier report, the ability to block access to websites or pages on the Internet advocating terrorism is introduced. This measure, inscribed in French law since 2014, has demonstrated its operational inefficiency and numerous human rights abuses including the rights to freedom of expression and information. However, it is in the directive without any sufficient guarantees from the rapporteur.

The following versions of this compromise amendment, not only do not come back on this blocking measure, but add another one from MEP Rachida Dati report (3 November 2015) on "preventing radicalization and recruitment of European Union citizens by terrorists organizations". This report recommends that Member States could be criminally sue Internet service companies and social networks that do not respond favourably to a request exercised by a "public authority" without the nature of the public authority being specified, which leaves the possibility of withdrawal requests without any procedural guarantees and no transparency.

In the latest version of the amendment, the notion of public authority disappears, leaving more open the possibility of abusive requests for withdrawal or blocking of online content. The right to fair trial and to legal action is not clearly define for citizens.

  • Version 1 : text of the European Commission

  • Version 2 : report HOHLMEIER

  • Version 3 : Compromise Amendment 23 May 2016

  • Version 4 : Compromise Amendment 31 May 2016

[COMP 9] Recital 15a: "Invetigative tools"

This recital added by the compromise amendement 9 [COMP 9] relates on means used by antiterror investigations.

Not present in the original text of the European Commission, it was added by the rapporteur Monika Holhmeier and has continued to be strengthened with each evolution of the text. Originally planned to grant to the fight against terrorism the same means than against organized crime, it was worsen to allow the widest intrusions in electronic surveillance, interception of communications, audio capture or video, in public or private places, as well as the financial and banking searches.

As it, it would legitimize the most extreme anti-terror laws or surveillance measures of the European Union.

  • Version 1 : report HOHLMEIER

  • Version 2 : Compromise Amendment end April 2016

  • Version 3 : Compromise Amendment 23 May 2016

Récupérée de « https://wiki.laquadrature.net/index.php?title=Directive_Terrorisme/Amendements_LIBE/en&oldid=168726 »