Difference between revisions of "PrivacyNightmare"
|Line 349:||Line 349:|
=== George Washington University Law School - [https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=998565 'I've Got Nothing to Hide' and Other Misunderstandings of Privacy
=== George Washington University Law School - [https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=998565 'I've Got Nothing to Hide' and Other Misunderstandings of Privacy] (2007) ===
] (2007) ===
Academic paper that undermines the 'nothing to hide' argument when asked about government surveillance. Professor Daniel Solove critiques the definition of 'privacy' found in the litterature and shows that some attempts to conceptualize privacy were too narrow, excluding things we commonly understand to
Academic paper that undermines the 'nothing to hide' argument when asked about government surveillance. Professor Daniel Solove critiques the definition of 'privacy' found in the litterature and shows that some attempts to conceptualize privacy were too narrow, excluding things we commonly understand to
Revision as of 18:04, 22 January 2014
This page gathers articles, studies and reports on the risks and excesses caused by weak data protection.
Feel free to contribute by adding links to the "discussion" tab above or by directly editing this page. Articles in languages other than English and French go here also.
For documents in French click on "Français" above.
For current press and Quadrature press releases on the matter go to: https://www.laquadrature.net/en/Privacy
- 1 Studies on re-identification / de-anonymization
- 1.1 EPIC Electronic Privacy Information Center Re-identification (continuously updated)
- 1.2 Wired - Security researcher de-anonymises users of French political forums (29 October 2013)
- 1.3 Nature - Unique in the Crowd: The privacy bounds of human mobility (25 March 2013)
- 1.4 University of Cambridge - Digital records could expose intimate details and personality traits of millions (11 March 2013)
- 1.5 Wired - Liking curly fries on Facebook reveals your high IQ (12 March 2013)
- 1.6 ArsTechnica - 'Anonymized' data really isn’t—and here’s why not (08 September 2009)
- 2 Public positions
- 3 The data industry
- 3.1 The New Scientist - Nest thermostat acquisition is Google's home invasion (15 January 2014)
- 3.2 Tech Crunch - Google’s Location History Browser Is A Minute-By-Minute Map Of Your Life (18 December 2013)
- 3.3 The Verge - LG admits its Smart TVs were ignoring privacy settings, promises firmware update to fix it (21 November 2013)
- 3.4 Wall Street Journal (blog) and Arstechnica - Facebook Tests Software to Track Your Cursor on Screen (30 October 2013)
- 3.5 The Verge - Judge dismisses suit against Google for bypassing Safari privacy settings (10 October 2013)
- 3.6 EU Observer - Hundreds of US companies make false data protection claims (8 October 2013)
- 3.7 Salon.com - Data hackers are watching you, Software inside your smartphone can follow you (8 October 2013)
- 3.8 Mother Jones - Here's How Twitter Can Track You on All of Your Devices (24 September 2013)
- 3.9 The New York Times - Attention, Shoppers: Store Is Tracking Your Cell (14 July 2013)
- 3.10 Privatics - Paris Metro Tracks and Trackers: Why is the RATP App leaking my private data? (4 July 2013)
- 3.11 EU Observer - German data chief attacks credit-profile firms (25 April 2013)
- 3.12 CNN Money - What your zip code reveals about you (18 April 2013)
- 3.13 The American Prospect - Meet the Stalkers (15 April 2013)
- 3.14 RadioFreeEurope/RadioLiberty - Interview: 'It's Pretty Much Impossible' To Protect Online Privacy (8 April 2013)
- 3.15 SydneyMorningHerald - Facebook 'erodes any idea of privacy' (8 April 2013)
- 3.16 MemeBurn - How much are you worth to Facebook? (4 April 2013)
- 3.17 Computerworld - Judge awards class action status in privacy lawsuit vs. comScore (4 April 2013)
- 3.18 GigaOm - Why the collision of big data and privacy will require a new realpolitik (25 March 2013)
- 3.19 AdAge digital - Facebook to Partner With Acxiom, Epsilon to Match Store Purchases With User Profiles (22 February 2013)
- 3.20 The New York Times - Mapping, and Sharing, the Consumer Genome (Article on data broker Acxiom) (16 June 2012)
- 3.21 LA Times - Dad gets OfficeMax mail addressed 'Daughter Killed in Car Crash' (19 January 2014)
- 4 Data breach
- 4.1 Washington Post - Target says up to 70 million more customers were hit by December data breach (10 January 2014)
- 4.2 BBC News - Snapchat hack affects 4.6 million users (2 January 2014)
- 4.3 BBC News - Stolen Facebook and Yahoo passwords dumped online (4 December 2013)
- 4.4 Mediapart - «It was child's play»: how a hacker broke into MEPs' secret email accounts (21 November 2013)
- 4.5 Irish Times - Over 1.5 million affected by Ennis data breach (12 November 2013)
- 4.6 BBC news - 70,000 customers at risk from 'sophisticated criminal attack' (12 November 2013)
- 4.7 Ars Technica - Limo service hack spills compromising data about the rich and famous (4 November 2013)
- 4.8 Reuters - Adobe says source code, customer data stolen by hackers (3 October 2013)
- 4.9 Information is beautiful - World's Biggest Data Breaches (continually updated)
- 4.10 Infosecurity - Ubuntu Forum Hacked; 1.8 Million Accounts Compromised (22 July 2013)
- 4.11 Cambridge News - Massive personal data breach by police to G4S (23 April 2013)
- 4.12 Wired - Cloud Computing Snafu Shares Private Data Between Users (4 February 2013)
- 4.13 NURPA - SNCB Europe data leak involves more than one million customers (23 December 2012)
- 4.14 Bits - Yahoo Breach Extends Beyond Yahoo to Gmail, Hotmail, AOL Users (12 July 2012)
- 4.15 The Huffington Post - Yahoo Confirms 450,000 Accounts Breached, Experts Warn Of Collateral Damage (12 July 2012)
- 4.16 Network World - eHarmony data breach lessons: Cracking hashed passwords can be too easy (6 July 2012)
- 4.17 The New York Times - Lax Security at LinkedIn Is Laid Bare (10 June 2012)
- 4.18 The Register - 35m Google Profiles dumped into private database (25 May 2011)
