Toutes les traductions
De La Quadrature du Net
Aller à la navigationAller à la rechercheEntrez un nom de message ci-dessous pour visualiser toutes les traductions disponibles.
Il existe 2 traductions.
| Nom | Message actuel |
|---|---|
| h anglais (en) | * External Legality ** The decree was adopted following an irregular procedure where the final published text does not match the version submitted for review to the Council of State * Internal Legality ** The decree doesn't have a legal basis: it has been adopted on the basis of the proposals of the French Surveillance Law which are against the French Constitution, to the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, to the 2002/58/CE of 12 July 2008 Directive on the processing of personal data and to the European Convention on Human Rights *** On the ignorance of the Constitution: the GIC (Inter ministerial Control Group) must originally intervene on the ensemble of intelligence techniques without exception, among which the "surveillance and control of transmissions using the Hertzian Waves". But the implementation of the proposals of article L. 811-5 of the Interior Security Code, such an intervention of the GIC —implying the collection and the conservation of informations— wouldn't be subject to any legal framework against Constitutional exigences; *** On the ignorance of the Charter of Fundamental Rights: the litigious proposals, allowing the administration to gather data, constitute a limitation to the principles of confidentiality, to erasure and anonymisation and those data such as foreseen by the 2002/58/CE directive (ePrivacy) and do not respect the necessary and proportionate such as found in the Charter in case of rights limitation; *** Concerning the ignorance of the right to privacy and the right to personal data protection: the litigious proposals are a disproportionate infringement of the the right to privacy and to protection to personal data. This is against the articles 7, 8 and 52 of the Charter but also against the jurisprudence of the European Court of Justice ([http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf;jsessionid=9ea7d2dc30d512a4042547ec455cb373a07f386db426.e34KaxiLc3qMb40Rch0SaxuTa3f0?text=&docid=169195&pageIndex=0&doclang=FR&mode=req&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=517254 CJUE, 8 April 2014, Digital Rights Ireland, C-293/12 et C-594/12]). *** Considering the disproportionate intervention: the article 52 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union requires legal warranties to ensure the proportionality of the intervention. But the guaranties given by the litigious proposals are not sufficient, for example concerning the purposes justifying the intervention or the type of intelligence techniques or the retention of the data. Other proposals add to the disproportionate aspect of the decree. It is the case for the absence of a effective control by an independent authority; *** Moreover, a number of proposals of the decree question the article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights which guarantees the right to an effective legal redress and the access to an impartial court. It is the case for: **** the limitation of the access to data in a judicial context (article 41 of Law 78-17 of 6 January 1978) **** the absence of judicial appeal regarding international surveillance **** the absence of guarantees around the access of to transmitted data by foreign services **** the absence of procedure to guarantee the access of the claimant to classified information *** Also, the obligation for operators to implement an automated processing of data is contrary to the 2000/31/EC directive (called eCommerce); *** Finally, the questioned measures are contrary to the article 8 and 31 of the European Convention of Human Rights in: **** they don't guarantee the effective possibility for contest retrospectively intelligence gathering techniques; **** they don't foresee any procedure destined to compensate effectively and sufficiently the absence of any notification ''a posteriori'' |
| h français (fr) | * Légalité externe ** Le décret a été adopté au terme d'une procédure irrégulière dans la mesure où la version définitive et publiée du texte ne correspond pas à la version soumise pour avis au Conseil d'État * Légalité interne ** Le décret est dépourvu de base légale. Il a été pris sur le fondement de dispositions de la loi sur le renseignement qui ne répondent pas aux exigences de justification et de proportionnalité, au regarde de la Charte des droits fondamentaux de l'Union européenne, de la directive 2002/58/CE du 12 juillet 2008 concernant le traitement des données à caractère personnel, et de la Convention européenne de sauvegarde des droits de l'homme et des libertés fondamentales. |
