Paquet Telecom 2017/amendements ITRE : Différence entre versions

De La Quadrature du Net
Aller à la navigationAller à la recherche
(Amendment 935 --)
 
(68 révisions intermédiaires par 2 utilisateurs non affichées)
Ligne 1 : Ligne 1 :
 
{{Introduction|Cette page représente un travail en cours, son contenu peut être modifié.}}
 
{{Introduction|Cette page représente un travail en cours, son contenu peut être modifié.}}
  
Les amendements de la commission IMCO sont visibles [https://wiki.laquadrature.net/Paquet_Telecom_2017/amendements_IMCO sur cette page]
+
Les amendements de la commission IMCO sont visibles [[Paquet Telecom 2017/amendements IMCO|sur cette page]].
 +
 
 +
Les amendements de la commission LIBE sont visibles [[Paquet Telecom 2017/amendements LIBE|sur cette page]].
 +
 
 +
Voting list des amendements déposés en commission ITRE
 +
 
 +
=== Amendment 297 ++ ===
 +
 
 +
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 +
|-
 +
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
 +
'''Amendment 297'''<br/>
 +
Morten Helveg Petersen<br/>
 +
'''ALDE'''<br/>
 +
Article 1 – paragraph 3 – indent 1
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
- obligations imposed by national law in accordance with Union law or by Union law in respect of services provided using electronic communications networks and services ; - measures taken at Union or national level, in compliance with Union law, to pursue general interest objectives, in particular relating to '''''content regulation and audio-visual policy. - the provisions of Directive 2014/53/EU.'''''
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
- obligations imposed by national law in accordance with Union law or by Union law in respect of services provided using electronic communications networks and services ; - measures taken at Union or national level, in compliance with Union law, to pursue general interest objectives, in particular relating to '''''the protection of personal data and privacy, content regulation and audio-visual policy'''''
 +
|}
 +
 
 +
 
 +
Take into account the protection of personal data and privacy, content regulation and audio-visual policy
 +
 
  
Les amendements de la commission LIBE sont visibles [https://wiki.laquadrature.net/Paquet_Telecom_2017/amendements_LIBE sur cette page]
 
 
=== Amendment 298 ++ ===
 
=== Amendment 298 ++ ===
  
Ligne 14 : Ligne 37 :
 
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1
 
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 
(1) ‘electronic communications network’ means transmission systems, whether or not based on a permanent infrastructure or centralised administration capacity, and, where applicable, switching or routing equipment and other resources, including network elements which are not active, which permit the conveyance of signals by wire, radio, optical or other electromagnetic means, including satellite networks, fixed (circuit- and packet-switched, including Internet) and mobile terrestrial networks, electricity cable systems, to the extent that they are used for the purpose of transmitting signals, networks used for radio and television broadcasting, and cable television networks, irrespective of the type of information conveyed;
 
(1) ‘electronic communications network’ means transmission systems, whether or not based on a permanent infrastructure or centralised administration capacity, and, where applicable, switching or routing equipment and other resources, including network elements which are not active, which permit the conveyance of signals by wire, radio, optical or other electromagnetic means, including satellite networks, fixed (circuit- and packet-switched, including Internet) and mobile terrestrial networks, electricity cable systems, to the extent that they are used for the purpose of transmitting signals, networks used for radio and television broadcasting, and cable television networks, irrespective of the type of information conveyed;
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 
(1) ‘electronic communications network’ means transmission systems, whether or not based on a permanent infrastructure or centralised administration capacity, and, where applicable, switching or routing equipment and other resources, including network elements which are not active, which permit the conveyance of signals by wire, radio, optical or other electromagnetic means, including satellite networks, fixed (circuit- and packet-switched, including Internet) and mobile terrestrial networks, electricity cable systems, to the extent that they are used for the purpose of transmitting signals, networks used for radio and television broadcasting, and cable television networks, irrespective of the type of information conveyed; '''''it does not include network elements managed by individuals in the context of not-for-profit activities;'''''
 
(1) ‘electronic communications network’ means transmission systems, whether or not based on a permanent infrastructure or centralised administration capacity, and, where applicable, switching or routing equipment and other resources, including network elements which are not active, which permit the conveyance of signals by wire, radio, optical or other electromagnetic means, including satellite networks, fixed (circuit- and packet-switched, including Internet) and mobile terrestrial networks, electricity cable systems, to the extent that they are used for the purpose of transmitting signals, networks used for radio and television broadcasting, and cable television networks, irrespective of the type of information conveyed; '''''it does not include network elements managed by individuals in the context of not-for-profit activities;'''''
 
|-
 
|-
Ligne 24 : Ligne 47 :
  
  
Inclusion des orga non-profit.
+
Inclusion of not-for-profit organisations.
  
 
=== Amendment 299 - ===
 
=== Amendment 299 - ===
Ligne 42 : Ligne 65 :
 
|}
 
|}
  
 
+
=== Amendment 301 + ===
Dérégulation sur la QoS + dérégulation sur les réseaux privés.
 
 
 
=== Amendment 300 -- ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #A60000; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 300'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 301'''<br/>
Michał Boni, Jerzy Buzek, Gunnar Hökmark<br/>
+
Michel Reimon<br/>
'''EPP'''<br/>
+
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
 
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2
 
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(2) 'very high capacity network' means an electronic communications network which either consists wholly of optical fibre elements at least up to the distribution point at the serving location or which is capable of delivering under usual peak-time conditions similar network performance in terms of available down- and uplink bandwidth, resilience, error-related parameters, and latency and its variation. Network performance '''''can be considered similar regardless of whether''''' the end-user experience varies due to the inherently different characteristics of the medium by which the network ultimately connects with the network termination point.
+
(2) 'very high capacity network' means an electronic communications network which either consists wholly of optical fibre elements at least up to the distribution point at the serving location or which is capable of delivering under usual peak-time conditions '''''similar''''' network performance in terms of available down- and uplink bandwidth, resilience, error-related parameters, and latency and its variation. Network performance can be considered '''''similar''''' regardless of whether the end-user experience varies due to the inherently different characteristics of the medium by which the network ultimately connects with the network termination point.
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(2) 'very high capacity network' means an electronic communications network which either consists wholly of optical fibre elements at least up to the distribution point at the serving location or '''''any other type of network''''' which is capable of delivering under usual peak-time conditions similar network performance in terms of available down- and uplink bandwidth, resilience, error-related parameters, and latency and its variation. '''''Very high capacity networks are in any case fibre to the home networks or any other''''' network '''''which provides the technical''''' performance '''''requirements needed for the backhaul of 5G networks. Network performance will be assessed solely on the basis of technical parameters and not take into account''''' the end-user experience varies due to the inherently different characteristics of the medium by which the network ultimately connects with the network termination point.
+
(2) 'very high capacity network' means an electronic communications network which either consists wholly of optical fibre elements at least up to the distribution point at the serving location '''''corresponding in the fixed-line connection case to the premises and in the mobile connection case to the base station,''''' or which is capable of delivering under usual peak-time conditions '''''at least the same''''' network performance in terms of available down- and uplink bandwidth, resilience, error-related parameters, and latency and its variation. Network performance can be considered '''''at least the same''''' regardless of whether the end-user experience varies due to the inherently different characteristics of the medium by which the network ultimately connects with the network termination point.
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
| colspan='2' |
''Justification: The overarching objective of the Code is to stimulate the roll-out of networks which can serve the future demands of European businesses and citizens. The term very high capacity network seeks to define what future state of the art electronic communications infrastructure look like. It is suggested to clarify the definition in a way that ensures that very high capacity networks benefit the roll-out of 5G networks in the sense that they provide the backhaul for these mobile networks. Future 5G ultra-dense and heavy traffic cells have to be connected to a backhaul with very high requirements in terms of capacity, latency, and availability. The proposal also takes into account the need to ensure technology neutrality since the definition of very high capacity network is not based on any given technology.''
+
''Justification: Clarification included from the respective Recital 13. Moreover, strengthening the performance benchmark while lifting its upper limit. This clarifies that – independent of the used technology – better performing infrastructures would also be considered ‘very high capacity’.''
 
|}
 
|}
  
 
+
=== Amendment 312 + ===
Pas de focus sur la QoS, la qualité seulement mesurée sur les paramètres du réseau.
 
 
 
=== Amendment 301 + ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 301'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 312'''<br/>
Michel Reimon<br/>
+
Edouard Martin<br/>
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
+
'''S&D'''<br/>
 
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2
 
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(2) 'very high capacity network' means an electronic communications network which either consists wholly of optical fibre elements at least up to the distribution point at the serving location or which is capable of delivering under usual peak-time conditions '''''similar''''' network performance in terms of available down- and uplink bandwidth, resilience, error-related parameters, and latency and its variation. Network performance can be considered '''''similar''''' regardless of whether the end-user experience varies due to the inherently different characteristics of the medium by which the network ultimately connects with the network termination point.
+
(2) 'very high capacity network' means an electronic communications network which either consists wholly of optical fibre elements at least up to the '''''distribution point at the serving location''''' or which is capable of delivering under usual peak-time conditions similar network performance in terms of available down- and uplink bandwidth, resilience, error-related parameters, and latency and its variation. Network performance can be considered similar regardless of whether the end-user experience varies due to the inherently different characteristics of the medium by which the network ultimately connects with the network termination point.
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(2) 'very high capacity network' means an electronic communications network which either consists wholly of optical fibre elements at least up to the distribution point at the serving location '''''corresponding in the fixed-line connection case to the premises and in the mobile connection case to the base station,''''' or which is capable of delivering under usual peak-time conditions '''''at least the same''''' network performance in terms of available down- and uplink bandwidth, resilience, error-related parameters, and latency and its variation. Network performance can be considered '''''at least the same''''' regardless of whether the end-user experience varies due to the inherently different characteristics of the medium by which the network ultimately connects with the network termination point.
+
(2) 'very high capacity network' means an electronic communications network which either consists wholly of optical fibre elements at least up to the '''''premises''''' or which is capable of delivering under usual peak-time conditions '''''at least''''' similar network performance in terms of available down- and uplink bandwidth, resilience, error-related parameters, and latency and its variation. Network performance can be considered similar regardless of whether the end-user experience varies due to the inherently different characteristics of the medium by which the network ultimately connects with the network termination point.
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
''Justification: Clarification included from the respective Recital 13. Moreover, strengthening the performance benchmark while lifting its upper limit. This clarifies that – independent of the used technology – better performing infrastructures would also be considered ‘very high capacity’.''
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
 
+
=== Amendment 313 + ===
Tentative d'inclure une QoS.
 
 
 
=== Amendment 302 / ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 302'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 313'''<br/>
David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano<br/>
+
Anne Sander, Françoise Grossetête<br/>
'''EFD'''<br/>
+
'''S&D'''<br/>
 
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2
 
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(2) 'very high capacity network' means an electronic communications network '''''which either consists''''' wholly of optical fibre elements at least up to the distribution point at the serving location or which is capable of delivering under usual peak-time conditions similar network performance in terms of available down- and uplink bandwidth, resilience, error-related parameters, and latency and its variation. '''''Network performance can be considered similar regardless of whether the end-user experience varies due to the inherently different characteristics of the medium by which the network ultimately connects with the network termination point.'''''
+
(2) 'very high capacity network' means an electronic communications network which either consists wholly of optical fibre elements at least up to the '''''distribution point at the serving location''''' or which is capable of delivering under usual peak-time conditions '''''similar''''' network performance in terms of available down- and uplink bandwidth, resilience, error-related parameters, and latency and its variation. Network performance can be considered similar regardless of whether the end-user experience varies due to the inherently different characteristics of the medium by which the network ultimately connects with the network termination point.
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(2) 'very high capacity network' means an electronic communications network '''''consisting''''' wholly of optical fibre elements at least up to the distribution point at the serving location''''', corresponding in the fixed-line connection case to the premises and in the mobile connection case to the base station,''''' or which is capable of delivering under usual peak-time conditions similar network performance in terms of available down- and uplink bandwidth, resilience, error-related parameters, and latency and its variation.
+
(2) 'very high capacity network' means an electronic communications network which either consists wholly of optical fibre elements at least up to the '''''premises''''' or which is capable of delivering under usual peak-time conditions '''''at least the same''''' network performance in terms of available down- and uplink bandwidth, resilience, error-related parameters, and latency and its variation. Network performance can be considered similar regardless of whether the end-user experience varies due to the inherently different characteristics of the medium by which the network ultimately connects with the network termination point.
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
''Justification: To clarify the "very high capacity network" definition in light of the technology landscape.''
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
À relire.
+
Same as 312
 +
 
  
=== Amendment 304 - ===
+
=== Amendment 316 ++ ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 304'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 316'''<br/>
Gunnar Hökmark, Michał Boni, Krišjānis Kariņš, Bendt Bendtsen<br/>
+
Michel Reimon<br/>
'''EPP'''<br/>
+
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2
+
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(2) 'very high capacity network' means an electronic communications network which either consists wholly of optical fibre elements at least up to the distribution point at the serving location or which is capable of delivering under usual peak-time conditions '''''similar''''' network performance in terms of available down- and uplink bandwidth, resilience, error-related parameters, and latency and its variation. Network performance '''''can be considered similar''''' regardless of whether the end-user experience varies due to the inherently different characteristics of the medium by which the network ultimately connects with the network termination point.
+
(4) ‘electronic communications service’ means a service '''''normally''''' provided for remuneration via electronic communications networks, which encompasses 'internet access service' as defined in Article 2(2) of Regulation (EU) 2015/2120; and/or 'interpersonal communications service'; and/or services consisting wholly or mainly in the conveyance of signals such as transmission services used for the provision of machine-to-machine services and for broadcasting, but excludes services providing, or exercising editorial control over, content transmitted using electronic communications networks and services;
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(2) 'very high capacity network' means an electronic communications network which either consists wholly of optical fibre elements at least up to the distribution point at the serving location or '''''any network''''' which is capable of delivering under usual peak-time conditions '''''at least equally consistent and reliable''''' network performance in terms of available down- and uplink bandwidth, resilience, error-related parameters, and latency and its variation. Network performance '''''shall be assessed on the basis of technical parameters,''''' regardless of whether the end-user experience varies due to the inherently different characteristics of the medium by which the network ultimately connects with the network termination point.
+
(4) ‘electronic communications service’ means a service provided for remuneration via electronic communications networks, which encompasses 'internet access service' as defined in Article 2(2) of Regulation (EU) 2015/2120; and/or 'interpersonal communications service'; and/or services consisting wholly or mainly in the conveyance of signals such as transmission services used for the provision of machine-to-machine services and for broadcasting, but excludes services providing, or exercising editorial control over, content transmitted using electronic communications networks and services '''''as well as not-for-profit-services provided by individuals''''';
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
| colspan='2' |
''Justification: The aim of the EECC is to incentivise the roll-out of infrastructure capable of delivering the speeds necessary to accelerate the transition to a 5G society. Thus, the definition must, while taking into account future technological developments, thereby maintaining the technology neutrality principle, strictly be limited to include only state of the art infrastructure.''
+
''Justification: Individuals participating in a not-for-profit network (such as radio local area networks) or providing not-for-profit services shall not be subject to the obligations imposed on legal persons providing networks or services. Specifically, the strict obligations provided by the Directive 2002/58/CE would be disproportionate and impracticable if imposed on individual volunteers, who should only be subject to the obligations set by the General Data Protection Regulation.''
 
|}
 
|}
  
 
+
=== Amendment 318 - ===
Pas de focus sur la QoS, la qualité seulement mesurée sur les paramètres du réseau
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 305 - ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 305'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 318'''<br/>
 
Kaja Kallas<br/>
 
Kaja Kallas<br/>
 
'''ALDE'''<br/>
 
'''ALDE'''<br/>
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2
+
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 5
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(2) 'very high capacity network' means an electronic communications network which '''''either consists wholly of optical fibre elements at least up to the distribution point at the serving location or which''''' is capable of delivering under usual peak-time conditions '''''similar''''' network performance in terms of available down- and uplink bandwidth, resilience, error-related parameters, and latency and its variation. Network performance '''''can be considered similar regardless of whether the''''' end-user experience '''''varies''''' due to the inherently different characteristics of the medium by which the network ultimately connects with the network termination point.
+
(5) 'interpersonal communications service’ means a service normally provided for remuneration '''''that enables''''' direct interpersonal and interactive exchange of information via electronic communications networks between a finite number of persons, whereby the persons initiating or participating in the communication determine its recipient(s); '''''it does not include services which enable interpersonal and interactive communication merely as a minor ancillary feature that is intrinsically linked to another service;'''''
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(2) 'very high capacity network' means an electronic communications network which is capable of delivering under usual peak-time conditions network performance''''',''''' in terms of available down- and uplink bandwidth, resilience, error-related parameters, and latency and its variation''''', meeting the needs of the most demanding, digitally intensive end-users, and in particular a network consisting of optical elements at least up to the distribution point at the serving location'''''. Network performance '''''should be assessed without regard to variations in''''' end-user experience due to the inherently different characteristics of the medium by which the network ultimately connects with the network termination point.
+
(5) 'interpersonal communications service’ means a service normally provided for remuneration '''''where the principal purpose of the service is devoted to enabling''''' direct interpersonal and interactive exchange of information via electronic communications networks between a finite number of persons, whereby the persons initiating or participating in the communication determine its recipient(s);
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
| colspan='2' |
Ligne 154 : Ligne 159 :
  
  
QoS ? Pas sur, à relire
+
Excludes ancillary interpersonal communication services from the scope
  
 
+
=== Amendment 319 - ===
=== Amendment 306 / ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 306'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 319'''<br/>
Anna Záborská, Ivan Štefanec<br/>
+
Barbara Kappel, Angelo Ciocca, Lorenzo Fontana<br/>
'''EPP'''<br/>
+
'''ENF'''<br/>
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2
+
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 5
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(2) 'very high capacity network' means '''''an''''' electronic communications network which '''''either''''' consists wholly of optical fibre elements '''''at least up to the distribution point at the serving location or which is capable of delivering under usual peak-time conditions similar''''' network '''''performance''''' in terms of available down- and uplink bandwidth, resilience, error-related parameters, and latency and its variation. Network performance can be considered similar regardless of whether the end-user experience varies due to the inherently different characteristics of the medium by which the network ultimately connects with the network termination point.
+
(5) 'interpersonal communications service’ means '''''a''''' service normally provided for remuneration that enables direct interpersonal and interactive exchange of information via electronic communications networks between a finite number of persons, whereby the persons initiating or participating in the communication determine its recipient(s); it does not include services which enable interpersonal and interactive communication merely as a minor ancillary feature that is intrinsically linked to another service;
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(2) 'very high capacity network' means '''''high speed''''' electronic communications network which consists wholly '''''or partly''''' of optical fibre elements '''''with sufficient capacity to allow unconstrained use of the''''' network in terms of available down- and uplink bandwidth, resilience, error-related parameters, and latency and its variation. Network performance can be considered similar regardless of whether the end-user experience varies due to the inherently different characteristics of the medium by which the network ultimately connects with the network termination point.
+
(5) 'interpersonal communications service' means '''''an electronic communications''''' service '''''whose primary purpose is to enable''''' normally provided for remuneration that enables direct interpersonal and interactive exchange of information via electronic communications networks between a finite number of persons, whereby the persons initiating or participating in the communication determine its recipient(s); it does not include services which enable interpersonal and interactive communication merely as '''''an''''' a minor ancillary feature that is intrinsically linked to another service;
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Pas comprise et ça a pas l'air bon
+
Excludes ancillary interpersonal communication services from the scope
  
Quota : « partly » -> ça, ça ouvre la porte à définir comme réseau à haute capacité un truc avec 3 morceaux de fibres dedans, pas bon, je trouve.
 
  
=== Amendment 307 -- ===
+
=== Amendment 325 - ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #A60000; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 307'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 325'''<br/>
Kathleen Van Brempt<br/>
+
Barbara Kappel, Angelo Ciocca, Lorenzo Fontana<br/>
'''S&D'''<br/>
+
'''ENF'''<br/>
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2
+
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 7
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(2) 'very high capacity network' means an electronic communications network which either consists wholly of optical fibre elements '''''at least up to the distribution point at the serving location or''''' which is capable of delivering under usual peak-time conditions similar network performance in terms of available down- and uplink bandwidth, resilience, error-related parameters, and latency and its variation. Network performance can be considered similar regardless of whether the end-user experience varies due to the inherently different characteristics of the medium by which the network ultimately connects with the network termination point.
+
(7) 'number-independent interpersonal communications service' means an interpersonal communications service which does not connect with the public switched telephone network, either by means of assigned numbering resources, i.e. a number or numbers in '''''national or international''''' telephone numbering '''''plans''''', or by enabling communication with a number or numbers in national or international telephone numbering plans;
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(2) 'very high capacity network' means an electronic communications network which either consists wholly '''''or partly''''' of optical fibre elements '''''and/or''''' which is capable of delivering under usual peak-time conditions similar network performance in terms of available down- and uplink bandwidth, resilience, error-related parameters, and latency and its variation. Network performance can be considered similar regardless of whether the end-user experience varies due to the inherently different characteristics of the medium by which the network ultimately connects with the network termination point.
+
(7) 'number-independent interpersonal communications service' means an interpersonal communications service which does not connect with the public switched telephone network, either by means of assigned numbering resources, i.e. a number or numbers in '''''the national''''' telephone numbering '''''plan''''', or by enabling communication with a number or numbers in national or international telephone numbering plans; '''''it does not include information society services that allow interpersonal and interactive communication as a secondary feature;'''''
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Pas clair, dérégulation
+
Excludes information society services that allow interpersonal and interactive communication as a secondary feature from the scope
  
  
=== Amendment 308 + ===
+
=== Amendment 333 ++ ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 308'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 333'''<br/>
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Dan Nica, Edouard Martin, Theresa Griffin, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Jeppe Kofod<br/>
+
Michel Reimon<br/>
'''S&D'''<br/>
+
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2
+
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 23
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(2) 'very high capacity network' means an electronic communications network which either consists wholly of optical fibre elements at least up to the distribution point at the serving location or which is capable of delivering under usual peak-time conditions '''''similar''''' network performance in terms of available down- and uplink bandwidth, resilience, error-related parameters, and latency and its variation. Network performance can be considered similar regardless of whether the end-user experience varies due to the inherently different characteristics of the medium by which the network ultimately connects with the network termination point.
+
(23) ‘general authorisation’ means a legal framework established by the Member State ensuring rights for the provision of electronic communications networks or services and laying down sector-specific obligations that may apply to all or to specific types of electronic communications networks and services, in accordance with this Directive.
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(2) 'very high capacity network' means an electronic communications network which either consists wholly of optical fibre elements at least up to the distribution point at the serving location or which is capable of delivering under usual peak-time conditions '''''at least the same''''' network performance in terms of available down- and uplink bandwidth, resilience, error-related parameters, and latency and its variation. Network performance can be considered similar regardless of whether the end-user experience varies due to the inherently different characteristics of the medium by which the network ultimately connects with the network termination point.
+
(23) ‘general authorisation’ means a legal framework established by the Member State ensuring rights for the provision of electronic communications networks or services and laying down sector-specific obligations that may apply to all or to specific types of electronic communications networks and services, in accordance with this Directive''''', excluding not-for-profit-services provided by individuals'''''.
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
''Justification: The word ‘similar’ is too subjective. We should ensure consistency with our objectives.''
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
QoS mais doit aller plus loin mais cet amendement renforcerait l'obligation de bonne gestion des interconnexions comme demandée par FFDN
+
Excluding not-for-profit-services provided by individuals is a way to enable innovation and development of services by individuals who would be discouraged from proposing services with administrative obligations
  
  
=== Amendment 310 / ===
+
=== Amendment 334 - ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 310'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 334'''<br/>
Henna Virkkunen<br/>
+
Barbara Kappel, Angelo Ciocca, Lorenzo Fontana<br/>
'''EPP'''<br/>
+
'''ENF'''<br/>
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2
+
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 26
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(2) 'very high capacity network' means an electronic communications network which either consists wholly of optical fibre elements '''''at least up to the distribution point at the serving location or''''' which is capable of delivering under usual peak-time conditions '''''similar network performance''''' in terms of available down- and uplink bandwidth, resilience, error-related parameters, and latency and its variation. Network performance can be considered similar regardless of whether the end-user experience varies due to the inherently different characteristics of the medium by which the network ultimately connects with the network termination point.
+
(26) 'shared use of radio spectrum' means access by two or more users to use the same frequencies under a defined sharing arrangement, authorised by a national regulatory authority on the basis of a general authorisation, individual rights of use or a combination thereof''''', including regulatory approaches such as licenced shared access aiming to facilitate the shared use of a frequency band, subject to a binding agreement of all parties involved, in accordance with sharing rules as included in their rights of use so as to guarantee to all users predictable and reliable sharing arrangements, and without prejudice to the application of competition law''''';
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(2) 'very high capacity network' means an electronic communications network which either consists wholly '''''or partly''''' of optical fibre elements '''''and''''' which is capable of delivering under usual peak-time conditions '''''high-performing broadband access services''''' in terms of available down- and uplink bandwidth, resilience, error-related parameters, and latency and its variation. Network performance can be considered similar regardless of whether the end-user experience varies due to the inherently different characteristics of the medium by which the network ultimately connects with the network termination point.
+
(26) 'shared use of radio spectrum' means access by two or more users to use the same frequencies under a defined sharing arrangement, authorised by a national regulatory authority on the basis of a general authorisation, individual rights of use or a combination thereof;
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Utilité ?
+
This AM deletes the part that promotes the development of licenced shared access.
  
Quota : même réserve sur « partly ».
 
  
=== Amendment 311 + ===
+
=== Amendment 343 + ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 311'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 343'''<br/>
Eva Kaili<br/>
+
Kaja Kallas, Marietje Schaake<br/>
'''S&D'''<br/>
+
'''ALDE'''<br/>
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2
+
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
National regulatory and other competent authorities may contribute within their competencies to ensuring the implementation of policies aimed at the promotion of cultural and linguistic diversity, as well as media pluralism.
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
National regulatory and other competent authorities may contribute within their competencies to ensuring the implementation of policies aimed at the promotion of '''''freedom of expression and information,''''' cultural and linguistic diversity, as well as media pluralism.
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
| colspan='2' |
(2) 'very high capacity network' means an electronic communications network which either consists wholly of optical fibre elements at least up to the distribution point at the serving location or which is capable of delivering under usual peak-time conditions '''''similar''''' network performance in terms of available down- and uplink bandwidth, resilience, error-related parameters, and latency and its variation. Network performance can be considered similar regardless of whether the end-user experience varies due to the inherently different characteristics of the medium by which the network ultimately connects with the network termination point.
+
''Justification: In accordance with rule 104 of the rules of procedure, this amendment is necessary for pressing reasons related to the internal logic of the text''
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
(2) 'very high capacity network' means an electronic communications network which either consists wholly of optical fibre elements at least up to the distribution point at the serving location or which is capable of delivering under usual peak-time conditions '''''at least the same''''' network performance in terms of available down- and uplink bandwidth, resilience, error-related parameters, and latency and its variation. Network performance can be considered similar regardless of whether the end-user experience varies due to the inherently different characteristics of the medium by which the network ultimately connects with the network termination point.
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Pareil que le 308
+
Promotes freedom of expression and information
  
  
=== Amendment 312 + ===
+
=== Amendment 344 + ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 312'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 344'''<br/>
Edouard Martin<br/>
+
Morten Helveg Petersen<br/>
'''S&D'''<br/>
+
'''ALDE'''<br/>
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2
+
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
 
|-
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(2) 'very high capacity network' means an electronic communications network which either consists wholly of optical fibre elements at least up to the '''''distribution point at the serving location''''' or which is capable of delivering under usual peak-time conditions similar network performance in terms of available down- and uplink bandwidth, resilience, error-related parameters, and latency and its variation. Network performance can be considered similar regardless of whether the end-user experience varies due to the inherently different characteristics of the medium by which the network ultimately connects with the network termination point.
+
National regulatory and other competent authorities may contribute within their competencies to ensuring the implementation of policies aimed at the promotion of cultural and linguistic diversity, as well as media pluralism.
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(2) 'very high capacity network' means an electronic communications network which either consists wholly of optical fibre elements at least up to the '''''premises''''' or which is capable of delivering under usual peak-time conditions '''''at least''''' similar network performance in terms of available down- and uplink bandwidth, resilience, error-related parameters, and latency and its variation. Network performance can be considered similar regardless of whether the end-user experience varies due to the inherently different characteristics of the medium by which the network ultimately connects with the network termination point.
+
National regulatory and other competent authorities may contribute within their competencies to ensuring the implementation of policies aimed at the '''''protection of personal data and privacy, the''''' promotion of cultural and linguistic diversity, as well as media pluralism.
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Enhance def
+
Promotes the protection of personal data and privacy
  
=== Amendment 313 + ===
+
 
 +
=== Amendment 345 + ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 313'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 345'''<br/>
Anne Sander, Françoise Grossetête<br/>
+
Michel Reimon<br/>
'''EPP'''<br/>
+
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2
+
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
National regulatory and other competent authorities '''''may''''' contribute within their competencies to ensuring the implementation of policies aimed at the promotion of cultural and linguistic diversity, as well as media pluralism.
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
National regulatory and other competent authorities '''''shall''''' contribute within their competencies to ensuring the implementation of policies aimed at the promotion of cultural and linguistic diversity, as well as media pluralism.
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
| colspan='2' |
(2) 'very high capacity network' means an electronic communications network which either consists wholly of optical fibre elements at least up to the '''''distribution point at the serving location''''' or which is capable of delivering under usual peak-time conditions '''''similar''''' network performance in terms of available down- and uplink bandwidth, resilience, error-related parameters, and latency and its variation. Network performance can be considered similar regardless of whether the end-user experience varies due to the inherently different characteristics of the medium by which the network ultimately connects with the network termination point.
+
''Justification: Despite the fact that the Directive does not lay down substantive rules regarding content and only on networks and services, national authorities need to play close attention to the impact that markets have on each other. The degree of competition in telecommunications markets can significantly impact media and content pluralism in Europe, reducing consumers’ ability to access the content and services of their choice.''
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
(2) 'very high capacity network' means an electronic communications network which either consists wholly of optical fibre elements at least up to the '''''premises''''' or which is capable of delivering under usual peak-time conditions '''''at least the same''''' network performance in terms of available down- and uplink bandwidth, resilience, error-related parameters, and latency and its variation. Network performance can be considered similar regardless of whether the end-user experience varies due to the inherently different characteristics of the medium by which the network ultimately connects with the network termination point.
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Pareil 308, 311
+
This AM give the NRAs the obligation to take into account policies such as media pluralism
  
  
=== Amendment 315 / ===
+
=== Amendment 346 + ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 315'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 346'''<br/>
Anne Sander, Françoise Grossetête<br/>
+
José Blanco López, Inmaculada Rodríguez-Piñero Fernández, Soledad Cabezón Ruiz<br/>
'''EPP'''<br/>
+
'''S&D'''<br/>
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4
+
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(4) ‘electronic communications service’ means a service normally provided for remuneration via electronic communications networks, which encompasses 'internet access service' as defined in Article 2(2) of Regulation (EU) 2015/2120; and/or 'interpersonal communications service'; and/or services consisting wholly or mainly in the conveyance of signals such as transmission services used for the provision of machine-to-machine services and for broadcasting, but excludes services providing, or exercising editorial control over, content transmitted using electronic communications networks and services;
+
National regulatory and other competent authorities '''''may''''' contribute within their competencies to ensuring the implementation of policies aimed at the promotion of cultural and linguistic diversity, as well as media pluralism.
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(4) ‘electronic communications service’ means a service normally provided for remuneration via electronic communications networks, which encompasses 'internet access service' as defined in Article 2(2) of Regulation (EU) 2015/2120; and/or 'interpersonal communications service'; and/or services consisting wholly or mainly in the conveyance of signals such as transmission services used for the provision of machine-to-machine services and for broadcasting, but excludes '''''interpersonal communication services as defined in paragraph (5) of the present Article, information society services, as defined in Article 1 of Directive 98/34/EC and''''' services providing, or exercising editorial control over, content transmitted using electronic communications networks and services;
+
National regulatory and other competent authorities '''''shall''''' contribute within their competencies to ensuring the implementation of policies aimed at the promotion of cultural and linguistic diversity, as well as media pluralism.
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
| colspan='2' |
''Justification: To ensure legal certainty and a level playing field between providers of "electronic communications service," the aim of this amendment is to clarify that the scope of the third category of Electronic Communications Services “consisting wholly or mainly in the conveyance of signal” only concerns pure transmission services, excluding services which qualify as Interpersonal Communication Services or as Information Society Services notably subject to the e-commerce directive.''
+
''Justification: This provision aims at ensuring a strong commitment of NRA and other competent authorities with the promotion of cultural and linguistic diversity, and media pluralism.''
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Pas compris
+
Same as AM 344 -  This AM give the NRAs the obligation to take into account policies such as media pluralism
  
  
=== Amendment 316 ++ ===
+
=== Amendment 347 + ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 316'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 347'''<br/>
Michel Reimon<br/>
+
David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano<br/>
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
+
'''EFDD'''<br/>
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4
+
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(4) ‘electronic communications service’ means a service '''''normally''''' provided for remuneration via electronic communications networks, which encompasses 'internet access service' as defined in Article 2(2) of Regulation (EU) 2015/2120; and/or 'interpersonal communications service'; and/or services consisting wholly or mainly in the conveyance of signals such as transmission services used for the provision of machine-to-machine services and for broadcasting, but excludes services providing, or exercising editorial control over, content transmitted using electronic communications networks and services;
+
National regulatory and other competent authorities '''''may''''' contribute within their competencies to ensuring the implementation of policies aimed at the promotion of cultural and linguistic diversity, as well as media pluralism.
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(4) ‘electronic communications service’ means a service provided for remuneration via electronic communications networks, which encompasses 'internet access service' as defined in Article 2(2) of Regulation (EU) 2015/2120; and/or 'interpersonal communications service'; and/or services consisting wholly or mainly in the conveyance of signals such as transmission services used for the provision of machine-to-machine services and for broadcasting, but excludes services providing, or exercising editorial control over, content transmitted using electronic communications networks and services '''''as well as not-for-profit-services provided by individuals''''';
+
National regulatory and other competent authorities '''''shall''''' contribute within their competencies to ensuring the implementation of policies aimed at the promotion of cultural and linguistic diversity, as well as media pluralism.
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
| colspan='2' |
''Justification: Individuals participating in a not-for-profit network (such as radio local area networks) or providing not-for-profit services shall not be subject to the obligations imposed on legal persons providing networks or services. Specifically, the strict obligations provided by the Directive 2002/58/CE would be disproportionate and impracticable if imposed on individual volunteers, who should only be subject to the obligations set by the General Data Protection Regulation.''
+
''Justification: National authorities need to play close attention to the impact that markets have on each other.''
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
inclusion des non-profit
+
Same as AM 344 - This AM give the NRAs the obligation to take into account policies such as media pluralism
  
  
=== Amendment 317 / ===
+
=== Amendment 348 + ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 317'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 348'''<br/>
Evžen Tošenovský<br/>
+
Pervenche Berès<br/>
'''ECR'''<br/>
+
'''S&D'''<br/>
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4
+
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(4) ‘electronic communications service’ means a service normally provided for remuneration via electronic communications networks, which encompasses 'internet access service' as defined in Article 2(2) of Regulation (EU) 2015/2120; and/or 'interpersonal communications service'; and/or services consisting wholly '''''or mainly''''' in the conveyance of signals such as transmission '''''services''''' used for the provision of machine-to-machine services and for broadcasting, but excludes services providing, or exercising editorial control over, content transmitted using electronic communications networks and services;
+
Les autorités de régulation nationales et les autres autorités compétentes '''''peuvent contribuer''''', dans la limite de leurs compétences, à la mise en œuvre des politiques visant à promouvoir la diversité culturelle et linguistique ainsi que le pluralisme dans les médias.
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(4) 'electronic communications service' means a '''''publicly available''''' service normally provided for remuneration via electronic communications networks, which encompasses 'internet access service' as defined in Article 2(2) of Regulation (EU) 2015/2120; and/or 'interpersonal communications service'; and/or services consisting wholly in the conveyance of signals such as transmission '''''of signals''''' used for the provision of machine-to-machine services and for broadcasting, but excludes services providing, or exercising editorial control over, content transmitted using electronic communications networks and services;
+
Les autorités de régulation nationales et les autres autorités compétentes '''''contribuent''''', dans la limite de leurs compétences, à la mise en œuvre des politiques visant à promouvoir la diversité culturelle et linguistique ainsi que le pluralisme dans les médias.
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Pas compris
+
Same as AM 344 -  This AM give the NRAs the obligation to take into account policies such as media pluralism
  
Quota: Le « publicly available » me semble à double tranchant. On peut dire que fournir des services => IP publiques, mais en même temps, il y a des services qui en sont bien et qui ne sont pas *ouverts* au public (genre, mon mail).
 