- 4.19 The New York Times - After Breach, Companies Warn of E-Mail Fraud (Epsilon breach) (04 April 2013)
- 4.20 Wikipedia Article - Data breach: Major incidents
- 4.21 Wikipedia Fr - Piratage du PlayStation Network
- 5 Surveillance (different ways that data is collected), the state and legislation addressing data collection
- 5.1 BBC News - Tesco petrol stations use face-scan tech to target ads (4 November 2013)
- 5.2 The New York Times - Europe Aims to Regulate the Cloud - (6 October 2013)
- 5.3 Bloomberg - U.K. Seeks to Block EU Data-Protection Plans That ‘Burden’ Firms (27 September 2013)
- 5.4 The Guardian Newspaper Britain accused of trying to impede EU data protection law (27 September 2013)
- 5.5 The Washington Post - NSA collects millions of e-mail address books globally (15 October 2013)
- 5.6 The Wall Street Journal - French Privacy Agency Moves to Sanction Google (27 September 2013)
- 5.7 Computer World - Google knows nearly every Wi-Fi password in the world (12 September 2013)
- 5.8 New York Times - Germany Fines Google Over Data Collection (22 April 2013)
- 5.9 Harvard Law Review: The Dangers of Surveillance (2012)
- 5.10 ZDNET : China's new data protection rules good step, but little bite (September 27, 2013)
- 6 Effects of loss of privacy on employment and credit worthiness
- 6.1 Ars Technica - Denied for that loan? Soon you may thank online data collection (11 October 2013)
- 6.2 On Device Research - Facebook costing 16-34s jobs in tough economic climate (29 May 2013)
- 6.3 CNN - Facebook friends could change your credit score (27 August 2013)
- 6.4 Spiegel Online - Puny Punishment for Goliath: Google Case Exposes Weak US Data Privacy Laws (10 August 2012)
- 7 General studies
- 7.1 George Washington University Law School - 'I've Got Nothing to Hide' and Other Misunderstandings of Privacy (2007)
- 7.2 Harvard Law Review - The Dangers of Surveillance (2012)
- 7.3 TED talks - The internet, the perfect tool for the surveillance state? Further reading (and watching) on the state of digital privacy (7 November 2013)
- 7.4 Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) - Who has your back? (continuously updated)
- 7.5 MIT Technological Review - The real privacy problem (22 October 2013)
- 7.6 Boston College Law Review - Big Data and Due Process: Toward a Framework to Redress Predictive Privacy Harms (13 September 2013)
- 7.7 The Boston Consulting Group - The Value of Our Digital Identity (20 November 2012)
- 7.8 The Cost of Reading Privacy Policies. I/S: A Journal of Law and Policy for the Information Society 2008 Privacy Year in Review issue. (with A. McDonald) http://lorrie.cranor.org/#publications Download: http://lorrie.cranor.org/pubs/readingPolicyCost-authorDraft.pdf
- 8 Other
Studies on re-identification / de-anonymization
EPIC Electronic Privacy Information Center Re-identification (continuously updated)
This website lists developments and reports on the question of re-identification.
Wired - Security researcher de-anonymises users of French political forums (29 October 2013)
A Swiss security researcher has managed to de-anonymise users of French political forums and blogs by exploiting a vulnerability in a service called Gravatar, which allows people to automatically use the same profile picture on all participating sites when posting anonymously.
Nature - Unique in the Crowd: The privacy bounds of human mobility (25 March 2013)
A simply anonymized dataset does not contain name, home address, phone number or other obvious identifier. Yet, if individual's patterns are unique enough, outside information can be used to link the data back to an individual. [...] We study fifteen months of human mobility data for one and a half million individuals and find that human mobility traces are highly unique. In fact, in a dataset where the location of an individual is specified hourly, and with a spatial resolution equal to that given by the carrier's antennas, four spatio-temporal points are enough to uniquely identify 95% of the individuals. [...]
University of Cambridge - Digital records could expose intimate details and personality traits of millions (11 March 2013)
Research shows that intimate personal attributes can be predicted with high levels of accuracy from ‘traces’ left by seemingly innocuous digital behaviour, in this case Facebook Likes. In the study, researchers describe Facebook Likes as a “generic class” of digital record - similar to web search queries and browsing histories - and suggest that such techniques could be used to extract sensitive information for almost anyone regularly online.
Researchers created statistical models able to predict personal details using Facebook Likes alone. Models proved 88% accurate for determining male sexuality, 95% accurate distinguishing African-American from Caucasian American and 85% accurate differentiating Republican from Democrat. Christians and Muslims were correctly classified in 82% of cases, and good prediction accuracy was achieved for relationship status and substance abuse – between 65 and 73%. [...]
The researchers also tested for personality traits including intelligence, emotional stability, openness and extraversion. While such latent traits are far more difficult to gauge, the accuracy of the analysis was striking. Study of the openness trait – the spectrum of those who dislike change to those who welcome it – revealed that observation of Likes alone is roughly as informative as using an individual’s actual personality test score.
Wired - Liking curly fries on Facebook reveals your high IQ (12 March 2013)
What you Like on Facebook could reveal your race, age, IQ, sexuality and other personal data, even if you've set that information to "private". [...] The research shows that although you might choose not to share particular information about yourself it could still be inferred from traces left on social media, such as the TV shows you watch or the music you listen to or the spiders that are afraid of you. [...]
