Portal: Copyright/Essential points : Différence entre versions

De La Quadrature du Net
Aller à la navigationAller à la recherche
m (Reverted edits by Lilytq (talk) to last revision by Yost)
 
(4 révisions intermédiaires par 2 utilisateurs non affichées)
Ligne 1 : Ligne 1 :
The next revision of the directive anti-shares IPRED is already planned by the European Commission as a repressive application of ACTA. On the contrary, this revision would be considered as an opportunity '''to define more just borders for the copyright's enforcement, by concentrating on breaches profit-seeking, and by protecting citizens realizing or using non-profit copies.'''  
+
<div style="text-align:justify">The next revision of the directive anti-shares IPRED is already planned by the European Commission as a repressive application of ACTA. On the contrary, this revision would be considered as an opportunity '''to define more just borders for the copyright's enforcement, by concentrating on breaches profit-seeking, and by protecting citizens realizing or using non-profit copies.'''  
  
 
The Elected Representatives have to forge ahead by requiring a new copyright's regime more fair, by legalizing wide-spread practices realized aimlessly of profit - as the files' sharing, the remix, the mash-up and the other modifications of works used as forms of expression - by the exceptions in the copyright
 
The Elected Representatives have to forge ahead by requiring a new copyright's regime more fair, by legalizing wide-spread practices realized aimlessly of profit - as the files' sharing, the remix, the mash-up and the other modifications of works used as forms of expression - by the exceptions in the copyright
 
+
</div>
 
<noinclude>
 
<noinclude>
 +
This is a partial page. It is visible in [[Portal: IPRED]]
 
[[Category:IPRED]]
 
[[Category:IPRED]]
</noinclude
+
</noinclude>

Version actuelle datée du 6 mars 2014 à 15:42

The next revision of the directive anti-shares IPRED is already planned by the European Commission as a repressive application of ACTA. On the contrary, this revision would be considered as an opportunity to define more just borders for the copyright's enforcement, by concentrating on breaches profit-seeking, and by protecting citizens realizing or using non-profit copies.

The Elected Representatives have to forge ahead by requiring a new copyright's regime more fair, by legalizing wide-spread practices realized aimlessly of profit - as the files' sharing, the remix, the mash-up and the other modifications of works used as forms of expression - by the exceptions in the copyright

This is a partial page. It is visible in Portal: IPRED