  
=== Amendment 318 - ===
+
=== Amendment 356 + ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 318'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 356'''<br/>
Kaja Kallas<br/>
+
Michel Reimon<br/>
'''ALDE'''<br/>
+
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 5
+
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point a
 
|-
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(5) 'interpersonal communications service’ means a service normally provided for remuneration '''''that enables''''' direct interpersonal and interactive exchange of information via electronic communications networks between a finite number of persons, whereby the persons initiating or participating in the communication determine its recipient(s); '''''it does not include services which enable interpersonal and interactive communication merely as a minor ancillary feature that is intrinsically linked to another service;'''''
+
(a) promote '''''access to, and take-up of,''''' very high capacity data connectivity, both fixed and mobile, by all Union citizens and businesses;
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(5) 'interpersonal communications service’ means a service normally provided for remuneration '''''where the principal purpose of the service is devoted to enabling''''' direct interpersonal and interactive exchange of information via electronic communications networks between a finite number of persons, whereby the persons initiating or participating in the communication determine its recipient(s);
+
(a) promote '''''the availability and affordability of and access to''''' very high capacity data connectivity, both fixed and mobile '''''and of interpersonal communications services''''', by all Union citizens and businesses;
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
| colspan='2' |
''Justification: In accordance with rule 104 of the rules of procedure, this amendment is necessary for pressing reasons related to the internal logic of the text''
+
''Justification: In a market economy where consumers can leverage their collective power, it should always be them (and not governments, regulators or companies) who freely decide whether they want to take up a new service or not. The objective of EU telecom regulation has always been to guide regulatory intervention towards the offer side of the market, ensuring wholesale and retail competition, and the availability of services and networks. If regulation would aim to guide the demand side of the market too, it could condition the promotion of efficiency, transparency and fairness in markets, and of consumer protection. The regulatory framework must therefore continue focusing on availability and affordability of services.''
 
|}
 
|}
  
 
+
=== Amendment 357 + ===
Excludes ancillary interpersonal communication services from the scope
 
 
 
=== Amendment 319 - ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 319'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 357'''<br/>
Barbara Kappel, Angelo Ciocca, Lorenzo Fontana<br/>
+
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Dan Nica, Edouard Martin, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Jeppe Kofod<br/>
'''ENF'''<br/>
+
'''S&D'''<br/>
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 5
+
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point a
|-
+
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(5) 'interpersonal communications service’ means '''''a''''' service normally provided for remuneration that enables direct interpersonal and interactive exchange of information via electronic communications networks between a finite number of persons, whereby the persons initiating or participating in the communication determine its recipient(s); it does not include services which enable interpersonal and interactive communication merely as a minor ancillary feature that is intrinsically linked to another service;
+
(a) promote access to, and take-up of, very high capacity data connectivity, both fixed and mobile, by all Union citizens and businesses;
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(5) 'interpersonal communications service' means '''''an electronic communications''''' service '''''whose primary purpose is to enable''''' normally provided for remuneration that enables direct interpersonal and interactive exchange of information via electronic communications networks between a finite number of persons, whereby the persons initiating or participating in the communication determine its recipient(s); it does not include services which enable interpersonal and interactive communication merely as '''''an''''' a minor ancillary feature that is intrinsically linked to another service;
+
(a) promote '''''the availability and affordability of and''''' access to, and take-up of, very high capacity data connectivity, both fixed and mobile, by all Union citizens and businesses;
 +
|-
 +
| colspan='2' |
 +
''Justification: Both availability and affordability are important for bridging digital divide.''
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Excludes ancillary interpersonal communication services from the scope
+
Same as 356
  
=== Amendment 320 / ===
+
=== Amendment 363 - ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 320'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 363'''<br/>
Evžen Tošenovský<br/>
+
Anne Sander, Françoise Grossetête<br/>
'''ECR'''<br/>
+
'''EPP'''<br/>
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 5
+
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point b
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(5) 'interpersonal communications service’ means '''''a''''' service normally provided for '''''remuneration''''' that enables direct interpersonal and interactive exchange of information via electronic communications networks between a finite number of persons, whereby the persons initiating or participating in the communication determine its recipient(s); it does not include services which enable interpersonal and interactive communication merely as a minor ancillary feature that is intrinsically linked to another service;
+
(b) promote competition in the provision of electronic communications networks and associated facilities, including efficient infrastructure-based competition, and in the provision of electronic communications services and associated services;
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(5) 'interpersonal communications service' means '''''an electronic communications''''' service normally provided for '''''remunerations''''' that enables direct interpersonal and interactive exchange of information via electronic communications networks between a finite number of persons, whereby the persons initiating or participating in the communication determine its recipient(s); it does not include services which enable interpersonal and interactive communication merely as a minor ancillary feature that is intrinsically linked to another service;
+
(b) promote '''''sustainable''''' competition in the provision of electronic communications networks and associated facilities, including efficient infrastructure-based competition, and in the provision of electronic communications services and associated services;
 
|}
 
|}
  
 
+
=== Amendment 382 + ===
Forme, précision sur "electronic"
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 321 / ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 321'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 382'''<br/>
 
Michel Reimon<br/>
 
Michel Reimon<br/>
 
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
 
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 5
+
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – point f
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(5) 'interpersonal communications service’ means a service '''''normally''''' provided for remuneration that enables direct interpersonal and interactive exchange of information via electronic communications networks between a finite number of persons, whereby the persons initiating or participating in the communication determine its recipient(s); it does not include services which enable interpersonal and interactive communication merely as a minor ancillary feature that is intrinsically linked to another service;
+
'''''(f)''''' '''''imposing ex ante regulatory obligations only to the extent necessary to secure effective and sustainable competition on the retail market concerned and relaxing or lifting such obligations as soon as that condition is fulfilled.'''''
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(5) 'interpersonal communications service’ means a service provided for remuneration that enables direct interpersonal and interactive exchange of information via electronic communications networks between a finite number of persons, whereby the persons initiating or participating in the communication determine its recipient(s); it does not include services which enable interpersonal and interactive communication merely as a minor ancillary feature that is intrinsically linked to another service;
+
'''''deleted'''''
 
|}
 
|}
  
 
+
=== Amendment 392 + ===
Retrait de "normally", précision
 
 
 
=== Amendment 322 / ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 322'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 392'''<br/>
Kaja Kallas<br/>
+
Morten Helveg Petersen<br/>
 
'''ALDE'''<br/>
 
'''ALDE'''<br/>
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 6
+
Article 4 – paragraph 1
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(6) ‘number-based interpersonal communications service’ means an interpersonal communications service which connects with the public switched telephone network, either by means of assigned numbering resources, i.e. a number or numbers in national or international telephone numbering plans, or by enabling communication with a number or numbers in national or international telephone numbering plans;
+
1. Member States shall cooperate with each other and with the Commission in the strategic planning, coordination and harmonisation of the use of radio spectrum in the Union. To this end, they shall take into consideration, inter alia, the economic, safety, health, public interest, public security and defence, freedom of expression, cultural, scientific, social and technical aspects of EU policies as well as the various interests of radio spectrum user communities with the aim of optimising the use of radio spectrum and avoiding harmful interference.
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(6) ‘number-based interpersonal communications service’ means an interpersonal communications service which connects with the public switched telephone network, either by means of assigned numbering resources, i.e. a number or numbers in national or international telephone numbering plans, or by enabling communication with a number or numbers in national or international telephone numbering plans''''', and where the provider of the service has substantial control over the network used for enabling the communication''''' ;
+
1. Member States shall cooperate with each other and with the Commission in the strategic planning, coordination and harmonisation of the use of radio spectrum in the Union. To this end, they shall take into consideration, inter alia, the economic, safety, health, public interest, public security and defence, '''''data protection and privacy,''''' freedom of expression, cultural, scientific, social and technical aspects of EU policies as well as the various interests of radio spectrum user communities with the aim of optimising the use of radio spectrum and avoiding harmful interference.
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
''Justification: There is a need to differentiate between services delivered over their own infrastructure and therefore can control the quality of the service and services which do not have such a control. In accordance with rule 104 of the rules of procedure, this amendment is necessary for pressing reasons related to the internal logic of the text''
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Pas compris, quelle contrôle "significant" pour les MVNO ?
+
Includes data protection
  
  
=== Amendment 323 / ===
+
=== Amendment 393 - ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 323'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 393'''<br/>
 
Barbara Kappel, Angelo Ciocca, Lorenzo Fontana<br/>
 
Barbara Kappel, Angelo Ciocca, Lorenzo Fontana<br/>
 
'''ENF'''<br/>
 
'''ENF'''<br/>
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 6
+
Article 4 – paragraph 1
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(6) ‘number-based interpersonal communications service’ means an interpersonal communications service '''''which connects with the public switched telephone network, either''''' by means of '''''assigned numbering resources, i.e.''''' a number '''''or numbers in national or international''''' telephone numbering '''''plans, or by enabling communication with''''' a number or numbers in national or international telephone numbering plans;
+
1. Member States shall cooperate with each other and with the Commission in the strategic planning, coordination and harmonisation of the use of radio spectrum '''''in the Union. To this end, they shall''''' take into consideration, inter alia, the economic, safety, health, public interest, public security and defence, freedom of expression, cultural, scientific, social and technical aspects of EU policies as well as the various interests of radio spectrum user communities with the aim of optimising the use of radio spectrum and avoiding harmful interference.
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(6) 'number-based interpersonal communications service' means an interpersonal communications service '''''for receiving communications''''' by means of '''''an assignment of''''' a number '''''in the national''''' telephone numbering '''''plan, or for originating communications to''''' a number or numbers in national or international telephone numbering plans;
+
1. Member States shall cooperate with each other and with the Commission in the strategic planning, coordination and harmonisation of the use of radio spectrum''''', a scarce resource that belongs to the Member States. They might''''' take into consideration, inter alia, the economic, safety, health, public interest, public security and defence, freedom of expression, cultural, scientific, social and technical aspects of EU policies as well as the various interests of radio spectrum user communities with the aim of optimising the use of radio spectrum and avoiding harmful interference.
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Précision sur la définition de number-based service, à confirmer avec notre position
+
We promotes the shared spectrum => emphasizing that spectrum belongs to the MS would diminish the scope and possibility to develop the shared spectrum.
  
  
=== Amendment 324 / ===
+
=== Amendment 403 + ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 324'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 403'''<br/>
Kaja Kallas<br/>
+
Michel Reimon<br/>
'''ALDE'''<br/>
+
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 7
+
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – indent 8
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(7) 'number-independent interpersonal communications service' means an interpersonal communications service which does not connect with the public switched telephone network, either by means of assigned numbering resources, i.e. a number or numbers in national or international telephone numbering plans, or by enabling communication with a number or numbers in national or international telephone numbering plans;
+
- '''''dealing with issues''''' related to open internet access;
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(7) 'number-independent interpersonal communications service' means an interpersonal communications service which does not connect with the public switched telephone network, either by means of assigned numbering resources, i.e. a number or numbers in national or international telephone numbering plans, or by enabling communication with a number or numbers in national or international telephone numbering plans '''''or where a number-based interpersonal communication service provider does not have substantial control over the network used for enabling the communication''''';
+
- '''''ensuring compliance with rules''''' related to open internet access;
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
''Justification: There is a need to differentiate between services delivered over their own infrastructure and therefore can control the quality of the service and services which do not have such a control. In accordance with rule 104 of the rules of procedure, this amendment is necessary for pressing reasons related to the internal logic of the text''
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Inverse du 322, à revoir
+
Reinforce the importance of the open internet access rules
  
  
=== Amendment 325 - ===
+
=== Amendment 404 + ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 325'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 404'''<br/>
Barbara Kappel, Angelo Ciocca, Lorenzo Fontana<br/>
+
Eva Kaili<br/>
'''ENF'''<br/>
+
'''S&D'''<br/>
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 7
+
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – indent 8
 
|-
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(7) 'number-independent interpersonal communications service' means an interpersonal communications service which does not connect with the public switched telephone network, either by means of assigned numbering resources, i.e. a number or numbers in '''''national or international''''' telephone numbering '''''plans''''', or by enabling communication with a number or numbers in national or international telephone numbering plans;
+
- '''''dealing with issues''''' related to open internet access;
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(7) 'number-independent interpersonal communications service' means an interpersonal communications service which does not connect with the public switched telephone network, either by means of assigned numbering resources, i.e. a number or numbers in '''''the national''''' telephone numbering '''''plan''''', or by enabling communication with a number or numbers in national or international telephone numbering plans; '''''it does not include information society services that allow interpersonal and interactive communication as a secondary feature;'''''
+
- '''''ensuring compliance with rules''''' related to open internet access;
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Excludes information society services that allow interpersonal and interactive communication as a secondary feature from the scope
+
Same as 403 - Reinforce the importance of the open internet access rules
 +
 
  
=== Amendment 326 - ===
+
=== Amendment 415 ++ ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 326'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 415'''<br/>
Evžen Tošenovský<br/>
+
Michel Reimon<br/>
'''ECR'''<br/>
+
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 11
+
Article 10 – paragraph 2 a (new)
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
 
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
'''''2 a.''''' '''''Member States shall ensure that national regulatory authorities apply Regulation 2015/2120 and BEREC Guidelines adopted pursuant to Article 5.3 of the abovementioned Regulation and coordinate within BEREC with other national regulatory authorities when implementing it.'''''
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
| colspan='2' |
(11) ‘associated services’ means those services associated with an electronic communications network and/or an electronic communications service which enable and/or support the provision of services''''', self-provision or automated-provision''''' via that network and/or service or have the potential to do so and include, inter alia, number translation or systems offering equivalent functionality, conditional access systems and electronic programme guides, '''''voice command, multi-language or language translation''''' as well as other services such as identity, location and presence service;
+
''Justification: The implementation of the regulation 2015/2120 is made on a national basis without any coordination of national regulation authorities, despite the BEREC guidelines.A harmonised implementation within the EU is of the utmost importance for predictability of law and for ensuring end-users rights.''
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
(11) 'associated services' means those services associated with an electronic communications network and/or an electronic communications service which enable and/or support the provision of services via that network and/or service or have the potential to do so and include, inter alia, number translation or systems offering equivalent functionality, conditional access systems and electronic programme guides, as well as other services such as identity, location and presence service;
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Dérégulation
+
The implementation of the regulation 2015/2120 is made on a national basis without any coordination of national regulation authorities, despite the BEREC guidelines. A harmonised implementation within the EU is of the utmost importance for predictability of law and for ensuring end-users rights.
  
  
=== Amendment 327 + ===
+
=== Amendment 417 ++ ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 327'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 417'''<br/>
Barbara Kappel, Angelo Ciocca, Lorenzo Fontana<br/>
+
Morten Helveg Petersen<br/>
'''ENF'''<br/>
+
'''ALDE'''<br/>
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 15 a (new)
+
Article 12 – paragraph 1
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 
+
1. Member States shall ensure the freedom to provide electronic communications networks and services, subject to the conditions set out in this Directive. To this end, Member States shall not prevent an undertaking from providing electronic communications networks or services, except where this is necessary for the reasons set out in Article 52 (1) of the Treaty. Any such limitation to the freedom to provide electronic communications networks and services shall be duly reasoned '''''and shall be''''' notified to the Commission.
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
'''''(15 a)''''' ''''''subscriber' means any person or legal entity who or which is party to a contract with the provider of publicly available electronic communications services for the supply of such services;'''''
+
1. Member States shall ensure the freedom to provide electronic communications networks and services, subject to the conditions set out in this Directive. To this end, Member States shall not prevent an undertaking from providing electronic communications networks or services, except where this is necessary for the reasons set out in Article 52 (1) of the Treaty. Any such limitation to the freedom to provide electronic communications networks and services shall be duly reasoned''''', provided for by law, respect the essence of the rights and freedoms recognised by the Charter and be subject to the principle of proportionality, in accordance with Article 52 (1) of the Charter and''''' notified to the Commission.
 
|}
 
|}
  
 +
=== Amendment 420 - ===
  
Définition de subscriber
+
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
+
|-
 +
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
 +
'''Amendment 420'''<br/>
 +
Michał Boni, Françoise Grossetête, Anne Sander<br/>
 +
'''EPP'''<br/>
 +
Article 18 – paragraph 1
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
1. Member States shall ensure that the rights, conditions and procedures concerning general authorisations and rights of use for radio spectrum or for numbers or rights to install facilities may only be amended in objectively justified cases and in a proportionate manner, taking into consideration, where appropriate, the specific conditions applicable to transferable rights of use for radio spectrum and for numbers.
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
1. Member States shall ensure that the rights, conditions and procedures concerning general authorisations and rights of use for radio spectrum or for numbers or rights to install facilities may only be amended in objectively justified cases and in a proportionate manner, taking into consideration, where appropriate, the specific conditions applicable to transferable rights of use for radio spectrum and for numbers. '''''In the case of right of use for spectrum, the right holder shall have the right to object to any proposed amendment based on its existing and future spectrum usage plan and the need to safeguard investment.'''''
 +
|-
 +
| colspan='2' |
 +
''Justification: Legal certainty as to spectrum usage rights is key to the promotion of investment in mobile networks and in particular in the next generation of mobile, 5G. It is proposed that operators be given the opportunity of objecting to spectrum rights changes on the basis of limited conditions such as future networks spectrum usage plans and the need to safeguard investment not yet fully depreciated.''
 +
|}
  
=== Amendment 328 + ===
+
=== Amendment 430 + ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 328'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 430'''<br/>
Michel Reimon<br/>
+
José Blanco López, Inmaculada Rodríguez-Piñero Fernández, Soledad Cabezón Ruiz<br/>
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
+
'''S&D'''<br/>
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 20
+
Article 20 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(20) ‘harmful interference’ means interference which endangers the functioning of a radio navigation service or of other safety services or which otherwise seriously degrades, obstructs or repeatedly interrupts a radio communications service operating in accordance with the applicable international, Union or national regulations;
+
Member States shall ensure that '''''undertakings providing electronic communications networks and services associated facilities, or associated services provide all the''''' information, including financial information, '''''necessary for national regulatory authorities, other competent authorities and BEREC to''''' ensure conformity with the provisions of, or decisions made in accordance with, this Directive. In particular, national regulatory authorities shall have the power to require those undertakings to submit information concerning '''''future''''' network or service developments that could have an impact on the wholesale services that they make available to competitors. They may also require information on electronic communications networks and associated facilities which is disaggregated at local level and sufficiently detailed for the national regulatory authority to be able to conduct the geographical survey and to designate digital exclusion areas in accordance with Article 22. '''''In accordance with Article 29, national regulatory authorities may sanction undertakings deliberately providing misleading, erroneous or incomplete information.'''''
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(20) ‘harmful interference’ means interference which endangers the functioning of a radio navigation service or of other safety '''''and mission-critical''''' services or which otherwise seriously degrades, obstructs or repeatedly interrupts a radio communications service operating in accordance with the applicable international, Union or national regulations;
+
Member States shall ensure that '''''national regulatory authorities, other competent authorities and BEREC have legal powers to request''''' information, including financial information, '''''from all relevant parties necessary to fulfilling their tasks and''''' ensure conformity with the provisions of, or decisions made in accordance with, this Directive. In particular, national regulatory authorities shall have the power to require those undertakings to submit information concerning network or service developments that could have an impact on the wholesale services that they make available to competitors. They may also require information on electronic communications networks and associated facilities which is disaggregated at local level and sufficiently detailed for the national regulatory authority to be able to conduct the geographical survey and to designate digital exclusion areas in accordance with Article 22.
|}
 
 
 
 
 
Service de sécurité et d'urgence
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 329 + ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' |
'''Amendment 329'''<br/>
+
''Justification: NRAs should have legal powers to request information to carry out their duties from any undertaking, whether or not it is defined as Electronic Communication Network/Service provider. This information is particularly relevant for market analyses''
Françoise Grossetête, Anne Sander<br/>
 
'''EPP'''<br/>
 
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 20
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
(20) ‘harmful interference’ means interference which endangers the functioning of a radio navigation service or of other safety services or which otherwise seriously degrades, obstructs or repeatedly interrupts a radio communications service operating in accordance with the applicable international, Union or national regulations;
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
(20) ‘harmful interference’ means interference which endangers the functioning of a radio navigation service or of other safety '''''and mission-critical''''' services or which otherwise seriously degrades, obstructs or repeatedly interrupts a radio communications service operating in accordance with the applicable international, Union or national regulations;
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Idem 328
+
This AM reinforces the powers of NRAs to request information.
  
  
=== Amendment 330 + ===
+
=== Amendment 565 ++ ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 330'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 565'''<br/>
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Dan Nica, Edouard Martin, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Jeppe Kofod, Martina Werner<br/>
+
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Dan Nica, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Jeppe Kofod, Martina Werner<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 20
+
Article 40 – paragraph 1
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(20) ‘harmful interference’ means interference which endangers the functioning of a radio navigation service or of other safety services or which otherwise seriously degrades, obstructs or repeatedly interrupts a radio communications service operating in accordance with the applicable international, Union or national regulations;
+
1. Member States shall ensure that undertakings providing public communications networks or publicly available electronic communications services take appropriate technical and organisational measures to appropriately manage the risks posed to security of networks and services. Having regard to the state of the art, these measures shall ensure a level of security appropriate to the risk presented. In particular, measures shall be taken to prevent and minimise the impact of security incidents on users and on other networks and services.
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(20) 'harmful interference' means interference which endangers the functioning of a radio navigation service or of other safety '''''and mission-critical''''' services or which otherwise seriously degrades, obstructs or repeatedly interrupts a radio communications service operating in accordance with the applicable international, Union or national regulations;
+
1. Member States shall ensure that undertakings providing public communications networks or publicly available electronic communications services take appropriate technical and organisational measures to appropriately manage the risks posed to security of networks and services. Having regard to the state of the art, these measures shall ensure a level of security appropriate to the risk presented. In particular, measures shall be taken to '''''ensure that, when necessary for confidentiality, electronic communications content is encrypted from end-to-end by default, in order to''''' prevent and minimise the impact of security incidents on users and on other networks and services.
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
| colspan='2' |
''Justification: ERTMS is the European railway traffic management system controlling the spacing between trains and the respect of their speed limitation; thus providing safety-related mission-critical services to railway operations. It relies on a radio-based communication service. On-board ERTMS subsystems shall be protected against interference, fulfilling the requirements specified in Annex A of the technical specification for interoperability relating to the ‘control-command and signalling’ subsystems of the rail system in the European Union (EU) 2016 919, which otherwise would seriously endanger the functioning of ERTMS.''
+
''Justification: Encrypting communications content from end to end by default is the best way to effectively minimise the impact of security incidents.''
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Idem 328, 329
+
Encrypting communications content from end to end by default is the best way to effectively minimise the impact of security incidents.
  
  
=== Amendment 331 + ===
+
=== Amendment 566 ++ ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 331'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 566'''<br/>
José Blanco López<br/>
+
Eva Kaili<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 20
+
Article 40 – paragraph 1
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(20) ‘harmful interference’ means interference which endangers the functioning of a radio navigation service or of other safety services or which otherwise seriously degrades, obstructs or repeatedly interrupts a radio communications service operating in accordance with the applicable international, Union or national regulations;
+
1. Member States shall ensure that undertakings providing public communications networks or publicly available electronic communications services take appropriate technical and organisational measures to appropriately manage the risks posed to security of networks and services. Having regard to the state of the art, these measures shall ensure a level of security appropriate to the risk presented. In particular, measures shall be taken to prevent and minimise the impact of security incidents on users and on other networks and services.
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(20) 'harmful interference' means interference which endangers the functioning of a radio navigation service or of other safety '''''and mission-critical''''' services or which otherwise seriously degrades, obstructs or repeatedly interrupts a radio communications service operating in accordance with the applicable international, Union or national regulations;
+
1. Member States shall ensure that undertakings providing public communications networks or publicly available electronic communications services take appropriate technical and organisational measures to appropriately manage the risks posed to security of networks and services. Having regard to the state of the art, these measures shall ensure a level of security appropriate to the risk presented. In particular, measures shall be taken to '''''ensure that, when necessary for confidentiality, electronic communications content is encrypted from end-to-end by default, in order to''''' prevent and minimise the impact of security incidents on users and on other networks and services.
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Idem 328, 329, 330
+
Encrypting communications content from end to end by default is the best way to effectively minimise the impact of security incidents.
  
  
=== Amendment 332 + ===
+
=== Amendment 567 ++ ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 332'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 567'''<br/>
Morten Helveg Petersen<br/>
+
Michel Reimon<br/>
'''ALDE'''<br/>
+
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 22
+
Article 40 – paragraph 1
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
1. Member States shall ensure that undertakings providing public communications networks or publicly available electronic communications services take appropriate technical and organisational measures to appropriately manage the risks posed to security of networks and services. Having regard to the state of the art, these measures shall ensure a level of security appropriate to the risk presented. In particular, measures shall be taken to prevent and minimise the impact of security incidents on users and on other networks and services.
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
1. Member States shall ensure that undertakings providing public communications networks or publicly available electronic communications services take appropriate technical and organisational measures to '''''ensure that electronic communications content are encrypted from end-to-end by default, in order to''''' appropriately manage the risks posed to security of networks and services. Having regard to the state of the art, these measures shall ensure a level of security appropriate to the risk presented. In particular, measures shall be taken to prevent and minimise the impact of security incidents on users and on other networks and services.
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
| colspan='2' |
(22) ‘security’ of networks and services means the ability of electronic communications networks and services to resist, at a given level of confidence, any action that compromises the availability, authenticity, integrity or confidentiality of stored or transmitted or processed data or the related services offered by, or accessible via, those networks or services.
+
''Justification: Encrypting communications content from end to end by default is the only way to effectively minimise the impact of security incidents. Any other measure would barely has any effect.Furthermore, such an obligation would be the mere implementation of Directive 2002/58/EC, article 5(1), which prohibits any “kinds of interception or surveillance of communications (...) by persons other than users, without the consent of the users concerned”.''
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
(22) 'security' of networks and services means the '''''technical and structural''''' ability of electronic communications networks and services to resist, at a given level of confidence, any action that compromises the availability, authenticity, integrity or confidentiality of stored or transmitted or processed data or the related services offered by, or accessible via, those networks or services.
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Précision, impact ?
+
Encrypting communications content from end to end by default is the best way to effectively minimise the impact of security incidents.
  
=== Amendment 333 ++ ===
+
 
 +
=== Amendment 568 ++ ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 333'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 568'''<br/>
Michel Reimon<br/>
+
Kaja Kallas, Marietje Schaake<br/>
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
+
'''ALDE'''<br/>
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 23
+
Article 40 – paragraph 1
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(23) ‘general authorisation’ means a legal framework established by the Member State ensuring rights for the provision of electronic communications networks or services and laying down sector-specific obligations that may apply to all or to specific types of electronic communications networks and services, in accordance with this Directive.
+
1. Member States shall ensure that undertakings providing public communications networks or publicly available electronic communications services take appropriate technical and organisational measures to appropriately manage the risks posed to security of networks and services. Having regard to the state of the art, these measures shall ensure a level of security appropriate to the risk presented. In particular, measures shall be taken to prevent and minimise the impact of security incidents on users and on other networks and services.
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(23) ‘general authorisation’ means a legal framework established by the Member State ensuring rights for the provision of electronic communications networks or services and laying down sector-specific obligations that may apply to all or to specific types of electronic communications networks and services, in accordance with this Directive''''', excluding not-for-profit-services provided by individuals'''''.
+
1. Member States shall ensure that undertakings providing public communications networks or publicly available electronic communications services take appropriate technical and organisational measures to appropriately manage the risks posed to security of networks and services. Having regard to the state of the art, these measures shall ensure a level of security appropriate to the risk presented. In particular, measures shall be taken to '''''ensure that electronic communications content are encrypted from end-to-end by default, in order to''''' prevent and minimise the impact of security incidents on users and on other networks and services.
 +
|-
 +
| colspan='2' |
 +
''Justification: In accordance with rule 104 of the rules of procedure, this amendment is necessary for pressing reasons related to the internal logic of the text''
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
exclusion des obligations pour les non profits
+
Encrypting communications content from end to end by default is the best way to effectively minimise the impact of security incidents.
  
=== Amendment 334 - ===
+
 
 +
=== Amendment 570 + ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 334'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 570'''<br/>
Barbara Kappel, Angelo Ciocca, Lorenzo Fontana<br/>
+
Kaja Kallas, Marietje Schaake<br/>
'''ENF'''<br/>
+
'''ALDE'''<br/>
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 26
+
Article 40 – paragraph 1 a (new)
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(26) 'shared use of radio spectrum' means access by two or more users to use the same frequencies under a defined sharing arrangement, authorised by a national regulatory authority on the basis of a general authorisation, individual rights of use or a combination thereof''''', including regulatory approaches such as licenced shared access aiming to facilitate the shared use of a frequency band, subject to a binding agreement of all parties involved, in accordance with sharing rules as included in their rights of use so as to guarantee to all users predictable and reliable sharing arrangements, and without prejudice to the application of competition law''''';
+
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(26) 'shared use of radio spectrum' means access by two or more users to use the same frequencies under a defined sharing arrangement, authorised by a national regulatory authority on the basis of a general authorisation, individual rights of use or a combination thereof;
+
'''''1 a.''''' '''''Member States shall not impose any obligation to undertakings providing public communications networks or publicly available electronic communications services that would result in the weakening of the security of their networks and services.'''''
 
|}
 
|}
  
 
+
=== Amendment 575 + ===
dérégulation
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 335 -- ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #A60000; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 335'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 575'''<br/>
Evžen Tošenovský<br/>
+
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri<br/>
'''ECR'''<br/>
+
Article 40 – paragraph 3 subparagraph 4 a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 1 point 28
 
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(28) ‘access’ means the making available of facilities and/or services to another undertaking, under defined conditions, on either an exclusive or non-exclusive basis, for the purpose of providing electronic communications services, including when they are used for the delivery of information society services or broadcast content services. It covers inter alia: access to network elements and associated facilities, which may involve the connection of equipment, by fixed or non-fixed means (in particular this includes access to the local loop and to facilities and services necessary to provide services over the local loop); access to physical infrastructure including buildings, ducts and masts; access to relevant software systems including operational support systems; access to information systems or databases for pre-ordering, provisioning, ordering, maintaining and repair requests, and billing; access to number translation or systems offering equivalent functionality; access to fixed and mobile networks, '''''including software emulated networks,''''' in particular for roaming; access to conditional access systems for digital television services and access to virtual network services;
+
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(28) 'access' means the making available of facilities and/or services to another undertaking, under defined conditions, on either an exclusive or non-exclusive basis, for the purpose of providing electronic communications services, including when they are used for the delivery of information society services or broadcast content services. It covers inter alia: access to network elements and associated facilities, which may involve the connection of equipment, by fixed or non-fixed means (in particular this includes access to the local loop and to facilities and services necessary to provide services over the local loop); access to physical infrastructure including buildings, ducts and masts; access to relevant software systems including operational support systems; access to information systems or databases for pre-ordering, provisioning, ordering, maintaining and repair requests, and billing; access to number translation or systems offering equivalent functionality; access to fixed and mobile networks, in particular for roaming; access to conditional access systems for digital television services and access to virtual network services;
+
'''''Member States shall ensure that in case of a particular risk of a security incident in public communications networks or publicly available electronic communications services providers of such networks or services shall inform their end-users of such a risk and of any possible protective measures or remedies which can be taken by the end-users.'''''
 
|}
 
|}
  
 
+
=== Amendment 578 + ===
exclusion des réseaux privés virtuel (genre via VPN) ou locaux (LAN)
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 336 -- ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #A60000; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 336'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 578'''<br/>
Barbara Kappel, Angelo Ciocca, Lorenzo Fontana<br/>
+
Kaja Kallas, Marietje Schaake<br/>
'''ENF'''<br/>
+
'''ALDE'''<br/>
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 32
+
Article 40 – paragraph 5 a (new)
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(32) voice communications’ means a service made available to the public for originating and receiving, directly or indirectly, national or national '''''and international''''' calls through a number or numbers in a national or international telephone numbering plan;
+
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(32) '''''''''''voice communications '''''service'''''' means a '''''number-based interpersonal communications''''' service made available to the public for originating and receiving, directly or indirectly, national or national calls through a number or numbers in a national or international telephone numbering plan;
+
'''''5 a.''''' '''''By ...[date] in order to contribute to the consistent application of measures for the security of networks and services, ENISA, shall, after consulting stakeholders and in close cooperation with the Commission and BEREC issue guidelines on minimum criteria and common approaches for the security of networks and services and the promotion of the use of end-to-end encryption.'''''
 
|}
 
|}
  
 
+
=== Amendment 601 + ===
retrait de la VOIP comme service non-numbered based
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 414 / ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 414'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 601'''<br/>
Edouard Martin<br/>
+
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Dan Nica, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Jeppe Kofod<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
Article 10 – paragraph 2
+
Article 45 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point e
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
2. Member States shall ensure that national regulatory authorities take utmost account of opinions '''''and''''' common positions adopted by BEREC when adopting their own decisions for their national markets.
+
(e) promoting the shared use of radio spectrum between similar and/or different uses of spectrum through appropriate established sharing rules and conditions, including the protection of existing rights of use, in accordance with Union law;
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
2. Member States shall ensure that national regulatory authorities take utmost account of opinions''''',''''' common positions '''''or decisions''''' adopted by BEREC when adopting their own decisions for their national markets.
+
(e) promoting the shared use of radio spectrum between similar and/or different uses of spectrum'''''; promoting competition''''' through appropriate established sharing rules and conditions, including the protection of existing rights of use, in accordance with Union law;
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
| colspan='2' |
''Justification: If BEREC is to become an agency, its role and powers should be enhanced adequately (especially in articles 32-33)''
+
''Justification: Competition criteria in radio spectrum procedures are important when the procedures are designed. Fair and non-discriminatory wholesale access conditions and consumer choice should be enhanced.''
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Comprends pas l'intérêt
+
Competition criteria in radio spectrum procedures is important. Fair and non-discriminatory wholesale access conditions and consumer choice should be enhanced.
  
Quota : J'ai l'impression que le cadre est plus lâche, on peut choisir d'ignorer le BEREC sur un des deux points (décisions OU positions).
+
=== Amendment 602 + ===
 
 
=== Amendment 415 + ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 415'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 602'''<br/>
Michel Reimon<br/>
+
David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano<br/>
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
+
'''EFDD'''<br/>
Article 10 – paragraph 2 a (new)
+
Article 45 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point e
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 
+
(e) promoting the shared use of radio spectrum between similar and/or different uses of spectrum through appropriate established sharing rules and conditions, including the protection of existing rights of use, in accordance with Union law;
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
'''''2 a.''''' '''''Member States shall ensure that national regulatory authorities apply Regulation 2015/2120 and BEREC Guidelines adopted pursuant to Article 5.3 of the abovementioned Regulation and coordinate within BEREC with other national regulatory authorities when implementing it.'''''
+
(e) promoting the shared use of radio spectrum between similar and/or different uses of spectrum '''''promoting competition''''' through appropriate established sharing rules and conditions, including the protection of existing rights of use, in accordance with Union law;
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
| colspan='2' |
''Justification: The implementation of the regulation 2015/2120 is made on a national basis without any coordination of national regulation authorities, despite the BEREC guidelines. A harmonised implementation within the EU is of the utmost importance for predictability of law and for ensuring end-users rights.Amendment''
+
''Justification: The amendment aims to promote competition in radio spectrum assignment procedures.''
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Coordination ++ entre MS dans l'implémentation du travail du BEREC
+
Same as AM 601 - The amendment aims to promote competition in radio spectrum assignment procedures.
  
