Telecoms Package Vote Sept24 Mobilisation : Différence entre versions

De La Quadrature du Net
Aller à la navigationAller à la recherche
(added No technology mandates! etc)
Ligne 3 : Ligne 3 :
 
Telecoms Package 1st reading plenary vote - vote on September 24th, 11h30AM in European Parliament, Brussels
 
Telecoms Package 1st reading plenary vote - vote on September 24th, 11h30AM in European Parliament, Brussels
  
<big>'''Let's Mobilize against surveillance of the European Internet! No graduated response! No filtering! No notion of "lawful content"'''</big>
+
<tt><center><big><big>'''Let's Mobilize against surveillance of the European Internet!'''</big></big></center></tt>
 +
<tt><center><big>'''No graduated response! No filtering! No notion of "lawful content"! No technology mandates! No surveillance of Internet users!'''</big></center></tt>
 +
<tt><center><big>'''Say YES! to Internet users' access to content, services and applications.'''</big></center></tt>
  
 
''Whatever you do will be insignificant, but it is very important that you do it.'' - Mahatma Gandhi
 
''Whatever you do will be insignificant, but it is very important that you do it.'' - Mahatma Gandhi

Version du 21 septembre 2008 à 21:23

Translations : Spanish | French | German

Telecoms Package 1st reading plenary vote - vote on September 24th, 11h30AM in European Parliament, Brussels

Let's Mobilize against surveillance of the European Internet!
No graduated response! No filtering! No notion of "lawful content"! No technology mandates! No surveillance of Internet users!
Say YES! to Internet users' access to content, services and applications.

Whatever you do will be insignificant, but it is very important that you do it. - Mahatma Gandhi


This page is constantly updated. Please check it often, using for instance its RSS feed. 
Help improving it by editing it or using the associated discussion tab. Any comment welcome.


Executive summary of current situation

  • The "Telecoms Package" directives will be voted in European Parliament in Brussels on September 24th, 11h30AM, in plenary session.
  • Some amendments, contain some very disturbing/harmful/problematic dispositions.
    • Some amendments could allow Member States to create "graduated response" against unauthorized file sharing, which would have many harmful consequences for civil liberties
    • The notion of "lawful content" is a threat for civil liberties and the socio-economic development of the Internet.
    • Amendment 34, if voted, can allow to harm privacy in the name of unauthorized file sharing.
  • Progress was made in the rework of the LIBE amendments, according to the EDPS report of Sept. 2nd
  • Some good amendments got tabled: Bono amendment #138 on Trautmann report, other ones (see [marked in green on our voting list]
  • There is little time left to inform Members of European Parliament (MEPs) about those questions and advice them to vote in order to protect citizens/consumers' freedom and rights.


Latest News

Detailed argumentation

"Graduated Response"

Some amendments could allow Member States to create "graduated response" against unauthorized file sharing, which would have many harmful consequences for civil liberties.

  • The notion of "cooperation" between internet service providers and cultural industries, about the "promotion of lawful content" is vague
    • General interest messages sent to all customers could be acceptable
    • Targeted messages, based on the surveillance of individual user's behaviour is untolerable
    • There is no clear limitation that excludes individual messages from that "cooperation".


  • LIBE amendments were reworked according to the EDPS recommandations
    • The EDPS suggested to delete problematic amendments, and as a second choice to rewrite them. Unfortunately, the second choice that was taken.
    • Major improvements were made. They will make the graduated response harder to implement, but it's still a threat.


"Lawful content"

The notion of "lawful content" is bad for civil liberties and socio-economic development of the Internet.

  • Who shall determine what is lawful and what is not except the judicial authority ?
  • Will administrative authorities be able to decide of what is "lawful content" ?
  • What about fair use, independent author's diffusion, Creative Commons, bottom-up innovation which is the root of the development of digital environment ?


Bono amendment

The plenary amendment tabled by Guy Bono (PS, FR), Daniel Cohn-Bendit (Greens, DE, chairman), Zuzana Roithova (EPP/ED, CZ) guarantees that citizen's fundamental rights, including freedom of speech, can only be restricted by the judicial authority.


Article 8.4

"The national regulatory authorities shall promote the interests of the citizens of the European Union by inter alia:"

...

"h) applying the principle that no restriction may be imposed on the rights and freedoms of end users 
in accordance with Article 11 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union 
on freedom of expression and information, without a prior ruling by the judicial authorities, 
except where dictated by force majeure or by the requirements of preserving network integrity and security, 
and subject to national provisions of criminal law imposed for reasons 
of public policy, public security or public morality."


  • Today, the judicial judge is the guardian of civil liberties and freedom of citizens. This amendment guarantees that this will continue, that no administrative authority can order justice rulings impacting on internet users' ability to access and distribute content.
  • The exceptions for "force majeure" and "national provisions of criminal law imposed for reasons of public policy, public security, or public morality" are already in Member State's criminal laws. Nothing will be changed here.
  • The exceptions for "preserving network integrity and security" are legitimate, technically demonstrable, and described in ( some other part of the texts )
  • The reference to the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, which some conservative don't recognize, might be subject to a "split vote" (important to notify if MEP is refusing to vote the amendment because of this specific reference).


Amendment 34

  • This amendment may allow identification of IP addresses for the purpose of enforcing Copyright infringements, even civil cases, described in the IPRED directive.
  • Identification of IP addresses shall not be concerned by Telecoms Package according to Peter Hustinx, European Data Protection Supervisor.



Everyone shall call their MEPs!

  • A phone call is 100 times more efficient than an email! Phonecalls are personnal and are harder to avoid than emails.
  • A cut/paste email has *negative* impact: it weakens the content and make it look like spam.
  • MEPs assistants who will answer are most of the time young and intelligent people who understand the importance of these issues. All of them use Internet.
  • Ask MEPs to vote for the Bono amendment (138) that guarantees that citizen's fundamental rights, including freedom of speech, can only be restricted by the judicial authority.
    • If there is a doubt about whether the "graduated response" is still in the package or not, the best is to guarantee that it won't be.
    • The judge is the guardian of freedom and civil liberties already. This amendment won't change that situation, nor the criminal law of member states.
  • Ask MEPs to reject amendment 34 that might allow to harm privacy in the name of unauthorized file sharing.
  • advise them of the voting recommandations from La Quadrature.

You can find your MEP by using our Political Memory tool.