ArsTechnica - 'Anonymized' data really isn’t—and here’s why not (08 September 2009)
This article makes the point that although information is "scrubbed" of all information that could personally identity an individual, this sounds better in theory than in practice. The article states that "87 percent of all Americans could be uniquely identified using only three bits of information: ZIP code, birthdate, and sex. [...]". The article referes to a paper by Ohm on "the surprising failure of anonymization."
The New York Times - Letter to the Editor - Protecting our Privacy (4 November 2013)
Short letter to the editor from the president of the Electronic Privacy Information Center that sheds worry on the use of cloud computing given the recent revelations of access to data collected by private companies and accessed unlawfully by the NSA.
WorldCrunch - European Academics Launch Petition To Protect Personal Data From "Huge Lobby" (13 March 2013)
This week, more than 90 leading academics across Europe launched a petition to support the European Commission’s draft data protection regulation, reports the EU Observer. The online petition, entitled Data Protection in Europe, says “huge lobby groups are trying to massively influence the regulatory bodies.” The goal of the site is to make sure the European Commission’s law is in line with the latest technologies and that the protection of personal data is guaranteed. [...]
More than 100 Leading European Academics are taking a position (February 2013)
A position paper that puts forth a series of arguments that argue generally in favour of stronger protection for personal data. The document is available in several European languages. The arguments include perspectives on affects on innovation and competitiveness and raises the question of how to correct or best ways to legislate on this topic making reference to legislation currently in front of the European Institutions.
The data industry
The New Scientist - Nest thermostat acquisition is Google's home invasion (15 January 2014)
[Sara Watson at Harvard University's Berkman Center for Internet and Society] believes Google is now a company obsessed with viewing everyday activities as "information problems" to be solved by machine learning and algorithms. Google's fleet of self-driving vehicles is just one example. The home is no different, and a Google-enabled smart home of the future, using a platform such as the Google Now app – which already gathers data on users' travel habits – could adapt energy usage to your life in even more sophisticated ways.
"Imagine Google Now knows you're on your way home," suggests Watson. "The thermostat can predict that you're going to be home in 10 minutes and it can get the heat going."
Tech Crunch - Google’s Location History Browser Is A Minute-By-Minute Map Of Your Life (18 December 2013)
Quick! Where were you last Tuesday at 6:35 PM? If you’re anything like me, your answer is probably along the lines of “I… have absolutely no idea.” Most people’s brains just don’t work that way. But odds are, Google knows. They probably know where you’ve been most other days, too. And they’ll happily show you, letting you relive your life one step at a time. If you carry any Google-filled gear (like, say, an Android phone or tablet), there was a prompt during the initial setup that asked if Google could transmit your location data back to the mothership. This is that data. You know how Google Now can auto-magically figure out where you work and warn you about traffic? This is the data that makes that possible (or at least a good chunk of it.)
The Verge - LG admits its Smart TVs were ignoring privacy settings, promises firmware update to fix it (21 November 2013)
After an LG Smart TV owner discovered that his television was surreptitiously gathering information about him without his permission, the company has admitted that its opt-out system wasn't doing what it promised.
Wall Street Journal (blog) and Arstechnica - Facebook Tests Software to Track Your Cursor on Screen (30 October 2013)
The blog on the Wall Street Journal and an article on Arstechnica that links to it (http://arstechnica.com/business/2013/10/facebook-may-start-logging-your-cursor-movements/) report that Facebook is developing technology that would allow them to track the movement of your mouse.
The Verge - Judge dismisses suit against Google for bypassing Safari privacy settings (10 October 2013)
A Delaware judge has dismissed a class-action lawsuit against Google for secretly storing Safari cookies even when users had opted out. In a ruling from yesterday, Judge Sue Robinson wrote that the plaintiffs — who had filed suit under a variety of privacy and anti-hacking laws — hadn't proved real harm under any of them, nor had they convincingly argued that Google had violated their legal rights.
EU Observer - Hundreds of US companies make false data protection claims (8 October 2013)
Hundreds of US-based companies handling EU citizens' data have lied about belonging to a data protection arrangement known as the Safe Harbour Framework
Christopher Connolly, a director at Galexia, an Australian-based consulting company on internet law and privacy, told the European Parliament’s civil liberties committee on Monday (7 October) that “many claims of Safe Harbour membership are false.”. […]
The Safe Harbour agreement, hammered out in 2000 between the European Commission and the US Department of Commerce, is supposed to ensure that firms follow EU data protection laws when processing the personal data of EU citizens. […]
Salon.com - Data hackers are watching you, Software inside your smartphone can follow you (8 October 2013)
A long article giving a good overview of some of the products on the market that allow anyone who buys them to access your laptop, smart phone etc. The article lists the names of companies involved and the products available.
Mother Jones - Here's How Twitter Can Track You on All of Your Devices (24 September 2013)
This detailed article discusses twitter's recent purchase of MoPub, a company that places advertisements on mobile devices. Twitter, the author argues, would be uniquely placed to help data collectors match the various bits of data they collect about the same person. As twitter is used on many different platforms, they might be in a position to match "the person who just visited XYZ.com on their phone" and the person "who just logged into YZ.fr" on their laptop. Which would of course give much more information to advertisers. The author highlights that twitter has had a good history respecting privacy but that the economics might be too strong.
The New York Times - Attention, Shoppers: Store Is Tracking Your Cell (14 July 2013)
Article on shops tracking customer's movement in the store via cellphones. Interestingly, the article notes, contrary to the willing suspencion of privacy concerns, enough customers, when alerted to this, complained.