=== Amendment 565 ++ ===
+
 
 +
=== Amendment 603 ++ ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 565'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 603'''<br/>
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Dan Nica, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Jeppe Kofod, Martina Werner<br/>
+
Michel Reimon<br/>
'''S&D'''<br/>
+
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
Article 40 – paragraph 1
+
Article 45 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point e a (new)
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
1. Member States shall ensure that undertakings providing public communications networks or publicly available electronic communications services take appropriate technical and organisational measures to appropriately manage the risks posed to security of networks and services. Having regard to the state of the art, these measures shall ensure a level of security appropriate to the risk presented. In particular, measures shall be taken to prevent and minimise the impact of security incidents on users and on other networks and services.
+
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
1. Member States shall ensure that undertakings providing public communications networks or publicly available electronic communications services take appropriate technical and organisational measures to appropriately manage the risks posed to security of networks and services. Having regard to the state of the art, these measures shall ensure a level of security appropriate to the risk presented. In particular, measures shall be taken to '''''ensure that, when necessary for confidentiality, electronic communications content is encrypted from end-to-end by default, in order to''''' prevent and minimise the impact of security incidents on users and on other networks and services.
+
'''''(e a)''''' '''''The Commission shall establish a programme aiming to release spectrum for shared and unlicensed uses. This programme shall include the development of a European database of shared and unlicensed spectrum.'''''
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
| colspan='2' |
''Justification: Encrypting communications content from end to end by default is the best way to effectively minimise the impact of security incidents.''
+
''Justification: Innovation and freedom of expression need a broad access to shared and unlicensed uses of , as stressed in article 6 of the 2012 Radio Spectrum Policy Programme. Increasing this access is thus a major challenge. Following the success of the release of the 1,2 Ghz frequencies within the Radio spectrum policy programme (Article 3 of Decision 243/2012/EU), the European Commission shall launch such a programme aiming at the release of shared spectrum. A database of shared spectrum would greatly facilitate and encourage the release of shared spectrum.''
 
|}
 
|}
  
 
+
=== Amendment 636 - ===
Chiffrement par défaut
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 566 ++ ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 566'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 636'''<br/>
Eva Kaili<br/>
+
Kaja Kallas, Marietje Schaake<br/>
'''S&D'''<br/>
+
'''ALDE'''<br/>
Article 40 – paragraph 1
+
Article 46 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 – introductory part
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
'''''When applying a general authorisation or individual rights taking in account measures adopted under Decision No 676/2002/EC where the radio spectrum band concerned has been harmonised, Member States''''' shall '''''seek to minimise problems of harmful interference, including in cases of shared use of radio spectrum on the basis of a combination of general authorisation and individual rights of use. In so doing, they shall have regard to the need:'''''
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
'''''2. Where appropriate, Member States shall consider the possibility to authorise the use of radio spectrum based on a combination of general authorisation and individual rights of use. They''''' shall '''''in particular consider the possibility of the gradual transfer from general authorisation to individual rights of use where necessary to foster innovation and facilitate market entry of smaller market participants. They shall favour technological solutions for the management of potential harmful interference with a view to choose the least restrictive authorisation regime possible.'''''
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
| colspan='2' |
1. Member States shall ensure that undertakings providing public communications networks or publicly available electronic communications services take appropriate technical and organisational measures to appropriately manage the risks posed to security of networks and services. Having regard to the state of the art, these measures shall ensure a level of security appropriate to the risk presented. In particular, measures shall be taken to prevent and minimise the impact of security incidents on users and on other networks and services.
+
''Justification: There is a need to simplify the procedure as proposed. In addition, in accordance with rule 104 of the rules of procedure, this amendment is necessary for pressing reasons related to the internal logic of the text''
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
1. Member States shall ensure that undertakings providing public communications networks or publicly available electronic communications services take appropriate technical and organisational measures to appropriately manage the risks posed to security of networks and services. Having regard to the state of the art, these measures shall ensure a level of security appropriate to the risk presented. In particular, measures shall be taken to '''''ensure that, when necessary for confidentiality, electronic communications content is encrypted from end-to-end by default, in order to''''' prevent and minimise the impact of security incidents on users and on other networks and services.
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
 
+
=== Amendment 645 - ===
Idem 565
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 567 ++ ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 567'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 645'''<br/>
Michel Reimon<br/>
+
Kaja Kallas, Marietje Schaake<br/>
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
+
'''ALDE'''<br/>
Article 40 – paragraph 1
+
Article 46 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 a (new)
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
 
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
'''''When authorising the shared use of spectrum, Member States shall minimise the restrictions to the use of radio spectrum to what is necessary to avoid harmful interference, including by limiting to the best extent possible the application of the non-interference, non-protection principle. Where such principles shall apply, Member States shall take measures to ensure protection against out-of-and interference from adjacent bands.'''''
 +
|}
 +
 
 +
=== Amendment 665 + ===
 +
 
 +
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
1. Member States shall ensure that undertakings providing public communications networks or publicly available electronic communications services take appropriate technical and organisational measures to appropriately manage the risks posed to security of networks and services. Having regard to the state of the art, these measures shall ensure a level of security appropriate to the risk presented. In particular, measures shall be taken to prevent and minimise the impact of security incidents on users and on other networks and services.
+
'''Amendment 665'''<br/>
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
András Gyürk<br/>
1. Member States shall ensure that undertakings providing public communications networks or publicly available electronic communications services take appropriate technical and organisational measures to '''''ensure that electronic communications content are encrypted from end-to-end by default, in order to''''' appropriately manage the risks posed to security of networks and services. Having regard to the state of the art, these measures shall ensure a level of security appropriate to the risk presented. In particular, measures shall be taken to prevent and minimise the impact of security incidents on users and on other networks and services.
+
'''EPP'''<br/>
 +
Article 49 – paragraph 2
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' |
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
''Justification: Encrypting communications content from end to end by default is the only way to effectively minimise the impact of security incidents. Any other measure would barely has any effect.Furthermore, such an obligation would be the mere implementation of Directive 2002/58/EC, article 5(1), which prohibits any “kinds of interception or surveillance of communications (...) by persons other than users, without the consent of the users concerned”.''
+
'''''2.''''' '''''Where Member States grant rights of use for harmonised radio spectrum for a limited period of time, those rights of use for harmonised radio spectrum shall be valid for a duration of at least 25 years, except in the case of temporary rights, temporary extension of rights pursuant to paragraph 3 and rights for secondary use in harmonised bands.'''''
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
'''''deleted'''''
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Idem 565, 566
+
Removes the duration of 25 years licencing
  
 
+
=== Amendment 670 + ===
=== Amendment 568 ++ ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 568'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 670'''<br/>
 
Kaja Kallas, Marietje Schaake<br/>
 
Kaja Kallas, Marietje Schaake<br/>
 
'''ALDE'''<br/>
 
'''ALDE'''<br/>
Article 40 – paragraph 1
+
Article 49 – paragraph 2
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
1. Member States shall ensure that undertakings providing public communications networks or publicly available electronic communications services take appropriate technical and organisational measures to appropriately manage the risks posed to security of networks and services. Having regard to the state of the art, these measures shall ensure a level of security appropriate to the risk presented. In particular, measures shall be taken to prevent and minimise the impact of security incidents on users and on other networks and services.
+
2. Where Member States grant rights of use for harmonised radio spectrum for a limited period of time, those rights of use for harmonised radio spectrum shall be valid for a duration of '''''at least''''' 25 years, except in the case of temporary rights, temporary extension of rights pursuant to paragraph 3 and rights for secondary use in harmonised bands.
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
1. Member States shall ensure that undertakings providing public communications networks or publicly available electronic communications services take appropriate technical and organisational measures to appropriately manage the risks posed to security of networks and services. Having regard to the state of the art, these measures shall ensure a level of security appropriate to the risk presented. In particular, measures shall be taken to '''''ensure that electronic communications content are encrypted from end-to-end by default, in order to''''' prevent and minimise the impact of security incidents on users and on other networks and services.
+
2. Where Member States grant rights of use for harmonised radio spectrum for a limited period of time, those rights of use for harmonised radio spectrum shall be valid for a '''''maximum''''' duration of 25 years, except in the case of temporary rights, temporary extension of rights pursuant to paragraph 3 and rights for secondary use in harmonised bands.'''''Where rights of use have been granted for a duration of 25 years, Member states shall conduct reviews at regular intervals of every 5 years to assess if the use of spectrum is the most efficient in light of technological or market evolution, and where justified and necessary shall amend such rights in accordance with articles 50 and 51.'''''
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
| colspan='2' |
Ligne 886 : Ligne 881 :
  
  
Idem 565, 566, 567
+
Maximum 25 years with a review every 5 years
  
  
=== Amendment 569 / ===
+
=== Amendment 674 ++ ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 569'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 674'''<br/>
Evžen Tošenovský<br/>
+
Michel Reimon<br/>
'''ECR'''<br/>
+
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
Article 40 – paragraph 1
+
Article 49 – paragraph 2
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
2. Where Member States grant rights of use for harmonised radio spectrum for a limited period of time, those rights of use for harmonised radio spectrum shall be valid for a duration of '''''at least''''' 25 years, '''''except in the case of temporary rights, temporary extension of rights pursuant to paragraph 3 and rights for secondary use in harmonised bands'''''.
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
2. Where Member States grant rights of use for harmonised radio spectrum for a limited period of time, those rights of use for harmonised radio spectrum shall be valid for a '''''maximum''''' duration of 25 years, '''''reviewed at regular intervals of maximum 5 years for assessing and amending the rights according to laydown procedures'''''.
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
| colspan='2' |
1. Member States shall ensure that undertakings providing public communications networks or publicly available electronic communications services take appropriate technical and organisational measures to appropriately manage the risks posed to security of networks and services. Having regard to the state of the art, these measures shall ensure a level of security appropriate to the risk presented. In particular, measures shall be taken to prevent and minimise the impact of security incidents on users and on other networks and services.
+
''Justification: The draft Code proposes to extend to a minimum of 25 years the duration of rights to use the radio spectrum. This is disproportionate and unnecessary. Experience shows us that 20 years is already too long, especially considering that the regulation does not enable regulators to act when necessary, e.g. by withdrawing authorisation, even if the operator fails to honor its commitments. Allocating spectrum for more than 5 years would necessitate adding a revision clause/sunset date regularly, with sanctions if the operator fails its obligations. The maximum length of allocation shall be 25 years, with such scheduled sunset dates.The "use it or lose it" clause proposed in the Code is insufficient to enable NRAs to withdraw authorisation if necessary. The capacities of the NRAs should thus be enhanced and more detailed in order to control the use of the licences, preventing holders from "parking" frequencies for too long, thereby hindering connectivity and innovation.''
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
1. Member States shall ensure that undertakings providing public communications networks or publicly available '''''number-based''''' electronic communications services take appropriate technical and organisational measures to appropriately manage the risks posed to security of networks and services. Having regard to the state of the art, these measures shall ensure a level of security appropriate to the risk presented. In particular, measures shall be taken to prevent and minimise the impact of security incidents on users and on other networks and services.
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
 
+
=== Amendment 702 ++ ===
What about public funded OTT (genre l'application SAIP)
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 570 + ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 570'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 702'''<br/>
Kaja Kallas, Marietje Schaake<br/>
+
Michel Reimon<br/>
'''ALDE'''<br/>
+
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
Article 40 – paragraph 1 a (new)
+
Article 55 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
Where that provision is not commercial in character or is ancillary to another commercial activity or public service which is not dependent on the conveyance of signals on those networks, any undertaking, public authority or '''''end-user''''' providing such access shall not be subject to any general authorisation for the provision of electronic communications networks or services pursuant to Article 12, to obligations regarding '''''end-users''''' rights pursuant to Title III of Part III of this Directive nor to obligations to interconnect their networks pursuant to Article 59 (1).
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
Where that provision is not commercial in character or is ancillary to another commercial activity or public service which is not dependent on the conveyance of signals on those networks, any undertaking, public authority or '''''user''''' providing such access shall not be subject to any general authorisation for the provision of electronic communications networks or services pursuant to Article 12, to obligations regarding '''''users''''' rights pursuant to Title III of Part III of this Directive nor to obligations to interconnect their networks pursuant to Article 59 (1). '''''Individuals providing such access not-for-profit shall not be liable for information transmitted by third parties over such access.'''''
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
| colspan='2' |
 
+
''Justification: The Proposal intends to foster the development of radio local area networks, especially where they provide services which are not commercial in character. The development of such networks mainly depends on the personal participation of individual volunteers, who expend the networks by managing their own relays and access points. However, such a participation is hindered by several laws which seek to prevent the sharing of Internet connections amongst several users by making people responsible (and potentially liable) for all communication made through their Wi-Fi connection, and create legal risks for people sharing their connection.In Germany, rights-holders have used a "secondary liability" doctrine to chill the growth of the community networks movement. In France too, copyright law imposes a secondary liability regime that creates significant legal uncertainty for people sharing their network connections with other users. The so-called "mere conduit", inscribed in EU law since 2000 in the directive on information society services, needs to be clearly guaranteed and expanded to small-area wireless access points.In the same spirit, contract clauses that forbid subscribers to share their connections with others should be prohibited in any case: the possibility to share their connections should not be limited to specific offers.Promoting a right to share Internet connections is all the more vital considering the economic and ecological crises, as well as the rapid increase of populations that cannot afford access to the Internet. In this context, connection sharing can play a critical role in fostering a more equitable and sustainable use of telecommunications infrastructure.''
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
'''''1 a.''''' '''''Member States shall not impose any obligation to undertakings providing public communications networks or publicly available electronic communications services that would result in the weakening of the security of their networks and services.'''''
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Impératif de sécurité pour tout service de communication électronic qui a un financement public
+
This AM aims to avoid legal risks for people sharing their connection
  
  
=== Amendment 571 + ===
+
=== Amendment 703 ++ ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 571'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 703'''<br/>
Evžen Tošenovský<br/>
+
Kaja Kallas, Marietje Schaake<br/>
'''ECR'''<br/>
+
'''ALDE'''<br/>
Article 40 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
+
Article 55 – paragraph 2
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
2. Competent authorities shall not prevent providers of public communications networks or publicly available electronic communications services from allowing access to their networks to the public, through radio local area networks, which may be located at an end-user's premises, subject to compliance with the applicable general authorisation conditions and the prior informed agreement of the end-user.
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
2. Competent authorities shall not prevent providers of public communications networks or publicly available electronic communications services from allowing access to their networks to the public, through radio local area networks, which may be located at an end-user's premises, subject to compliance with the applicable general authorisation conditions and the prior informed agreement of the end-user. '''''Individuals providing access to their networks for non-commercial purposes shall not be liable for information transmitted by third parties through the use of such access.'''''
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
| colspan='2' |
Member States shall ensure that undertakings providing public communications networks or publicly available electronic communications services notify without undue delay the competent authority of a '''''breach of security''''' that has had a significant impact on the operation of networks or services.
+
''Justification: In accordance with rule 104 of the rules of procedure, this amendment is necessary for pressing reasons related to the internal logic of the text''
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
Member States shall ensure that undertakings providing public communications networks or publicly available electronic communications services notify without undue delay the competent authority of a '''''security incident''''' that has had a significant impact on the operation of networks or services.
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Précision qu'un problème de sécurité n'est pas nécessairement une faille
+
This AM aims to avoid legal risks for people sharing their connection
  
  
=== Amendment 572 + ===
+
=== Amendment 706 ++ ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 572'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 706'''<br/>
Evžen Tošenovský<br/>
+
José Blanco López, Sergio Gutiérrez Prieto, Inmaculada Rodríguez-Piñero Fernández, Soledad Cabezón Ruiz<br/>
'''ECR'''<br/>
+
'''S&D'''<br/>
Article 40 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 – point d
+
Article 55 – paragraph 2 a (new)
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(d) the extent to which the functioning of the service is disrupted;
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
(d) the extent to which the functioning of the '''''network or''''' service is disrupted;
 
|}
 
  
 
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
Précision pour la sécurité sur les réseaux et pas seulement le service
+
'''''2 a.''''' '''''End-users allowing access to their internet access service as set out in paragraph 2 shall not be liable for any use that other end-users might do while connected to their network.'''''
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 573 / ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0; width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 573'''<br/>
 
Kaja Kallas, Marietje Schaake<br/>
 
'''ALDE'''<br/>
 
Article 40 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 – point e
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
'''''(e)''''' '''''the impact on economic and societal activities.'''''
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
'''''deleted'''''
 
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
| colspan='2' |
''Justification: There is a need to align these provisions with the NIS directive''
+
''Justification: Sharing of consumers' private Wi-Fi networks may bring benefits to consumers as they can use additional access points. However, it is imperative that such additional networks are only installed on consumers' private equipment with their explicit consent and that the consumer whose internet access service is being shared is under no circumstance responsible nor liable for any use that other person might do while connected to his Wi-Fi network.''
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Quel impact pour cet amendement ?
+
This AM aims to avoid legal risks for people sharing their connection
  
  
=== Amendment 574 / ===
+
=== Amendment 708 -- ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #A60000; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 574'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 708'''<br/>
 
Evžen Tošenovský<br/>
 
Evžen Tošenovský<br/>
 
'''ECR'''<br/>
 
'''ECR'''<br/>
Article 40 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 – point e
+
Article 55 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point a
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
'''''(e)''''' '''''the impact on economic and societal activities.'''''
+
'''''a)''''' '''''the right of end-users to accede to radio local area networks of their choice provided by third parties;'''''
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 
'''''deleted'''''
 
'''''deleted'''''
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Idem 573
+
This AM removes the right of users to accede to radio local area networks of their choice.
  
 
+
=== Amendment 710 -- ===
=== Amendment 575 + ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #A60000; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 575'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 710'''<br/>
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri<br/>
+
Evžen Tošenovský<br/>
'''S&D'''<br/>
+
'''ECR'''<br/>
Article 40 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 4 a (new)
+
Article 55 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point b
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 
+
'''''b)''''' '''''the right of end-users to allow reciprocally or more generally access to the networks of such providers by other end-users through radio local area networks, including on the basis of third-party initiatives which aggregate and make publicly accessible the radio local area networks of different end-users.'''''
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
'''''Member States shall ensure that in case of a particular risk of a security incident in public communications networks or publicly available electronic communications services providers of such networks or services shall inform their end-users of such a risk and of any possible protective measures or remedies which can be taken by the end-users.'''''
+
'''''deleted'''''
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Communication sur les incidents de sécurité
+
This AM removes the provisions giving end-users the rights to share their own access with other uses.
  
=== Amendment 576 / ===
+
=== Amendment 712 + ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 576'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 712'''<br/>
 
Evžen Tošenovský<br/>
 
Evžen Tošenovský<br/>
 
'''ECR'''<br/>
 
'''ECR'''<br/>
Article 40 – paragraph 5
+
Article 55 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
'''''5.''''' '''''The Commission, shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 109 with a view to specifying the measures referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2, including measures defining the circumstances, format and procedures applicable to notification requirements. The delegated acts shall be based on European and international standards to the greatest extent possible, and shall not prevent Member States from adopting additional requirements in order to pursue the objectives set out in paragraphs 1 and 2.'''''
+
'''''To that end, providers of public communications networks or publicly available electronic communications services shall make available and actively offer, clearly and transparently, products or specific offers allowing its end-users to provide access to third parties through a radio local area network.'''''
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 
'''''deleted'''''
 
'''''deleted'''''
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Pas compris
+
Contract clauses that forbid subscribers to share their connections with others should be prohibited in any case: the possibility to share their connections should not be limited to specific offers.
  
  
=== Amendment 577 / ===
+
=== Amendment 713 + ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 577'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 713'''<br/>
Kaja Kallas, Marietje Schaake<br/>
+
Michel Reimon<br/>
'''ALDE'''<br/>
+
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
Article 40 – paragraph 5
+
Article 55 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
5. The Commission, shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 109 with a view to specifying the measures referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2, including measures defining the circumstances, format and procedures applicable to notification requirements. The delegated acts shall be based on European and international standards to the greatest extent possible, and shall not prevent Member States from adopting additional requirements in order to pursue the objectives set out in paragraphs 1 and 2.
+
'''''To that end, providers of public communications networks or publicly available electronic communications services shall make available and actively offer, clearly and transparently, products or specific offers allowing its end-users to provide access to third parties through a radio local area network.'''''
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
5. The Commission, shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 109 with a view to specifying the measures referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2, including measures defining the circumstances, format and procedures applicable to notification requirements. The delegated acts shall be based on European and international standards to the greatest extent possible, and shall not prevent Member States from adopting additional requirements in order to pursue the objectives set out in paragraphs 1 and 2. '''''Where Member States impose additional requirements on undertakings providing public communications networks or publicly available electronic communications services in more than one Member state, they should notify these measures to the Commission and ENISA. ENISA shall assist Member states in coordinating the measures taken to avoid duplication or diverging requirements that may create security risks and barriers to the internal market.'''''
+
'''''deleted'''''
 +
|-
 +
| colspan='2' |
 +
''Justification: Contract clauses that forbid subscribers to share their connections with others should be prohibited in any case: the possibility to share their connections should not be limited to specific offers.''
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Notification à l'ENISA + coopération MS/ENISA
+
Contract clauses that forbid subscribers to share their connections with others should be prohibited in any case: the possibility to share their connections should not be limited to specific offers.
  
=== Amendment 578 + ===
+
 
 +
=== Amendment 717 + ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 578'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 717'''<br/>
Kaja Kallas, Marietje Schaake<br/>
+
Pervenche Berès, Edouard Martin<br/>
'''ALDE'''<br/>
+
'''S&D'''<br/>
Article 40 – paragraph 5 a (new)
+
Article 59 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 
+
Pour réaliser les objectifs exposés à l’article 3, les autorités de régulation nationales encouragent et, le cas échéant, assurent, conformément aux dispositions de la présente directive, un accès et une interconnexion adéquats, ainsi que l’interopérabilité des services et elles s’acquittent de leur tâche de façon à promouvoir l’efficacité économique, à favoriser une concurrence durable '''''et''''' le déploiement de réseaux à très haute capacité, à encourager des investissements efficients et l’innovation et à procurer un avantage maximal à l’utilisateur final. Elles fournissent des orientations et rendent publiques les procédures applicables pour l’obtention de l’accès et de l’interconnexion, afin que les petites et moyennes entreprises et les opérateurs actifs dans une zone géographique limitée puissent bénéficier des obligations imposées.
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
'''''5 a.''''' '''''By ...[date] in order to contribute to the consistent application of measures for the security of networks and services, ENISA, shall, after consulting stakeholders and in close cooperation with the Commission and BEREC issue guidelines on minimum criteria and common approaches for the security of networks and services and the promotion of the use of end-to-end encryption.'''''
+
Pour réaliser les objectifs exposés à l’article 3, les autorités de régulation nationales encouragent et, le cas échéant, assurent, conformément aux dispositions de la présente directive, un accès et une interconnexion adéquats, ainsi que l’interopérabilité des services et elles s’acquittent de leur tâche de façon à promouvoir l’efficacité économique, à favoriser une concurrence durable''''', le pluralisme des médias, la diversité culturelle,''''' le déploiement de réseaux à très haute capacité, à encourager des investissements efficients et l’innovation et à procurer un avantage maximal à l’utilisateur final. Elles fournissent des orientations et rendent publiques les procédures applicables pour l’obtention de l’accès et de l’interconnexion, afin que les petites et moyennes entreprises et les opérateurs actifs dans une zone géographique limitée puissent bénéficier des obligations imposées.
 
|}
 
|}
  
 
+
=== Amendment 722 / ===
ENISA + promotion du chiffrement
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 592 / ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 592'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 722'''<br/>
David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano<br/>
+
Michel Reimon<br/>
'''EFDD'''<br/>
+
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
Article 45 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
+
Article 59 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point c
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
Taking due account of the fact that radio spectrum is a public good that has an important social, cultural and economic value, Member States shall ensure the effective management of radio spectrum for electronic communications services and networks in their territory in accordance with Articles 3 and 4. They shall ensure that radio spectrum allocation used for electronic communications services and networks and issuing general authorisations or individual rights of use for such radio spectrum by competent authorities are based on objective, transparent, non-discriminatory and proportionate criteria.
+
'''''(c)''''' '''''in justified cases, obligations on providers of number-independent interpersonal communications services to make their services interoperable, namely where access to emergency services or end-to-end connectivity between end-users is endangered due to a lack of interoperability between interpersonal communications services.'''''
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
Taking due account of the fact that radio spectrum is a public good that has an important social, cultural and economic value, Member States shall ensure the effective management of radio spectrum for electronic communications services and networks in their territory in accordance with Articles 3 and 4. They shall ensure that radio spectrum allocation used for electronic communications services and networks and issuing general authorisations or individual rights of use for such radio spectrum by competent authorities are based on objective, transparent, '''''pro-competitive,''''' non-discriminatory and proportionate criteria.
+
'''''deleted'''''
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
''Justification: The amendment aims to promote competition criteria in radio spectrum assignment procedures.''
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
 
+
=== Amendment 731 ++ ===
Ajout du pro-competitive, pourquoi ?
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 593 / ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 593'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 731'''<br/>
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Dan Nica, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Jeppe Kofod, Martina Werner, Flavio Zanonato<br/>
+
Michel Reimon<br/>
'''S&D'''<br/>
+
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
Article 45 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
+
Article 59 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 – point i
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
Taking due account of the fact that radio spectrum is a public good that has an important social, cultural and economic value, Member States shall ensure the effective management of radio spectrum for electronic communications services and networks in their territory in accordance with Articles 3 and 4. They shall ensure that radio spectrum allocation used for electronic communications services and networks and issuing general authorisations or individual rights of use for such radio spectrum by competent authorities are based on objective, transparent, non-discriminatory and proportionate criteria.
+
(i) to the extent necessary to ensure interoperability of interpersonal communications services and may include '''''obligations relating to''''' the use '''''and implementation''''' of standards or specifications listed in Article 39(1) or of any other relevant European or international standards; and
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
Taking due account of the fact that radio spectrum is a public good that has an important social, cultural and economic value, Member States shall ensure the effective management of radio spectrum for electronic communications services and networks in their territory in accordance with Articles 3 and 4. They shall ensure that radio spectrum allocation used for electronic communications services and networks and issuing general authorisations or individual rights of use for such radio spectrum by competent authorities are based on objective, transparent, '''''pro-competitive,''''' non-discriminatory and proportionate criteria.
+
(i) to the extent necessary to ensure interoperability of interpersonal communications services and may include '''''an obligation to publish and authorize''''' the use''''', modification and redistribution of any relevant information or an obligation to use or implement''''' of standards or specifications listed in Article 39(1) or of any other relevant European or international standards; and
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
| colspan='2' |
''Justification: Member states should ensure that spectrum is allocated in a way that takes into account the possibility to promote competition in the markets.''
+
''Justification: Ensuring interoperability of interpersonal communications services requires that the technical information necessary to communicate with the users of such services can be freely accessed, used, modified and redistributed by anyone, whether this information is already public or held by the providers of these services. Encryption should not be jeopardized by such standards.''
 
|}
 
|}
  
 
+
=== Amendment 732 + ===
Idem 592
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 594 / ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 594'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 732'''<br/>
José Blanco López<br/>
+
Kaja Kallas, Marietje Schaake<br/>
'''S&D'''<br/>
+
'''ALDE'''<br/>
Article 45 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
+
Article 59 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 – point i
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
Taking due account of the fact that radio spectrum is a public good that has an important social, cultural and economic value, Member States shall ensure the effective management of radio spectrum for electronic communications services and networks in their territory in accordance with Articles 3 and 4. They shall ensure that radio spectrum allocation used for electronic communications services and networks and issuing general authorisations or individual rights of use for such radio spectrum by competent authorities are based on objective, transparent, non-discriminatory and proportionate criteria.
+
(i) to the extent necessary to ensure interoperability of interpersonal communications services and may include obligations relating to the use and implementation of standards or specifications listed in Article 39(1) or of any other relevant European or international standards; '''''and'''''
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
Taking due account of the fact that radio spectrum is a public good that has an important social, cultural and economic value, Member States shall ensure the effective management of radio spectrum for electronic communications services and networks in their territory in accordance with Articles 3 and 4. They shall ensure that radio spectrum allocation used for electronic communications services and networks and issuing general authorisations or individual rights of use for such radio spectrum by competent authorities are based on objective, transparent, '''''pro-competitive,''''' non-discriminatory and proportionate criteria.
+
(i) to the extent necessary to ensure interoperability of interpersonal communications services and may include obligations relating to the use and implementation of standards or specifications listed in Article 39(1) or of any other relevant European or international standards; '''''such obligations shall not lead to the weakening of security standards of these services.'''''
 +
|-
 +
| colspan='2' |
 +
''Justification: In accordance with rule 104 of the rules of procedure, this amendment is necessary for pressing reasons related to the internal logic of the text''
 
|}
 
|}
  
 +
=== Amendment 734 - ===
  
Idem 592, 592
+
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 +
|-
 +
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
 +
'''Amendment 734'''<br/>
 +
Angelika Niebler, Herbert Reul, Markus Pieper<br/>
 +
'''EPP'''<br/>
 +
Article 59 – paragraph 2
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-bottom:0em;'|
 +
'''''2.''''' '''''National regulatory authorities shall impose obligations upon reasonable request to grant access to wiring and cables inside buildings or up to the first concentration or distribution point where that point is located outside the building, on the owners of such wiring and cable or on undertakings that have the right to use such wiring and cables, where this is justified on the grounds that replication of such network elements would be economically inefficient or physically impracticable. The access conditions imposed may include specific rules on access, transparency and non-discrimination and for apportioning the costs of access, which, where appropriate, are adjusted to take into account risk factors.'''''
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-bottom:0em;'|
 +
'''''deleted'''''
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
'''''National regulatory authorities may extend to those owners or undertakings the imposition of such access obligations, on fair and reasonable terms and conditions, beyond the first concentration or distribution point to a concentration point as close as possible to end-users, to the extent strictly necessary to address insurmountable economic or physical barriers to replication in areas with lower population density.'''''
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
  
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
'''''National regulatory authorities shall not impose obligations in accordance with the second subparagraph where:'''''
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
  
=== Amendment 595 / ===
+
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
'''''(a)a viable and similar alternative means of access to end-users is made available to any undertaking, provided that the access is offered on fair and reasonable terms and conditions to a very high capacity network by an undertaking meeting the criteria listed in Article 77 paragraphs (a) and (b); and'''''
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
  
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em'|
'''Amendment 595'''<br/>
+
'''''(b)in the case of recently deployed network elements, in particular by smaller local projects, the granting of that access would compromise the economic or financial viability of their deployment.'''''
David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano<br/>
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em'|
'''EFDD'''<br/>
+
 
Article 45 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
(a) ensuring coverage of their national territory and population at high quality and speed, both indoors and outdoors, including along major transport paths, including the trans-European transport network;
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
(a) ensuring coverage of their national territory and population at high quality and speed, both indoors and outdoors, including along major transport paths, including the trans-European transport network '''''as defined in Regulation 1315/2013''''';
 
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
| colspan='2' |
''Justification: The reference to the Regulation clarifies the definition of TEN-T.''
+
''Justification: The EU cost reduction directive (2014/61/EU) contains additional elements of symmetrical regulation. The Commission is to submit a report on the implementation of this directive to the European Parliament and the Council by 1 July 2018. No action should be taken until the findings of the implementation report, which can provide a basis for deciding whether additional elements of symmetrical regulation are needed, are available.''
 
|}
 
|}
  
 
+
=== Amendment 735 - ===
Pas compris, vérifier les références
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 596 / ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 596'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 735'''<br/>
Michel Reimon<br/>
+
Kaja Kallas<br/>
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
+
'''ALDE'''<br/>
Article 45 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 point a
+
Article 59 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
National regulatory authorities shall impose obligations upon reasonable request to grant access to wiring and cables inside buildings or up to the first concentration or distribution point where that point is located outside the building''''',''''' on the owners of such wiring and cable or on undertakings that have the right to use such wiring and cables''''', where this is justified on the grounds that replication of such network elements would be economically inefficient or physically impracticable'''''. The access conditions imposed may include specific rules on access, '''''transparency and''''' non-discrimination and for apportioning the costs of access, which, where appropriate, are adjusted to take into account risk factors.
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
'''''Where this is justified on the grounds that replication of such network elements would be economically inefficient or technically impossible and the access to such elements is necessary to foster sustainable competition,''''' national regulatory authorities shall impose obligations upon reasonable request''''',''''' to grant access to wiring and cables inside buildings or up to the first concentration or distribution point where that point is located outside the building on the owners of such wiring and cable or on undertakings that have the right to use such wiring and cables. The access conditions imposed may include specific rules on access, '''''including where necessary to the required associated facilities, on transparency,''''' non-discrimination and for apportioning the costs of access, which, where appropriate, are adjusted to take into account risk factors.'''''Such obligations shall only be imposed following a market analysis procedure in accordance with article 65 and shall complement but not replace regulatory measures taken in accordance with article 66 to ensure the effectiveness of the actions of national regulatory authorities to comply with the objectives set out in article 3 of this Directive.'''''
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
| colspan='2' |
(a) ensuring coverage of their national territory and population at high quality and speed, both indoors and outdoors, including along major transport paths, including the trans-European transport network;
+
''Justification: Symmetric obligations being imposed on all undertaking without regard to their market power shall only be imposed where justified and necessary given their potential negative impact on investment and competition. They should therefore be linked to a market analysis procedure to prevent that they achieve the opposite goals that the obligations taken by regulators under the SMP regime seek to achieve. In accordance with rule 104 of the rules of procedure, this amendment is necessary for pressing reasons related to the internal logic of the text''
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
(a) ensuring coverage of their national territory and population at high quality and speed, both indoors and outdoors, including along major transport paths, including the trans-European transport network '''''as defined in Regulation 1315/2013''''';
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Vérifier la régulation de référence
+
Limits regulation possibilities
  
  
=== Amendment 597 / ===
+
=== Amendment 737 + ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 597'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 737'''<br/>
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Dan Nica, Martina Werner, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Jeppe Kofod<br/>
+
Eva Kaili<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
Article 45 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a
+
Article 59 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(a) ensuring coverage of their national territory and population at high quality and speed, both indoors and outdoors, including along major transport paths, including the trans-European transport network;
+
National regulatory authorities shall impose obligations '''''upon''''' reasonable '''''request''''' to grant access to wiring and cables inside buildings or up to the first concentration or distribution point where that point is located outside the building, on the owners of such wiring and cable or on undertakings that have the right to use such wiring and cables, where this is justified on the grounds that replication of such network elements would be economically inefficient or physically impracticable. The access conditions imposed may include specific rules on access, transparency and non-discrimination and for apportioning the costs of access''''', which, where appropriate, are adjusted to take into account risk factors.'''''
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(a) ensuring coverage of their national territory and population at high quality and speed, both indoors and outdoors, including along major transport paths, including the trans-European transport network '''''as defined in Regulation 1315/2013''''';
+
'''''Without prejudice to 59(1),''''' national regulatory authorities shall''''', taking full account of the principle of proportionality''''' impose obligations '''''to meet''''' reasonable '''''requests''''' to grant access to wiring and cables inside buildings or up to the first concentration or distribution point where that point is located outside '''''but close to''''' the building, '''''or beyond it to a concentration point close to end-users,''''' on the owners of such wiring and cable or on undertakings '''''on providers of electronic communications networks or electronic communications services''''' that have the right to use such wiring and cables, where this is justified on the grounds that replication of such network elements would be economically inefficient or physically impracticable. The access conditions imposed '''''shall be objective, transparent, non-discriminatory and proportionate in accordance with the principles set out in Article 3(3), and''''' may include specific rules on access, transparency and non-discrimination and for apportioning the costs of access'''''. These measures should be consistent with the provisions of [Broadband Cost reductions Directive]'''''
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
''Justification: The reference to the Trans-European networks clarifies the definition, keeping railways in the scope.''
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
 +
=== Amendment 738 + ===
  
Idem 596
+
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
+
|-
 +
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
 +
'''Amendment 738'''<br/>
 +
Michel Reimon<br/>
 +
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
 +
Article 59 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
National regulatory authorities '''''shall''''' impose obligations '''''upon''''' reasonable '''''request to grant''''' access to wiring and cables inside buildings or up to the first concentration or distribution point where that point is located outside the building''''', on the owners of such wiring and cable or on undertakings''''' that have the right to use such wiring and cables, where this is justified on the grounds that replication of such network elements would be economically inefficient or physically impracticable. The access conditions imposed may include specific rules on access, transparency '''''and''''' non-discrimination and '''''for apportioning the costs''''' of access, which, where appropriate, are adjusted to take into account risk factors.
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
'''''In particular, and without prejudice to the generalities of 59(1),''''' national regulatory authorities '''''may''''' impose obligations '''''to meet''''' reasonable '''''requests for''''' access to wiring and cables inside buildings or up to the first concentration or distribution point where that point is located outside the building '''''or beyond it to a concentration point close to end-users on providers of electronic communications networks or electronic communications services''''' that have the right to use such wiring and cables, where this is justified on the grounds that replication of such network elements would be economically inefficient or physically impracticable. The access conditions imposed may include specific rules on access, transparency''''',''''' non-discrimination and '''''the price''''' of access, which, where appropriate, are adjusted to take into account risk factors.'''''When imposing access regulation beyond the first concentration or distribution point, national regulatory authorities may under special circumstances impose active or virtual access to such wiring and cables.'''''
 +
|}
  
=== Amendment 598 / ===
+
=== Amendment 739 -- ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #A60000; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 598'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 739'''<br/>
José Blanco López<br/>
+
Lieve Wierinck, Hilde Vautmans<br/>
'''S&D'''<br/>
+
'''ALDE'''<br/>
Article 45 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a
+
Article 59 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
 
|-
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
(a) ensuring coverage of their national territory and population at high quality and speed, both indoors and outdoors, including along major transport paths, including the trans-European transport network;
+
National regulatory authorities '''''shall''''' impose obligations '''''upon''''' reasonable '''''request to grant''''' access to wiring and cables inside buildings or up to the first concentration or distribution point where that point is located outside the building, on the owners of such wiring and cable or on undertakings that have the right to use such wiring and cables, where this is justified on the grounds that replication of such network elements would be economically inefficient or physically impracticable. '''''The''''' access conditions imposed may include specific rules on access, transparency and non-discrimination and for apportioning the costs of access, which, where appropriate, are adjusted to take into account risk factors.
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
(a) ensuring coverage of their national territory and population at high quality and speed, both indoors and outdoors, including along major transport paths, including the trans-European transport network '''''as defined in Regulation 1315/2013''''';
+
National regulatory authorities '''''may''''' impose obligations '''''to meet''''' reasonable '''''requests for''''' access to wiring and cables inside buildings or up to the first concentration or distribution point where that point is located outside the building, '''''or beyond it to a concentration point close to end-users,''''' on the owners of such wiring and cable or on undertakings that have the right to use such wiring and cables, where this is justified on the grounds that replication of such network elements would be economically inefficient or physically impracticable. '''''These''''' access conditions '''''should be''''' imposed '''''on fair and reasonable terms and conditions, and''''' may include specific rules on access, transparency and non-discrimination and for apportioning the costs of access, which, where appropriate, are adjusted to take into account risk factors. '''''When imposing access regulation beyond the first concentration or distribution point, national regulatory authorities may, under special circumstances, impose active or virtual access to such wiring and cables.'''''
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Idem 596, 597
+
Removes the obligation to develop broadband networks for false solutions such as VDSL.
  
 
+
=== Amendment 740 + ===
=== Amendment 599 / ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 599'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 740'''<br/>
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Dan Nica, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Jeppe Kofod, Flavio Zanonato, Theresa Griffin<br/>
+
Kathleen Van Brempt<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
Article 45 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point c a (new)
+
Article 59 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 
+
National regulatory authorities '''''shall''''' impose obligations '''''upon reasonable request to grant''''' access to wiring and cables inside buildings '''''or''''' up to the first concentration or distribution point where that point is located outside the building, on the owners of such wiring and cable or on undertakings that have the right to use such wiring and cables, where this is justified on the grounds that replication of such network elements would be economically inefficient or physically impracticable. The access conditions imposed may include specific rules on access, transparency and non-discrimination and for apportioning the costs of access, which, where appropriate, are adjusted to take into account risk factors.
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
'''''(c a)''''' '''''ensuring predictability and consistency in the way rights are granted, renewed or modified in order to promote long term investments'''''
+
National regulatory authorities '''''may''''' impose obligations '''''to address reasonable requests for''''' access to wiring and cables inside buildings''''',''''' up to the first concentration or distribution point where that point is located outside the building, '''''or beyond that point at a concentration point in proximity of the end-user, '''''on the owners of such wiring and cable or on undertakings that have the right to use such wiring and cables, where this is justified on the grounds that replication of such network elements would be economically inefficient or physically impracticable. The access conditions imposed may include specific rules on access, transparency and non-discrimination and for apportioning the costs of access, which, where appropriate, are adjusted to take into account risk factors. '''''National regulatory authorities may, when circumstances require it, impose active or virtual access to wiring and cables, in the event of imposing access regulation beyond the first concentration or distribution point.'''''
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
''Justification: Predictability lowers the risk for investments''
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
 
+
=== Amendment 741 + ===
Pas compris
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 600 / ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 600'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 741'''<br/>
José Blanco López<br/>
+
Gunnar Hökmark, Henna Virkkunen, Bendt Bendtsen<br/>
'''S&D'''<br/>
+
'''EPP'''<br/>
Article 45 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point c a (new)
+
Article 59 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 
+
National regulatory authorities shall impose obligations '''''upon reasonable request to grant''''' access to wiring and cables inside buildings or up to '''''the first''''' concentration or distribution point '''''where that point is located outside the building''''', on the owners of such wiring and cable or on undertakings that have the right to use such wiring and cables, where this is justified on the grounds that replication of such network elements would be economically inefficient or physically impracticable. The access conditions imposed may include specific rules on access, transparency and non-discrimination and for apportioning the costs of access, which, where appropriate, are adjusted to take into account risk factors.
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
'''''(c a)''''' '''''ensuring predictability and consistency in the way rights are granted, renewed or modified in order to promote long term investments'''''
+
National regulatory authorities shall impose obligations '''''to meet reasonable requests for''''' access to wiring and cables inside buildings or up to '''''a''''' concentration or distribution point '''''as close to end-users as possible''''', on the owners of such wiring and cable or on undertakings that have the right to use such wiring and cables, where this is justified on the grounds that replication of such network elements would be economically inefficient or physically impracticable. The access conditions imposed may include specific rules on access, transparency and non-discrimination and for apportioning the costs of access, which, where appropriate, are adjusted to take into account risk factors. '''''Under special circumstances, when access regulation is imposed beyond the first concentration or distribution point, national regulatory authorities may impose active or virtual access to such wiring and cables.'''''
 
|}
 
|}
  
 
+
=== Amendment 742 + ===
Idem 599
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 601 + ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 601'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 742'''<br/>
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Dan Nica, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Jeppe Kofod<br/>
+
Olle Ludvigsson<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
Article 45 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point e
+
Article 59 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
 
|-
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(e) promoting the shared use of radio spectrum between similar and/or different uses of spectrum through appropriate established sharing rules and conditions, including the protection of existing rights of use, in accordance with Union law;
+
National regulatory authorities shall impose obligations '''''upon reasonable request to grant''''' access to wiring and cables inside buildings or up to '''''the first''''' concentration or distribution point '''''where that point is located outside the building''''', on the owners of such wiring and cable or on undertakings that have the right to use such wiring and cables, where this is justified on the grounds that replication of such network elements would be economically inefficient or physically impracticable. The access conditions imposed may include specific rules on access, transparency '''''and''''' non-discrimination and '''''for apportioning the costs''''' of access, which, where appropriate, are adjusted to take into account risk '''''factors'''''.
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(e) promoting the shared use of radio spectrum between similar and/or different uses of spectrum'''''; promoting competition''''' through appropriate established sharing rules and conditions, including the protection of existing rights of use, in accordance with Union law;
+
National regulatory authorities shall impose obligations '''''to meet reasonable requests for''''' access to wiring and cables inside buildings or up to '''''a''''' concentration or distribution point '''''as close as possible to end-users''''', on the owners of such wiring and cable or on undertakings that have the right to use such wiring and cables, where this is justified on the grounds that replication of such network elements would be economically inefficient or physically impracticable. The access conditions imposed may include specific rules on access, transparency''''',''''' non-discrimination and '''''the price''''' of access, which, where appropriate, are adjusted to take into account risk '''''factors.When imposing access regulation beyond the first concentration or distribution point, national regulatory authorities may under special circumstances impose active or virtual access to such wiring and cables'''''.
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
''Justification: Competition criteria in radio spectrum procedures are important when the procedures are designed. Fair and non-discriminatory wholesale access conditions and consumer choice should be enhanced.''
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
 
+
=== Amendment 753 + ===
Competition criteria in radio spectrum procedures are important when the procedures are designed. Fair and non-discriminatory wholesale access conditions and consumer choice should be enhanced.
 
