Difference between revisions of "TAFTA documents"

From La Quadrature du Net
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Others)
Line 99: Line 99:
 
*[https://stoptafta.wordpress.com/conferences-reunions-des-collectifs-locaux/ Calendrier de conférences et réunions locales sur TAFTA]
 
*[https://stoptafta.wordpress.com/conferences-reunions-des-collectifs-locaux/ Calendrier de conférences et réunions locales sur TAFTA]
 
*[https://mediakit.laquadrature.net/view.php?full=1&id=1342 Réponse] de François Hollande à une question sur TAFTA au cours d'une conférence de presse avec Barack Obama (« Nous pouvons aller vite ! »)
 
*[https://mediakit.laquadrature.net/view.php?full=1&id=1342 Réponse] de François Hollande à une question sur TAFTA au cours d'une conférence de presse avec Barack Obama (« Nous pouvons aller vite ! »)
 
+
*[http://www.senat.fr/seances/s201401/s20140109/s20140109001.html#par_15 Débat au Sénat sur les négociations commerciales transatlantiques]
 +
*[http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+COMPARL+JURI-OJ-20140210-1+01+DOC+XML+V0//EN Hearing] in JURI Committee of the European Parliament on the “Regulatory coherence and the implementation of EU law” in the context of TAFTA (video?) - 11 February 2014
  
 
[[Category: TAFTA]]
 
[[Category: TAFTA]]

Revision as of 17:26, 4 March 2014

Leaks

Issues paper Communicating on TTIP – Areas for cooperation between the Commission services and Member States

The directives for the negotiation on TAFTA, as adopted by the Foreign Affairs Council (Trade) on 14 June 2013.

Leaked document from the EU negotiators related to Internet

Documents published by institutions

Reports

This study discusses the potential impact of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership agreement on the EU acquis in the areas of the environment and food safety. It recommends, in particular, that the European Parliament pay very close attention to the precise wording of provisions regarding the environment, food safety, and investment set out in the final text to ensure that both parties are able to maintain the environmental and consumer protection standards they deem appropriate, as provided for in the European Commission’s negotiating mandate.

The proposed EU-US Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partners hip (TTIP/TAFTA), and its socio-economic & environmental consequences

The EU negotiating mandate for a far-reaching free trade agreement with the US reveals the European Commission’s plans to enshrine more powers for corporations in the deal. The proposal follows a persistent campaign by industry lobby groups and law firms to empower large companies to challenge regulations both at home and abroad if they affect their profits. As a result, EU member states could soon find domestic laws to protect the public interest challenged in secretive, offshore tribunals where national laws have no weight and politicians no powers to intervene. Read the updated version of our initial analysis from June this year.

DG Trade (PVM) presented the steps taken so far and the future ones in view of the discussion with the US on the IPR chapter.

Initial EU Position Paper

Analysis

Updates by Glyn Moody

  • Update XVII: Bad news, lots of leaks, plus debunking another misleading European Commission document
  • Update XVI: More details emerge on ISDS provisions, and a rather ironic call for transparency from the paranoically opaque USTR

Others