Privatics - Paris Metro Tracks and Trackers: Why is the RATP App leaking my private data? (4 July 2013)
Informative and technical article about RATP (the Parisian metro system) app on cell phone sending data that could identify the apps that you run on your phone to third parties.
EU Observer - German data chief attacks credit-profile firms (25 April 2013)
This article, after a quick overview of Germany's legals procedures against Google and Facebook, focuses on data collecting and selling companies. Schufa, which "holds data on 65 million people in Germany", there are other smaller companies that offer services that estimate how likely a person is to default on their debt/pay on time by using their address (aka your neighbourhood) and age. Although there is already legislation limiting some use of data in such a way, there is a loop hole currently being exploited and legislation should be on its way to address it.
CNN Money - What your zip code reveals about you (18 April 2013)
This article echoes the points that are few other articles already made concerning the existence of data brokers (the article makes mention in particular to Acxiom) and how their industry works. The article raises the question of what is considered 'personal' information and mentions the decision in a Massachusets court that Zip codes (Postal code) can/should be considered as personal information. In this state and California retailers can no longer request your zip code for promotional purposes. As a whole the article makes a good overview of issues around personal data and uses simple language to get the ideas across.
The American Prospect - Meet the Stalkers (15 April 2013)
A long informative article that describes the data industry and it's effects on society. It considers the history of credit records and the effect that the ability to keep records indefinitely, even after the public institutions have expunged them, by private company can have on peoples' lives.
It states that the "law has failed to keep up with the rapid expansion of data harvesting in the same way it has stepped in to protect other sensitive information like credit reports [...] There was a time not long ago, [...] when consumer credit files were riddled with erroneous data and speculation—and when Americans had no legal recourse to correct these mistakes."
"The most worrisome outcome of the data revolution—and the hardest to quantify—is the discrimination that follows in this treasure trove of information’s wake. “What's at stake," wrote Singer, "is the risk that wholesale data collection creates an algorithmic system that assigns some people better offers like low interest rates while using an invisible scoring system to prevent others from getting loans, insurance or jobs. The risk is discrimination by statistical inference."
RadioFreeEurope/RadioLiberty - Interview: 'It's Pretty Much Impossible' To Protect Online Privacy (8 April 2013)
From online companies tracking users' digital footprints to the trend for more and more data to be stored on cloud servers, Internet privacy seems like a thing of the past -- if it ever existed at all. RFE/RL correspondent Deana Kjuka recently spoke about these issues with online security analyst Bruce Schneier, author of the book "Liars and Outliers: Enabling the Trust Society Needs to Survive." [...]
"If [you use] Gmail, [then] Google has all of your e-mail. If your files are in Dropbox, if you are using Google Docs, [or] if your calendar is iCal, then Apple has your calendar. So it just makes it harder for us to protect our privacy because our data isn't in our hands anymore." "I don't know about the future, but my guess is that, yes. The big risks are not going to be the illegal risks. They are going to be the legal risks. It's going to be governments. It's going to be corporations. It's going to be those in power using the Internet to stay in power."
SydneyMorningHerald - Facebook 'erodes any idea of privacy' (8 April 2013)
Facebook Home for Android phones has been dubbed by technologists as the death of privacy and the start of a new wave of invasive tracking and advertising. [...] Prominent tech blogger Om Malik wrote that Home “erodes any idea of privacy”. “If you install this, then it is very likely that Facebook is going to be able to track your every move, and every little action,” said Mailk. “This opens the possibility up for further gross erosions of privacy on unsuspecting users, all in the name of profits, under the guise of social connectivity,” he said. [...]
MemeBurn - How much are you worth to Facebook? (4 April 2013)
The argument that hundreds of millions of people give away their personal data on social networks with absolutely no interest in the commercial value of that information does not make sense. It is simply the case that they don’t have the slightest idea. [...] According to Spiekerman: “Even if privacy is an inalienable human right it would be good if people were enabled to manage their personal data as private property.” It’s not only about “monetizing”. The earth is, happily, not that flat. But materializing privacy might help us to overcome the huge issues we have when it comes to the privacy of internet users, and finally social networks and marketing will profit from more knowledge and more trust in the use of personal data.
Computerworld - Judge awards class action status in privacy lawsuit vs. comScore (4 April 2013)
A federal court in Chicago this week granted class action status to a lawsuit accusing comScore, one of the Internet's largest user tracking firms, of secretly collecting and selling Social Security numbers, credit card numbers, passwords and other personal data collected from consumer systems. [...] To collect data, comScore's software modifies computer firewall settings, redirects Internet traffic, and can be upgraded and controlled remotely, the complaint alleged. The suit challenged comScore's assertions that it filtered out personal information from data sold to third parties, and of intercepting data it had no business to access. [...]
GigaOm - Why the collision of big data and privacy will require a new realpolitik (25 March 2013)
People’s movements are highly predictable, researchers say, making it easy to identify most individuals from supposedly anonymized location datasets. As these datasets have valid uses, this is yet another reason why we need better regulation. [...] One of the explicit purposes of Unique in the Crowd was to raise awareness. As the authors put it: “these findings represent fundamental constraints to an individual’s privacy and have important implications for the design of frameworks and institutions dedicated to protect the privacy of individuals.” [...]
AdAge digital - Facebook to Partner With Acxiom, Epsilon to Match Store Purchases With User Profiles (22 February 2013)
"Facebook is partnering with data giants including Epsilon, Acxiom and Datalogix to allow brands to match data gathered through shopper loyalty program to individual Facebook profiles, much like it's done previously with marketers' customer data from their CRM databases."