 
 
=== Amendment 602 + ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 602'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 753'''<br/>
David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano<br/>
+
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Dan Nica, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Jeppe Kofod, Flavio Zanonato<br/>
'''EFDD'''<br/>
+
'''S&D'''<br/>
Article 45 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point e
+
Article 59 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
 
|-
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(e) promoting the shared use of radio spectrum between similar and/or different uses of spectrum through appropriate established sharing rules and conditions, including the protection of existing rights of use, in accordance with Union law;
+
'''''National regulatory authorities may extend to those owners or undertakings the imposition of such access obligations, on fair and reasonable terms and conditions,''''' beyond the first concentration or distribution point to a concentration point as close as possible to end-users, to the extent strictly necessary to address insurmountable economic or physical barriers to replication in areas with lower population density.
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(e) promoting the shared use of radio spectrum between similar and/or different uses of spectrum '''''promoting competition''''' through appropriate established sharing rules and conditions, including the protection of existing rights of use, in accordance with Union law;
+
'''''When imposing access regulation beyond the first concentration or distribution point, national regulatory authorities may under special circumstances impose active or virtual access to such wiring and cables''''' beyond the first concentration or distribution point to a concentration point as close as possible to end-users, to the extent strictly necessary to address insurmountable economic or physical barriers to replication in areas with lower population density.
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
| colspan='2' |
''Justification: The amendment aims to promote competition in radio spectrum assignment procedures.''
+
''Justification: National regulatory authorities should have ability to impose regulation as close as possible to end-users if necessary to address economic or physical barriers, especially in areas with low population density.''
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Same as AM 601 - The amendment aims to promote competition in radio spectrum assignment procedures.
+
National regulatory authorities should have ability to impose regulation as close as possible to end-users if necessary to address economic or physical barriers, especially in areas with low population density.
 +
 
  
=== Amendment 603 ++ ===
+
=== Amendment 757 ++ ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 603'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 757'''<br/>
Michel Reimon<br/>
+
José Blanco López, Inmaculada Rodríguez-Piñero Fernández, Soledad Cabezón Ruiz<br/>
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
+
Article 59 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3
Article 45 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point e a (new)
+
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-bottom:0em;'|
 +
'''''National regulatory authorities shall not impose obligations in accordance with the second subparagraph where:'''''
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-bottom:0em;'|
 +
'''''deleted'''''
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
'''''(a) a viable and similar alternative means of access to end-users is made available to any undertaking, provided that the access is offered on fair and reasonable terms and conditions to a very high capacity network by an undertaking meeting the criteria listed in Article 77 paragraphs (a) and (b); and'''''
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
  
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
'''''(e a)''''' '''''The Commission shall establish a programme aiming to release spectrum for shared and unlicensed uses. This programme shall include the development of a European database of shared and unlicensed spectrum.'''''
 
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' |
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em'|
''Justification: Innovation and freedom of expression need a broad access to shared and unlicensed uses of , as stressed in article 6 of the 2012 Radio Spectrum Policy Programme. Increasing this access is thus a major challenge. Following the success of the release of the 1,2 Ghz frequencies within the Radio spectrum policy programme (Article 3 of Decision 243/2012/EU), the European Commission shall launch such a programme aiming at the release of shared spectrum. A database of shared spectrum would greatly facilitate and encourage the release of shared spectrum.''
+
'''''(b) in the case of recently deployed network elements, in particular by smaller local projects, the granting of that access would compromise the economic or financial viability of their deployment.'''''
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em'|
 +
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Mise en place d'un régime de partage du spectre non-soumis à license
+
Removes limitations to regulation
 
 
  
=== Amendment 604 / ===
+
=== Amendment 790 - ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 604'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 790'''<br/>
 
Evžen Tošenovský<br/>
 
Evžen Tošenovský<br/>
 
'''ECR'''<br/>
 
'''ECR'''<br/>
Article 45 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
+
Article 59 – paragraph 6
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
'''''When adopting technical harmonisation measures under Decision No 676/2002/EC, the Commission may, taking utmost account of the opinion of Radio Spectrum Policy Group, adopt an implementing measure setting out whether, pursuant to Article 46 of this Directive, rights in the harmonised band shall be subject to a general authorisation or to individual rights of use. Those implementing measures shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 110(4).'''''
+
'''''6.''''' '''''By [entry into force plus 18 months in order to contribute to a consistent definition of the location of network termination points by national regulatory authorities, BEREC shall, after consulting stakeholders and in close cooperation with the Commission, adopt guidelines on common approaches to the identification of the network termination point in different network topologies. National regulatory authorities shall take utmost account of those guidelines when defining the location of network termination points.'''''
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 
'''''deleted'''''
 
'''''deleted'''''
 
|}
 
|}
  
=== Amendment 605 / ===
+
 
 +
A common approach within the EU would ensure a predictability for all EU users.
 +
 
 +
 
 +
=== Amendment 792 ++ ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 605'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 792'''<br/>
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Dan Nica, Edouard Martin, Theresa Griffin, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Jeppe Kofod<br/>
+
Michel Reimon<br/>
'''S&D'''<br/>
+
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
Article 45 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3
+
Article 61 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
Where the Commission is considering acting to provide for measures in accordance with Article 39, it '''''may''''' seek the advice of the Radio Spectrum Policy Group with regard to the implications of any such standard or specification for the coordination, harmonisation and availability of radio spectrum. The Commission shall take utmost account of the advice of the Radio Spectrum Policy Group in taking any subsequent steps.
+
An undertaking shall be deemed to have significant market power if, either individually or jointly with others, it enjoys a position equivalent to dominance, that is to say a position of economic strength affording it the power to behave to an appreciable extent independently of competitors, customers and ultimately consumers.
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
Where the Commission is considering acting to provide for measures in accordance with Article 39, it '''''shall''''' seek the advice of the Radio Spectrum Policy Group with regard to the implications of any such standard or specification for the coordination, harmonisation and availability of radio spectrum. The Commission shall take utmost account of the advice of the Radio Spectrum Policy Group in taking any subsequent steps.
+
An undertaking shall be deemed to have significant market power if, either individually or jointly with others, '''''including through a commercial or a co-investment agreement,''''' it enjoys a position equivalent to dominance, that is to say a position of economic strength affording it the power to behave to an appreciable extent independently of competitors, customers and ultimately consumers.
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
| colspan='2' |
''Justification: Advice of RSPG is essential to assess the impact of measures linked to spectrum harmonisation.''
+
''Justification: Co-investment in a certain area must be considered an oligopoly of a few powerful actors (on the local level), as the FDN Federation showed in their analysis of the fixed-line market (www.ffdn.org/en/node/129 ) written for a consultation of the ARCEP in 2016. These oligopolies work as a cartel. The co-investors, in a given area, should be regarded as having the position of the incumbent in that area. Such symmetric regulation would allow welcoming all actors into the market.''
 
|}
 
|}
  
 
+
=== Amendment 793 + ===
Obligation de l'avis du RSPG
 
 
 
=== Amendment 606 / ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 606'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 793'''<br/>
Pervenche Berès, Edouard Martin<br/>
+
Kathleen Van Brempt<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
Article 45 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
+
Article 61 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
Si l’utilisation d’une bande harmonisée ne suscite pas de demande sur le marché national ou régional, et sous réserve de la mesure d’harmonisation adoptée en vertu de la décision n° 676/2002/CE, les États membres peuvent autoriser une utilisation alternative de tout ou partie de cette bande, y compris l’utilisation existante, conformément aux paragraphes 4 et 5, à condition:
+
An undertaking shall be deemed to have significant market power if, either individually or jointly with others, it enjoys a position equivalent to dominance, that is to say a position of economic strength affording it the power to behave to an appreciable extent independently of competitors, customers and ultimately consumers.
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
Si l’utilisation d’une bande harmonisée ne suscite pas de demande sur le marché national ou régional, et sous réserve de la mesure d’harmonisation adoptée en vertu de la décision n° 676/2002/CE, '''''et sans préjudice de la décision 243/2012 / UE établissant un programme pluriannuel de politique du spectre radioélectrique (RSPP) et la décision n ° ... / 2017 / UE concernant l'utilisation de la bande de fréquences 470-790 MHz dans l'Union,''''' les États membres peuvent autoriser une utilisation alternative de tout ou partie de cette bande, y compris l’utilisation existante, conformément aux paragraphes 4 et 5, à condition:
+
An undertaking shall be deemed to have significant market power if, either individually or jointly with others, it enjoys a position equivalent to dominance, that is to say a position of economic strength affording it the power to behave to an appreciable extent independently of competitors, customers and ultimately consumers '''''or when it is able to disrupt effective competition'''''.
 
|}
 
|}
  
 +
=== Amendment 794 + ===
  
Pas compris l'intérêt
+
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 +
|-
 +
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
 +
'''Amendment 794'''<br/>
 +
Kaja Kallas<br/>
 +
'''ALDE'''<br/>
 +
Article 61 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
  
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
'''''Two or more undertakings may each be deemed to enjoy a position equivalent to having significant market power when they have the possibility to significantly impede effective competition, taking into account the relevant markets including but not limited to the market shares of other market participants, the market power of an undertaking on closely related markets, barriers to entry, market concentration, product differentiation, capacity constraints and switching costs.'''''
 +
|-
 +
| colspan='2' |
 +
''Justification: In light of the increasing trend of convergence between markets, and development of oligopolies in Europe, there is a need to include situations where two or more undertakings can foreclose the markets even without tacit collusion.In accordance with rule 104 of the rules of procedure, this amendment is necessary for pressing reasons related to the internal logic of the text''
 +
|}
  
=== Amendment 607 / ===
+
=== Amendment 800 + ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 607'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 800'''<br/>
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Dan Nica, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Jeppe Kofod, Edouard Martin<br/>
+
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Edouard Martin, Flavio Zanonato, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Dan Nica, Jeppe Kofod<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
Article 45 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
+
Article 61 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 b (new)
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
In case of a national or regional lack of market demand for the use of a harmonised band, and subject to the harmonisation measure adopted under Decision No 676/2002/EC, Member States may allow an alternative use of all or part of that band, including the existing use, in accordance with paragraphs 4 and 5, provided that:
+
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
In case of a national or regional lack of market demand for the use of a harmonised band, and subject to the harmonisation measure adopted under Decision No 676/2002/EC '''''and without prejudice to Decision 243/2012/EU establishing a multiannual radio spectrum policy programme (RSPP) and Decision No .../2017/EU on the use of the 470-790 MHz frequency band in the Union''''', Member States may allow an alternative use of all or part of that band, including the existing use, in accordance with paragraphs 4 and 5, provided that:
+
'''''An undertaking shall be deemed to have unilateral market power where, in the absence of significant market power, it enjoys a position of economic strength by virtue of the weakness of competitive constraints in an oligopolistic market, enabling it to act in a manner which is detrimental to consumer welfare.'''''
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
| colspan='2' |
''Justification: Any of the proposed measures in Article 45, paragraph 3 should not put into question the specific solutions retained in Decision 243/2012/EU establishing a multiannual radio spectrum policy programme (RSPP) and Decision No …/2017/EU on the use of the UHF band.''
+
''Justification: Defining unilateral market power can bring tools for NRAs to ensure competition in markets. Oligopolies have become increasingly commonplace in the EU.''
 
|}
 
|}
  
 
+
=== Amendment 818 + ===
Idem 606
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 608 / ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 608'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 818'''<br/>
José Blanco López<br/>
+
Michel Reimon<br/>
'''S&D'''<br/>
+
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
Article 45 – paragraph 3 subparagraph 1 – introductory part
+
Article 65 – paragraph 2 point a
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
'''''(a)''''' '''''the existence of market developments which may increase the likelihood of the relevant market tending towards effective competition, such as those commercial co-investment or access agreements between operators which benefit competitive dynamics sustainably;'''''
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
'''''deleted'''''
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
| colspan='2' |
In case of a national or regional lack of market demand for the use of a harmonised band, and subject to the harmonisation measure adopted under Decision No 676/2002/EC, Member States may allow an alternative use of all or part of that band, including the existing use, in accordance with paragraphs 4 and 5, provided that:
+
''Justification: The Commission’s proposal weakens the SMP regime. The way in which the 3-criteria test is described in the draft Code differs from the version of the test that has been applied, successfully, by NRAs over the last 15 years and which is set out in Recommendation 2014/710/EU. Article 65 (2) (a) as proposed by the Commission adds a purely speculative element into the market analysis framework. According to BEREC opinion BoR (16) 213 (p.10): “In particular, in order to determine whether a market can be considered for regulation, the new test requires NRAs to take account of market developments which “may increase the likelihood” of a relevant market tending towards effective competition, ultimately making it difficult for NRAs to find that a market can be assessed for SMP.” Constraints on NRAs’ ability to impose regulations have to be avoided. The focus on commercial agreements undermines the SMP regime, as it is linked to a deregulatory promise and might in the long run create cartel-like oligopolies that cannot easily be treated with anti-trust law. The proposal also neglects the connection between cause and effect. Sufficient competition on the retail market results from functioning wholesale markets and should hence by no means be taken as a criterion to deregulate wholesale access. Effective access regulation to the SMP operator’s network is crucial to maintain sustainable retail competition, which in turn leads to lower prices and more choice for consumers.''
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
In case of a national or regional lack of market demand for the use of a harmonised band, and subject to the harmonisation measure adopted under Decision No 676/2002/EC '''''and without prejudice to Decision 243/2012/EU establishing a multiannual radio spectrum policy programme (RSPP) and Decision No .../2017/EU on the use of the 470-790 MHz frequency band in the Union''''', Member States may allow an alternative use of all or part of that band, including the existing use, in accordance with paragraphs 4 and 5, provided that:
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Idem 606, 607
+
The Commission’s proposal weakens the SMP regime.
  
  
=== Amendment 609 / ===
+
=== Amendment 831 + ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 609'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 831'''<br/>
Eva Kaili<br/>
+
Michel Reimon<br/>
'''S&D'''<br/>
+
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
Article 45 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 introductory part
+
Article 65 – paragraph 2 point b
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
In case of a national or regional lack of market demand for the use of a harmonised band, and subject to the harmonisation measure adopted under Decision No 676/2002/EC, Member States may allow an alternative use of all or part of that band, including the existing use, in accordance with paragraphs 4 and 5, provided that:
+
(b) all relevant competitive constraints, '''''including at retail''''' level, irrespective of whether the sources of such constraints are deemed to be electronic communications networks, electronic communications services, or other types of services or applications which are comparable from the perspective of the end-user''''', and irrespective of whether such constraints are part of the relevant market''''';
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
In case of a national or regional lack of market demand for the use of a harmonised band, and subject to the harmonisation measure adopted under Decision No 676/2002/EC '''''and without prejudice to Decision 243/2012/EU establishing a multiannual radio spectrum policy programme (RSPP) and Decision No .../2017/EU on the use of the 470-790 MHz frequency band in the Union''''', Member States may allow an alternative use of all or part of that band, including the existing use, in accordance with paragraphs 4 and 5, provided that:
+
(b) all relevant competitive constraints, '''''especially at wholesale''''' level, irrespective of whether the sources of such constraints are deemed to be electronic communications networks, electronic communications services, or other types of services or applications which are comparable from the perspective of the end-user;
 
|}
 
|}
  
 
+
=== Amendment 832 + ===
Idem 606, 607, 608
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 610 - ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 610'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 832'''<br/>
Kaja Kallas<br/>
+
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Dan Nica, Jeppe Kofod, Flavio Zanonato<br/>
'''ALDE'''<br/>
+
'''S&D'''<br/>
Article 45 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point a
+
Article 65 – paragraph 2 – point b
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(a) the finding of a lack of market demand for the use of the harmonised band is based on a public consultation in line with Article 23;
+
(b) all relevant competitive constraints, '''''including at''''' retail level, irrespective of whether the sources of such constraints are deemed to be electronic communications networks, electronic communications services, or other types of services or applications which are comparable from the perspective of the end-user''''', and irrespective of whether such constraints are part of the relevant market''''';
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(a) the finding of a lack of market demand for the use of the harmonised band is based on a public consultation in line with Article 23 '''''and on a forward-looking assessment of the market competitive conditions''''' ;
+
(b) all relevant competitive constraints, '''''on wholesale and''''' retail level '''''level''''', irrespective of whether the sources of such constraints are deemed to be electronic communications networks, electronic communications services, or other types of services or applications which are comparable from the perspective of the end-user;
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
| colspan='2' |
''Justification: There is a need to simplify the procedure as proposed. In addition, in accordance with rule 104 of the rules of procedure, this amendment is necessary for pressing reasons related to the internal logic of the text''
+
''Justification: Avoiding the possibility to deregulate on the sole basis of the existence of commercial access agreements is necessary. Putting the focus on commercial agreements for deregulating would weaken and undermine the SMP regime already in place. At the same time, we should avoid the focus on only retail market, as narrowing the scope of competition to the retail level introduces great uncertainty as regards one of the cornerstones of the regulatory framework. Effective access wholesale regulation to the SMP operator’s network is pivotal to establish and maintain an intensive and sustainable retail competition. Sufficient competition on the retail market results from functioning wholesale markets and should hence by no means be taken as a criterion to deregulate wholesale access. Consequently the mere prospect of removing access regulation undermines investments of alternative network operators, which are sensitive to expectations on the (un)reliability of wholesale access products. Therefore, deregulation subject to weak safeguards has to be prevented.''
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Vocabulaire ETNO, warning !
+
=== Amendment 872 -- ===
 
 
=== Amendment 611 - ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #A60000; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 611'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 872'''<br/>
Michel Reimon<br/>
+
Anna Záborská, Ivan Štefanec<br/>
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
+
'''EPP'''<br/>
Article 45 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 – introductory part
+
Article 70
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-bottom:0em;'|
 +
'''''Article 70'''''
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-bottom:0em;'|
 +
'''''deleted'''''
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
Member States '''''may, however,''''' provide for proportionate and non-discriminatory restrictions to the types of radio network or wireless access technology used for electronic communications services '''''where this is necessary''''' to:
+
'''''Access to civil engineering'''''
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
Member States '''''shall''''' provide for proportionate and non-discriminatory restrictions to the types of radio network or wireless access technology used for electronic communications services '''''in order''''' to:
 
|}
 
  
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
'''''1. A national regulatory authority may, in accordance with Article 66, impose obligations on operators to meet reasonable requests for access to, and use of, civil engineering including, without limitation, buildings or entries to buildings, building cables including wiring, antennae, towers and other supporting constructions, poles, masts, ducts, conduits, inspection chambers, manholes, and cabinets, in situations where the market analysis indicates that denial of access or access given under unreasonable terms and conditions having a similar effect would hinder the emergence of a sustainable competitive market at the retail level and would not be in the end-user's interest.'''''
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
  
Renforcement et obligation pour les MS de prendre des restrictions proportionnelles et non-discriminatoires
+
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em'|
 +
'''''2. National regulatory authorities may impose obligations on an operator to provide access in accordance with this Article, irrespective of whether the assets that are affected by the obligation are part of the relevant market in accordance with the market analysis, provided that the obligation is necessary and proportionate to meet the objectives of Article 3.'''''
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em'|
  
=== Amendment 612 + ===
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 612'''<br/>
 
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Dan Nica, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Jeppe Kofod, Edouard Martin, Theresa Griffin<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
 
Article 45 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 – introductory part
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
Member States '''''may''''', however, provide for proportionate and non-discriminatory restrictions to the types of radio network or wireless access technology used for electronic communications services '''''where this is necessary''''' to:
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
Member States '''''shall''''', however, provide for proportionate and non-discriminatory restrictions to the types of radio network or wireless access technology used for electronic communications services '''''in order''''' to:
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
''Justification: Avoiding harmful interferences in the safety-critical tasks can be an obligation for safety reasons.''
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Idem 611
+
This AM reduces the operators' obligations on access to network
  
 
+
=== Amendment 880 -- ===
=== Amendment 613 + ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #A60000; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 613'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 880'''<br/>
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Dan Nica, Theresa Griffin, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Jeppe Kofod, Martina Werner<br/>
+
Michał Boni, Henna Virkkunen, Jerzy Buzek<br/>
'''S&D'''<br/>
+
'''EPP'''<br/>
Article 45 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 – point d a (new)
+
Article 70 – paragraph 1
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 
+
1. A national regulatory authority may, in accordance with Article 66, impose obligations on operators to meet reasonable requests for access to, and use of, civil engineering including, without limitation, buildings or entries to buildings, building cables including wiring, antennae, towers and other supporting constructions, poles, masts, ducts, conduits, inspection chambers, manholes, and cabinets, in situations where the market analysis indicates that denial of access or access given under unreasonable terms and conditions having a similar effect would hinder the emergence of a sustainable competitive market at the retail level and would not be in the end-user's interest.
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
'''''(d a)''''' '''''promote interconnection in Europe along major transport paths;'''''
+
1. A national regulatory authority may, in accordance with Article 66, impose obligations on operators to meet reasonable requests for access to, and use of, civil engineering '''''and passive infrastructure''''' including, without limitation, buildings or entries to buildings, building cables including wiring, antennae, towers and other supporting constructions, poles, masts, ducts''''', inactive wireline transmission infrastructure including cable and fiber''''', conduits, inspection chambers, manholes, and cabinets, in situations where the market analysis indicates that denial of access or access given under unreasonable terms and conditions having a similar effect would hinder the emergence of a sustainable competitive market at the retail level and would not be in the end-user's interest.
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
| colspan='2' |
''Justification: Achieving interoperability is essential for the creation of smart, single transportation area in Europe. The seamless and safe circulation of passengers and goods on roads and railways across the EU. Seamless interconnection can boost the efficiency and safety of logistics and passenger traffic and contribute to environment-friendly transport in the internal market.''
+
''Justification: It is proposed to extend the scope of this Article to all passive infrastructure.''
 
|}
 
|}
  
 
+
=== Amendment 889 - ===
Promotion de l'interconnexion
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 614 + ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 614'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 889'''<br/>
José Blanco López<br/>
+
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Edouard Martin, Dan Nica, Jeppe Kofod, Carlos Zorrinho, Victor Negrescu, Zigmantas Balčytis<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
Article 45 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 – point d a (new)
+
Article 70 – paragraph 1 a (new)
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-bottom:0em;'|
  
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-bottom:0em;'|
'''''(d a)''''' '''''promote interconnection in Europe along major transport paths;'''''
+
'''''1 a.''''' '''''National regulatory authorities shall take account in particular of the following factors:'''''
|}
+
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
  
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
'''''(a) the technical and economic viability of using or installing competing facilities, in the light of the rate of market development, taking into account the nature and type of interconnection and/or access involved, including the viability of other upstream access products such as access to ducts;'''''
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
  
Idem 613
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
'''''(b) the technological evolution affecting network design and management'''''
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
  
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
'''''(cb) the feasibility of providing the access proposed, in relation to the capacity available;'''''
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
'''''(dc) the initial investment by the facility owner, taking account of any public investment made and the risks involved in making the investment;'''''
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
  
=== Amendment 615 + ===
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 
+
'''''(ed) the need to safeguard competition in the long term, with particular attention to economically efficient infrastructure-based competition;'''''
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0; width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
'''Amendment 615'''<br/>
+
 
Françoise Grossetête, Anne Sander<br/>
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
'''EPP'''<br/>
+
'''''(fe) where appropriate, any relevant intellectual property rights;'''''
Article 45 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2 – point d a (new)
 
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em'|
  
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em'|
'''''(d a)''''' '''''the promotion of interconnection in Europe along major transport paths.'''''
+
'''''(g) the provision of pan-European services.'''''
 +
|-
 +
| colspan='2' |
 +
''Justification: Civil engineering access enhances infrastructure-based-competition but should not be treated as the sole or primary remedy. That is what it is necessary to include the complementary obligation of giving access to the entire physical network elements (i.e. passive access). Passive remedies, compared to active ones, remain the main wholesale access products that ensure and promote sustainable infrastructure-based competition. The amendment therefore gives priority to passive over active remedies.''
 
|}
 
|}
  
 
+
=== Amendment 890 - ===
Idem 613, 614
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 616 + ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 616'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 890'''<br/>
Michel Reimon<br/>
+
Eva Kaili<br/>
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
+
'''S&D'''<br/>
Article 45 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2 – point d a (new)
+
Article 70 – paragraph 1 a (new)
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-bottom:0em;'|
  
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-bottom:0em;'|
'''''(d a)''''' '''''the promotion of interconnection in Europe along major transport paths'''''
+
'''''1 a.''''' '''''National regulatory authorities shall take account in particular of the following factors:'''''
|}
+
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
  
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
'''''(a) the technical and economic viability of using or installing competing facilities, in the light of the rate of market development, taking into account the nature and type of interconnection and/or access involved, including the viability of other upstream access products such as access to ducts;'''''
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
  
Idem 613, 614, 615
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
'''''(b) the technological evolution affecting network design and management'''''
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
  
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
'''''(cb) the feasibility of providing the access proposed, in relation to the capacity available;'''''
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
  
=== Amendment 617 + ===
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
'''''(dc) the initial investment by the facility owner, taking account of any public investment made and the risks involved in making the investment;'''''
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
  
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0; width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
'''''(ed) the need to safeguard competition in the long term, with particular attention to economically efficient infrastructure-based competition;'''''
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
'''Amendment 617'''<br/>
+
 
Michel Reimon<br/>
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
+
'''''(fe) where appropriate, any relevant intellectual property rights;'''''
Article 45 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 3
 
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em'|
A measure which prohibits the provision of any other electronic communications service in a specific band may only be provided for where justified by the need to protect safety of life services. Member States may, exceptionally, also extend such a measure in order to fulfil other general interest objectives as defined by Member States in accordance with Union law.
+
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em'|
A measure which prohibits the provision of any other electronic communications service in a specific band may only be provided for where justified by the need to protect safety of life services. Member States may, exceptionally, also extend such a measure in order to fulfil other general interest objectives as defined by '''''the Union and''''' Member States in accordance with Union law.
+
'''''(g) the provision of pan-European services.'''''
 
|}
 
|}
  
 +
=== Amendment 891 - ===
  
Inclusion de l'Union européenne dans la prise des décisions
+
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 618 + ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 618'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 891'''<br/>
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Dan Nica, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Jeppe Kofod<br/>
+
Patrizia Toia<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
Article 45 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 3
+
Article 70 – paragraph 1 a (new)
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
A measure which prohibits the provision of any other electronic communications service in a specific band may only be provided for where justified by the need to protect safety of life services. Member States may, exceptionally, also extend such a measure in order to fulfil other general interest objectives as defined by Member States in accordance with Union law.
+
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
A measure which prohibits the provision of any other electronic communications service in a specific band may only be provided for where justified by the need to protect safety of life services. Member States may, exceptionally, also extend such a measure in order to fulfil other general interest objectives as defined by Member States '''''and the EU''''' in accordance with Union law.
+
'''''1 a.''''' '''''National regulators should however not impose access to ducts, conduits, inspection chambers, manholes, and cabinets from wholesale-only operators in the sense of Article 77, when these operators offer a viable and similar alternative means of access to end-users in accordance with Article 3(3) of the Directive 2014/61/EU.'''''
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
| colspan='2' |
''Justification: Safety of life services need to be acknowledged on Member State and EU level.''
+
''Justification: In order to make the business model of vertically separate undertakings sustainable, wholesale only operators should not be obliged to provide access to their ducts to for example vertically integrated operators. This would take away economic incentives of the latter to use the networks of wholesale only operators and put at risk the prospective returns of investors in wholesale only networks.''
 
|}
 
|}
  
 
+
=== Amendment 892 - ===
Essentiellement idem 617
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 619 + ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 619'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 892'''<br/>
José Blanco López<br/>
+
Kaja Kallas<br/>
'''S&D'''<br/>
+
'''ALDE'''<br/>
Article 45 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 3
+
Article 70 – paragraph 1 a (new)
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
 
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
'''''1 a.''''' '''''A national regulatory authority shall ensure that where access to civil engineering such as access to ducts is limited due to availability, alternatives means of access such as dark fiber are imposed in accordance with article 71.'''''
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
| colspan='2' |
A measure which prohibits the provision of any other electronic communications service in a specific band may only be provided for where justified by the need to protect safety of life services. Member States may, exceptionally, also extend such a measure in order to fulfil other general interest objectives as defined by Member States in accordance with Union law.
+
''Justification: Access to civil engineering is important to contribute to sustainable competition, however it should take into account the limited availability or physical constraints of granting such access''
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
A measure which prohibits the provision of any other electronic communications service in a specific band may only be provided for where justified by the need to protect safety of life services. Member States may, exceptionally, also extend such a measure in order to fulfil other general interest objectives as defined by Member States '''''and the EU''''' in accordance with Union law.
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
 
+
=== Amendment 893 - ===
Essentiellement idem 617, 618
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 663 / ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 663'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 893'''<br/>
Kaja Kallas, Marietje Schaake<br/>
+
Pavel Telička<br/>
 
'''ALDE'''<br/>
 
'''ALDE'''<br/>
Article 49 – paragraph 1
+
Article 70 – paragraph 2
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
1. Where Member States authorise the use of radio spectrum through individual rights of use for a limited period of time, they shall ensure that the authorisation is granted for a period that is appropriate in view of the objective pursued taking due account of the need to ensure effective and efficient use '''''and''''' promote efficient investments, including by allowing for an appropriate period for investment amortisation.
+
2. National regulatory authorities '''''may impose obligations on an operator to provide access in accordance with this Article, irrespective of whether the assets that are affected by the obligation are part of the relevant market in accordance with the market analysis, provided that the obligation is necessary and proportionate to meet the objectives of Article 3'''''.
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
1. Where Member States authorise the use of radio spectrum through individual rights of use for a limited period of time, they shall ensure that the authorisation is granted for a period that is appropriate in view of the objective pursued taking due account of the need to ensure effective and efficient use''''',''''' promote efficient investments, including by allowing for an appropriate period for investment amortisation ''''', promote innovation and allow for the evolution of services and technologies'''''.
+
2. National regulatory authorities '''''shall take account in particular of the following factors:''''''''''(a) the technical and economic viability of using or installing competing facilities, in the light of the rate of market development, taking into account the nature and type of interconnection and/or access involved, including the viability of other upstream access products such as access to ducts;''''''''''(b) the technological evolution affecting network design and management''''''''''(c) the feasibility of providing the access proposed, in relation to the capacity available;''''''''''(d) the initial investment by the facility owner, taking account of any public investment made and the risks involved in making the investment;''''''''''(e) the need to safeguard competition in the long term, with particular attention to economically efficient infrastructure-based competition;''''''''''(f) where appropriate, any relevant intellectual property rights;''''''''''(g) the provision of pan-European services'''''.
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
''Justification: in accordance with rule 104 of the rules of procedure, this amendment is necessary for pressing reasons related to the internal logic of the text''
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
 
+
=== Amendment 894 - ===
BS ETNO
 
 
 
=== Amendment 664 / ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 664'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 894'''<br/>
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Dan Nica, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Jeppe Kofod, Martina Werner<br/>
+
Michel Reimon<br/>
'''S&D'''<br/>
+
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
Article 49 – paragraph 1
+
Article 70 – paragraph 2
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
1. Where Member States authorise the use of radio spectrum through individual rights of use for a limited period of time, they shall ensure that the authorisation is granted for a period that is appropriate in view of the objective pursued taking due account of the need to ensure effective and efficient use and promote efficient investments, including by allowing for an appropriate period for investment amortisation.
+
2. National regulatory authorities '''''may impose obligations on an operator to provide access in accordance with this Article, irrespective of whether the assets that are affected by the obligation are part''''' of the '''''relevant market in accordance with the market analysis, provided that the obligation is necessary and proportionate to meet the objectives of Article 3.'''''
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
1. Where Member States authorise the use of radio spectrum through individual rights of use for a limited period of time, they shall ensure that the authorisation is granted for a period that is appropriate in view of the objective pursued taking due account of the need to ensure '''''competition as well as''''' effective and efficient use and promote efficient investments, including by allowing for an appropriate period for investment amortisation.
+
2. National regulatory authorities '''''shall take account in particular''''' of the '''''following factors:'''''
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
| colspan='2' |
''Justification: We should strengthen the criteria not only towards investment but also competition.''
+
''Justification: Civil engineering access enhances infrastructure-based-competition but should not be treated as the sole or primary remedy. That is what it is necessary to include the complementary obligation of giving access to the entire physical network elements (i.e. passive access). Passive remedies, compared to active ones, remain the main wholesale access products that ensure and promote sustainable infrastructure-based competition. The amendment therefore gives priority to passive over active remedies.''
 
|}
 
|}
  
 
+
=== Amendment 895 - ===
Inclusion de la compétition
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 665 + ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 665'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 895'''<br/>
András Gyürk<br/>
+
Michel Reimon<br/>
'''EPP'''<br/>
+
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
Article 49 – paragraph 2
+
Article 70 – paragraph 2 – point a (new)
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
'''''2.''''' '''''Where Member States grant rights of use for harmonised radio spectrum for a limited period of time, those rights of use for harmonised radio spectrum shall be valid for a duration of at least 25 years, except in the case of temporary rights, temporary extension of rights pursuant to paragraph 3 and rights for secondary use in harmonised bands.'''''
+
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
'''''deleted'''''
+
'''''(a)''''' '''''the technical and economic viability of using or installing competing facilities, in the light of the rate of market development, taking into account the nature and type of interconnection and/or access involved, including the viability of other upstream access products such as access to ducts;'''''
 
|}
 
|}
  
 
+
=== Amendment 896 - ===
Retrait de l'obligation de 25 ans (! à voir si c'est remplacé)
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 666 -- ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #A60000; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 666'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 896'''<br/>
Edouard Martin<br/>
+
Michel Reimon<br/>
'''S&D'''<br/>
+
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
Article 49 – paragraph 2
+
Article 70 – paragraph 2 – point b (new)
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
2. Where Member States grant rights of use for harmonised radio spectrum for a limited period of time, those rights of use for harmonised radio spectrum shall be valid for a duration of at least '''''25''''' years, except in the case of temporary rights, temporary extension of rights pursuant to paragraph 3 and rights for secondary use in harmonised bands.
+
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
2. Where Member States grant rights of use for harmonised radio spectrum for a limited period of time, those rights of use for harmonised radio spectrum shall be valid for a duration of at least '''''15''''' years, except in the case of temporary rights, temporary extension of rights pursuant to paragraph 3 and rights for secondary use in harmonised bands''''', and subject to the provisions of Article 19 and 30. Where the rights of use duration goes beyond 15 years, a mid-term assessment shall be convened after 10 years of granting the rights of use. Rights of use may be withdrawn or adjusted by the Member States pursuant to this assessment if such allocation prevents:''''''''''- ensuring the efficient and effective use of radio spectrum,''''''''''- pursuing a general interest objective, such as the achievement of the Union connectivity targets, or''''''''''- organising and using radio spectrum for public order, public security purposes or defence.''''''''''In case of withdrawal, the rights of use can only be revoked after a transitional period'''''.
+
'''''(b)''''' '''''the technological evolution affecting network design and management'''''
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
''Justification: The harmonised license duration is a set as a minimum but it remains up to the MS to decide to grant it for a longer period. The proposal here aims at guaranteeing at the same time a degree of visibility and certainty for market players (15 years) across the EU, while introducing flexibility safeguards in case MS decide to grant rights of use for a longer period.''
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
 
