TAFTA INTA 20140425

How to read an amendment: added to the initial text / deleted from the initial text

Amendment 4

Tokia Saïfi

Citation 7 a (new)

• – vu la convention de l'Unesco sur la protection et la promotion de la diversité des expressions culturelles de 2005;

lawbox|title=Amendment 100|rate=-|1=Vive la liberté d'expression !|2=Vive la liberté d'expression ! d'entreprise

</noinclude>

How to read an amendment: added to the initial text / deleted from the initial text

Amendment 20

Henri Weber

Recital D a (new)

• D bis. considérant que la Convention de l'Unesco sur la protection et la promotion de la diversité des expressions culturelles de 2005 consacre le droit souverain des Etats parties, dont l'UE, d'établir et de mettre en œuvre des politiques culturelles et des mesures de protection et de promotion de la diversité culturelle, et considérant que, contrairement à d'autres pays partenaires de l'UE, les Etats-Unis ne sont pas signataires de ce texte;

lawbox|title=Amendment 100|rate=-|1=Vive la liberté d'expression !|2=Vive la liberté d'expression ! d'entreprise

</noinclude>

– DÉFINITIONS

Aux fins de la présente Convention, il est entendu que : 1. Diversité culturelle « Diversité culturelle » renvoie à la multiplicité des formes par lesquelles les cultures des groupes et des sociétés trouvent leur expression. Ces expressions se transmettent au sein des groupes et des sociétés et entre eux. La diversité culturelle se manifeste non seulement dans les formes variées à travers lesquelles le patrimoine culturel de l’humanité est exprimé, enrichi et transmis grâce à la variété des expressions culturelles, mais aussi à travers divers modes de création artistique, de production, de diffusion, de distribution et de jouissance des expressions culturelles, quels que soient les moyens et les technologies utilisés.

How to read an amendment: added to the initial text / deleted from the initial text

Amendment 21

Helmut Scholz

Recital D a (new)

• Da. whereas there is a great amount of regulatory divergence between the EU and the US especially concerning different approaches towards social policy, state subsidy rules, environmental, consumer and data protection, agricultural production and rules of origin; whereas the European Parliament throughout its years of existence has made clear its position on those controversial issues while remaining committed to the deepening of political and economic relations with the US;

lawbox|title=Amendment 100|rate=-|1=Vive la liberté d'expression !|2=Vive la liberté d'expression ! d'entreprise

</noinclude>

How to read an amendment: added to the initial text / deleted from the initial text

Amendment 34

Yannick Jadot

Recital G a (new)

• Ga. whereas Parliament in its resolution of 23 October 2012 commends the Interim Report of the HLWG, but reiterates the necessity of "taking into historical account transatlantic divergence on issues such as the planting of genetically modified organisms and certain questions regarding animal welfare" (Paragraph

10); emphasises "that an alignment of EU and US regulatory standards should aim at reaching the highest common standard and, thereby, also improve the product safety for consumers" (Paragraph 11); "takes the view that given the increasing importance of e-commerce, data protection standards play an essential role in protecting customers both in the EU and US" (Paragraph 16); "underlines that the EU and the US maintain highly different definitions of public services and

services of general economic interest, and recommends precise definitions of these terms" (Paragraph 19);

lawbox|title=Amendment 100|rate=-|1=Vive la liberté d'expression !|2=Vive la liberté d'expression ! d'entreprise

</noinclude>

How to read an amendment: added to the initial text / deleted from the initial text

Amendment 34

Yannick Jadot

Recital G a (new)

• Ga. whereas Parliament in its resolution of 23 October 2012 commends the Interim Report of the HLWG, but reiterates the necessity of "taking into historical account transatlantic divergence on issues such as the planting of genetically modified organisms and certain questions regarding animal welfare" (Paragraph

10); emphasises "that an alignment of EU and US regulatory standards should aim at reaching the highest common standard and, thereby, also improve the product safety for consumers" (Paragraph 11); "takes the view that given the increasing importance of e-commerce, data protection standards play an essential role in protecting customers both in the EU and US" (Paragraph 16); "underlines that the EU and the US maintain highly different definitions of public services and

services of general economic interest, and recommends precise definitions of these terms" (Paragraph 19);

lawbox|title=Amendment 100|rate=-|1=Vive la liberté d'expression !|2=Vive la liberté d'expression ! d'entreprise

</noinclude>