The New York Times - Mapping, and Sharing, the Consumer Genome (Article on data broker Acxiom) (16 June 2012)
Long article on the data broker Acxiom, second largest (in size?) after Epsilon. The article describes the history of the company, how it works, what type of data it holds, it's annual profits and how it has dealt with privacy concerns. On the other hand the article also explores privacy concerns of citizens, questions of how well the information is protected, data breaches (not much information on this), encryption of the website, racial and stereotyping of other kinds and that these businesses have little oversight nor regulation.
LA Times - Dad gets OfficeMax mail addressed 'Daughter Killed in Car Crash' (19 January 2014)
A dad who have lost his daughter in a car crash targeted by spam emails with subject "Daughter killed in a car crash"
Washington Post - Target says up to 70 million more customers were hit by December data breach (10 January 2014)
Target said Friday that the thieves who stole massive amounts of credit and debit card information during the holiday season also swept up names, addresses and phone numbers of 70 million customers, information that could put victims at greater risk for identity theft.
BBC News - Snapchat hack affects 4.6 million users (2 January 2014)
The usernames and phone numbers for 4.6 million Snapchat accounts have been downloaded by hackers, who temporarily posted the data online.
BBC News - Stolen Facebook and Yahoo passwords dumped online (4 December 2013)
More than two million stolen passwords used for sites such as Facebook, Google and Yahoo and other web services have been posted online.
Mediapart - «It was child's play»: how a hacker broke into MEPs' secret email accounts (21 November 2013)
A hacker using elementary computer equipment and what he described as “a few bits of knowledge that everyone is capable of finding on the internet” has succeeded in accessing confidential emails and personal files of Members of the European Parliament, their assistants and even the institution’s IT experts, Mediapart can reveal. The operation was, he said, mounted as a demonstration of the vulnerability of security at both the parliament in Strasbourg and also among many national administrations which use software, notably that of Microsoft, that experts have for years warned is exposed to espionage manipulations through fundamental - and what some suggest are possibly deliberate - flaws. While the scandal of mass surveillance employed by the US National Security Agency continues to unfold, Jérôme Hourdeaux reports on how major public institutions like the European Parliament continue to expose themselves to almost mundane intrusion of confidential data.
Irish Times - Over 1.5 million affected by Ennis data breach (12 November 2013)
More than 1.5 million people are now known to have had personal information compromised by a major security breach at a Co Clare-based company which manages customer loyalty schemes across Europe.
BBC news - 70,000 customers at risk from 'sophisticated criminal attack' (12 November 2013)
"Up to 70,000 people in Ireland who took advantage of a customer loyalty offer could have been victims of a "sophisticated criminal attack"."
Another case where data on customers of one company (in this case a holiday booking company) was stolen but in which the information obtained could jeopardize the security of their bank accounts.
Ars Technica - Limo service hack spills compromising data about the rich and famous (4 November 2013)
Information about famous and rich people has been posted online. Motivations are unclear but as Krebs reports, this breach and the publication of the data, exposes famous peoples' data and some of their potentially insalubrious behaviour. Refers to Krebs on security post: http://krebsonsecurity.com/2013/11/hackers-take-limo-service-firm-for-a-ride/.
Reuters - Adobe says source code, customer data stolen by hackers (3 October 2013)
Adobe Systems Inc said on Thursday that hackers had stolen source code to some of its most popular software and data about millions of its customers.
Adobe Chief Security Officer Brad Arkin said hackers also took information on 2.9 million Adobe customers, including their names, user identification numbers and encrypted passwords and payment card numbers.
UPDATE: Adobe Breach Impacted At Least 38 Million Users (29 October 2013)
But just this past weekend, AnonNews.org posted a huge file called “users.tar.gz” that appears to include more than 150 million username and hashed password pairs taken from Adobe. The 3.8 GB file looks to be the same one Hold Security CTO Alex Holden and I found on the server with the other data stolen from Adobe.
Information is beautiful - World's Biggest Data Breaches (continually updated)
Go to the website for an updated version of this image.
Infosecurity - Ubuntu Forum Hacked; 1.8 Million Accounts Compromised (22 July 2013)
The article gives details of the July 2013 hack of the Ubuntu Linux forum that defaced the forum's website and stole users' account information.
Cambridge News - Massive personal data breach by police to G4S (23 April 2013)
Small town version of the data breach kind. Good example of how insecure the whole system of data is. The Cambridgeshire police released information about their staff to another company that it was in contact with.
A low-cost competitor to giants such as RackSpace and Amazon, DigitalOcean sells cheap computing power to web developers who want to get their sites up and running for as little as $5 per month. But it turns out that some of those customers — those who were buying the $40 per month or $80 per month plans, for example — aren’t necessarily getting their data wiped when they cancel their service. And some of that data is viewable to other customers. Kenneth White stumbled across several gigabytes of someone else’s data when he was noodling around on DigitalOcean’s service last week. White, who is chief of biomedical informatics with Social and Scientific Systems, found e-mail addresses, web links, website code and even strings that look like usernames and passwords — things like 1234qwe and 1234567passwd. [...]
NURPA - SNCB Europe data leak involves more than one million customers (23 December 2012)
For several weeks, personal details of more than one million customers of the train company SNCB Europe were available on-line. Although the exact search terms that lead to the original disclosure are unknown, these data were indeed accessible via a simple query in a search engine.
Bits - Yahoo Breach Extends Beyond Yahoo to Gmail, Hotmail, AOL Users (12 July 2012)
Yahoo confirmed Thursday that about 400,000 user names and passwords to Yahoo and other companies were stolen on Wednesday. A group of hackers, known as the D33D Company, posted online the user names and passwords for what appeared to be 453,492 accounts belonging to Yahoo, and also Gmail, AOL, Hotmail, Comcast, MSN, SBC Global, Verizon, BellSouth and Live.com users. [...] The hackers wrote a brief footnote to the data dump, which has since been taken offline: “We hope that the parties responsible for managing the security of this subdomain will take this as a wake-up call, and not as a threat.”