+
=== Amendment 897 - ===
15 ans, ça reste trop + revue de tous les 10 ans
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 667 -- ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #A60000; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 667'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 897'''<br/>
Eva Kaili<br/>
+
Michel Reimon<br/>
'''S&D'''<br/>
+
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
Article 49 – paragraph 2
+
Article 70 – paragraph 2 – point c (new)
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
2. Where Member States grant rights of use for harmonised radio spectrum for a limited period of time, those rights of use '''''for harmonised radio spectrum shall be valid for a duration of at least 25''''' years''''', except in the case of temporary''''' rights''''', temporary extension of rights pursuant to paragraph 3 and rights for secondary use in harmonised bands'''''.
+
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
2. Where Member States grant rights of use for harmonised radio spectrum for a limited period of time, '''''they shall ensure''''' those rights of use '''''remain valid for a minimum period of [15] years subject to a mid-term assessment after [7-10]''''' years '''''of granting the rights of use. Rights of use may be withdrawn or adjusted by the Member States after the mid-term assessment if such''''' rights '''''prevent:''''''''''- ensuring the efficient and effective use of radio spectrum,''''''''''- pursuing a general interest objective, such as the achievement of the Union connectivity targets, or''''''''''- organising and using radio spectrum for public order, public security purposes or defence.''''''''''In case of withdrawal, the rights of use can only be revoked after a transitional period'''''.
+
'''''(c)''''' '''''the feasibility of providing the access proposed, in relation to the capacity available;'''''
 
|}
 
|}
  
 
+
=== Amendment 898 - ===
Idem 666
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 668 -- ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #A60000; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 668'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 898'''<br/>
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Dan Nica, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Jeppe Kofod, Martina Werner<br/>
+
Michel Reimon<br/>
'''S&D'''<br/>
+
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
Article 49 – paragraph 2
+
Article 70 – paragraph 2 – point d (new)
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
2. Where Member States grant rights of use for harmonised radio spectrum for a limited period of time, those rights of use '''''for harmonised radio spectrum shall be valid for a duration of at least 25''''' years''''', except in the case of temporary''''' rights''''', temporary extension of rights pursuant to paragraph 3 and rights for secondary use in harmonised bands'''''.
+
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
2. Where Member States grant rights of use for harmonised radio spectrum for a limited period of time, '''''they shall ensure''''' those rights of use '''''remain valid for a minimum period of [15] years subject to a mid-term assessment after [7-10]''''' years '''''of granting the rights of use. Rights of use may be withdrawn or adjusted by the Member States after the mid-term assessment if such''''' rights '''''prevent:''''''''''- ensuring the efficient and effective use of radio spectrum,''''''''''- pursuing a general interest objective, such as the achievement of the Union connectivity targets, or''''''''''- organising and using radio spectrum for public order, public security purposes or defence.''''''''''In case of withdrawal, the rights of use can only be revoked after a transitional period'''''.
+
'''''(d)''''' '''''the initial investment by the facility owner, taking account of any public investment made and the risks involved in making the investment;'''''
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
''Justification: We need to ensure effective and efficient use of spectrum and promotion of efficient investments by bringing certainty to the markets. Setting a licence duration might be one means to achieve this. However, trusting the scarce resource of radio spectrum to limited amount of players in society for a long time may hamper innovations and technological development as well as harm the competitive market dynamics and the ability of new entrants to access spectrum reliant markets, which all may result in less positive impact for citizens and consumers. We should keep in mind that there might not be a single duration that is suitable for all situations and Member States. Further than that, betting the 30 years licence to a wrong horse in 1987 could have created significant obstacles for European digital development.''
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
 +
=== Amendment 899 - ===
  
Idem 666, 667
+
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 +
|-
 +
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
 +
'''Amendment 899'''<br/>
 +
Michel Reimon<br/>
 +
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
 +
Article 70 – paragraph 2 – point e (new)
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
  
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
'''''(e)''''' '''''the need to safeguard competition in the long term, with particular attention to economically efficient infrastructure based competition;'''''
 +
|}
  
=== Amendment 669 -- ===
+
=== Amendment 900 - ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #A60000; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 669'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 900'''<br/>
José Blanco López<br/>
+
Michel Reimon<br/>
'''S&D'''<br/>
+
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
Article 49 – paragraph 2
+
Article 70 – paragraph 2 – point f (new)
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
2. Where Member States grant rights of use for harmonised radio spectrum for a limited period of time, those rights of use '''''for harmonised radio spectrum shall be valid for a duration of at least 25''''' years''''', except in the case of temporary''''' rights''''', temporary extension of rights pursuant to paragraph 3 and rights for secondary use in harmonised bands'''''.
+
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
2. Where Member States grant rights of use for harmonised radio spectrum for a limited period of time, '''''they shall ensure''''' those rights of use '''''remain valid for a minimum period of [15] years subject to a mid-term assessment after [7-10]''''' years '''''of granting the rights of use. Rights of use may be withdrawn or adjusted by the Member States after the mid-term assessment if such''''' rights '''''prevent:''''''''''- ensuring the efficient and effective use of radio spectrum,''''''''''- pursuing a general interest objective, such as the achievement of the Union connectivity targets, or''''''''''- organising and using radio spectrum for public order, public security purposes or defence.''''''''''In case of withdrawal, the rights of use can only be revoked after a transitional period'''''.
+
'''''(f)''''' '''''the provision of pan-European services.'''''
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Idem 666, 667, 668
 
  
 
+
=== Amendment 901 - ===
=== Amendment 670 + ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 670'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 901'''<br/>
Kaja Kallas, Marietje Schaake<br/>
+
Anna Záborská, Ivan Štefanec<br/>
'''ALDE'''<br/>
+
'''EPP'''<br/>
Article 49 – paragraph 2
+
Article 70 a (new)
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-bottom:0em;'|
 +
 
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-bottom:0em;'|
 +
'''''Article 70 a'''''
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
2. Where Member States grant rights of use for harmonised radio spectrum for a limited period of time, those rights of use for harmonised radio spectrum shall be valid for a duration of '''''at least''''' 25 years, except in the case of temporary rights, temporary extension of rights pursuant to paragraph 3 and rights for secondary use in harmonised bands.
+
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
2. Where Member States grant rights of use for harmonised radio spectrum for a limited period of time, those rights of use for harmonised radio spectrum shall be valid for a '''''maximum''''' duration of 25 years, except in the case of temporary rights, temporary extension of rights pursuant to paragraph 3 and rights for secondary use in harmonised bands.'''''Where rights of use have been granted for a duration of 25 years, Member states shall conduct reviews at regular intervals of every 5 years to assess if the use of spectrum is the most efficient in light of technological or market evolution, and where justified and necessary shall amend such rights in accordance with articles 50 and 51.'''''
+
'''''Access obligations beyond civil engineering'''''
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' |
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em'|
''Justification: In accordance with rule 104 of the rules of procedure, this amendment is necessary for pressing reasons related to the internal logic of the text''
+
 
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em'|
 +
'''''In geographic areas where two access networks can be expected on a forward-looking basis and where at least one of the network operators offers wholesale access to any interested undertaking, on reasonable commercial terms permitting sustainable competition on the retail market, national regulatory authorities shall not impose or maintain wholesale access obligations, beyond access to civil infrastructure according to Article 3 of Directive 2014/61/EU.'''''
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Maximum 25 years with a review every 5 years
 
  
=== Amendment 671 -- ===
+
 
 +
=== Amendment 907 + ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #A60000; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 671'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 907'''<br/>
Gunnar Hökmark, Michał Boni, Bendt Bendtsen<br/>
+
Michel Reimon<br/>
'''EPP'''<br/>
+
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
Article 49 – paragraph 2
+
Article 71 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
2. Where Member States grant rights of use for harmonised radio spectrum for a limited period of time, those rights of use for harmonised radio spectrum shall be valid for a duration of at least '''''25''''' years, except in the case of temporary rights, temporary extension of rights pursuant to paragraph 3 and rights for secondary use in harmonised bands.
+
'''''Only where''''' a national regulatory authority '''''concludes that the obligations imposed in accordance with Article 70 would not on their own lead to the achievement of the objectives set out in Article 3, it''''' may, in accordance with the provisions of Article 66, impose obligations on operators to meet reasonable requests for access to, and use of, specific network elements and associated facilities, in situations where the national regulatory authority considers that denial of access or unreasonable terms and conditions having a similar effect would hinder the emergence of a sustainable competitive market at the retail level, and would not be in the end-user's interest.
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
2. Where Member States grant rights of use for harmonised radio spectrum for a limited period of time, those rights of use for harmonised radio spectrum shall be valid for a duration of at least '''''30''''' years''''', provided there are conditions to facilitate trading, leasing and sharing of rights''''', except in the case of temporary rights, temporary extension of rights pursuant to paragraph 3 and rights for secondary use in harmonised bands.
+
A national regulatory authority may, in accordance with the provisions of Article 66, impose obligations on operators to meet reasonable requests for access to, and use of, specific network elements and associated facilities, in situations where the national regulatory authority considers that denial of access or unreasonable terms and conditions having a similar effect would hinder the emergence of a sustainable competitive market at the retail level, and would not be in the end-user's interest.
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
30 ans, trop long
 
  
  
=== Amendment 672 - ===
+
=== Amendment 908 + ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 672'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 908'''<br/>
David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano<br/>
+
José Blanco López, Inmaculada Rodríguez-Piñero Fernández, Soledad Cabezón Ruiz<br/>
'''EFDD'''<br/>
+
'''S&D'''<br/>
Article 49 – paragraph 2
+
Article 71 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
2. Where Member States grant rights of use for harmonised radio spectrum for a limited period of time, those rights of use for harmonised radio spectrum shall be valid for a duration of at least '''''25''''' years, except in the case of temporary rights, temporary extension of rights pursuant to paragraph 3 and rights for secondary use in harmonised bands.
+
'''''Only where''''' a national regulatory authority '''''concludes that the obligations imposed in accordance with Article 70 would not on their own lead to the achievement of the objectives set out in Article 3, it''''' may, in accordance with the provisions of Article 66, impose obligations on operators to meet reasonable requests for access to, and use of, specific network elements and associated facilities, in situations where the national regulatory authority considers that denial of access or unreasonable terms and conditions having a similar effect would hinder the emergence of a sustainable competitive market at the retail level, and would not be in the end-user's interest.
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
2. Where Member States grant rights of use for harmonised radio spectrum for a limited period of time, those rights of use for harmonised radio spectrum shall be valid for a duration of at least '''''10''''' years, except in the case of temporary rights, temporary extension of rights pursuant to paragraph 3 and rights for secondary use in harmonised bands.
+
A national regulatory authority may, in accordance with the provisions of Article 66, impose obligations on operators to meet reasonable requests for access to, and use of, specific network elements and associated facilities, in situations where the national regulatory authority considers that denial of access or unreasonable terms and conditions having a similar effect would hinder the emergence of a sustainable competitive market at the retail level, and would not be in the end-user's interest.
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
''Justification: The amendment aims to shorten the duration of 25 years for licenses, which is too long.''
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
10 ans trop long
+
Same as AM 907
  
  
=== Amendment 673 -- ===
+
=== Amendment 914 - ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #A60000; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 673'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 914'''<br/>
Evžen Tošenovský<br/>
+
Pavel Telička<br/>
'''ECR'''<br/>
+
'''EFDD'''<br/>
Article 49 – paragraph 2
+
Article 71 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point a
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
2. Where Member States grant rights of use for harmonised radio spectrum for a limited period of time, those rights of use for harmonised radio spectrum shall be valid for '''''a duration of at least 25 years''''', except in the case of temporary rights, temporary extension of rights pursuant to paragraph 3 and rights for secondary use in harmonised bands.
+
(a) to give third parties access to specified '''''network elements and/or facilities, as appropriate including access to''''' network elements '''''which are either not''''' active '''''or physical and/or active or virtual unbundled access to the local loop''''';
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
2. Where Member States grant rights of use for harmonised radio spectrum for a limited period of time, those rights of use for harmonised radio spectrum shall be valid for '''''an appropriate duration''''', except in the case of temporary rights, temporary extension of rights pursuant to paragraph 3 and rights for secondary use in harmonised bands.
+
(a) to give third parties access to specified '''''non-physical''''' network elements '''''including''''' active '''''services''''';
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Dérégulation et laissé vide
+
This amendment gives the priority of passive access over active access remedies which is not always the best solution especially for enabling small actors to enter the market and thus foster competition.
  
  
=== Amendment 674 ++ ===
+
=== Amendment 916 - ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 674'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 916'''<br/>
Michel Reimon<br/>
+
David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano<br/>
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
+
'''EPP'''<br/>
Article 49 – paragraph 2
+
Article 71 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point a
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
2. Where Member States grant rights of use for harmonised radio spectrum for a limited period of time, those rights of use for harmonised radio spectrum shall be valid for a duration of '''''at least''''' 25 years, '''''except in the case of temporary rights, temporary extension of rights pursuant to paragraph 3 and rights for secondary use in harmonised bands'''''.
+
(a) to give third parties access to specified '''''network elements and/or facilities, as appropriate including access to''''' network elements '''''which are either not''''' active '''''or physical and/or active or virtual unbundled access to the local loop''''';
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
2. Where Member States grant rights of use for harmonised radio spectrum for a limited period of time, those rights of use for harmonised radio spectrum shall be valid for a '''''maximum''''' duration of 25 years, '''''reviewed at regular intervals of maximum 5 years for assessing and amending the rights according to laydown procedures'''''.
+
(a) to give third parties access to specified '''''non-physical''''' network elements '''''including''''' active '''''services''''';
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
| colspan='2' |
''Justification: The draft Code proposes to extend to a minimum of 25 years the duration of rights to use the radio spectrum. This is disproportionate and unnecessary. Experience shows us that 20 years is already too long, especially considering that the regulation does not enable regulators to act when necessary, e.g. by withdrawing authorisation, even if the operator fails to honor its commitments. Allocating spectrum for more than 5 years would necessitate adding a revision clause/sunset date regularly, with sanctions if the operator fails its obligations. The maximum length of allocation shall be 25 years, with such scheduled sunset dates. The "use it or lose it" clause proposed in the Code is insufficient to enable NRAs to withdraw authorisation if necessary. The capacities of the NRAs should thus be enhanced and more detailed in order to control the use of the licences, preventing holders from "parking" frequencies for too long, thereby hindering connectivity and innovation.''
+
''Justification: This amendment aims at ensuring the priority of passive access over active access remedies.''
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Maximum 25 ans et revue tous les 5 ans
 
  
  
=== Amendment 675 - ===
+
=== Amendment 917 + ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 675'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 917'''<br/>
Michał Boni, Françoise Grossetête, Anne Sander<br/>
+
Michel Reimon<br/>
'''EPP'''<br/>
+
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
Article 49 – paragraph 3
+
Article 71 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point a
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
3. Member States may extend the duration of rights of use for a '''''short''''' period of time to ensure the simultaneous expiry of rights in one or several bands.
+
(a) to give third parties access to specified network elements and/or facilities, as appropriate including '''''access to network elements''''' which '''''are either not active or physical and/or active or virtual unbundled access to the local loop''''';
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
3. Member States may '''''without prejudice to Article 53,'''''extend the duration of rights of use for a period of time to ensure the simultaneous expiry of rights in one or several bands''''', which shall be as short as possible'''''.
+
(a) to give third parties access to specified '''''non-physical''''' network elements and/or facilities, as appropriate including '''''active services under transparent and regulated tariff conditions,''''' which '''''at least make it possible to reproduce the tariffs of the retail offers of the regulated operator''''';
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
''Justification: It is important that any attempt to ensure the simultaneous expiry of rights does not interfere with attempts to secure the coordinated use of harmonised radio spectrum in the Union in accordance with Article 53. Amendment''
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Donne la possibilité d'étendre
+
This AM shall be adopted together with AM 923
  
  
=== Amendment 702 ++ ===
+
=== Amendment 923 + ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 702'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 923'''<br/>
Michel Reimon<br/>
+
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Edouard Martin, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Dan Nica, Jeppe Kofod, Patrizia Toia<br/>
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
+
'''S&D'''<br/>
Article 55 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
+
Article 71 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point a a (new)
|-
+
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
Where that provision is not commercial in character or is ancillary to another commercial activity or public service which is not dependent on the conveyance of signals on those networks, any undertaking, public authority or '''''end-user''''' providing such access shall not be subject to any general authorisation for the provision of electronic communications networks or services pursuant to Article 12, to obligations regarding '''''end-users''''' rights pursuant to Title III of Part III of this Directive nor to obligations to interconnect their networks pursuant to Article 59 (1).
+
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
Where that provision is not commercial in character or is ancillary to another commercial activity or public service which is not dependent on the conveyance of signals on those networks, any undertaking, public authority or '''''user''''' providing such access shall not be subject to any general authorisation for the provision of electronic communications networks or services pursuant to Article 12, to obligations regarding '''''users''''' rights pursuant to Title III of Part III of this Directive nor to obligations to interconnect their networks pursuant to Article 59 (1). '''''Individuals providing such access not-for-profit shall not be liable for information transmitted by third parties over such access.'''''
+
'''''(a a)''''' '''''obligations to share with third parties specified network elements, including shared access to the metallic local loop and sub-loop as well as shared access to fibre loops and fibre terminating segments, including wavelength division multiplexing and similar sharing solutions;'''''
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
''Justification: The Proposal intends to foster the development of radio local area networks, especially where they provide services which are not commercial in character. The development of such networks mainly depends on the personal participation of individual volunteers, who expend the networks by managing their own relays and access points. However, such a participation is hindered by several laws which seek to prevent the sharing of Internet connections amongst several users by making people responsible (and potentially liable) for all communication made through their Wi-Fi connection, and create legal risks for people sharing their connection.In Germany, rights-holders have used a "secondary liability" doctrine to chill the growth of the community networks movement. In France too, copyright law imposes a secondary liability regime that creates significant legal uncertainty for people sharing their network connections with other users. The so-called "mere conduit", inscribed in EU law since 2000 in the directive on information society services, needs to be clearly guaranteed and expanded to small-area wireless access points.In the same spirit, contract clauses that forbid subscribers to share their connections with others should be prohibited in any case: the possibility to share their connections should not be limited to specific offers.Promoting a right to share Internet connections is all the more vital considering the economic and ecological crises, as well as the rapid increase of populations that cannot afford access to the Internet. In this context, connection sharing can play a critical role in fostering a more equitable and sustainable use of telecommunications infrastructure.''
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
mise en place de protections et d'avantages pour les non-profit
+
This AM shall be adopted together with AM 917
  
  
=== Amendment 703 ++ ===
+
=== Amendment 932 - ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 703'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 932'''<br/>
Kaja Kallas, Marietje Schaake<br/>
+
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Edouard Martin, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Dan Nica, Jeppe Kofod, Patrizia Toia<br/>
'''ALDE'''<br/>
+
'''S&D'''<br/>
Article 55 – paragraph 2
+
Article 71 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point e
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
2. Competent authorities shall not prevent providers of public communications networks or publicly available electronic communications services from allowing access to their networks to the public, through radio local area networks, which may be located at an end-user's premises, subject to compliance with the applicable general authorisation conditions and the prior informed agreement of the end-user.
+
'''''(e)''''' '''''to provide co-location or other forms of associated facilities sharing;'''''
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
2. Competent authorities shall not prevent providers of public communications networks or publicly available electronic communications services from allowing access to their networks to the public, through radio local area networks, which may be located at an end-user's premises, subject to compliance with the applicable general authorisation conditions and the prior informed agreement of the end-user. '''''Individuals providing access to their networks for non-commercial purposes shall not be liable for information transmitted by third parties through the use of such access.'''''
+
'''''deleted'''''
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
''Justification: In accordance with rule 104 of the rules of procedure, this amendment is necessary for pressing reasons related to the internal logic of the text''
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Idem 702
+
=== Amendment 933 - ===
  
 
+
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
=== Amendment 704 + ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 704'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 933'''<br/>
José Blanco López, Sergio Gutiérrez Prieto, Inmaculada Rodríguez-Piñero Fernández, Soledad Cabezón Ruiz<br/>
+
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Edouard Martin, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Dan Nica, Jeppe Kofod, Patrizia Toia<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
Article 55 – paragraph 2
+
Article 71 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point f
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
2. Competent authorities shall not prevent providers of public communications networks or publicly available electronic communications services from allowing access to their networks to the public, through radio local area networks, which may be located at an end-user's premises, subject to compliance with the applicable general authorisation conditions and the prior informed agreement of the end-user.
+
'''''(f)''''' '''''to provide specified services needed to ensure interoperability of end-to-end services to users, including facilities for software emulated networks or roaming on mobile networks;'''''
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
2. Competent authorities shall not prevent providers of public communications networks or publicly available electronic communications services from allowing access to their networks to the public, through radio local area networks, which may be located at an end-user's premises, subject to compliance with the applicable general authorisation conditions and the prior informed '''''and explicit''''' agreement of the end-user.
+
'''''deleted'''''
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
''Justification: Sharing of consumers' private Wi-Fi networks may bring benefits to consumers as they can use additional access points. However, it is imperative that such additional networks are only installed on consumers' private equipment with their explicit consent and that the consumer whose internet access service is being shared is under no circumstance responsible nor liable for any use that other person might do while connected to his Wi-Fi network.''
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Consentement explicite
+
=== Amendment 935 - ===
 
 
=== Amendment 705 / ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 705'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 935'''<br/>
Michel Reimon<br/>
+
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Edouard Martin, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Dan Nica, Jeppe Kofod, Patrizia Toia<br/>
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
+
'''S&D'''<br/>
Article 55 – paragraph 2
+
Article 71 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point g
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
2. Competent authorities shall not prevent providers of public communications networks or publicly available electronic communications services from allowing access to their networks to the public, through radio local area networks, which may be located at an '''''end-user's''''' premises, subject to compliance with the applicable general authorisation conditions and the prior informed agreement of the '''''end-user'''''.
+
'''''(g)''''' '''''to provide access to operational support systems or similar software systems necessary to ensure fair competition in the provision of services;'''''
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
2. Competent authorities shall not prevent providers of public communications networks or publicly available electronic communications services from allowing access to their networks to the public, through radio local area networks, which may be located at an '''''user's''''' premises, subject to compliance with the applicable general authorisation conditions and the prior informed agreement of the '''''user'''''.
+
'''''deleted'''''
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
End user > user, quel intérêt ?
+
=== Amendment 936 - ===
  
 +
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 +
|-
 +
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
 +
'''Amendment 936'''<br/>
 +
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Edouard Martin, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Dan Nica, Jeppe Kofod, Patrizia Toia<br/>
 +
'''S&D'''<br/>
 +
Article 71 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point h
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
'''''(h)''''' '''''to interconnect networks or network facilities;'''''
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
'''''deleted'''''
 +
|}
  
=== Amendment 706 ++ ===
+
 
 +
=== Amendment 937 - ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 706'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 937'''<br/>
José Blanco López, Sergio Gutiérrez Prieto, Inmaculada Rodríguez-Piñero Fernández, Soledad Cabezón Ruiz<br/>
+
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Edouard Martin, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Dan Nica, Jeppe Kofod, Patrizia Toia<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
Article 55 – paragraph 2 a (new)
+
Article 71 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point i
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 
+
'''''(i)''''' '''''to provide access to associated services such as identity, location and presence service.'''''
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
'''''2 a.''''' '''''End-users allowing access to their internet access service as set out in paragraph 2 shall not be liable for any use that other end-users might do while connected to their network.'''''
+
'''''deleted'''''
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
''Justification: Sharing of consumers' private Wi-Fi networks may bring benefits to consumers as they can use additional access points. However, it is imperative that such additional networks are only installed on consumers' private equipment with their explicit consent and that the consumer whose internet access service is being shared is under no circumstance responsible nor liable for any use that other person might do while connected to his Wi-Fi network.''
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Partage de connexion wifi et pas de résponsabilité de l'utilisation
+
=== Amendment 939 + ===
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 707 / ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 707'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 939'''<br/>
Evžen Tošenovský<br/>
+
Michel Reimon<br/>
'''ECR'''<br/>
+
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
Article 55 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
+
Article 71 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
2. '''''When national regulatory authorities are considering the appropriateness of imposing any of the possible specific obligations referred in paragraph 1, and in particular when assessing, in conformity with the principle of proportionality, whether and how such obligations should be imposed, they shall analyse whether other forms of access to wholesale inputs either on the same or a related wholesale market, would already be sufficient to address the identified problem at the retail level. The assessment shall include existing or prospective commercial access offers, regulated access pursuant to Article 59, or existing or contemplated regulated access to other wholesale inputs pursuant to this Article.''''' They shall take account in particular of the following factors:
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
2. They shall take account in particular of the following factors:
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
| colspan='2' |
In line in particular with Article 3(1) of Regulation 2015/2120 of the European Parliament and of the Council,48 competent authorities shall ensure that providers of public communications networks or publicly available electronic communications services do not unilaterally restrict:
+
''Justification: Before intervening in wholesale markets, NRAs would have to demonstrate that their intervention corresponds to a retail problem. The focus on retail markets would lead to the automatic de-regulation of wholesale markets in many cases, and would ultimately lead to the monopolisation or ‘duopolisation’. In addition, retail competition of the kind where all retail providers are dependent on one wholesale provider is not sustainable in the long run and only amounts to ‘fake-competition’ and could lead to higher prices and less innovation and choice for end-users.The mere existence of a “prospective commercial access offer” should not be a sufficient basis upon which to require regulatory forbearance – if it were, then the absence of take-up could result in a de facto unregulated monopoly (see also BEREC opinion BoR (16) 213 (p. 7)).''
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
In line in particular with Article 3(1) of Regulation 2015/2120 of the European Parliament and of the Council,48 competent authorities shall ensure that providers of public communications networks or '''''number-based''''' publicly available electronic communications services do not unilaterally restrict:
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Pas compris
+
=== Amendment 948 ++ ===
 
 
Quota : Je pense que ça revient à limite le scope de l'article aux communications qui passent par le téléphone (number).
 
 
 
=== Amendment 708 -- ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #A60000; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 708'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 948'''<br/>
Evžen Tošenovský<br/>
+
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Edouard Martin, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Dan Nica, Jeppe Kofod, Patrizia Toia<br/>
'''ECR'''<br/>
+
'''S&D'''<br/>
Article 55 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point a
+
Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point a
 
|-
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
'''''a)''''' '''''the right of end-users to accede to radio local area networks of their choice provided by third parties;'''''
+
'''''(a)''''' '''''the technical and economic viability of using or installing competing facilities, in the light of the rate of market development, taking into account the nature and type of interconnection and/or access involved, including the viability of other upstream access products such as access to ducts;'''''
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
'''''deleted'''''
 
'''''deleted'''''
Ligne 2 114 : Ligne 2 088 :
  
  
Pas le choix de réseau tiers par les utilisateurs
+
The role of NRAs is not to secure the investments of operators but to ensure a harmonious development in the territories and give to all equal access to the market and services.
  
 
+
=== Amendment 949 - ===
=== Amendment 709 / ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 709'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 949'''<br/>
Michel Reimon<br/>
+
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Edouard Martin, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Dan Nica, Jeppe Kofod, Patrizia Toia<br/>
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
+
'''S&D'''<br/>
Article 55 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point a
+
Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point b
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
a) the right of '''''end-users''''' to accede to radio local area networks of their choice provided by third parties;
+
'''''(b)''''' '''''the expected technological evolution affecting network design and management'''''
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
a) the right of '''''users''''' to accede to radio local area networks of their choice provided by third parties;
+
'''''deleted'''''
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Question Idem 705
+
=== Amendment 953 ++ ===
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 710 -- ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #A60000; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 710'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 953'''<br/>
Evžen Tošenovský<br/>
+
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Edouard Martin, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Dan Nica, Jeppe Kofod, Patrizia Toia<br/>
'''ECR'''<br/>
+
'''S&D'''<br/>
Article 55 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point b
+
Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point c
 
|-
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
'''''b)''''' '''''the right of end-users to allow reciprocally or more generally access to the networks of such providers by other end-users through radio local area networks, including on the basis of third-party initiatives which aggregate and make publicly accessible the radio local area networks of different end-users.'''''
+
'''''(c)''''' '''''the feasibility of providing the access proposed, in relation to the capacity available;'''''
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
'''''deleted'''''
 
'''''deleted'''''
Ligne 2 154 : Ligne 2 124 :
  
  
Pas le choix pour les utilisateurs
+
The role of NRAs is not to secure the investments of operators but to ensure a harmonious development in the territories and give to all equal access to the market and services.
  
 
+
=== Amendment 954 ++ ===
=== Amendment 711 / ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 711'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 954'''<br/>
Michel Reimon<br/>
+
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Edouard Martin, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Dan Nica, Jeppe Kofod, Patrizia Toia<br/>
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
+
'''S&D'''<br/>
Article 55 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point b
+
Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point d
 
|-
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
b) the right of '''''end-users''''' to allow reciprocally or more generally access to the networks of such providers by other end-users through radio local area networks, including on the basis of third-party initiatives which aggregate and make publicly accessible the radio local area networks of different end-users.
+
'''''(d)''''' '''''the initial investment by the facility owner, taking account of any public investment made and the risks involved in making the investment with particular regard to investments in and risk levels associated with very high capacity networks;'''''
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
b) the right of '''''users''''' to allow reciprocally or more generally access to the networks of such providers by other end-users through radio local area networks, including on the basis of third-party initiatives which aggregate and make publicly accessible the radio local area networks of different end-users.
+
'''''deleted'''''
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Question idem 705, 709
+
The role of NRAs is not to secure the investments of operators but to ensure a harmonious development in the territories and give to all equal access to the market and services.
  
=== Amendment 712 + ===
+
=== Amendment 955 + ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 712'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 955'''<br/>
Evžen Tošenovský<br/>
+
Fulvio Martusciello<br/>
'''ECR'''<br/>
+
'''EPP'''<br/>
Article 55 – paragraph 3 subparagraph 2
+
Article 71 – paragraph 2 point d
 
|-
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
'''''To that end, providers of public communications networks or publicly available electronic communications services shall make available and actively offer, clearly and transparently, products or specific offers allowing its end-users to provide access to third parties through a radio local area network.'''''
+
(d) the initial investment by the facility owner, taking account of any public investment made and the risks involved in making the investment '''''with particular regard to investments in and risk levels associated with very high capacity networks''''';
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
'''''deleted'''''
+
(d) the initial investment by the facility owner, taking account of any public investment made and the risks involved in making the investment;
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Contract clauses that forbid subscribers to share their connections with others should be prohibited in any case: the possibility to share their connections should not be limited to specific offers.
+
=== Amendment 959 + ===
 
 
=== Amendment 713 + ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 713'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 959'''<br/>
Michel Reimon<br/>
+
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Edouard Martin, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Dan Nica, Jeppe Kofod, Patrizia Toia<br/>
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
+
'''S&D'''<br/>
Article 55 – paragraph 3 subparagraph 2
+
Article 71 – paragraph 2 point e
 
|-
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
'''''To that end, providers of public communications networks or publicly available electronic communications services shall make available and actively offer, clearly and transparently, products or specific offers allowing its end-users to provide access to third parties through a radio local area network.'''''
+
'''''(e)''''' '''''the need to safeguard competition in the long term, with particular attention to economically efficient infrastructure-based competition and to sustainable competition based on co-investment in networks;'''''
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 
'''''deleted'''''
 
'''''deleted'''''
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
''Justification: Contract clauses that forbid subscribers to share their connections with others should be prohibited in any case: the possibility to share their connections should not be limited to specific offers.''
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Contract clauses that forbid subscribers to share their connections with others should be prohibited in any case: the possibility to share their connections should not be limited to specific offers.
+
=== Amendment 961 - ===
 
 
=== Amendment 714 + ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 714'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 961'''<br/>
Michel Reimon<br/>
+
José Blanco López, Inmaculada Rodríguez-Piñero Fernández, Soledad Cabezón Ruiz<br/>
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
+
'''S&D'''<br/>
Article 55 – paragraph 4
+
Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point e
 
|-
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
4. Competent authorities shall not restrict the right of '''''end-users''''' to allow reciprocally or more generally access to their radio local area networks by other end-users, including on the basis of third-party initiatives which aggregate and make the radio local area networks of different end-users publicly accessible.
+
(e) the need to safeguard competition in the long term, with particular attention to economically efficient infrastructure-based competition and to sustainable competition based on co-investment in networks;
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
4. Competent authorities shall not restrict the right of '''''users''''' to allow reciprocally or more generally access to their radio local area networks by other end-users, including on the basis of third-party initiatives which aggregate and make the radio local area networks of different end-users publicly accessible.
+
(e) the need to safeguard competition in the long term, with particular attention to economically efficient infrastructure-based competition and to sustainable competition based on '''''innovative commercial business models such as, but not only,''''' co-investment in networks;
 +
|-
 +
| colspan='2' |
 +
''Justification: Recital 166 introduces the need to take into account newly concluded voluntary agreements between operators in order to provide regulatory flexibility. Co-investment is a particular case, but not the only one''
 
|}
 
|}
  
 
+
=== Amendment 965 + ===
Users et end-users ont pas les mêmes obligations et les mêmes droits user => business et end-user => gens. Pas normal, cet amendement le règle
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 715 + ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 715'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 965'''<br/>
 
Michel Reimon<br/>
 
Michel Reimon<br/>
 
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
 
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
Article 55 – paragraph 5 – point b
+
Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point e
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(b) by initiatives of non-governmental organisations or public authorities to aggregate and make reciprocally or more generally accessible the radio local area networks of different '''''end-users''''', including, where applicable, the radio local area networks to which public access is provided in accordance with point (a).
+
(e) the need to safeguard competition in the long term, with particular attention to economically efficient infrastructure-based competition '''''and to sustainable competition based on co-investment in networks''''';
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(b) by initiatives of non-governmental organisations or public authorities to aggregate and make reciprocally or more generally accessible the radio local area networks of different '''''users''''', including, where applicable, the radio local area networks to which public access is provided in accordance with point (a).
+
(e) the need to safeguard competition in the long term, with particular attention to economically efficient infrastructure-based competition;
 +
|-
 +
| colspan='2' |
 +
''Justification: Concerning, co-investment schemes: some of them have the potential to create ineffectively competitive market outcomes. The Commission’s proposal includes criteria in Annex IV as well as conditions against which co-investment offers should be judged (compliance with which would entitle the co-investment to effectively benefit from a regulatory holiday). However, these do not provide sufficient competition protections to warrant a relaxation of SMP regulation. It is also worth bearing in mind that co-investments by their nature can lead to coordinated behaviour, which in turn could produce uncompetitive outcomes. Ultimately, the resulting reduction in competition could lead to higher prices and less innovation and choice for end-users. In its opinion BoR (16) 213 (p. 7), BEREC recognises “[T]he risk is that in seeking to incentivise investment through regulatory forbearance, the Commission’s proposals could undermine competition, which in turn would impact on the virtuous cycle of competition- and demand driven investment. The Commission’s proposals would therefore undermine their own ultimate goal of increasing high-speed connectivity.”''
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Idem 714
+
=== Amendment 968 ++ ===
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 717 + ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 717'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 968'''<br/>
Pervenche Berès, Edouard Martin<br/>
+
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Edouard Martin, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Dan Nica, Jeppe Kofod, Patrizia Toia<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
Article 59 – paragraph 1 subparagraph 1
+
Article 71 – paragraph 2 point g
 
|-
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
Pour réaliser les objectifs exposés à l’article 3, les autorités de régulation nationales encouragent et, le cas échéant, assurent, conformément aux dispositions de la présente directive, un accès et une interconnexion adéquats, ainsi que l’interopérabilité des services et elles s’acquittent de leur tâche de façon à promouvoir l’efficacité économique, à favoriser une concurrence durable '''''et''''' le déploiement de réseaux à très haute capacité, à encourager des investissements efficients et l’innovation et à procurer un avantage maximal à l’utilisateur final. Elles fournissent des orientations et rendent publiques les procédures applicables pour l’obtention de l’accès et de l’interconnexion, afin que les petites et moyennes entreprises et les opérateurs actifs dans une zone géographique limitée puissent bénéficier des obligations imposées.
+
'''''(g)''''' '''''the provision of pan-European services.'''''
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
Pour réaliser les objectifs exposés à l’article 3, les autorités de régulation nationales encouragent et, le cas échéant, assurent, conformément aux dispositions de la présente directive, un accès et une interconnexion adéquats, ainsi que l’interopérabilité des services et elles s’acquittent de leur tâche de façon à promouvoir l’efficacité économique, à favoriser une concurrence durable''''', le pluralisme des médias, la diversité culturelle,''''' le déploiement de réseaux à très haute capacité, à encourager des investissements efficients et l’innovation et à procurer un avantage maximal à l’utilisateur final. Elles fournissent des orientations et rendent publiques les procédures applicables pour l’obtention de l’accès et de l’interconnexion, afin que les petites et moyennes entreprises et les opérateurs actifs dans une zone géographique limitée puissent bénéficier des obligations imposées.
+
'''''deleted'''''
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Possibilité de lutter contre des offres qui limite la liberté de l'information via des offres bundle
+
The role of NRAs is not to secure the investments of operators but to ensure a harmonious development in the territories and give to all equal access to the market and services.
  
=== Amendment 718 / ===
+
=== Amendment 969 ++ ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 718'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 969'''<br/>
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Dan Nica, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Jeppe Kofod<br/>
+
Michel Reimon<br/>
'''S&D'''<br/>
+
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
Article 59 – paragraph 1 subparagraph 1
+
Article 71 – paragraph 2 point g a (new)
 
|-
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
National regulatory authorities shall, acting in pursuit of the objectives set out in Article 3, encourage and where appropriate ensure, in accordance with the provisions of this Directive, adequate access and interconnection, and the interoperability of services, exercising their responsibility in a way that promotes efficiency, sustainable competition, '''''the deployment of very high capacity networks,''''' efficient investment and innovation, and gives the maximum benefit to end-users. They shall provide guidance and make publicly available the procedures applicable to gain access and interconnection to ensure that small and medium-sized enterprises and operators with a limited geographical reach can benefit from the obligations imposed.
+
 
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
National regulatory authorities shall, acting in pursuit of the objectives set out in Article 3, encourage and where appropriate ensure, in accordance with the provisions of this Directive, adequate access and interconnection, and the interoperability of services, exercising their responsibility in a way that promotes efficiency, sustainable competition, efficient investment and innovation, and gives the maximum benefit to end-users. They shall provide guidance and make publicly available the procedures applicable to gain access and interconnection to ensure that small and medium-sized enterprises and operators with a limited geographical reach can benefit from the obligations imposed.
+
'''''(g a)''''' '''''the existence of a broad choice of offers and providers for fixed and mobile access, for each consumer in Europe irrespective of their place of residence;'''''
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
''Justification: Significant Market Power (SMP) is an important barrier for regulatory intervention. Oligopolistic structures are increasingly commonplace as a result of market consolidation and NRAs should be able to regulate oligopolistic market structures when necessary. We should either delete the part on very high capacity networks or ensure that the objectives in Article 3 are in fact equal.''
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
À vérifier
+
The role of NRAs is not to secure the investments of operators but to ensure a harmonious development in the territories and give to all equal access to the market and services.
  
