Portal: Copyright/Essential points : Différence entre versions
De La Quadrature du Net
Aller à la navigationAller à la recherche(4 révisions intermédiaires par 2 utilisateurs non affichées) | |||
Ligne 1 : | Ligne 1 : | ||
− | The next revision of the directive anti-shares IPRED is already planned by the European Commission as a repressive application of ACTA. On the contrary, this revision would be considered as an opportunity '''to define more just borders for the copyright's enforcement, by concentrating on breaches profit-seeking, and by protecting citizens realizing or using non-profit copies.''' | + | <div style="text-align:justify">The next revision of the directive anti-shares IPRED is already planned by the European Commission as a repressive application of ACTA. On the contrary, this revision would be considered as an opportunity '''to define more just borders for the copyright's enforcement, by concentrating on breaches profit-seeking, and by protecting citizens realizing or using non-profit copies.''' |
The Elected Representatives have to forge ahead by requiring a new copyright's regime more fair, by legalizing wide-spread practices realized aimlessly of profit - as the files' sharing, the remix, the mash-up and the other modifications of works used as forms of expression - by the exceptions in the copyright | The Elected Representatives have to forge ahead by requiring a new copyright's regime more fair, by legalizing wide-spread practices realized aimlessly of profit - as the files' sharing, the remix, the mash-up and the other modifications of works used as forms of expression - by the exceptions in the copyright | ||
− | + | </div> | |
<noinclude> | <noinclude> | ||
+ | This is a partial page. It is visible in [[Portal: IPRED]] | ||
[[Category:IPRED]] | [[Category:IPRED]] | ||
− | </noinclude | + | </noinclude> |
Version actuelle datée du 6 mars 2014 à 15:42
The next revision of the directive anti-shares IPRED is already planned by the European Commission as a repressive application of ACTA. On the contrary, this revision would be considered as an opportunity to define more just borders for the copyright's enforcement, by concentrating on breaches profit-seeking, and by protecting citizens realizing or using non-profit copies.
The Elected Representatives have to forge ahead by requiring a new copyright's regime more fair, by legalizing wide-spread practices realized aimlessly of profit - as the files' sharing, the remix, the mash-up and the other modifications of works used as forms of expression - by the exceptions in the copyright
This is a partial page. It is visible in Portal: IPRED