The Huffington Post - Yahoo Confirms 450,000 Accounts Breached, Experts Warn Of Collateral Damage (12 July 2012)
Security researchers warned Thursday that thousands of people could be vulnerable to hackers after Yahoo confirmed that about 450,000 usernames and passwords were stolen from one of the company's databases [...] Yahoo Voices contributors signed up using a variety of accounts: about 140,000 Yahoo addresses, more than 100,000 Gmail addresses, more than 55,000 Hotmail addresses and more than 25,000 AOL addresses. [...] A hacker group called D33D claimed responsibility for the disclosure of usernames and passwords belonging to Yahoo Voices' users. "We hope that the parties responsible for managing the security of this subdomain will take this as a wake-up call, and not as a threat," the group said in a statement. [...] Alex Horan, a senior product manager at CORE Security, criticized Yahoo for apparently storing usernames and passwords without encrypting them. "The bigger problem is these passwords were sitting there in the clear," Horan said. He added that encrypting passwords was "Security 101." "That’s mind-blowing that a company wouldn't do that," he said. [...]
Network World - eHarmony data breach lessons: Cracking hashed passwords can be too easy (6 July 2012)
Last month the dating site eHarmony suffered a data breach in which more than 1.5 million eHarmony password hashes were stolen and later dumped online by the hacker gang called Doomsday Preppers. The crypto-based "hashing" process is supposed to conceal stored passwords, but Trustwave's SpiderLabs division says eHarmony could have done this process a lot better because it only took 72 hours to crack about 80% of 1.5 million eHarmony hashed passwords that were dumped.
Cracking the dumped eHarmony passwords wasn't too hard, says Mike Kelly, security analyst at SpiderLabs, which used tools such as oclHashcat and John the Ripper. In fact, he says it was one of the "easiest" challenges he ever faced. There are many reasons why this is so, starting with the fact the cracked passwords may have been "hashed," but they weren't "salted," which he says "would drastically increase the time it would take to crack them." [...]
The New York Times - Lax Security at LinkedIn Is Laid Bare (10 June 2012)
Last week, hackers breached the site and stole more than six million of its customers’ passwords, which had been only lightly encrypted. [...]
What has surprised customers and security experts alike is that a company that collects and profits from vast amounts of data had taken a bare-bones approach to protecting it. The breach highlights a disturbing truth about LinkedIn’s computer security: there isn’t much. Companies with customer data continue to gamble on their own computer security, even as the break-ins increase.
“If they had consulted with anyone that knows anything about password security, this would not have happened,” said Paul Kocher, president of Cryptography Research, a San Francisco computer security firm. [...]
LinkedIn does not have a chief security officer whose sole job it is to monitor for breaches. The company says David Henke, its senior vice president for operations, oversees security in addition to other roles, but Mr. Henke declined to speak for this article. [...]
The Register - 35m Google Profiles dumped into private database (25 May 2011)
In order to demonstrate that online information is trivial to mine, a Phd student from the University of Amsterdam in one month dumped the names, email addresses and biographical information of 35 million google profiles into a database. This was a experiment to test how difficult it would be to do and the answer was, not hard at all. The article does into some technical detail explaining why and how Google profiles in particular were vulnerable.
The New York Times - After Breach, Companies Warn of E-Mail Fraud (Epsilon breach) (04 April 2013)
Similar article by the WTJ with a slightly more business angle on it: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704587004576245131531712342.html and for a list of companies that had used Epsilon and had their email lists stolen: http://www.securityweek.com/massive-breach-epsilon-compromises-customer-lists-major-brands.
Articles describing a breach of Epsilon, an online marketing form (data broker) that handles email marketing for big firms such as JP Morgan Chase, Target, ... had been hacked and unencrypted email addresses had been stolen. In some cases names of the email addresses also which makes "spear phishing" a lot more effective as the phishing attack knows you have an account with company X, uses your name, perhaps even your address, making it much more likely that you will assume the email to be legitimate.
Wikipedia Article - Data breach: Major incidents
Wikipedia Fr - Piratage du PlayStation Network
Surveillance (different ways that data is collected), the state and legislation addressing data collection
BBC News - Tesco petrol stations use face-scan tech to target ads (4 November 2013)
At Tesco petrol stations in the UK, faces of customers will be scanned in order to target advertisement. The company says that customers will be asked to opt in but privacy concerns are being raised.
The New York Times - Europe Aims to Regulate the Cloud - (6 October 2013)
This article focuses mostly on the affects that proposals to the new EU regulation on data protection might have on cloud computing. It raises pertinent question such as what the consequences will be for EU companies with subsidiaries in the US and vice versa. Although the link makes an explicit link with Snowden's revelations, it is unclear to what extent the writer sees the new regulation as addressing concerns of data collection in the name of national security (which it is meant to not address) vs. data collection by private firms.
Bloomberg - U.K. Seeks to Block EU Data-Protection Plans That ‘Burden’ Firms (27 September 2013)
This article represents the point of view taken by some businesses, namely Google and Facebook, that argue that the new European legislation proposed by the European Commission and which is making its way through the European Parliament, would harm businesses by raising their costs.
The Guardian Newspaper Britain accused of trying to impede EU data protection law (27 September 2013)
Article dealing pretty much with the same argument but focusing instead on the interests of spy agencies to prevent too much data protection. The article also mentions 'safe harbour' which had been an agreement between the EU and the USA and which, after the Snowden leaks, has come under renewed scrutiny.