 
+
=== Amendment 970 ++ ===
=== Amendment 719 / ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 719'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 970'''<br/>
 
Michel Reimon<br/>
 
Michel Reimon<br/>
 
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
 
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
Article 59 – paragraph 1 subparagraph 1
+
Article 71 – paragraph 2 point g b (new)
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
National regulatory authorities shall, acting in pursuit of the objectives set out in Article 3, encourage and where appropriate ensure, in accordance with the provisions of this Directive, adequate access and interconnection, and the interoperability of services, exercising their responsibility in a way that promotes efficiency, sustainable competition, '''''the deployment of very high capacity networks,''''' efficient investment and innovation, and gives the maximum benefit to end-users. They shall provide guidance and make publicly available the procedures applicable to gain access and interconnection to ensure that small and medium-sized enterprises and operators with a limited geographical reach can benefit from the obligations imposed.
+
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
National regulatory authorities shall, acting in pursuit of the objectives set out in Article 3, encourage and where appropriate ensure, in accordance with the provisions of this Directive, adequate access and interconnection, and the interoperability of services, exercising their responsibility in a way that promotes efficiency, sustainable competition, efficient investment and innovation, and gives the maximum benefit to end-users. They shall provide guidance and make publicly available the procedures applicable to gain access and interconnection to ensure that small and medium-sized enterprises and operators with a limited geographical reach can benefit from the obligations imposed.
+
'''''(g b)''''' '''''the development of a democratic society in the digital era allowing free access to information and expression for all citizens of Europe;'''''
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
''Justification: The tools that NRAs are given by telecom regulation are mainly focused on situations where Significant Market Power (SMP) is demonstrable. This is an important barrier for regulatory intervention that is not easy for NRAs to overcome. Importantly, as BEREC rightly points out, situations of Significant Market Power are not the only threats to competition. Oligopolistic structures where the market is dominated by not one but a reduced number of players are also problematic and increasingly commonplace as a result of market consolidation. Member States must be entitled to empower their NRAs to deal with oligopolistic market structures.''
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
À vérifier
+
=== Amendment 971 -- ===
  
Quota : je comprends la justification, mais je ne comprends pas pourquoi ça passe par le retrait de « the deployment of very high capacity networks »…
+
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 +
|-
 +
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #A60000; text-align:center;' |
 +
'''Amendment 971'''<br/>
 +
Anna Záborská, Ivan Štefanec<br/>
 +
'''EPP'''<br/>
 +
Article 71 – paragraph 2 a (new)
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
 
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
'''''2 a.''''' '''''In order to account for the long-term interest of end-users, national regulatory authorities should focus more on facilitating network investments by all operators. Regulation should not be to the detriment of innovative developments, in particular very high capacity networks, software defined networks and network function virtualisation. Only where strictly necessary to safeguard competition and where no alternative access possibilities, including access based on commercial agreements, exist, regulated access should be maintained in an appropriate and balanced manner, i.e. at a single network layer. Regulated access at multiple network layers has led to unnecessarily high complexity with regard to the consistency of regulated wholesale products at different network layers and unduly restricts flexibility and commercial freedom in the dynamic telecoms market environment. Limiting access to a single network layer that best addresses the problem identified at the retail level will significantly reduce regulatory costs and the potential for regulatory gaming by market players, leading to more efficient and appropriate outcomes. In this regard, national regulatory authorities should assess whether active or passive access is more appropriate in consideration of national or local circumstances. As unbundling is detrimental to network investments by allowing 'cream-skimming' of the most profitable customers at average cost, there should no longer be an obligation to provide unbundled access, which undermines investment models based on product and price differentiation.'''''
 +
|}
  
=== Amendment 720 + ===
+
 
 +
=== Amendment 973 - ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 720'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 973'''<br/>
Theresa Griffin<br/>
+
Anna Záborská, Ivan Štefanec<br/>
'''S&D'''<br/>
+
'''EPP'''<br/>
Article 59 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
+
Article 72 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
National regulatory authorities shall, acting in pursuit of the objectives set out in Article 3, encourage and where appropriate ensure, in accordance with the provisions of this Directive, adequate access and interconnection, and the interoperability of services, exercising their responsibility in a way that promotes efficiency, sustainable competition, '''''the deployment of very high capacity networks''''', efficient investment and innovation, and gives the maximum benefit to end-users. They shall provide guidance and make publicly available the procedures applicable to gain access and interconnection to ensure that small and medium-sized enterprises and operators with a limited geographical reach can benefit from the obligations imposed.
+
A national regulatory authority may, in accordance with the provisions of Article 66, impose obligations relating to cost recovery and price controls, including obligations '''''for cost orientation of prices and obligations''''' concerning cost accounting systems, for the provision of specific types of interconnection and/or access, in situations where a market analysis indicates '''''that''''' a lack of effective competition '''''means that the operator concerned may sustain prices at an excessively high level, or may apply a''''' price '''''squeeze,''''' to the detriment of '''''end-users'''''.
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
National regulatory authorities shall, acting in pursuit of the objectives set out in Article 3, encourage and where appropriate ensure, in accordance with the provisions of this Directive, adequate access and interconnection, and the interoperability of services, exercising their responsibility in a way that promotes efficiency, sustainable competition, '''''media pluralism''''', efficient investment and innovation, and gives the maximum benefit to end-users. They shall provide guidance and make publicly available the procedures applicable to gain access and interconnection to ensure that small and medium-sized enterprises and operators with a limited geographical reach can benefit from the obligations imposed.
+
A national regulatory authority may, in accordance with the provisions of Article 66, impose obligations relating to cost recovery and price controls, including obligations concerning cost accounting systems, for the provision of specific types of interconnection and/or access, in situations where a market analysis indicates a lack of effective competition'''''. A national regulatory authority may only impose price controls that ensure fair and reasonable prices and do not negatively impact investments. When applied, a price control shall meet the following cumulative conditions:''''''''''(a) the price control ensures recovery of all investments connected to the deployment of new networks and fully incorporates the risks associated with these investments;''''''''''(b) the price control does not lead to a situation where the investing operator is put at a disadvantage compared to non-investing operators or lead to a situation under which an investment would not have been made in the first place;''''''''''(c) the''''' price '''''control avoids undue profit margins for access seekers''''' to the detriment of '''''the investing operator and appropriately reflects differences in the risks taken by different access seekers'''''.
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Possibilité de lutter contre des offres qui limite la liberté de l'information via des offres bundle
+
=== Amendment 976 + ===
 
 
=== Amendment 721 - ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 721'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 976'''<br/>
Pervenche Berès<br/>
+
Michel Reimon<br/>
'''S&D'''<br/>
+
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
Article 59 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – introductory part
+
Article 72 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
'''''In determining whether or not price control obligations would be appropriate, national regulatory authorities shall take into account long-term end-user interests related to the deployment and take-up of next-generation networks, and in particular of very high capacity networks. In particular,''''' to encourage investments by the operator, including in next-generation networks, national regulatory authorities shall take into account the investment made by the operator. Where the national regulatory authorities deem price controls appropriate, they shall allow the operator a reasonable rate of return on adequate capital employed, taking into account any risks specific to a particular new investment network project.
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
To encourage investments by the operator, including in next-generation networks, national regulatory authorities shall take into account the investment made by the operator. Where the national regulatory authorities deem price controls appropriate, they shall allow the operator a reasonable rate of return on adequate capital employed, taking into account any risks specific to a particular new investment network project.
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
| colspan='2' |
En particulier, sans préjudice des mesures qui pourraient être prises à l’égard d’entreprises puissantes sur le marché conformément à l’article 66, les autorités de régulation nationales doivent être en mesure d’imposer:
+
''Justification: Price control is an essential element of access regulation and should not be conditioned to any other criteria.''
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
En particulier, sans préjudice des mesures qui pourraient être prises à l’égard d’entreprises puissantes sur le marché conformément à l’article 66, les autorités de régulation nationales doivent être en mesure d’imposer''''', entre autres''''' :
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
"Entre autres" fait que la liste n'est pas une liste d'obligations
+
=== Amendment 977 + ===
 
 
=== Amendment 722 / ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 722'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 977'''<br/>
Michel Reimon<br/>
+
Kaja Kallas<br/>
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
+
'''ALDE'''<br/>
Article 59 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point c
+
Article 72 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
In determining whether or not price control obligations would be appropriate, national regulatory authorities shall take into account long-term end-user interests related to the deployment and take-up of next-generation networks, and in particular of very high capacity networks. In particular, to encourage investments by the operator, including in next-generation networks, national regulatory authorities shall take into account the investment made by the operator. '''''Where the national regulatory authorities deem price controls appropriate, they shall allow the operator a reasonable rate of return on adequate capital employed, taking into account any risks specific to a particular new investment network project.'''''
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
In determining whether or not price control obligations would be appropriate, national regulatory authorities shall take into account long-term end-user interests related to the deployment and take-up of next-generation networks, and in particular of very high capacity networks. In particular, to encourage investments by the operator, including in next-generation networks, national regulatory authorities shall take into account the investment made by the operator.
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
| colspan='2' |
'''''(c)''''' '''''in justified cases, obligations on providers of number-independent interpersonal communications services to make their services interoperable, namely where access to emergency services or end-to-end connectivity between end-users is endangered due to a lack of interoperability between interpersonal communications services.'''''
+
''Justification: In accordance with rule 104 of the rules of procedure, this amendment is necessary for pressing reasons related to the internal logic of the text''
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
'''''deleted'''''
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
pas compris
+
=== Amendment 978 - ===
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 723 / ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 723'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 978'''<br/>
Olle Ludvigsson<br/>
+
Anna Záborská, Ivan Štefanec<br/>
'''S&D'''<br/>
+
'''EPP'''<br/>
Article 59 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point c
+
Article 72 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
'''''(c)''''' '''''in justified cases, obligations on providers of number-independent interpersonal communications services to make their services interoperable, namely where access to emergency services or end-to-end connectivity between end-users is endangered due to a lack of interoperability between interpersonal communications services.'''''
+
In determining whether or not price control obligations would be appropriate, national regulatory authorities shall take into account long-term end-user interests related to '''''the deployment and take-up of next-generation networks, and in particular of very high capacity''''' networks. In particular, to encourage investments by the operator, including in next-generation networks, national regulatory authorities shall take into account the investment made by the operator. Where the national regulatory authorities deem price controls appropriate, they shall allow the operator a reasonable rate of return on adequate capital employed, taking into account any risks specific to a particular new investment network project.
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
'''''deleted'''''
+
In determining whether or not price control obligations would be appropriate, national regulatory authorities shall take into account long-term end-user interests related to '''''investment in, the deployment of and take-up of next-generation''''' networks. In particular, to encourage investments by the operator, including in next-generation networks, national regulatory authorities shall take into account the investment made by the operator. Where the national regulatory authorities deem price controls appropriate, they shall allow the operator a reasonable rate of return on adequate capital employed, taking into account any risks specific to a particular new investment network project.
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
id
+
=== Amendment 979 ++ ===
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 724 / ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 724'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 979'''<br/>
Evžen Tošenovský<br/>
+
Kaja Kallas<br/>
'''ECR'''<br/>
+
'''ALDE'''<br/>
Article 59 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point c
+
Article 72 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3
 
|-
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
'''''(c)''''' '''''in justified cases, obligations on providers of number-independent interpersonal communications services to make their services interoperable, namely where access to emergency services or end-to-end connectivity between end-users is endangered due to a lack of interoperability between interpersonal communications services.'''''
+
'''''National regulatory authorities shall not impose or maintain obligations pursuant to this Article, where they establish that a demonstrable retail price constraint is present and that any obligations imposed in accordance with Articles 67 to 71, including in particular any economic replicability test imposed in accordance with Article 68 ensures effective and non discriminatory access.'''''
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
'''''deleted'''''
 
'''''deleted'''''
 +
|-
 +
| colspan='2' |
 +
''Justification: In accordance with rule 104 of the rules of procedure, this amendment is necessary for pressing reasons related to the internal logic of the text''
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
id
+
Current provisions for co-investment practices do not allow non-profit or local ISPs to participate in the investments, restricting this opportunity only to larger and incumbent actors. Although Community Networks (CN) and local actors have proven successful in connecting underprivileged communities both in urban and rural areas, it would be only normal to considered them equal members of the telecoms ecosystem, thus giving them fair and equal access to co-investment opportunities. Moreover, co-investment in a certain area must be considered as an oligopoly of a few powerful actors that work as a cartel. This is thus not acceptable to reduce the obligations. Furthermore, the access to co-investment agreement shall be affordable for small operators.
  
 
+
=== Amendment 980 ++ ===
=== Amendment 725 / ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 725'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 980'''<br/>
Gunnar Hökmark, Henna Virkkunen, Krišjānis Kariņš, Bendt Bendtsen<br/>
+
Michel Reimon<br/>
'''EPP'''<br/>
+
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
Article 59 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point c
+
Article 72 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
'''''National regulatory authorities shall not impose or maintain obligations pursuant to this Article, where they establish that a demonstrable retail price constraint is present and that any obligations imposed in accordance with Articles 67 to 71, including in particular any economic replicability test imposed in accordance with Article 68 ensures effective and non discriminatory access.'''''
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
'''''deleted'''''
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
| colspan='2' |
(c) in justified cases''''', obligations on providers of number-independent interpersonal communications services to make their''''' services '''''interoperable, namely''''' where access to emergency services or end-to-end '''''connectivity''''' between end-users is '''''endangered''''' due to a lack of interoperability between interpersonal communications services.
+
''Justification: Current provisions for co-investment practices do not allow non-profit or local ISPs to participate in the investments, restricting this opportunity only to larger and incumbent actors. Although Community Networks (CN) and local actors have proven succesful in connecting underprivileged communities both in urban and rural areas, it would be only normal to considered them equal members of the telecoms ecosystem, thus giving them fair and equal access to co-investment opportunities.Moreover, co-investment in a certain area must be considered as an oligopoly of a few powerful actors that work as a cartel.This is thus not acceptable to reduce the obligations. Furthermore, the access to co-investment agreement shall be affordable for small operators.''
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
(c) in justified cases '''''where the reach, coverage and user uptake corresponds to that of number-based''''' services '''''and''''' where '''''strictly necessary in order to ensure''''' access to emergency services or end-to-end '''''communication''''' between end-users is due to a lack of interoperability between interpersonal communications services''''', obligations on providers of number-independent interpersonal communications services to make their services interoperable'''''.
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
id
+
=== Amendment 982 - ===
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 726 / ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 726'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 982'''<br/>
Pervenche Berès, Edouard Martin<br/>
+
Anna Záborská, Ivan Štefanec<br/>
'''S&D'''<br/>
+
'''EPP'''<br/>
Article 59 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point d
+
Article 72 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
d) aux opérateurs, dans la mesure de ce qui est nécessaire pour assurer l’accès des utilisateurs finaux à des services de transmissions radiophoniques '''''et télévisées numériques''''' spécifiés par l’État membre, l’obligation de fournir l’accès aux autres ressources visées à l’annexe II, partie II, dans des conditions équitables, raisonnables et non discriminatoires.
+
National regulatory authorities shall not impose or maintain obligations pursuant to this Article, where they establish that a demonstrable retail price constraint is present and that any obligations imposed in accordance with Articles 67 to 71, including in particular any economic replicability test imposed in accordance with Article 68 ensures effective '''''and non discriminatory''''' access.
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
d) aux opérateurs, dans la mesure de ce qui est nécessaire pour assurer l’accès des utilisateurs finaux à des services de transmissions radiophoniques''''', aux services média audiovisuels et aux services complémentaires,''''' spécifiés par l’État membre, l’obligation de fournir l’accès aux autres ressources visées à l’annexe II, partie II, dans des conditions équitables, raisonnables et non discriminatoires.
+
National regulatory authorities shall not impose or maintain obligations pursuant to this Article, '''''either for new network elements in case a network roll-out contributes to the availability of very-high capacity networks or''''' where they establish that a demonstrable retail price constraint is present and that any obligations imposed in accordance with Articles 67 to 71, including in particular any economic replicability test imposed in accordance with Article 68 ensures effective '''''non discrimination of''''' access.
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Autres services que celui de la télé
+
=== Amendment 983 - ===
 
 
=== Amendment 727 + ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 727'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 983'''<br/>
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Dan Nica, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Jeppe Kofod, Theresa Griffin<br/>
+
Anna Záborská, Ivan Štefanec<br/>
'''S&D'''<br/>
+
'''EPP'''<br/>
Article 59 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point d
+
Article 72 – paragraph 3
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(d) to the extent that is necessary to ensure accessibility for end-users to digital radio and '''''television broadcasting''''' services specified by the Member State, obligations on operators to provide access to the other facilities referred to in Annex II, Part II on fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory terms.
+
'''''3.''''' '''''Where an operator has an obligation regarding the cost orientation of its prices, the burden of proof that charges are derived from costs including a reasonable rate of return on investment shall lie with the operator concerned. For the purpose of calculating the cost of efficient provision of services, national regulatory authorities may use cost accounting methods independent of those used by the undertaking. National regulatory authorities may require an operator to provide full justification for its prices, and may, where appropriate, require prices to be adjusted.'''''
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(d) to the extent that is necessary to ensure accessibility for end-users to digital radio and '''''audiovisual media services and related complementary''''' services specified by the Member State, obligations on operators to provide access to the other facilities referred to in Annex II, Part II on fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory terms.
+
'''''deleted'''''
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
''Justification: TV broadcasting should be changed in to more technology neutral and future-proof term.''
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
 
+
=== Amendment 984 - ===
Autres services que celui de la télé, mais la justification pue, ça vient d'ETNO
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 728 + ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 728'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 984'''<br/>
Eva Kaili<br/>
+
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Edouard Martin, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Dan Nica, Jeppe Kofod, Patrizia Toia<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
Article 59 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point d
+
Article 72 a (new)
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-bottom:0em;'|
(d) to the extent that is necessary to ensure accessibility for end-users to digital radio and '''''television broadcasting''''' services specified by the Member State, obligations on operators to provide access to the other facilities referred to in Annex II, Part II on fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory terms.
+
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-bottom:0em;'|
(d) to the extent that is necessary to ensure accessibility for end-users to digital radio and '''''audiovisual media services and related complementary''''' services specified by the Member State, obligations on operators to provide access to the other facilities referred to in Annex II, Part II on fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory terms.
+
'''''Article 72 a'''''
|}
+
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
  
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
'''''Other access-related obligations'''''
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
  
Id 727
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
'''''1. A national regulatory authority'''''
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
  
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
'''''may, in accordance with the provisions of Article 66, impose:'''''
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
  
=== Amendment 729 -- ===
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
'''''(a) to give third parties access to specified active network elements and services;'''''
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
  
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0; width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
'''''(b) to provide specified services on a wholesale basis for resale by third parties;'''''
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #A60000; text-align:center;' |
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
'''Amendment 729'''<br/>
 
Olle Ludvigsson<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
 
Article 59 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 
'''''The obligations referred to in point (c) of the second subparagraph may only be imposed:'''''
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 
'''''deleted'''''
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 
'''''(i) to the extent necessary to ensure interoperability of interpersonal communications services and may include obligations relating to the use and implementation of standards or specifications listed in Article 39(1) or of any other relevant European or international standards; and'''''
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 
  
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
'''''(c) to negotiate in good faith with undertakings requesting access;'''''
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
'''''(ii) where the Commission, on the basis of a report that it had requested from BEREC, has found an appreciable threat to effective access to emergency services or to end-to-end connectivity between end-users within one or several Member States or throughout the European Union and has adopted implementing measures specifying the nature and scope of any obligations that may be imposed, in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 110(4).'''''
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 
  
|}
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
'''''(d) not to withdraw access to facilities already granted;'''''
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
  
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
'''''(ee) to grant open access to technical interfaces, protocols or other key technologies that are indispensable for the interoperability of services or virtual network services;'''''
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
  
Dérégulation dangereuse
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
'''''(ff) to provide co-location or other forms of associated facilities sharing;'''''
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
  
=== Amendment 730 -- ===
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
'''''(gg) to provide specified services needed to ensure interoperability of end-to-end services to users, including facilities for software emulated networks or roaming on mobile networks;'''''
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
  
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0; width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
'''''(hh) to provide access to operational support systems or similar software systems necessary to ensure fair competition in the provision of services;'''''
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #A60000; text-align:center;' |
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
'''Amendment 730'''<br/>
 
Evžen Tošenovský<br/>
 
'''ECR'''<br/>
 
Article 59 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 
'''''The obligations referred to in point (c) of the second subparagraph may only be imposed:'''''
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 
'''''deleted'''''
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 
'''''(i) to the extent necessary to ensure interoperability of interpersonal communications services and may include obligations relating to the use and implementation of standards or specifications listed in Article 39(1) or of any other relevant European or international standards; and'''''
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 
  
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
'''''(i) to interconnect networks or network facilities;'''''
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
'''''(ii) where the Commission, on the basis of a report that it had requested from BEREC, has found an appreciable threat to effective access to emergency services or to end-to-end connectivity between end-users within one or several Member States or throughout the European Union and has adopted implementing measures specifying the nature and scope of any obligations that may be imposed, in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 110(4).'''''
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 
  
|}
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
'''''(j) to provide access to associated services such as identity, location and presence service.'''''
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
  
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
'''''National regulatory authorities may attach to those obligations conditions covering fairness, reasonableness and timeliness.'''''
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
  
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
'''''2. They shall take account in particular of the following factors:'''''
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
  
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
'''''(a) the technical and economic viability of using or installing competing facilities, in the light of the rate of market development, taking into account the nature and type of interconnection and/or access involved, including the viability of other upstream access products such as access to ducts;'''''
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
  
Dérégulation dangereuse
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
'''''(b) the technological evolution affecting network design and management'''''
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
  
=== Amendment 731 ++ ===
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
'''''(cb) the feasibility of providing the access proposed, in relation to the capacity available;'''''
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
  
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0; width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
'''''(dc) the initial investment by the facility owner, taking account of any public investment made and the risks involved in making the investment ;'''''
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
'''Amendment 731'''<br/>
+
 
Michel Reimon<br/>
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
+
'''''(ed) the need to safeguard competition in the long term, with particular attention to economically efficient infrastructure-based competition;'''''
Article 59 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 – point i
 
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
(i) to the extent necessary to ensure interoperability of interpersonal communications services and may include '''''obligations relating to''''' the use '''''and implementation''''' of standards or specifications listed in Article 39(1) or of any other relevant European or international standards; and
+
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
(i) to the extent necessary to ensure interoperability of interpersonal communications services and may include '''''an obligation to publish and authorize''''' the use''''', modification and redistribution of any relevant information or an obligation to use or implement''''' of standards or specifications listed in Article 39(1) or of any other relevant European or international standards; and
+
'''''(fe) where appropriate, any relevant intellectual property rights;'''''
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' |
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em'|
''Justification: Ensuring interoperability of interpersonal communications services requires that the technical information necessary to communicate with the users of such services can be freely accessed, used, modified and redistributed by anyone, whether this information is already public or held by the providers of these services. Encryption should not be jeopardized by such standards.''
+
 
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em'|
 +
'''''(g) the provision of pan-European services.'''''
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
=== Amendment 732 + ===
+
=== Amendment 1001 + ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 732'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 1001'''<br/>
Kaja Kallas, Marietje Schaake<br/>
+
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Dan Nica, Jeppe Kofod, Patrizia Toia<br/>
'''ALDE'''<br/>
+
'''S&D'''<br/>
Article 59 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 – point i
+
Article 74
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-bottom:0em;'|
(i) to the extent necessary to ensure interoperability of interpersonal communications services and may include obligations relating to the use and implementation of standards or specifications listed in Article 39(1) or of any other relevant European or international standards; '''''and'''''
+
'''''Article 74'''''
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-bottom:0em;'|
(i) to the extent necessary to ensure interoperability of interpersonal communications services and may include obligations relating to the use and implementation of standards or specifications listed in Article 39(1) or of any other relevant European or international standards; '''''such obligations shall not lead to the weakening of security standards of these services.'''''
+
'''''deleted'''''
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' |
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
''Justification: In accordance with rule 104 of the rules of procedure, this amendment is necessary for pressing reasons related to the internal logic of the text''
+
'''''Regulatory treatment of new network elements'''''
|}
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
  
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
'''''1.'''''
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
'''''A national regulatory authority shall not impose obligations as regards new network elements that are part of the relevant market on which it intends to impose or maintain obligations in accordance with Articles 66 and Articles 67 to 72 and that the operator designated as significant market power on that relevant market has deployed or is planning to deploy, if the following cumulative conditions are met:'''''
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
'''''(a) the deployment of the new network elements is open to co-investment offers according to a transparent process and on terms which favour sustainable competition in the long term including inter alia fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory terms offered to potential co-investors; flexibility in terms of the value and timing of the commitment provided by each co-investor; possibility to increase such commitment in the future; reciprocal rights awarded by the co-investors after the deployment of the co-invested infrastructure;'''''
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
'''''(b) the deployment of the new network elements contributes significantly to the deployment of very high capacity networks;'''''
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
  
=== Amendment 733 / ===
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
'''Amendment 733'''<br/>
+
'''''(c) access seekers not participating in the co-investment can benefit from the same quality, speed, conditions and end-user reach as was available before the deployment, either through commercial agreements based on fair and reasonable terms or by means of regulated access maintained or adapted by the national regulatory authority;'''''
Kaja Kallas, Marietje Schaake<br/>
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
'''ALDE'''<br/>
+
 
Article 59 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 – point ii
 
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em'|
(ii) where the Commission, on the basis of a report that it had requested from BEREC, has found an appreciable threat to effective access to emergency services or to end-to-end connectivity between end-users within one or several Member States or throughout the European Union and has adopted implementing measures specifying the nature and scope of any obligations that may be imposed, in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 110(4).
+
'''''When assessing co-investment offers and processes referred to in point (a) of the first subparagraph, national regulatory authorities shall ensure that those offers and processes comply with the criteria set out in Annex IV.'''''
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em'|
(ii) where the Commission, on the basis of a report that it had requested from BEREC, has found an appreciable threat to effective access to emergency services or to end-to-end connectivity between end-users within one or several Member States or throughout the European Union and has adopted implementing measures specifying the nature and scope of any obligations that may be imposed, in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 110(4). '''''Member states may not impose any additional obligations.'''''
+
 
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
| colspan='2' |
''Justification: In accordance with rule 104 of the rules of procedure, this amendment is necessary for pressing reasons related to the internal logic of the text''
+
''Justification: Current framework does not prevent co-investment. While the article may help to facilitate new fiber networks, it will not allow NRAs to intervene efficiently where it becomes necessary. It is problematic that the reference made in Art 74 (b) to the “deployment of very high capacity networks” establishes a hierarchy between the regulatory objectives set out in Article 3. Also, co-investments by their nature can lead to coordinated behaviour, which in turn yield uncompetitive outcomes.''
 
|}
 
|}
  
=== Amendment 735 - ===
+
 
 +
=== Amendment 1003 + ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 735'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 1003'''<br/>
Kaja Kallas<br/>
+
Michel Reimon<br/>
'''ALDE'''<br/>
+
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
Article 59 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
+
Article 74 – paragraph 1
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-bottom:0em;'|
 +
'''''1.''''' '''''A national regulatory authority shall not impose obligations as regards new network elements that are part of the relevant market on which it intends to impose or maintain obligations in accordance with Articles 66 and Articles 67 to 72 and that the operator designated as significant market power on that relevant market has deployed or is planning to deploy, if the following cumulative conditions are met:'''''
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-bottom:0em;'|
 +
'''''deleted'''''
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
'''''(a) the deployment of the new network elements is open to co-investment offers according to a transparent process and on terms which favour sustainable competition in the long term including inter alia fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory terms offered to potential co-investors; flexibility in terms of the value and timing of the commitment provided by each co-investor; possibility to increase such commitment in the future; reciprocal rights awarded by the co-investors after the deployment of the co-invested infrastructure;'''''
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
 
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
'''''(b) the deployment of the new network elements contributes significantly to the deployment of very high capacity networks;'''''
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
 
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
'''''(c) access seekers not participating in the co-investment can benefit from the same quality, speed, conditions and end-user reach as was available before the deployment, either through commercial agreements based on fair and reasonable terms or by means of regulated access maintained or adapted by the national regulatory authority;'''''
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
 
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em'|
National regulatory authorities shall impose obligations upon reasonable request to grant access to wiring and cables inside buildings or up to the first concentration or distribution point where that point is located outside the building''''',''''' on the owners of such wiring and cable or on undertakings that have the right to use such wiring and cables''''', where this is justified on the grounds that replication of such network elements would be economically inefficient or physically impracticable'''''. The access conditions imposed may include specific rules on access, '''''transparency and''''' non-discrimination and for apportioning the costs of access, which, where appropriate, are adjusted to take into account risk factors.
+
'''''When assessing co-investment offers and processes referred to in point (a) of the first subparagraph, national regulatory authorities shall ensure that those offers and processes comply with the criteria set out in Annex IV.'''''
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em'|
'''''Where this is justified on the grounds that replication of such network elements would be economically inefficient or technically impossible and the access to such elements is necessary to foster sustainable competition,''''' national regulatory authorities shall impose obligations upon reasonable request''''',''''' to grant access to wiring and cables inside buildings or up to the first concentration or distribution point where that point is located outside the building on the owners of such wiring and cable or on undertakings that have the right to use such wiring and cables. The access conditions imposed may include specific rules on access, '''''including where necessary to the required associated facilities, on transparency,''''' non-discrimination and for apportioning the costs of access, which, where appropriate, are adjusted to take into account risk factors.'''''Such obligations shall only be imposed following a market analysis procedure in accordance with article 65 and shall complement but not replace regulatory measures taken in accordance with article 66 to ensure the effectiveness of the actions of national regulatory authorities to comply with the objectives set out in article 3 of this Directive.'''''
+
 
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
| colspan='2' |
''Justification: Symmetric obligations being imposed on all undertaking without regard to their market power shall only be imposed where justified and necessary given their potential negative impact on investment and competition. They should therefore be linked to a market analysis procedure to prevent that they achieve the opposite goals that the obligations taken by regulators under the SMP regime seek to achieve. In accordance with rule 104 of the rules of procedure, this amendment is necessary for pressing reasons related to the internal logic of the text''
+
''Justification: The proposed provisions on “new network elements” in Article 74 are problematic firstly because the concept remains undefined. Secondly, Article 74 impedes NRAs from intervening on “new network elements” if there are co-investment offers. This could be problematic because SMP operators can use their market position to the detriment of smaller companies. Operators investing in VHC networks should not profit from regulatory holidays. The successful ex-ante regulatory regime should apply as much to VHC networks as to Next Generation Networks and legacy networks (e.g. copper).The explicit reference made in Art 74 (b) to the “deployment of very high capacity networks” establishes a hierarchy between the regulatory objectives set out in Article 3.In addition, co-investment schemes are diverse, and some of them have the potential to create ineffectively competitive market outcomes. While the Commission’s proposal includes criteria in Annex IV as well as conditions against which co-investment offers should be judged (compliance with which would entitle the co-investment to effectively benefit from a regulatory holiday), these do not provide sufficient competition protections to warrant a relaxation of SMP regulation. It is also worth bearing in mind that co-investments by their nature can lead to coordinated behaviour, which in turn could produce uncompetitive outcomes. Deregulation subject to weak safeguards has to be prevented. Independent from the concept of co-investment, commercial agreements must not artificially lead to non-SMP findings and to the removal of the wholesale access obligations that are necessary to enable and maintain sustainable competition and thus consumer well-being in the form of lower prices, increased choice and more innovative products.''
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Limits regulation possibilities
+
=== Amendment 1045 + ===
 
 
=== Amendment 736 / ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 736'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 1045'''<br/>
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Dan Nica, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Jeppe Kofod<br/>
+
Evžen Tošenovský<br/>
'''S&D'''<br/>
+
'''ECR'''<br/>
Article 59 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
+
Article 77
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-bottom:0em;'|
National regulatory authorities shall impose obligations '''''upon''''' reasonable '''''request''''' to grant access to wiring and cables inside buildings or up to the first concentration or distribution point where that point is located outside the building, on the owners of such wiring and cable or on undertakings that have the right to use such wiring and cables, where this is justified on the grounds that replication of such network elements would be economically inefficient or physically impracticable. The access conditions imposed may include specific rules on access, transparency and non-discrimination and for apportioning the costs of access''''', which, where appropriate, are adjusted to take into account risk factors.'''''
+
'''''Article 77'''''
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-bottom:0em;'|
'''''Without prejudice to 59(1),''''' national regulatory authorities shall''''', taking full account of the principle of proportionality''''' impose obligations '''''to meet''''' reasonable '''''requests''''' to grant access to wiring and cables inside buildings or up to the first concentration or distribution point where that point is located outside '''''but close to''''' the building, '''''or beyond it to a concentration point close to end-users,''''' on the owners of such wiring and cable or on undertakings '''''on providers of electronic communications networks or electronic communications services''''' that have the right to use such wiring and cables, where this is justified on the grounds that replication of such network elements would be economically inefficient or physically impracticable. The access conditions imposed '''''shall be objective, transparent, non-discriminatory and proportionate in accordance with the principles set out in Article 3(3), and''''' may include specific rules on access, transparency and non-discrimination and for apportioning the costs of access'''''. These measures should be consistent with the provisions of [Broadband Cost reductions Directive]'''''
+
'''''deleted'''''
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' |
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
''Justification: The connection between 59(1) and 59(2) should be clarified through the negotiations in the EP and with the Council. In the absence of specific powers for symmetrical obligation, assessing market dominance is difficult. There are links to article 13(2) and to Annex I, Part A, point 7.''
+
'''''Vertically separate undertakings'''''
|}
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
  
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
'''''1. A national regulatory authority that designates an undertaking which is absent from any retail markets for electronic communications services as having significant market power in one or several wholesale markets in accordance with Article 65 shall consider whether that undertaking has the following characteristics:'''''
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
  
Complexe, à revoir
+
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
'''''(a) all companies and business units within the undertaking, including all companies that are controlled but not necessarily wholly owned by the same ultimate owner(s), only have activities, current and planned for the future, in wholesale markets for electronic communications services and therefore do not have activities in any retail market for electronic communications services provided to end-users in the Union;'''''
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
  
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
'''''(b) the undertaking does not hold an exclusive agreement, or an agreement which de facto amounts to an exclusive agreement, with a single and separate undertaking operating downstream that is active in any retail market for electronic communications services provided to private or commercial end-users.'''''
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
  
=== Amendment 737 + ===
+
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
'''''2. If the national regulatory authority concludes that the conditions laid down in points (a) and (b) of paragraph 1 of this Article are fulfilled, it may only impose on that undertaking obligations pursuant to Articles 70 or 71.'''''
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
  
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
'''Amendment 737'''<br/>
+
'''''3. The national regulatory authority shall review obligations imposed on the undertaking in accordance with this Article at any time if it concludes that the conditions laid down in points (a) and (b) of paragraph 1 of this Article are no longer met and shall apply Articles 65 to 72, as appropriate.'''''
Eva Kaili<br/>
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
'''S&D'''<br/>
+
 
Article 59 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
 
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
National regulatory authorities shall impose obligations '''''upon''''' reasonable '''''request''''' to grant access to wiring and cables inside buildings or up to the first concentration or distribution point where that point is located outside the building, on the owners of such wiring and cable or on undertakings that have the right to use such wiring and cables, where this is justified on the grounds that replication of such network elements would be economically inefficient or physically impracticable. The access conditions imposed may include specific rules on access, transparency and non-discrimination and for apportioning the costs of access''''', which, where appropriate, are adjusted to take into account risk factors.'''''
+
'''''4. The national regulatory authority shall also review obligations imposed on the undertaking in accordance with this Article if on the basis of evidence of terms and conditions offered by the undertaking to its downstream customers, the authority concludes that competition problems have arisen to the detriment of end-users which require the imposition of one or more obligations provided in Articles 67, 68, 69 or 72, or the modification of the obligations imposed in accordance with paragraph 2.'''''
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
'''''Without prejudice to 59(1),''''' national regulatory authorities shall''''', taking full account of the principle of proportionality''''' impose obligations '''''to meet''''' reasonable '''''requests''''' to grant access to wiring and cables inside buildings or up to the first concentration or distribution point where that point is located outside '''''but close to''''' the building, '''''or beyond it to a concentration point close to end-users,''''' on the owners of such wiring and cable or on undertakings '''''on providers of electronic communications networks or electronic communications services''''' that have the right to use such wiring and cables, where this is justified on the grounds that replication of such network elements would be economically inefficient or physically impracticable. The access conditions imposed '''''shall be objective, transparent, non-discriminatory and proportionate in accordance with the principles set out in Article 3(3), and''''' may include specific rules on access, transparency and non-discrimination and for apportioning the costs of access'''''. These measures should be consistent with the provisions of [Broadband Cost reductions Directive]'''''
+
 
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em'|
 +
'''''5. The imposition of obligations and their review in accordance with this Article shall be implemented in accordance with the procedures referred to in Articles 23, 32 and 33.'''''
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em'|
 +
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
reinforce access
+
=== Amendment 1056 + ===
 
 
=== Amendment 738 + ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 738'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 1056'''<br/>
 
Michel Reimon<br/>
 
Michel Reimon<br/>
 
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
 
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
Article 59 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
+
Article 79 – paragraph 1
 
|-
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
National regulatory authorities '''''shall''''' impose obligations '''''upon''''' reasonable '''''request to grant''''' access to wiring and cables inside buildings or up to the first concentration or distribution point where that point is located outside the building''''', on the owners of such wiring and cable or on undertakings''''' that have the right to use such wiring and cables, where this is justified on the grounds that replication of such network elements would be economically inefficient or physically impracticable. The access conditions imposed may include specific rules on access, transparency '''''and''''' non-discrimination and '''''for apportioning the costs''''' of access, which, where appropriate, are adjusted to take into account risk factors.
+
1. Member States shall ensure that all end-users in their territory have access at an affordable price, in the light of specific national conditions, to available '''''functional''''' internet access and voice communications services at the quality specified in their territory, including the underlying connection, at least at a fixed location.
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
'''''In particular, and without prejudice to the generalities of 59(1),''''' national regulatory authorities '''''may''''' impose obligations '''''to meet''''' reasonable '''''requests for''''' access to wiring and cables inside buildings or up to the first concentration or distribution point where that point is located outside the building '''''or beyond it to a concentration point close to end-users on providers of electronic communications networks or electronic communications services''''' that have the right to use such wiring and cables, where this is justified on the grounds that replication of such network elements would be economically inefficient or physically impracticable. The access conditions imposed may include specific rules on access, transparency''''',''''' non-discrimination and '''''the price''''' of access, which, where appropriate, are adjusted to take into account risk factors.'''''When imposing access regulation beyond the first concentration or distribution point, national regulatory authorities may under special circumstances impose active or virtual access to such wiring and cables.'''''
+
1. Member States shall ensure that all end-users in their territory have access at an affordable price, in the light of specific national conditions, to available '''''broadband''''' internet access and voice communications services at the quality specified in their territory, including the underlying connection, at least at a fixed location.
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
comment
+
=== Amendment 1057 + ===
 
 
=== Amendment 739 -- ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #A60000; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 739'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 1057'''<br/>
Lieve Wierinck, Hilde Vautmans<br/>
+
Michel Reimon<br/>
'''ALDE'''<br/>
+
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
Article 59 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
+
Article 79 – paragraph 2
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
National regulatory authorities '''''shall''''' impose obligations '''''upon''''' reasonable '''''request to grant''''' access to wiring and cables inside buildings or up to the first concentration or distribution point where that point is located outside the building, on the owners of such wiring and cable or on undertakings that have the right to use such wiring and cables, where this is justified on the grounds that replication of such network elements would be economically inefficient or physically impracticable. '''''The''''' access conditions imposed may include specific rules on access, transparency and non-discrimination and for apportioning the costs of access, which, where appropriate, are adjusted to take into account risk factors.
+
'''''2.''''' '''''Member States shall define the functional internet access service referred to in paragraph 1 with a view to adequately reflect services used by the majority of end-users in their territory. To that end, the functional internet access service shall be capable of supporting the minimum set of services set out in Annex V.'''''
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
National regulatory authorities '''''may''''' impose obligations '''''to meet''''' reasonable '''''requests for''''' access to wiring and cables inside buildings or up to the first concentration or distribution point where that point is located outside the building, '''''or beyond it to a concentration point close to end-users,''''' on the owners of such wiring and cable or on undertakings that have the right to use such wiring and cables, where this is justified on the grounds that replication of such network elements would be economically inefficient or physically impracticable. '''''These''''' access conditions '''''should be''''' imposed '''''on fair and reasonable terms and conditions, and''''' may include specific rules on access, transparency and non-discrimination and for apportioning the costs of access, which, where appropriate, are adjusted to take into account risk factors. '''''When imposing access regulation beyond the first concentration or distribution point, national regulatory authorities may, under special circumstances, impose active or virtual access to such wiring and cables.'''''
+
'''''deleted'''''
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Perte de l'obligation de développer des réseaux haut débit pour des fausses solutions comme le VDSL. Et entre nous, ça pue l'amendement d'un lobby
+
=== Amendment 1069 + ===
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 740 -- ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #A60000; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 740'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 1069'''<br/>
Kathleen Van Brempt<br/>
+
Morten Helveg Petersen<br/>
'''S&D'''<br/>
+
'''ALDE'''<br/>
Article 59 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
+
Article 92 – paragraph 1
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
National regulatory authorities '''''shall''''' impose obligations '''''upon reasonable request to grant''''' access to wiring and cables inside buildings '''''or''''' up to the first concentration or distribution point where that point is located outside the building, on the owners of such wiring and cable or on undertakings that have the right to use such wiring and cables, where this is justified on the grounds that replication of such network elements would be economically inefficient or physically impracticable. The access conditions imposed may include specific rules on access, transparency and non-discrimination and for apportioning the costs of access, which, where appropriate, are adjusted to take into account risk factors.
+
Providers of electronic communications networks or services shall not apply any discriminatory requirements or conditions of access or use to end-users based on the end-user's nationality or place of residence unless such differences are objectively justified.
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
National regulatory authorities '''''may''''' impose obligations '''''to address reasonable requests for''''' access to wiring and cables inside buildings''''',''''' up to the first concentration or distribution point where that point is located outside the building, '''''or beyond that point at a concentration point in proximity of the end-user, '''''on the owners of such wiring and cable or on undertakings that have the right to use such wiring and cables, where this is justified on the grounds that replication of such network elements would be economically inefficient or physically impracticable. The access conditions imposed may include specific rules on access, transparency and non-discrimination and for apportioning the costs of access, which, where appropriate, are adjusted to take into account risk factors. '''''National regulatory authorities may, when circumstances require it, impose active or virtual access to wiring and cables, in the event of imposing access regulation beyond the first concentration or distribution point.'''''
+
Providers of electronic communications networks or services shall not apply any discriminatory requirements or conditions of access or use to end-users based on the end-user's nationality or place of residence unless such differences are objectively justified '''''and in compliance with the scope and interpretation of fundamental rights as provided for in Article 52 of the Charter'''''.
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Id 739
+
=== Amendment 1078 + ===
 +
 
 +
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 +
|-
 +
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
 +
'''Amendment 1078'''<br/>
 +
José Blanco López, Sergio Gutiérrez Prieto, Inmaculada Rodríguez-Piñero Fernández, Soledad Cabezón Ruiz<br/>
 +
'''S&D'''<br/>
 +
Article 94 – paragraph 1
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
Member States shall '''''not maintain or''''' introduce in their national law end-user protection provisions '''''on the subject-matters covered by this Title and diverging from''''' the provisions laid down in this Title''''', including more or less stringent provisions to ensure a different''''' level of protection''''', unless otherwise provided for in this Title'''''.
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
Member States shall '''''under no circumstance''''' introduce in their national law end-user protection provisions '''''that undermine''''' the provisions laid down in this Title '''''as it constitutes the minimum''''' level of '''''end-user''''' protection '''''to be pursued in the Union'''''.
 +
|}
  
  
=== Amendment 741 -- ===
+
=== Amendment 1097 + ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #A60000; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 741'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 1097'''<br/>
Gunnar Hökmark, Henna Virkkunen, Bendt Bendtsen<br/>
+
Morten Helveg Petersen<br/>
'''EPP'''<br/>
+
'''ALDE'''<br/>
Article 59 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
+
Article 114 – paragraph 3 a (new)
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
National regulatory authorities shall impose obligations '''''upon reasonable request to grant''''' access to wiring and cables inside buildings or up to '''''the first''''' concentration or distribution point '''''where that point is located outside the building''''', on the owners of such wiring and cable or on undertakings that have the right to use such wiring and cables, where this is justified on the grounds that replication of such network elements would be economically inefficient or physically impracticable. The access conditions imposed may include specific rules on access, transparency and non-discrimination and for apportioning the costs of access, which, where appropriate, are adjusted to take into account risk factors.
+
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
National regulatory authorities shall impose obligations '''''to meet reasonable requests for''''' access to wiring and cables inside buildings or up to '''''a''''' concentration or distribution point '''''as close to end-users as possible''''', on the owners of such wiring and cable or on undertakings that have the right to use such wiring and cables, where this is justified on the grounds that replication of such network elements would be economically inefficient or physically impracticable. The access conditions imposed may include specific rules on access, transparency and non-discrimination and for apportioning the costs of access, which, where appropriate, are adjusted to take into account risk factors. '''''Under special circumstances, when access regulation is imposed beyond the first concentration or distribution point, national regulatory authorities may impose active or virtual access to such wiring and cables.'''''
+
'''''3 a.''''' '''''The Commission shall periodically review the application of the fundamental rights safeguard referred to in Article 93. Such review shall be carried out every five year.'''''
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Id 739, 740
+
=== Amendment 1099 ++ ===
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 742 - ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 742'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 1099'''<br/>
Olle Ludvigsson<br/>
+
Michel Reimon<br/>
'''S&D'''<br/>
+
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
Article 59 paragraph 2 subparagraph 1
+
Annex I part A point 4
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-bottom:0em;'|
 +
'''''4.''''' '''''Enabling of legal interception by competent national authorities in conformity with Directive 2002/58/EC and Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data''''''''''54'''''''''' .'''''
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-bottom:0em;'|
 +
'''''deleted'''''
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
_________________
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
 
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em'|
National regulatory authorities shall impose obligations '''''upon reasonable request to grant''''' access to wiring and cables inside buildings or up to '''''the first''''' concentration or distribution point '''''where that point is located outside the building''''', on the owners of such wiring and cable or on undertakings that have the right to use such wiring and cables, where this is justified on the grounds that replication of such network elements would be economically inefficient or physically impracticable. The access conditions imposed may include specific rules on access, transparency '''''and''''' non-discrimination and '''''for apportioning the costs''''' of access, which, where appropriate, are adjusted to take into account risk '''''factors'''''.
+
'''''54''''' '''''OJ L 281, 23.11.1995, p. 31.'''''
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em'|
National regulatory authorities shall impose obligations '''''to meet reasonable requests for''''' access to wiring and cables inside buildings or up to '''''a''''' concentration or distribution point '''''as close as possible to end-users''''', on the owners of such wiring and cable or on undertakings that have the right to use such wiring and cables, where this is justified on the grounds that replication of such network elements would be economically inefficient or physically impracticable. The access conditions imposed may include specific rules on access, transparency''''',''''' non-discrimination and '''''the price''''' of access, which, where appropriate, are adjusted to take into account risk '''''factors.When imposing access regulation beyond the first concentration or distribution point, national regulatory authorities may under special circumstances impose active or virtual access to such wiring and cables'''''.
+
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Id 739, 740, 741 mais un peu moins pire
+
=== Amendment 1110 + ===
 
 
=== Amendment 743 + ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 743'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 1110'''<br/>
Anne Sander, Françoise Grossetête<br/>
+
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Dan Nica, Jeppe Kofod, Carlos Zorrinho, Victor Negrescu, Zigmantas Balčytis<br/>
'''EPP'''<br/>
+
'''S&D'''<br/>
Article 59 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
+
Annex IV
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
National regulatory authorities shall impose obligations upon reasonable request to grant access to wiring and cables inside buildings or up to '''''the first''''' concentration or distribution point '''''where that point is located outside the building''''', on the owners of such wiring and cable or on undertakings that have the right to use such wiring and cables, where this is justified on the grounds that replication of such network elements would be economically inefficient or physically impracticable. The access conditions imposed may include specific rules on access, transparency and non-discrimination and for apportioning the costs of access, which, where appropriate, are adjusted to take into account risk factors.
+
'''''[...]'''''
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
National regulatory authorities shall impose obligations upon reasonable request to grant access to wiring and cables inside buildings or up to '''''a''''' concentration or distribution point '''''as close as possible to end-users, determined by the national regulatory authority''''', on the owners of such wiring and cable or on undertakings that have the right to use such wiring and cables, where this is justified on the grounds that replication of such network elements would be economically inefficient or physically impracticable. The access conditions imposed may include specific rules on access '''''to such network elements and to associated facilities and services''''', transparency and non-discrimination and for apportioning the costs of access, which, where appropriate, are adjusted to take into account risk factors.
+
'''''deleted'''''
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
=== Amendment 744 / ===
+
=== Amendment 1130 + ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 744'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 1130'''<br/>
José Blanco López, Inmaculada Rodríguez-Piñero Fernández, Soledad Cabezón Ruiz<br/>
+
Michel Reimon<br/>
'''S&D'''<br/>
+
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
Article 59 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
+
Annex IV – paragraph 1 – point c indent 1
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
National regulatory authorities shall impose obligations '''''upon reasonable request''''' to grant access to wiring and cables inside buildings or up to the first concentration or distribution point where that point is located outside the building, on the owners of such wiring and cable or on undertakings that have the right to use such wiring and cables, where this is justified on the grounds that replication of such network elements would be economically inefficient or physically impracticable. The access conditions imposed may include specific rules on access, transparency and non-discrimination and for apportioning the costs of access, which, where appropriate, are adjusted to take into account risk factors.
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
'''''Following the completion of a market analysis carried out in accordance with Article 65,''''' national regulatory authorities shall impose obligations to grant access to wiring and cables inside buildings or up to the first concentration or distribution point where that point is located outside the building, on the owners of such wiring and cable or on undertakings that have the right to use such wiring and cables, where this is justified on the grounds that replication of such network elements would be economically inefficient or physically impracticable. The access conditions imposed may include specific rules on access, transparency and non-discrimination and for apportioning the costs of access, which, where appropriate, are adjusted to take into account risk factors.
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 745 + ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 745'''<br/>
 
Edouard Martin<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
 
Article 59 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
National regulatory authorities shall impose obligations upon reasonable request to grant access to wiring and cables inside buildings or up to '''''the first''''' concentration or distribution point '''''where that point is located outside the building''''', on the owners of such wiring and cable or on undertakings that have the right to use such wiring and cables, where this is justified on the grounds that replication of such network elements would be economically inefficient or physically impracticable. The access conditions imposed may include specific rules on access, transparency and non-discrimination and for apportioning the costs of access, which, where appropriate, are adjusted to take into account risk factors.
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
National regulatory authorities shall impose obligations upon reasonable request to grant access to wiring and cables inside buildings or up to '''''a''''' concentration or distribution point '''''as close as possible to end-users''''', on the owners of such wiring and cable or on undertakings that have the right to use such wiring and cables, where this is justified on the grounds that replication of such network elements would be economically inefficient or physically impracticable. The access conditions imposed may include specific rules on access '''''to such network elements and to associated facilities and services''''', transparency and non-discrimination and for apportioning the costs of access, which, where appropriate, are adjusted to take into account risk factors.
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 746 -- ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #A60000; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 746'''<br/>
 
Fulvio Martusciello<br/>
 
'''EPP'''<br/>
 
Article 59 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
National regulatory authorities '''''shall''''' impose obligations upon reasonable request to grant access to wiring and cables inside buildings or up to the first concentration or distribution point where that point is located outside the building, on the owners of such wiring and cable or on undertakings that have the right to use such wiring and cables, where this is justified on the grounds that replication of such network elements would be economically inefficient or physically impracticable. The access conditions imposed may include specific rules on access, transparency and non-discrimination and for apportioning the costs of access, which, where appropriate, are adjusted to take into account risk factors.
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
National regulatory authorities '''''may''''' impose obligations upon reasonable request to grant access to wiring and cables inside '''''residential''''' buildings or up to the first concentration or distribution point where that point is located outside the '''''residential''''' building, on the owners of such wiring and cable or on undertakings that have the right to use such wiring and cables, where this is justified on the grounds that replication of such network elements would be economically inefficient or physically impracticable. The access conditions imposed may include specific rules on access, transparency and non-discrimination and for apportioning the costs of access, which, where appropriate, are adjusted to take into account risk factors.
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
May => perte de l'obligation
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 747 -- ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #A60000; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 747'''<br/>
 
Krišjānis Kariņš<br/>
 
'''EPP'''<br/>
 
Article 59 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
National regulatory authorities '''''shall''''' impose obligations upon reasonable request to grant access to wiring and cables inside buildings or up to the first concentration or distribution point where that point is located outside the building, on the owners of such wiring and cable or on undertakings that have the right to use such wiring and cables, where this is justified on the grounds that replication of such network elements would be economically inefficient or physically impracticable. The access conditions imposed may include specific rules on access, transparency and non-discrimination and for apportioning the costs of access, which, where appropriate, are adjusted to take into account risk factors.
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
National regulatory authorities '''''may''''' impose obligations upon reasonable request to grant access to wiring and cables inside buildings or up to the first concentration or distribution point where that point is located outside the building, on the owners of such wiring and cable or on undertakings that have the right to use such wiring and cables, where this is justified on the grounds that replication of such network elements would be economically inefficient or physically impracticable. The access conditions imposed may include specific rules on access, transparency and non-discrimination and for apportioning the costs of access, which, where appropriate, are adjusted to take into account risk factors.
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
Id 746
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 748 ++ ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 748'''<br/>
 
Lieve Wierinck, Hilde Vautmans<br/>
 
'''ALDE'''<br/>
 
Article 59 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
'''''National regulatory authorities may extend to those owners or undertakings the imposition of such access obligations, on fair and reasonable terms and conditions, beyond the first concentration or distribution point to a concentration point as close as possible to end-users, to the extent strictly necessary to address insurmountable economic or physical barriers to replication in areas with lower population density.'''''
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
'''''deleted'''''
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 749 ++ ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 749'''<br/>
 
Olle Ludvigsson<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
 
Article 59 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
'''''National regulatory authorities may extend to those owners or undertakings the imposition of such access obligations, on fair and reasonable terms and conditions, beyond the first concentration or distribution point to a concentration point as close as possible to end-users, to the extent strictly necessary to address insurmountable economic or physical barriers to replication in areas with lower population density.'''''
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
'''''deleted'''''
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 750 ++ ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 750'''<br/>
 
Kathleen Van Brempt<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
 
Article 59 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
'''''National regulatory authorities may extend to those owners or undertakings the imposition of such access obligations, on fair and reasonable terms and conditions, beyond the first concentration or distribution point to a concentration point as close as possible to end-users, to the extent strictly necessary to address insurmountable economic or physical barriers to replication in areas with lower population density.'''''
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
'''''deleted'''''
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 751 ++ ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 751'''<br/>
 
Gunnar Hökmark, Henna Virkkunen, Krišjānis Kariņš, Bendt Bendtsen<br/>
 
'''EPP'''<br/>
 
Article 59 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
'''''National regulatory authorities may extend to those owners or undertakings the imposition of such access obligations, on fair and reasonable terms and conditions, beyond the first concentration or distribution point to a concentration point as close as possible to end-users, to the extent strictly necessary to address insurmountable economic or physical barriers to replication in areas with lower population density.'''''
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
'''''deleted'''''
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
''Justification: In correspondence to the amendment on Article 59 - paragraph 2 - subparagraph 1.''
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 752 ++ ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 752'''<br/>
 
Michel Reimon<br/>
 
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
 
Article 59 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
'''''National regulatory authorities may extend to those owners or undertakings the imposition of such access obligations, on fair and reasonable terms and conditions, beyond the first concentration or distribution point to a concentration point as close as possible to end-users, to the extent strictly necessary to address insurmountable economic or physical barriers to replication in areas with lower population density.'''''
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
'''''deleted'''''
 
|}
 
 
 
=== Amendment 753 + ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 753'''<br/>
 
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Dan Nica, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Jeppe Kofod, Flavio Zanonato<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
 
Article 59 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 
'''''National regulatory authorities may extend to those owners or undertakings the imposition of such access obligations, on fair and reasonable terms and conditions,''''' beyond the first concentration or distribution point to a concentration point as close as possible to end-users, to the extent strictly necessary to address insurmountable economic or physical barriers to replication in areas with lower population density.
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 
'''''When imposing access regulation beyond the first concentration or distribution point, national regulatory authorities may under special circumstances impose active or virtual access to such wiring and cables''''' beyond the first concentration or distribution point to a concentration point as close as possible to end-users, to the extent strictly necessary to address insurmountable economic or physical barriers to replication in areas with lower population density.
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
''Justification: National regulatory authorities should have ability to impose regulation as close as possible to end-users if necessary to address economic or physical barriers, especially in areas with low population density.''
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
National regulatory authorities should have ability to impose regulation as close as possible to end-users if necessary to address economic or physical barriers, especially in areas with low population density.
 
 
 
=== Amendment 754 -- ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #A60000; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 754'''<br/>
 
José Blanco López, Inmaculada Rodríguez-Piñero Fernández, Soledad Cabezón Ruiz<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
 
Article 59 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
National regulatory authorities may extend to those owners or undertakings the imposition of such access obligations, on fair and reasonable terms and conditions, beyond the first concentration or distribution point to a concentration point as close as possible to end-users, to the extent strictly necessary to address insurmountable economic or physical barriers to replication in areas with lower population density.
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
National regulatory authorities may extend to those owners or undertakings the imposition of such access obligations, on fair and reasonable terms and conditions, beyond the first concentration or distribution point to a concentration point as close as possible to end-users, to the extent strictly necessary to address insurmountable economic or physical barriers to replication''''', in particular''''' in areas with lower population density.
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 755 -- ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #A60000; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 755'''<br/>
 
Anne Sander, Françoise Grossetête<br/>
 
'''EPP'''<br/>
 
Article 59 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
National regulatory authorities may extend to those owners or undertakings the imposition of such access obligations, on fair and reasonable terms and conditions, beyond the '''''first''''' concentration or distribution point '''''to a concentration point as close as possible to end-users, to the extent strictly necessary to address insurmountable economic or physical barriers to replication''''' in areas with lower population density.
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
National regulatory authorities may extend to those owners or undertakings the imposition of such access obligations, on fair and reasonable terms and conditions, beyond the concentration or distribution point '''''mentioned to the first subparagraph where such network element would be economically unviable or physically impossible to replicate''''' in areas with lower population density.
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 756 -- ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #A60000; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 756'''<br/>
 
Edouard Martin<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
 
Article 59 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
National regulatory authorities may extend to those owners or undertakings the imposition of such access obligations, on fair and reasonable terms and conditions, beyond the '''''first''''' concentration or distribution point '''''to a concentration point as close as possible to end-users, to the extent strictly necessary to address insurmountable economic or physical barriers to replication''''' in areas with lower population density.
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
National regulatory authorities may extend to those owners or undertakings the imposition of such access obligations, on fair and reasonable terms and conditions, beyond the concentration or distribution point '''''mentioned in the first subparagraph where such network elements would be economically unviable or physically impossible to replicate''''' in areas with lower population density.
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 757 ++ ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 757'''<br/>
 
José Blanco López, Inmaculada Rodríguez-Piñero Fernández, Soledad Cabezón Ruiz<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
 
Article 59 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 
'''''National regulatory authorities shall not impose obligations in accordance with the second subparagraph where:'''''
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 
'''''deleted'''''
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none; padding-top: 0em;'|
 
'''''(a) a viable and similar alternative means of access to end-users is made available to any undertaking, provided that the access is offered on fair and reasonable terms and conditions to a very high capacity network by an undertaking meeting the criteria listed in Article 77 paragraphs (a) and (b); and'''''
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none; padding-top: 0em;'|
 
 
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none; padding-top: 0em;'|
 
'''''(b) in the case of recently deployed network elements, in particular by smaller local projects, the granting of that access would compromise the economic or financial viability of their deployment.'''''
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none; padding-top: 0em;'|
 
 
 
|}
 
 
 
=== Amendment 792 ++ ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 792'''<br/>
 
Michel Reimon<br/>
 
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
 
Article 61 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
An undertaking shall be deemed to have significant market power if, either individually or jointly with others, it enjoys a position equivalent to dominance, that is to say a position of economic strength affording it the power to behave to an appreciable extent independently of competitors, customers and ultimately consumers.
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
An undertaking shall be deemed to have significant market power if, either individually or jointly with others, '''''including through a commercial or a co-investment agreement,''''' it enjoys a position equivalent to dominance, that is to say a position of economic strength affording it the power to behave to an appreciable extent independently of competitors, customers and ultimately consumers.
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
''Justification: Co-investment in a certain area must be considered an oligopoly of a few powerful actors (on the local level), as the FDN Federation showed in their analysis of the fixed-line market (www.ffdn.org/en/node/129 ) written for a consultation of the ARCEP in 2016. These oligopolies work as a cartel. The co-investors, in a given area, should be regarded as having the position of the incumbent in that area. Such symmetric regulation would allow welcoming all actors into the market.''
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial agreements and co-investment can be considered as oligopolies
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 793 + ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 793'''<br/>
 
Kathleen Van Brempt<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
 
Article 61 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
An undertaking shall be deemed to have significant market power if, either individually or jointly with others, it enjoys a position equivalent to dominance, that is to say a position of economic strength affording it the power to behave to an appreciable extent independently of competitors, customers and ultimately consumers.
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
An undertaking shall be deemed to have significant market power if, either individually or jointly with others, it enjoys a position equivalent to dominance, that is to say a position of economic strength affording it the power to behave to an appreciable extent independently of competitors, customers and ultimately consumers '''''or when it is able to disrupt effective competition'''''.
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
Élargissement de la définition de SMP (significant market power)
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 794 + ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 794'''<br/>
 
Kaja Kallas<br/>
 
'''ALDE'''<br/>
 
Article 61 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 
 
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 
'''''Two or more undertakings may each be deemed to enjoy a position equivalent to having significant market power when they have the possibility to significantly impede effective competition, taking into account the relevant markets including but not limited to the market shares of other market participants, the market power of an undertaking on closely related markets, barriers to entry, market concentration, product differentiation, capacity constraints and switching costs.'''''
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
''Justification: In light of the increasing trend of convergence between markets, and development of oligopolies in Europe, there is a need to include situations where two or more undertakings can foreclose the markets even without tacit collusion.In accordance with rule 104 of the rules of procedure, this amendment is necessary for pressing reasons related to the internal logic of the text''
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
In light of the increasing trend of convergence between markets, and development of oligopolies in Europe, there is a need to include situations where two or more undertakings can foreclose the markets even without tacit collusion.
 
 
 
=== Amendment 795 + ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 795'''<br/>
 
Michel Reimon<br/>
 
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
 
Article 61 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
 
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
'''''3. Where an undertaking has significant market power on a specific market (the first market), it may also be designated as having significant market power on a closely related market (the second market), where the links between the two markets are such as to allow the market power held in the first market to be leveraged into the second market, thereby strengthening the market power of the undertaking. Consequently, remedies aimed at preventing such leverage may be applied in the second market pursuant to this Directive.'''''
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
''Justification: The Commission’s proposal weakens the SMP regime. The deleted provision aims at preventing SMP operators from leveraging their market power from one market to a closely related market. The SMP regime has been instrumental in promoting the objectives of the framework and should therefore remain at its centre. The reinstated provision supports a strong regulatory ‘safety net’ that provides clarity, predictability, and hence investor certainty. Reinstating the provision also closes an inconsistency in the Commission’s proposal, given that the Commission proposes in Article 65 (2)(d) that “regulation imposed on other relevant markets” shall be taken into account during the market analysis. If regulation on relevant markets is taken into account when analysing if a market should be subject to ex ante regulation, then SMP in relevant markets also needs to be taken into account when defining an SMP-operator in the first place.''
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
AM identique aux AMs 796, 797, 798 - Réinsertion du §3 de la directive 2009/140
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 799 / ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 799'''<br/>
 
Evžen Tošenovský<br/>
 
'''ECR'''<br/>
 
Article 61 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
 
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
'''''Two or more undertakings are each deemed to enjoy a position equivalent to having significant market power when they might significantly impede effective competition.'''''
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
Moins intéressant et complet que d'autres AM
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 800 + ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 800'''<br/>
 
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Edouard Martin, Flavio Zanonato, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Dan Nica, Jeppe Kofod<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
 
Article 61 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 b (new)
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
 
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
'''''An undertaking shall be deemed to have unilateral market power where, in the absence of significant market power, it enjoys a position of economic strength by virtue of the weakness of competitive constraints in an oligopolistic market, enabling it to act in a manner which is detrimental to consumer welfare.'''''
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
Élargissement de la définition de SMP (significant market power)
 
 
 
=== Amendment 872 -- ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #A60000; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 872'''<br/>
 
Anna Záborská, Ivan Štefanec<br/>
 
'''EPP'''<br/>
 
Article 70
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
'''''Article 70'''''
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
'''''deleted'''''
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
Suppression de l'art 70
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 880 -- ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #A60000; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 880'''<br/>
 
Michał Boni, Henna Virkkunen, Jerzy Buzek<br/>
 
'''EPP'''<br/>
 
Article 70 – paragraph 1
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
1. A national regulatory authority may, in accordance with Article 66, impose obligations on operators to meet reasonable requests for access to, and use of, civil engineering including, without limitation, buildings or entries to buildings, building cables including wiring, antennae, towers and other supporting constructions, poles, masts, ducts, conduits, inspection chambers, manholes, and cabinets, in situations where the market analysis indicates that denial of access or access given under unreasonable terms and conditions having a similar effect would hinder the emergence of a sustainable competitive market at the retail level and would not be in the end-user's interest.
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
1. A national regulatory authority may, in accordance with Article 66, impose obligations on operators to meet reasonable requests for access to, and use of, civil engineering '''''and passive infrastructure''''' including, without limitation, buildings or entries to buildings, building cables including wiring, antennae, towers and other supporting constructions, poles, masts, ducts''''', inactive wireline transmission infrastructure including cable and fiber''''', conduits, inspection chambers, manholes, and cabinets, in situations where the market analysis indicates that denial of access or access given under unreasonable terms and conditions having a similar effect would hinder the emergence of a sustainable competitive market at the retail level and would not be in the end-user's interest.
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
''Justification: It is proposed to extend the scope of this Article to all passive infrastructure.''
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
Cherche à focaliser l'art. 70 sur l'accès au passif
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 889 - ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 889'''<br/>
 
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Edouard Martin, Dan Nica, Jeppe Kofod, Carlos Zorrinho, Victor Negrescu, Zigmantas Balčytis<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
 
Article 70 – paragraph 1 a (new)
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-bottom:0em;'|
 
 
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-bottom:0em;'|
 
'''''1 a.''''' '''''National regulatory authorities shall take account in particular of the following factors:'''''
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 
 
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 
'''''(a) the technical and economic viability of using or installing competing facilities, in the light of the rate of market development, taking into account the nature and type of interconnection and/or access involved, including the viability of other upstream access products such as access to ducts;'''''
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 
 
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 
'''''(b) the technological evolution affecting network design and management'''''
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 
 
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 
'''''(cb) the feasibility of providing the access proposed, in relation to the capacity available;'''''
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 
 
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 
'''''(dc) the initial investment by the facility owner, taking account of any public investment made and the risks involved in making the investment;'''''
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 
 
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 
'''''(ed) the need to safeguard competition in the long term, with particular attention to economically efficient infrastructure-based competition;'''''
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 
 
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 
'''''(fe) where appropriate, any relevant intellectual property rights;'''''
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em'|
 
 
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em'|
 
'''''(g) the provision of pan-European services.'''''
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
''Justification: Civil engineering access enhances infrastructure-based-competition but should not be treated as the sole or primary remedy. That is what it is necessary to include the complementary obligation of giving access to the entire physical network elements (i.e. passive access). Passive remedies, compared to active ones, remain the main wholesale access products that ensure and promote sustainable infrastructure-based competition. The amendment therefore gives priority to passive over active remedies.''
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
comment
 
 
 
=== Amendment 893 - ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 893'''<br/>
 
Pavel Telička<br/>
 
'''ALDE'''<br/>
 
Article 70 – paragraph 2
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
2. National regulatory authorities '''''may impose obligations on an operator to provide access in accordance with this Article, irrespective of whether the assets that are affected by the obligation are part of the relevant market in accordance with the market analysis, provided that the obligation is necessary and proportionate to meet the objectives of Article 3'''''.
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
2. National regulatory authorities '''''shall take account in particular of the following factors:''''''''''(a) the technical and economic viability of using or installing competing facilities, in the light of the rate of market development, taking into account the nature and type of interconnection and/or access involved, including the viability of other upstream access products such as access to ducts;''''''''''(b) the technological evolution affecting network design and management''''''''''(c) the feasibility of providing the access proposed, in relation to the capacity available;''''''''''(d) the initial investment by the facility owner, taking account of any public investment made and the risks involved in making the investment;''''''''''(e) the need to safeguard competition in the long term, with particular attention to economically efficient infrastructure-based competition;''''''''''(f) where appropriate, any relevant intellectual property rights;''''''''''(g) the provision of pan-European services'''''.
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 894 - ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 894'''<br/>
 
Michel Reimon<br/>
 
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
 
Article 70 – paragraph 2
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
2. National regulatory authorities '''''may impose obligations on an operator to provide access in accordance with this Article, irrespective of whether the assets that are affected by the obligation are part''''' of the '''''relevant market in accordance with the market analysis, provided that the obligation is necessary and proportionate to meet the objectives of Article 3.'''''
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
2. National regulatory authorities '''''shall take account in particular''''' of the '''''following factors:'''''
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
''Justification: Civil engineering access enhances infrastructure-based-competition but should not be treated as the sole or primary remedy. That is what it is necessary to include the complementary obligation of giving access to the entire physical network elements (i.e. passive access). Passive remedies, compared to active ones, remain the main wholesale access products that ensure and promote sustainable infrastructure-based competition. The amendment therefore gives priority to passive over active remedies.''
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 895 - ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 895'''<br/>
 
Michel Reimon<br/>
 
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
 
Article 70 – paragraph 2 – point a (new)
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
 
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
'''''(a)''''' '''''the technical and economic viability of using or installing competing facilities, in the light of the rate of market development, taking into account the nature and type of interconnection and/or access involved, including the viability of other upstream access products such as access to ducts;'''''
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 896 - ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 896'''<br/>
 
Michel Reimon<br/>
 
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
 
Article 70 – paragraph 2 – point b (new)
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
 
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
'''''(b)''''' '''''the technological evolution affecting network design and management'''''
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 897 - ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 897'''<br/>
 
Michel Reimon<br/>
 
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
 
Article 70 – paragraph 2 – point c (new)
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
 
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
'''''(c)''''' '''''the feasibility of providing the access proposed, in relation to the capacity available;'''''
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 898 - ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 898'''<br/>
 
Michel Reimon<br/>
 
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
 
Article 70 – paragraph 2 – point d (new)
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
 
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
'''''(d)''''' '''''the initial investment by the facility owner, taking account of any public investment made and the risks involved in making the investment;'''''
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 899 - ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 899'''<br/>
 
Michel Reimon<br/>
 
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
 
Article 70 – paragraph 2 – point e (new)
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
 
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
'''''(e)''''' '''''the need to safeguard competition in the long term, with particular attention to economically efficient infrastructure based competition;'''''
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 900 - ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 900'''<br/>
 
Michel Reimon<br/>
 
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
 
Article 70 – paragraph 2 – point f (new)
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
 
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
'''''(f)''''' '''''the provision of pan-European services.'''''
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 901 - ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 901'''<br/>
 
Anna Záborská, Ivan Štefanec<br/>
 
'''EPP'''<br/>
 
Article 70 a (new)
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
 
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
'''''Article 70 a'''''
 
 
 
'''''Access obligations beyond civil engineering'''''
 
 
 
In geographic areas where two access networks can be expected on a forward-looking basis and where at least one of the network operators offers wholesale access to any interested undertaking, on reasonable commercial terms permitting sustainable competition on the retail market, national regulatory authorities shall not impose or maintain wholesale access obligations, beyond access to civil infrastructure according to Article 3 of Directive 2014/61/EU.
 
|}
 
 
 
=== Amendment 902 / ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 902'''<br/>
 
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Patrizia Toia, Edouard Martin, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Dan Nica, Jeppe Kofod<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
 
Article 71 – title
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
Obligations of access to, and use of, '''''specific''''' network '''''facilities'''''
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
Obligations of access to, and use of, '''''entire and shared physical''''' network '''''elements'''''
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
''Justification: In line with other AMs.Amendment''
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
Modification du titre => restriction au passif /!\ Inacceptable si l'actif n'est pas mis sur un pied d'égalité quelque part.
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 903 - ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 903'''<br/>
 
Pavel Telička<br/>
 
'''ALDE'''<br/>
 
Article 71 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
Only where a national regulatory authority concludes that the obligations imposed in accordance with Article 70 would not on their own lead to the achievement of the objectives set out in Article 3, it may, in accordance with the provisions of Article 66, impose obligations on operators '''''to meet reasonable requests for access to, and use of, specific network elements and associated facilities, in situations where the national regulatory authority considers that denial of access or unreasonable terms and conditions having a similar effect would hinder the emergence of a sustainable competitive market at the retail level, and would not be in the end-user's interest.'''''
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
Only where a national regulatory authority concludes that the obligations imposed in accordance with Article 70 would not on their own lead to the achievement of the objectives set out in Article 3, it may, in accordance with the provisions of Article 66, impose obligations on operators''''':'''''
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
AM identique à l'AM 904 - En contradiction avec d'autres AM que nous soutenons (cf. 907)
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 905 + ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 905'''<br/>
 
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Edouard Martin, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Dan Nica, Jeppe Kofod, Patrizia Toia<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
 
Article 71 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
'''''Only where''''' a national regulatory authority '''''concludes that the obligations imposed in accordance with Article 70 would not on their own lead to the achievement of the objectives set out in Article 3, it''''' may, in accordance with the provisions of Article 66, impose obligations on operators to meet reasonable requests for access to, and use of, specific network elements and associated facilities, in situations where the national regulatory authority considers that denial of access or unreasonable terms and conditions having a similar effect would hinder the emergence of a sustainable competitive market '''''at the retail level, and''''' would not be in the end-user's interest.
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
A national regulatory authority may, in accordance with the provisions of Article 66, impose obligations on operators to meet reasonable requests for access to, and use of, specific network elements and associated facilities, in situations where the national regulatory authority considers that denial of access or unreasonable terms and conditions having a similar effect would hinder the emergence of a sustainable competitive market''''', or''''' would not be in the end-user's interest.
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
''Justification: We need to ensure effective access to ducts and poles of SMP operators to ensure competition persists in the European markets.''
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
AM presque identique aux AMs 907 et 908, ainsi qu'à l'AM 909
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 906 - ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 906'''<br/>
 
Anna Záborská, Ivan Štefanec<br/>
 
'''EPP'''<br/>
 
Article 71 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
Only where a national regulatory authority concludes that the obligations imposed in accordance with Article '''''70''''' would not on their own lead to the achievement of the objectives set out in Article 3, it may, in accordance with the provisions of Article 66, impose obligations on operators to meet reasonable requests for access to, and use of, specific network elements and associated facilities, in situations where the national regulatory authority considers that denial of access or unreasonable terms and conditions having a similar effect would hinder the emergence of a sustainable competitive market at the retail level, and would not be in the end-user's interest.
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
Only where a national regulatory authority concludes that the obligations imposed in accordance with Article '''''3 of Directive 2014/61/EU''''' would not on their own lead to the achievement of the objectives set out in Article 3, it may, in accordance with the provisions of Article 66, impose obligations on operators to meet reasonable requests for access to, and use of, specific network elements and associated facilities, in situations '''''where this is not to the detriment of innovative developments such as very high capacity networks and software emulated networks, and''''' where the national regulatory authority considers that denial of access or unreasonable terms and conditions having a similar effect would hinder the emergence of a sustainable competitive market at the retail level, and would not be in the end-user's interest.
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
Fait passer l'innovation avant le reste ce qui implique trop de dérives possibles
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 907 + ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 907'''<br/>
 
Michel Reimon<br/>
 
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
 
Article 71 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 
'''''Only where''''' a national regulatory authority '''''concludes that the obligations imposed in accordance with Article 70 would not on their own lead to the achievement of the objectives set out in Article 3, it''''' may, in accordance with the provisions of Article 66, impose obligations on operators to meet reasonable requests for access to, and use of, specific network elements and associated facilities, in situations where the national regulatory authority considers that denial of access or unreasonable terms and conditions having a similar effect would hinder the emergence of a sustainable competitive market at the retail level, and would not be in the end-user's interest.
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 
A national regulatory authority may, in accordance with the provisions of Article 66, impose obligations on operators to meet reasonable requests for access to, and use of, specific network elements and associated facilities, in situations where the national regulatory authority considers that denial of access or unreasonable terms and conditions having a similar effect would hinder the emergence of a sustainable competitive market at the retail level, and would not be in the end-user's interest.
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
AM identique à l'AM 908
 
 
 
=== Amendment 908 + ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 908'''<br/>
 
José Blanco López, Inmaculada Rodríguez-Piñero Fernández, Soledad Cabezón Ruiz<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
 
Article 71 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 
'''Only where''' a national regulatory authority '''concludes that the obligations imposed in accordance with Article 70 would not on their own lead to the achievement of the objectives set out in Article 3, it''' may, in accordance with the provisions of Article 66, impose obligations on operators to meet reasonable requests for access to, and use of, specific network elements and associated facilities, in situations where the national regulatory authority considers that denial of access or unreasonable terms and conditions having a similar effect would hinder the emergence of a sustainable competitive market at the retail level, and would not be in the end-user's interest.
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 
A national regulatory authority may, in accordance with the provisions of Article 66, impose obligations on operators to meet reasonable requests for access to, and use of, specific network elements and associated facilities, in situations where the national regulatory authority considers that denial of access or unreasonable terms and conditions having a similar effect would hinder the emergence of a sustainable competitive market at the retail level, and would not be in the end-user's interest.
 
|}
 
 
 
=== Amendment 909 + ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 909'''<br/>
 
Kaja Kallas<br/>
 
'''ALDE'''<br/>
 
Article 71 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
'''''Only where''''' a national regulatory authority '''''concludes that the obligations imposed in accordance with Article 70 would not on their own lead to the achievement of the objectives set out in Article 3, it''''' may, in accordance with the provisions of Article 66, impose obligations on operators to meet reasonable requests for access to, and use of, specific network elements and associated facilities, in situations where the national regulatory authority considers that denial of access or unreasonable terms and conditions having a similar effect would hinder the emergence of '''''a''''' sustainable '''''competitive market at the retail level''''', and would not be in the end-user's interest.
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
A national regulatory authority may, in accordance with the provisions of Article 66, impose obligations on operators to meet reasonable requests for access to, and use of, specific network elements and associated facilities, in situations where the national regulatory authority considers that denial of access or unreasonable terms and conditions having a similar effect would hinder the emergence of '''''long-term''''' sustainable '''''competition in the relevant markets''''', and would not be in the end-user's interest.
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
''Justification: Access to civil engineering is important to contribute to sustainable competition, however it should take into account the limited availability or physical constraints of granting such access, therefore the national regulatory authority shall look at the most efficient remedies and not necessarily prioritise one over the other. In addition, the sole focus on retail market is not appropriate and should be replaced by long term sustainable competition in the relevant markets. In accordance with rule 104 of the rules of procedure, this amendment is necessary for pressing reasons related to the internal logic of the text''
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
Presque identiques aux AMs 905, 907 et 908. Essaie de ne pas se focaliser à la concurrence sur le marché de détail.
 