The Washington Post - NSA collects millions of e-mail address books globally (15 October 2013)
The National Security Agency is harvesting hundreds of millions of contact lists from personal e-mail and instant messaging accounts around the world, many of them belonging to Americans, according to senior intelligence officials and top-secret documents provided by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden. […]
During a single day last year, the NSA’s Special Source Operations branch collected 444,743 e-mail address books from Yahoo, 105,068 from Hotmail, 82,857 from Facebook, 33,697 from Gmail and 22,881 from unspecified other providers, according to an internal NSA PowerPoint presentation. […]
[…] the agency captures contact lists “on the fly” as they cross major Internet switches […]
The Wall Street Journal - French Privacy Agency Moves to Sanction Google (27 September 2013)
An article about the recent legal procedure initiated against Google Inc. by the French organisation Commission Nationale de l'Informatique et des Libertés, or CNIL, (http://www.cnil.fr/english/). The action focuses on the lack of transparency in Google's use of data collected. The article states that Google had introduced changes to its privacy data regulations in order to make its different products more compatible and as advertisers are increasingly turning away from other forms of advertising (e.g. TV ads), this data is becoming more valuable. The article overviews other European procedures against Google. See also NYTimes article 22 April 2013 below for similar developments in Germany.
Computer World - Google knows nearly every Wi-Fi password in the world (12 September 2013)
A short article reports that given the default setting on most of the millions of Android phones in the world, google is now probably in possession of very many of the world's wifi passwords. The default setting is to "back up your data" which means that quite a bit of personal information stored on your phone, including wifi passwords, is backed up with google. Given that the passwords are not well encrypted, and surely google is well able to decrypt them, this means that google has potentially access to very very many millions of wifi passwords. The article also lists several other articles that deal with the same issue.
New York Times - Germany Fines Google Over Data Collection (22 April 2013)
An article that starts with the 145 000 Euro fine Google received from a German court with regard to illegally collecting personal data during it's street view recording. It then does a quick overview of reactions by other countries to the disclosure that street view collected personal data. The article then considers approaches by other west European countries on the matter and efforts by the European institutions to introduce European legislation on the issue which would, amongst other things, raise the amount by which fines could in the future be levied on organizations.
Harvard Law Review: The Dangers of Surveillance (2012)
"From the Fourth Amendment to George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four, and from the Electronic Communications Privacy Act to films like Minority Report and The Lives of Others, our law and literature are full of warnings about state scrutiny of our lives. These warnings are commonplace, but they are rarely very specific. Other than the vague threat of an Orwellian dystopia, as a society we don’t really know why surveillance is bad, and why we should be wary of it. To the extent the answer has something to do with “privacy,” we lack an understanding of what “privacy” means in this context, and why it matters. We’ve been able to live with this state of affairs largely because the threat of constant surveillance has been relegated to the realms of science fiction and failed totalitarian states."
ZDNET : China's new data protection rules good step, but little bite (September 27, 2013)
Summary (quoted from website): "China has introduced rules to regulate the collection and use of personal data by its internet and telecoms operators. The rules have been a long time coming, but do they actually offer anything to users?"
Effects of loss of privacy on employment and credit worthiness
Ars Technica - Denied for that loan? Soon you may thank online data collection (11 October 2013)
Article based on a presentation given by Kate Crawford, a principal at Microsoft Research, at MIT’s EmTech conference. It visits two main points. Firstly, what data can be used for with regard to discrimination against persons on the base of what is known of them through online gathered data (e.g. loan decisions). Secondly, it considers the weakness of anonymization.
On Device Research - Facebook costing 16-34s jobs in tough economic climate (29 May 2013)
The index which covers 6000 16-34 year olds across six countries revealed some surprising results [: ] If getting a job was not hard enough in this tough economic climate, one in ten young people have been rejected for a job because of their social media profile.
CNN - Facebook friends could change your credit score (27 August 2013)
An article on the uses by financial companies of 'personal' data collected from Facebook, eBay... or even how you fill in an online application form. Amongst other the argument is made by representatives of these companies that this data is reliable enough, especially when taken as a whole, to have good enough idea of a person's creditworthiness.
Spiegel Online - Puny Punishment for Goliath: Google Case Exposes Weak US Data Privacy Laws (10 August 2012)
"Google has been forced to pay $22 million in fines this week, a record for data privacy violations but small change for the giant corporation. Internet companies benefit from America's lax privacy and data protection laws, which are unlikely to change any time soon. It's a stark contrast to Europe, where the EU wants to toughen its laws -- and apply them to American companies."
George Washington University Law School - 'I've Got Nothing to Hide' and Other Misunderstandings of Privacy (2007)
Academic paper that undermines the 'nothing to hide' argument when asked about government surveillance. Professor Daniel Solove critiques the definition of 'privacy' found in the litterature and shows that some attempts to conceptualize privacy were too narrow, excluding things we commonly understand to be private and on the other hand, some attempts to conceptualize privacy are far too broad, such as Samuel Warren and Louis Brandeis's understanding of privacy as the "right to be let alone". In this essay, the author argued that instead of conceptualizing privacy with the traditional method, we should instead understand privacy as a set of family resemblances and eventually the author propose a taxonomy of privacy as given below:
- Information Collection
- Information Processing
- Secondary Use
- Information Dissemination
- Breach of Confidentiality
- Increased Accessibility
- Decisional Interference
The taxonomy has four general categories of privacy problems with sixteen different subcategories. The first general category is information collection, which involves the ways that data is gathered about people. The subcategories, surveillance and interrogation, represent the two primary problematic ways of gathering information. A privacy problem occurs when an activity by a person, business, or government entity creates harm by disrupting valuable activities of others. These harms need not be physical or emotional; they can occur by chilling socially beneficial behavior (for example, free speech and association) or by leading to power imbalances that adversely affect social structure (for example, excessive executive power).
The second general category is information processing. This involves the storing, analysis, and manipulation of data. There are a number of problems that information processing can cause, and the author included five subcategories in my taxonomy. For example, one problem that the author label insecurity results in increasing people’s vulnerability to potential abuse of their information. The problem that the author calls exclusion involves people’s inability to access and have any say in the way their data is used.
Information dissemination is the third general category. Disseminating information involves the ways in which it is transferred—or threatened to be transferred—to others. the author identifies seven different information dissemination problems.
Finally, the last category involves invasions. Invasions are direct interferences with the individual, such as intruding into her life or regulating the kinds of decisions she can make about her life.
The deeper problem with the nothing to hide argument is that it myopically views privacy as a form of concealment or secrecy. But understanding privacy as a plurality of related problems demonstrates that concealment of bad things is just one among many problems caused by government programs such as the NSA surveillance and data mining. In the categories in the taxonomy, several problems are implicated.
Harvard Law Review - The Dangers of Surveillance (2012)
Article by Neil M. Richards, from the Washington University School of Law, on the dangers of surveillance. "Surveillance is harmful because it can chill the exercise of our civil liberties, and because it gives the watcher power over the watched." He proposes "principles that should guide the future development of surveillance law, allowing for an appropriate balance between the costs and benefits of government surveillance."
First, [...] surveillance transcends the public private divide. [...] Even if we are ultimately more concerned with government surveillance, any solution must grapple with the complex relationships between government and corporate watchers.
Second, we must recognize that secret surveillance is illegitimate and prohibit the creation of any domestic surveillance programs whose existe nce is secret.
Third, [...] total surveillance is illegitimate and [it is not] acceptable for the government to record all internet activity without authorization. [...]
Fourth, [...] surveillance is harmful. [...] Reducing the harms of surveillance to doctrine in this way is essential if we want to avoid sacrificing our vital civil liberties
TED talks - The internet, the perfect tool for the surveillance state? Further reading (and watching) on the state of digital privacy (7 November 2013)
A list of three talks that attempt to summarise issues surrounding digital privacy. By Mikko Hypponen, Bruce Schneier and Alessandro Acquisti.
Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) - Who has your back? (continuously updated)
This website lists the largest online companies and how their reported attitude with regard to privacy. For instance it awards stars for companies that attempted to defend against data requests by spy agencies.
MIT Technological Review - The real privacy problem (22 October 2013)
A detailed and long article analysing questions surrounding the privacy debate. A lot of good links to other articles, books and other sources as well as historical context to the debate on the interplay between privacy and democracy.
"So if you want to defend the “right to privacy” for its own sake, turning data into a tradable asset could resolve your misgivings. The NSA would still get what it wanted; but if you’re worried that our private information has become too liquid and that we’ve lost control over its movements, a smart business model, coupled with a strong digital-rights-management regime, could fix that."
Boston College Law Review - Big Data and Due Process: Toward a Framework to Redress Predictive Privacy Harms (13 September 2013)
"The rise of “big data” analytics in the private sector poses new challenges for privacy advocates. Unlike previous computational models that exploit personally identifiable information (PII) directly, such as behavioral targeting, big data has exploded the definition of PII to make many more sources of data personally identifiable. By analyzing primarily metadata, such as a set of predictive or aggregated findings without displaying or distributing the originating data, big data approaches often operate outside of current privacy protections (Rubinstein 2013; Tene and Polonetsky 2012), effectively marginalizing regulatory schema. Big data presents substantial privacy concerns – risks of bias or discrimination based on the inappropriate generation of personal data – a risk we call “predictive privacy harm.” Predictive analysis and categorization can pose a genuine threat to individuals, especially when it is performed without their knowledge or consent. While not necessarily a harm that falls within the conventional “invasion of privacy” boundaries, such harms still center on an individual’s relationship with data about her. Big data approaches need not rely on having a person’s PII directly: a combination of techniques from social network analysis, interpreting online behaviors and predictive modeling can create a detailed, intimate picture with a high degree of accuracy. Furthermore, harms can still result when such techniques are done poorly, rendering an inaccurate picture that nonetheless is used to impact on a person’s life and livelihood."
The Boston Consulting Group - The Value of Our Digital Identity (20 November 2012)
The Value of Our Digital Identity, a new report by The Boston Consulting Group in the Liberty Global Policy Series, takes a unique approach to understanding this new phenomenon. It quantifies, for the first time, the current and potential economic value of digital identity. It also explores—through research involving more than 3,000 individuals—the value that consumers place on their personal information and how they make decisions about whether or not to share it. Building on these findings, the report presents a new paradigm for unlocking the full value of digital identity in a sustainable, consumer-centered way. [...]
The report shows that the value created through digital identity can indeed be massive: €1 trillion in Europe by 2020 [...]
Given proper privacy controls and sufficient benefits, the survey found, most consumers are willing to share their personal data. To ensure that the flow of personal information continues, organizations therefore need to make the benefits clear to consumers. They also need to embrace responsibility, transparency, and user control. [...]
It would take each American 244 hours per year to read privacy policies… cf. page 18. About 40 minutes every day.
The New York Times - Letting Down Our Guard With Web Privacy (Psychology of divulging private information on the net) (30 March 2013)
Article considering the psychological reasons why we surrender more private information on the net than we would in real life.
The New Yorker - The Prism (24 June 2013)
Article that considers the history of society's understanding of privacy. It draws parallels with the 1844 scandal around the London government's opening of letters by an Italian resident. It also contrasts terms privacy with advertising, arguing that the two tendencies, contradictory, appear to be very strong in current US American society.
EuropaQuotidiano - Facebook, i Big Data e la fine della privacy
Euobserver - Academics line up to defend EU data protection law