 
 
=== Amendment 911 - ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 911'''<br/>
 
Evžen Tošenovský<br/>
 
'''ECR'''<br/>
 
Article 71 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
Only where a national regulatory authority concludes that the obligations imposed in accordance with Article 70 would not '''''on their own lead to the achievement of the objectives set out in Article 3''''', it may, in accordance with the provisions of Article 66, impose obligations on operators to meet reasonable requests for access to, and use of, specific network elements and associated facilities, in situations where the national regulatory authority considers that denial of access or unreasonable terms and conditions having a similar effect would hinder the emergence of a sustainable competitive market at the retail level, and would not be in the end-user's interest.
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
Only where a national regulatory authority concludes that the obligations imposed in accordance with Article 70 would not '''''address the competition problems identified in the relevant market''''', it may, in accordance with the provisions of Article 66, impose obligations on operators to meet reasonable requests for access to, and use of, specific network elements and associated facilities, in situations where the national regulatory authority considers that denial of access or unreasonable terms and conditions having a similar effect would hinder the emergence of a sustainable competitive market at the retail level, and would not be in the end-user's interest.
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 912 + ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0; width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 912'''<br/>
 
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Edouard Martin, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Dan Nica, Jeppe Kofod, Patrizia Toia<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
 
Article 71 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – introductory part
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
'''''Operators may be required''''' inter alia:
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
'''''National regulatory authorities may impose''''' inter alia:
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
Clarifie le fait que ce sont les ARNs qui peuvent imposer des obligations aux opérateurs.
 
 
 
=== Amendment 913 -- ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0; width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #A60000; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 913'''<br/>
 
Anna Záborská, Ivan Štefanec<br/>
 
'''EPP'''<br/>
 
Article 71 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – introductory part
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
Operators may be required '''''inter alia''''':
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
Operators may be required:
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
En enlevant le "inter alia", le PPE veut réduire les obligations qui peuvent porter les opérateurs.
 
 
 
=== Amendment 914 - ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 914'''<br/>
 
Pavel Telička<br/>
 
'''EFDD'''<br/>
 
Article 71 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point a
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 
(a) to give third parties access to specified '''''network elements and/or facilities, as appropriate including access to''''' network elements '''''which are either not''''' active '''''or physical and/or active or virtual unbundled access to the local loop''''';
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 
(a) to give third parties access to specified '''''non-physical''''' network elements '''''including''''' active '''''services''''';
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
This amendment gives the priority of passive access over active access remedies which is not always the best solution especially for small actors
 
/!\ Se focalise sur l'accès au éléments non physiques => offres activées - Identique aux AM 915 et 916
 
 
 
=== Amendment 917 + ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 917'''<br/>
 
Michel Reimon<br/>
 
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
 
Article 71 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point a
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 
(a) to give third parties access to specified network elements and/or facilities, as appropriate including '''''access to network elements''''' which '''''are either not active or physical and/or active or virtual unbundled access to the local loop''''';
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 
(a) to give third parties access to specified '''''non-physical''''' network elements and/or facilities, as appropriate including '''''active services under transparent and regulated tariff conditions,''''' which '''''at least make it possible to reproduce the tariffs of the retail offers of the regulated operator''''';
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
This AM shall be adopted together with AM 923
 
 
 
/!\ Se focalise sur l’accès au éléments non physiques => offres activées, mais plus complet que l’AM 914. Nous sommes totalement d’accord avec la seconde partie. C’est l’ajout “non-physical” qui me fait hésiter&nbsp;!
 
 
 
=== Amendment 918 -- ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #A60000; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 918'''<br/>
 
Anna Záborská, Ivan Štefanec<br/>
 
'''EPP'''<br/>
 
Article 71 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point a
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
(a) to give third parties access '''''to specified''''' network '''''elements and/or facilities,''''' as appropriate including access to network elements which are either not active or physical '''''and/or''''' active or virtual '''''unbundled''''' access to the local loop;
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
(a) to give third parties access '''''at a single''''' network '''''layer that best addresses the problem identified at retail level''''' as appropriate including access to network elements which are either not active '''''('''''or physical''''') or''''' active '''''('''''or virtual''''')''''' access to the local loop;
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
Considère que les obligations ne doivent exister que si des problèmes sont identifiés au niveau 'retail'. Cet AM n'a d'utilité que pour favoriser encore un peu plus la position dominante des très gros opérateurs.
 
 
 
=== Amendment 919 / ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 919'''<br/>
 
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Edouard Martin, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Dan Nica, Jeppe Kofod, Patrizia Toia<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
 
Article 71 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point a
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
(a) '''''to give third parties access to specified''''' network elements '''''and/or''''' facilities, '''''as appropriate including''''' access to '''''network elements which are either not active or physical and/or active or virtual''''' unbundled access to '''''the local loop;'''''
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
(a) '''''obligations of access to, and use of, specific entire physical''''' network elements '''''and associated''''' facilities, '''''including unbundled''''' access to '''''the metallic local loop and sub-loop as well as''''' unbundled access to '''''fibre loops and fibre terminating segments'''''
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
Focalise sur le passif et le dégroupage. Ne parle pas de l'offre active.
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 920 / ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 920'''<br/>
 
Michał Boni<br/>
 
'''EPP'''<br/>
 
Article 71 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point a
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
(a) to give third parties access to specified network elements and/or facilities, as appropriate including access to '''''network elements which are either not''''' active '''''or physical and/or active or''''' virtual unbundled access to the local loop;
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
(a) to give third parties access to specified network elements and/or facilities, as appropriate including access to '''''any''''' active '''''network elements and/or''''' virtual unbundled access to the local loop;
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
''Justification: It is suggested to clarify that Article 71 applies to active network elements only, while Article 70 addresses the regulation of passive infrastructure.''
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
/!\ Considère que l'art. 70 s'adresse au passif uniquement et l'art. 71 à l'actif uniquement.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 924 - ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 924'''<br/>
 
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Edouard Martin, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Dan Nica, Jeppe Kofod, Patrizia Toia<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
 
Article 71 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point b
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
'''''(b)''''' '''''to negotiate in good faith with undertakings requesting access;'''''
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
'''''deleted'''''
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 925 - ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 925'''<br/>
 
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Edouard Martin, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Dan Nica, Jeppe Kofod, Patrizia Toia<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
 
Article 71 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point c
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
'''''(c)''''' '''''not to withdraw access to facilities already granted;'''''
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
'''''deleted'''''
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 926 - ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 926'''<br/>
 
Fulvio Martusciello<br/>
 
'''EPP'''<br/>
 
Article 71 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point c a (new)
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
 
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
'''''(c a)''''' '''''to provide specified services on a wholesale basis for resale by third parties;'''''
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 930 -- ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #A60000; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 930'''<br/>
 
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Edouard Martin, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Dan Nica, Jeppe Kofod, Patrizia Toia<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
 
Article 71 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point d
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
'''''(d)''''' '''''to grant open access to technical interfaces, protocols or other key technologies that are indispensable for the interoperability of services or virtual network services;'''''
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
'''''deleted'''''
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 931 -- ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #A60000; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 931'''<br/>
 
Anna Záborská, Ivan Štefanec<br/>
 
'''EPP'''<br/>
 
Article 71 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point d
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
(d) to grant open access to technical interfaces, protocols or other key technologies that are indispensable for the interoperability of services '''''or virtual network services''''';
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
(d) to grant open access to technical interfaces, protocols or other key technologies that are indispensable for the interoperability of services;
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 932 - ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 932'''<br/>
 
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Edouard Martin, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Dan Nica, Jeppe Kofod, Patrizia Toia<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
 
Article 71 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point e
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 
'''''(e)''''' '''''to provide co-location or other forms of associated facilities sharing;'''''
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 
'''''deleted'''''
 
|}
 
 
 
=== Amendment 933 - ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 933'''<br/>
 
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Edouard Martin, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Dan Nica, Jeppe Kofod, Patrizia Toia<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
 
Article 71 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point f
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 
'''''(f)''''' '''''to provide specified services needed to ensure interoperability of end-to-end services to users, including facilities for software emulated networks or roaming on mobile networks;'''''
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 
'''''deleted'''''
 
|}
 
 
 
=== Amendment 934 -- ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #A60000; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 934'''<br/>
 
Anna Záborská, Ivan Štefanec<br/>
 
'''EPP'''<br/>
 
Article 71 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point f
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
(f) to provide specified services needed to ensure interoperability of end-to-end services to users, including facilities for '''''software emulated networks or''''' roaming on mobile networks;
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
(f) to provide specified services needed to ensure interoperability of end-to-end services to users, including facilities for roaming on mobile networks;
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
Cet AM concerne le "network slicing" des réseaux 5G. La 5G permet d'avoir *des* réseaux car le réseau (antennes, matériel opérateur) sera générique et pourra être programmé pour un usage donné en fonction des caractéristiques attendues du réseau (ex: faible latence). Cet AM vise donc à empêcher l'obligation de fournir les services d'accès nécessaires pour qu'un opérateur tiers puisse opérer sur le réseau "slicé", avec pour conséquence la fermeture du marché et de la concurrence.
 
 
 
=== Amendment 935 - ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 935'''<br/>
 
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Edouard Martin, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Dan Nica, Jeppe Kofod, Patrizia Toia<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
 
Article 71 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point g
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 
'''''(g)''''' '''''to provide access to operational support systems or similar software systems necessary to ensure fair competition in the provision of services;'''''
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 
'''''deleted'''''
 
|}
 
 
 
=== Amendment 936 -- ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #A60000; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 936'''<br/>
 
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Edouard Martin, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Dan Nica, Jeppe Kofod, Patrizia Toia<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
 
Article 71 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point h
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
'''''(h)''''' '''''to interconnect networks or network facilities;'''''
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
'''''deleted'''''
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 937 -- ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #A60000; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 937'''<br/>
 
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Edouard Martin, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Dan Nica, Jeppe Kofod, Patrizia Toia<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
 
Article 71 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point i
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
'''''(i)''''' '''''to provide access to associated services such as identity, location and presence service.'''''
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
'''''deleted'''''
 
|}
 
 
 
=== Amendment 939 ++ ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 939'''<br/>
 
Michel Reimon<br/>
 
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
 
Article 71 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
2. '''''When national regulatory authorities are considering the appropriateness of imposing any of the possible specific obligations referred in paragraph 1, and in particular when assessing, in conformity with the principle of proportionality, whether and how such obligations should be imposed, they shall analyse whether other forms of access to wholesale inputs either on the same or a related wholesale market, would already be sufficient to address the identified problem at the retail level. The assessment shall include existing or prospective commercial access offers, regulated access pursuant to Article 59, or existing or contemplated regulated access to other wholesale inputs pursuant to this Article.''''' They shall take account in particular of the following factors:
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
2. They shall take account in particular of the following factors:
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
''Justification: Before intervening in wholesale markets, NRAs would have to demonstrate that their intervention corresponds to a retail problem. The focus on retail markets would lead to the automatic de-regulation of wholesale markets in many cases, and would ultimately lead to the monopolisation or ‘duopolisation’. In addition, retail competition of the kind where all retail providers are dependent on one wholesale provider is not sustainable in the long run and only amounts to ‘fake-competition’ and could lead to higher prices and less innovation and choice for end-users.The mere existence of a “prospective commercial access offer” should not be a sufficient basis upon which to require regulatory forbearance – if it were, then the absence of take-up could result in a de facto unregulated monopoly (see also BEREC opinion BoR (16) 213 (p. 7)).''
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 940 ++ ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 940'''<br/>
 
David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano<br/>
 
'''EFD'''<br/>
 
Article 71 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
2. '''''When''''' national regulatory authorities '''''are considering the appropriateness of imposing any of the possible specific obligations referred in paragraph 1, and in particular when assessing, in conformity with the principle of proportionality, whether and how such obligations should be imposed, they shall analyse whether other forms of access to wholesale inputs either on the same or a related wholesale market, would already be sufficient to address the identified problem at the retail level. The assessment shall include existing or prospective commercial access offers, regulated access pursuant to Article 59, or existing or contemplated regulated access to other wholesale inputs pursuant to this Article. They''''' shall take account in particular of the following factors:
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
2. National regulatory authorities shall take account in particular of the following factors:
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
''Justification: The focus on retail markets would lead to the automatic de-regulation of wholesale markets in many cases. Furthermore, The mere existence of a “prospective commercial access offer” should not be a sufficient basis upon which to require regulatory forbearance.''
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 943 -- ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #A60000; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 943'''<br/>
 
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Edouard Martin, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Dan Nica, Jeppe Kofod, Patrizia Toia<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
 
Article 71 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
2. '''''When national regulatory authorities are considering the appropriateness of imposing any of the possible specific obligations referred in paragraph 1, and in particular when assessing, in conformity with the principle of proportionality, whether and how such obligations should be imposed, they shall analyse whether''''' other '''''forms of''''' access to '''''wholesale inputs either on the same or a related wholesale market, would already be sufficient to address the identified problem at the retail level. The assessment shall include existing or prospective commercial access offers, regulated access pursuant to Article 59, or existing or contemplated regulated access to other wholesale inputs pursuant to this Article. They shall take account in particular of the following factors:'''''
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
2. '''''They shall take account in particular of the following factors:(a) the technical and economic viability of using or installing competing facilities, in the light of the rate of market development, taking into account the nature and type of interconnection and/or access involved, including the viability of''''' other '''''upstream access products such as''''' access to '''''ducts;''''''''''(b) the technological evolution affecting network design and management''''''''''(cb) the feasibility of providing the access proposed, in relation to the capacity available;''''''''''(dc) the initial investment by the facility owner, taking account of any public investment made and the risks involved in making the investment ;''''''''''(ed) the need to safeguard competition in the long term, with particular attention to economically efficient infrastructure-based competition;''''''''''(fe) where appropriate, any relevant intellectual property rights;''''''''''(g) the provision of pan-European services.'''''
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
AM pro teclos
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 944 / ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 944'''<br/>
 
José Blanco López, Inmaculada Rodríguez-Piñero Fernández, Soledad Cabezón Ruiz<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
 
Article 71 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
2. When national regulatory authorities are considering the appropriateness of imposing any of the possible specific obligations referred in paragraph 1, and in particular when assessing, in conformity with the principle of proportionality, whether and how such obligations should be imposed, they shall analyse whether other forms of access to wholesale inputs either on the same or a related wholesale market, would already be sufficient to address the identified problem at the retail level. The assessment shall include existing or prospective commercial access offers, regulated access pursuant to Article 59, or existing or contemplated regulated access to other wholesale inputs pursuant to this Article. They shall take account in particular of the following factors:
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
2. When national regulatory authorities are considering the appropriateness of imposing any of the possible specific obligations referred in paragraph 1, and in particular when assessing, in conformity with the principle of proportionality, whether and how such obligations should be imposed, they shall analyse whether other forms of access to wholesale inputs either on the same or a related wholesale market, would already be sufficient to address the identified problem at the retail level. The assessment shall include existing or prospective commercial access offers, regulated access pursuant to Article 59, or existing or contemplated regulated access to other wholesale inputs pursuant to this Article''''', but shall when needed be adapted so as to reflect significant market changes'''''. They shall take account in particular of the following factors:
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
''Justification: This provision aims at ensuring that the assessment should reflect significant market changes''
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 946 - ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 946'''<br/>
 
Michał Boni<br/>
 
'''EPP'''<br/>
 
Article 71 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
2. When national regulatory authorities are considering the appropriateness of imposing any of the possible specific obligations referred in paragraph 1, and in particular when assessing, in conformity with the principle of proportionality, whether and how such obligations should be imposed, they shall analyse whether other forms of access to wholesale inputs either on the same or a related wholesale market, would already be sufficient to address the identified problem at the retail level. The assessment shall include existing '''''or prospective''''' commercial access offers, regulated access pursuant to Article 59, or existing '''''or contemplated''''' regulated access to other wholesale inputs pursuant to this Article. They shall take account in particular of the following factors:
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
2. When national regulatory authorities are considering the appropriateness of imposing any of the possible specific obligations referred in paragraph 1, and in particular when assessing, in conformity with the principle of proportionality, whether and how such obligations should be imposed, they shall analyse whether other forms of access to wholesale inputs either on the same or a related wholesale market, would already be sufficient to address the identified problem at the retail level. The assessment shall include existing commercial access offers, regulated access pursuant to Article 59, or existing regulated access to other wholesale inputs pursuant to this Article '''''but shall at all time be adapted so as to reflect significant market changes'''''. They shall take account in particular of the following factors:
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
''Justification: Article 71 provides that, in their assessment, NRAs should include existing or prospective commercial access offers and existing or contemplated regulated access. Including prospective offers and contemplated access however reduces predictability and legal certainty for providers of electronic communications services and networks. Consequently, only existing commercial access offers or regulated access should be taken into account. In addition, this provision should expressly provide that such assessment should at all times reflect significant market changes so as to avoid the situation that obligations that are no longer justified are maintained.''
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 947 / ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 947'''<br/>
 
Kaja Kallas<br/>
 
'''ALDE'''<br/>
 
Article 71 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
2. When national regulatory authorities are considering the appropriateness of imposing any of the possible specific obligations referred in paragraph 1, and in particular when assessing, in conformity with the principle of proportionality, whether and how such obligations should be imposed, they shall analyse whether other forms of access to wholesale inputs either on the same or a related wholesale market, would already be sufficient to address the identified problem '''''at the retail level'''''. The assessment shall include existing or prospective commercial access offers, regulated access pursuant to Article 59, or existing or contemplated regulated access to other wholesale inputs pursuant to this Article. They shall take account in particular of the following factors:
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
2. When national regulatory authorities are considering the appropriateness of imposing any of the possible specific obligations referred in paragraph 1, and in particular when assessing, in conformity with the principle of proportionality, whether and how such obligations should be imposed, they shall analyse whether other forms of access to wholesale inputs either on the same or a related wholesale market, would already be sufficient to address the identified problem '''''in the relevant markets'''''. The assessment shall include existing or prospective commercial access offers, regulated access pursuant to Article 59, or existing or contemplated regulated access to other wholesale inputs pursuant to this Article. They shall take account in particular of the following factors:
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
''Justification: There are often several retail markets linked to one larger wholesale market, that might evolve more rapidly in different manners while barriers to entry remain in the relevant wholesale market, therefore the sole focus on retail market is not appropriate and should be replaced by long term sustainable competition in the relevant markets. In accordance with rule 104 of the rules of procedure, this amendment is necessary for pressing reasons related to the internal logic of the text''
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 948 ++ ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 948'''<br/>
 
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Edouard Martin, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Dan Nica, Jeppe Kofod, Patrizia Toia<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
 
Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point a
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
'''''(a)''''' '''''the technical and economic viability of using or installing competing facilities, in the light of the rate of market development, taking into account the nature and type of interconnection and/or access involved, including the viability of other upstream access products such as access to ducts;'''''
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
'''''deleted'''''
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
Suppression - The role of NRAs is not to secure the investments of operators but to ensure a harmonious development in the territories and give to all equal access to the market and services.
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 950 - ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 950'''<br/>
 
Pavel Telička<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
 
Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point b
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
(b) the '''''expected''''' technological evolution affecting network design and management
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
(b) the technological evolution affecting network design and management
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 952 / ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 952'''<br/>
 
Kaja Kallas<br/>
 
'''ALDE'''<br/>
 
Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new)
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
 
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
'''''(b a)''''' '''''the need to ensure technology neutrality enabling access seekers to design and manage their own network'''''
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
''Justification: Without prejudice to SMP operators freedom to develop their own network architecture, regulators should ensure that the remedies adopted are forward looking by providing incentives for the development of open and flexible network architecture, that would enable the adoption of less burdensome and complex remedies.''
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 953 ++ ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 953'''<br/>
 
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Edouard Martin, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Dan Nica, Jeppe Kofod, Patrizia Toia<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
 
Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point c
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
'''''(c)''''' '''''the feasibility of providing the access proposed, in relation to the capacity available;'''''
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
'''''deleted'''''
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
Suppression - The role of NRAs is not to secure the investments of operators but to ensure a harmonious development in the territories and give to all equal access to the market and services.
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 954 ++ ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 954'''<br/>
 
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Edouard Martin, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Dan Nica, Jeppe Kofod, Patrizia Toia<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
 
Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point d
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
'''''(d)''''' '''''the initial investment by the facility owner, taking account of any public investment made and the risks involved in making the investment with particular regard to investments in and risk levels associated with very high capacity networks;'''''
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
'''''deleted'''''
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
Suppression - The role of NRAs is not to secure the investments of operators but to ensure a harmonious development in the territories and give to all equal access to the market and services.
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 955 - ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 955'''<br/>
 
Fulvio Martusciello<br/>
 
'''EPP'''<br/>
 
Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point d
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
(d) the initial investment by the facility owner, taking account of any public investment made and the risks involved in making the investment '''''with particular regard to investments in and risk levels associated with very high capacity networks''''';
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
(d) the initial investment by the facility owner, taking account of any public investment made and the risks involved in making the investment;
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 958 - ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 958'''<br/>
 
Michel Reimon<br/>
 
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
 
Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point d
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
(d) the initial investment by the facility owner, taking account of any public investment made and the risks involved in making the investment with particular regard to investments '''''in and risk levels associated with very high capacity networks''''';
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
(d) the initial investment by the facility owner, taking account of any public investment made and the risks involved in making the investment with particular regard to investments;
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 959 ++ ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 959'''<br/>
 
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Edouard Martin, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Dan Nica, Jeppe Kofod, Patrizia Toia<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
 
Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point e
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
'''''(e)''''' '''''the need to safeguard competition in the long term, with particular attention to economically efficient infrastructure-based competition and to sustainable competition based on co-investment in networks;'''''
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
'''''deleted'''''
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
Suppression - The role of NRAs is not to secure the investments of operators but to ensure a harmonious development in the territories and give to all equal access to the market and services.
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 960 - ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 960'''<br/>
 
Anna Záborská, Ivan Štefanec<br/>
 
'''EPP'''<br/>
 
Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point e
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
(e) the need to safeguard competition in the long term, with particular attention to economically efficient infrastructure-based competition and to sustainable competition based on co-investment in networks;
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
(e) the need to safeguard competition in the long term, with particular attention to economically efficient infrastructure-based competition and to sustainable competition '''''such as those''''' based on co-investment in networks '''''and other innovative commercial business models''''';
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 961 - ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 961'''<br/>
 
José Blanco López, Inmaculada Rodríguez-Piñero Fernández, Soledad Cabezón Ruiz<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
 
Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point e
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
(e) the need to safeguard competition in the long term, with particular attention to economically efficient infrastructure-based competition and to sustainable competition based on co-investment in networks;
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
(e) the need to safeguard competition in the long term, with particular attention to economically efficient infrastructure-based competition and to sustainable competition based on '''''innovative commercial business models such as, but not only,''''' co-investment in networks;
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
''Justification: Recital 166 introduces the need to take into account newly concluded voluntary agreements between operators in order to provide regulatory flexibility. Co-investment is a particular case, but not the only one''
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 962 / ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 962'''<br/>
 
David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano<br/>
 
'''EFD'''<br/>
 
Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point e
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
(e) the need to safeguard competition in the long term, with particular attention to economically efficient infrastructure-based competition '''''and to sustainable competition based on co-investment in networks''''';
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
(e) the need to safeguard competition in the long term, with particular attention to economically efficient infrastructure-based competition;
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
''Justification: Necessary because some of the co-investment schemes have the potential to create ineffectively competitive market outcomes.''
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 967 ++ ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 967'''<br/>
 
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Edouard Martin, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Dan Nica, Jeppe Kofod, Patrizia Toia<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
 
Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point f
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
'''''(f)''''' '''''where appropriate, any relevant intellectual property rights;'''''
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
'''''deleted'''''
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
Suppression - The role of NRAs is not to secure the investments of operators but to ensure a harmonious development in the territories and give to all equal access to the market and services.
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 968 ++ ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 968'''<br/>
 
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Edouard Martin, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Dan Nica, Jeppe Kofod, Patrizia Toia<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
 
Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point g
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
'''''(g)''''' '''''the provision of pan-European services.'''''
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
'''''deleted'''''
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
Suppression - The role of NRAs is not to secure the investments of operators but to ensure a harmonious development in the territories and give to all equal access to the market and services.
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 969 ++ ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 969'''<br/>
 
Michel Reimon<br/>
 
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
 
Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point g a (new)
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
 
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
'''''(g a)''''' '''''the existence of a broad choice of offers and providers for fixed and mobile access, for each consumer in Europe irrespective of their place of residence;'''''
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
Suppression - The role of NRAs is not to secure the investments of operators but to ensure a harmonious development in the territories and give to all equal access to the market and services.
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 970 ++ ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 970'''<br/>
 
Michel Reimon<br/>
 
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
 
Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point g b (new)
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
 
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
'''''(g b)''''' '''''the development of a democratic society in the digital era allowing free access to information and expression for all citizens of Europe;'''''
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
Suppression - The role of NRAs is not to secure the investments of operators but to ensure a harmonious development in the territories and give to all equal access to the market and services.
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 971 -- ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #A60000; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 971'''<br/>
 
Anna Záborská, Ivan Štefanec<br/>
 
'''EPP'''<br/>
 
Article 71 – paragraph 2 a (new)
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
 
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
'''''2 a.''''' '''''In order to account for the long-term interest of end-users, national regulatory authorities should focus more on facilitating network investments by all operators. Regulation should not be to the detriment of innovative developments, in particular very high capacity networks, software defined networks and network function virtualisation. Only where strictly necessary to safeguard competition and where no alternative access possibilities, including access based on commercial agreements, exist, regulated access should be maintained in an appropriate and balanced manner, i.e. at a single network layer. Regulated access at multiple network layers has led to unnecessarily high complexity with regard to the consistency of regulated wholesale products at different network layers and unduly restricts flexibility and commercial freedom in the dynamic telecoms market environment. Limiting access to a single network layer that best addresses the problem identified at the retail level will significantly reduce regulatory costs and the potential for regulatory gaming by market players, leading to more efficient and appropriate outcomes. In this regard, national regulatory authorities should assess whether active or passive access is more appropriate in consideration of national or local circumstances. As unbundling is detrimental to network investments by allowing 'cream-skimming' of the most profitable customers at average cost, there should no longer be an obligation to provide unbundled access, which undermines investment models based on product and price differentiation.'''''
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 972 - ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 972'''<br/>
 
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Edouard Martin, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Dan Nica, Jeppe Kofod, Patrizia Toia<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
 
Article 71 – paragraph 3
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
3. '''''When imposing obligations on an operator to provide access in accordance with the provisions of this Article,''''' national regulatory authorities '''''may lay down technical or operational conditions to be met by the provider and/or beneficiaries of such access where necessary to ensure normal operation''''' of the '''''network.''''' Obligations '''''to follow specific technical standards or specifications shall be in compliance with the standards and specifications laid down''''' in accordance with Article '''''39'''''.
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
3. '''''This is without prejudice to''''' national regulatory authorities '''''giving consideration in addition to imposing each''''' of the obligations '''''on an operator''''' in accordance with Article '''''72'''''.
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 973 -- ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #A60000; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 973'''<br/>
 
Anna Záborská, Ivan Štefanec<br/>
 
'''EPP'''<br/>
 
Article 72 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
A national regulatory authority may, in accordance with the provisions of Article 66, impose obligations relating to cost recovery and price controls, including obligations '''''for cost orientation of prices and obligations''''' concerning cost accounting systems, for the provision of specific types of interconnection and/or access, in situations where a market analysis indicates '''''that''''' a lack of effective competition '''''means that the operator concerned may sustain prices at an excessively high level, or may apply a''''' price '''''squeeze,''''' to the detriment of '''''end-users'''''.
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
A national regulatory authority may, in accordance with the provisions of Article 66, impose obligations relating to cost recovery and price controls, including obligations concerning cost accounting systems, for the provision of specific types of interconnection and/or access, in situations where a market analysis indicates a lack of effective competition'''''. A national regulatory authority may only impose price controls that ensure fair and reasonable prices and do not negatively impact investments. When applied, a price control shall meet the following cumulative conditions:''''''''''(a) the price control ensures recovery of all investments connected to the deployment of new networks and fully incorporates the risks associated with these investments;''''''''''(b) the price control does not lead to a situation where the investing operator is put at a disadvantage compared to non-investing operators or lead to a situation under which an investment would not have been made in the first place;''''''''''(c) the''''' price '''''control avoids undue profit margins for access seekers''''' to the detriment of '''''the investing operator and appropriately reflects differences in the risks taken by different access seekers'''''.
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 974 -- ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #A60000; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 974'''<br/>
 
Patrizia Toia<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
 
Article 72 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
'''''In determining whether or not price control obligations would be appropriate, national regulatory authorities shall take into account long-term end-user interests related to the deployment and take-up of next-generation networks, and in particular of very high capacity networks. In particular,''''' to encourage investments by the operator, including in next-generation networks, national regulatory authorities shall take into account the investment made by the operator. Where the national regulatory authorities deem price controls appropriate, they shall allow the operator a reasonable rate of return on adequate capital employed, taking into account any risks specific to a particular new investment network project.
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
To encourage investments by the operator, including in next-generation networks, national regulatory authorities shall take into account the investment made by the operator. Where the national regulatory authorities deem price controls appropriate, they shall allow the operator a reasonable rate of return on adequate capital employed, taking into account any risks specific to a particular new investment network project.
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
''Justification: Principles of cost orientation and economic replicability should allow NRA to guarantee low prices for consumers''
 
|}
 
 
 
=== Amendment 977 / ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 977'''<br/>
 
Kaja Kallas<br/>
 
'''ALDE'''<br/>
 
Article 72 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
In determining whether or not price control obligations would be appropriate, national regulatory authorities shall take into account long-term end-user interests related to the deployment and take-up of next-generation networks, and in particular of very high capacity networks. In particular, to encourage investments by the operator, including in next-generation networks, national regulatory authorities shall take into account the investment made by the operator. '''''Where the national regulatory authorities deem price controls appropriate, they shall allow the operator a reasonable rate of return on adequate capital employed, taking into account any risks specific to a particular new investment network project.'''''
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
In determining whether or not price control obligations would be appropriate, national regulatory authorities shall take into account long-term end-user interests related to the deployment and take-up of next-generation networks, and in particular of very high capacity networks. In particular, to encourage investments by the operator, including in next-generation networks, national regulatory authorities shall take into account the investment made by the operator.
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
''Justification: In accordance with rule 104 of the rules of procedure, this amendment is necessary for pressing reasons related to the internal logic of the text''
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 978 - ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 978'''<br/>
 
Anna Záborská, Ivan Štefanec<br/>
 
'''EPP'''<br/>
 
Article 72 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
In determining whether or not price control obligations would be appropriate, national regulatory authorities shall take into account long-term end-user interests related to '''''the deployment and take-up of next-generation networks, and in particular of very high capacity''''' networks. In particular, to encourage investments by the operator, including in next-generation networks, national regulatory authorities shall take into account the investment made by the operator. Where the national regulatory authorities deem price controls appropriate, they shall allow the operator a reasonable rate of return on adequate capital employed, taking into account any risks specific to a particular new investment network project.
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
In determining whether or not price control obligations would be appropriate, national regulatory authorities shall take into account long-term end-user interests related to '''''investment in, the deployment of and take-up of next-generation''''' networks. In particular, to encourage investments by the operator, including in next-generation networks, national regulatory authorities shall take into account the investment made by the operator. Where the national regulatory authorities deem price controls appropriate, they shall allow the operator a reasonable rate of return on adequate capital employed, taking into account any risks specific to a particular new investment network project.
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 979 ++ ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 979'''<br/>
 
Kaja Kallas<br/>
 
'''ALDE'''<br/>
 
Article 72 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
'''''National regulatory authorities shall not impose or maintain obligations pursuant to this Article, where they establish that a demonstrable retail price constraint is present and that any obligations imposed in accordance with Articles 67 to 71, including in particular any economic replicability test imposed in accordance with Article 68 ensures effective and non discriminatory access.'''''
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
'''''deleted'''''
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
''Justification: In accordance with rule 104 of the rules of procedure, this amendment is necessary for pressing reasons related to the internal logic of the text''
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
Current provisions for co-investment practices do not allow non-profit or local ISPs to participate in the investments, restricting this opportunity only to larger and incumbent actors. Although Community Networks (CN) and local actors have proven successful in connecting underprivileged communities both in urban and rural areas, it would be only normal to considered them equal members of the telecoms ecosystem, thus giving them fair and equal access to co-investment opportunities. Moreover, co-investment in a certain area must be considered as an oligopoly of a few powerful actors that work as a cartel. This is thus not acceptable to reduce the obligations. Furthermore, the access to co-investment agreement shall be affordable for small operators.
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 982 - ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 982'''<br/>
 
Anna Záborská, Ivan Štefanec<br/>
 
'''EPP'''<br/>
 
Article 72 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
National regulatory authorities shall not impose or maintain obligations pursuant to this Article, where they establish that a demonstrable retail price constraint is present and that any obligations imposed in accordance with Articles 67 to 71, including in particular any economic replicability test imposed in accordance with Article 68 ensures effective '''''and non discriminatory''''' access.
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
National regulatory authorities shall not impose or maintain obligations pursuant to this Article, '''''either for new network elements in case a network roll-out contributes to the availability of very-high capacity networks or''''' where they establish that a demonstrable retail price constraint is present and that any obligations imposed in accordance with Articles 67 to 71, including in particular any economic replicability test imposed in accordance with Article 68 ensures effective '''''non discrimination of''''' access.
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 983 -- ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #A60000; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 983'''<br/>
 
Anna Záborská, Ivan Štefanec<br/>
 
'''EPP'''<br/>
 
Article 72 – paragraph 3
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
'''''3.''''' '''''Where an operator has an obligation regarding the cost orientation of its prices, the burden of proof that charges are derived from costs including a reasonable rate of return on investment shall lie with the operator concerned. For the purpose of calculating the cost of efficient provision of services, national regulatory authorities may use cost accounting methods independent of those used by the undertaking. National regulatory authorities may require an operator to provide full justification for its prices, and may, where appropriate, require prices to be adjusted.'''''
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
'''''deleted'''''
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 984 -- ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #A60000; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 984'''<br/>
 
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Edouard Martin, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Dan Nica, Jeppe Kofod, Patrizia Toia<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
 
Article 72 a (new)
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-bottom:0em;'|
 
 
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-bottom:0em;'|
 
'''''Article 72 a'''''
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 
 
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 
'''''Other access-related obligations'''''
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 
 
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 
'''''1. A national regulatory authority'''''
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 
 
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 
'''''may, in accordance with the provisions of Article 66, impose:'''''
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 
 
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 
'''''(a) to give third parties access to specified active network elements and services;'''''
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 
 
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 
'''''(b) to provide specified services on a wholesale basis for resale by third parties;'''''
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 
 
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 
'''''(c) to negotiate in good faith with undertakings requesting access;'''''
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 
 
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 
'''''(d) not to withdraw access to facilities already granted;'''''
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 
 
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 
'''''(ee) to grant open access to technical interfaces, protocols or other key technologies that are indispensable for the interoperability of services or virtual network services;'''''
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 
 
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 
'''''(ff) to provide co-location or other forms of associated facilities sharing;'''''
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 
 
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 
'''''(gg) to provide specified services needed to ensure interoperability of end-to-end services to users, including facilities for software emulated networks or roaming on mobile networks;'''''
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 
 
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 
'''''(hh) to provide access to operational support systems or similar software systems necessary to ensure fair competition in the provision of services;'''''
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 
 
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 
'''''(i) to interconnect networks or network facilities;'''''
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 
 
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 
'''''(j) to provide access to associated services such as identity, location and presence service.'''''
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 
 
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 
'''''National regulatory authorities may attach to those obligations conditions covering fairness, reasonableness and timeliness.'''''
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 
 
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 
'''''2. They shall take account in particular of the following factors:'''''
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 
 
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 
'''''(a) the technical and economic viability of using or installing competing facilities, in the light of the rate of market development, taking into account the nature and type of interconnection and/or access involved, including the viability of other upstream access products such as access to ducts;'''''
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 
 
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 
'''''(b) the technological evolution affecting network design and management'''''
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 
 
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 
'''''(cb) the feasibility of providing the access proposed, in relation to the capacity available;'''''
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 
 
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 
'''''(dc) the initial investment by the facility owner, taking account of any public investment made and the risks involved in making the investment ;'''''
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 
 
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 
'''''(ed) the need to safeguard competition in the long term, with particular attention to economically efficient infrastructure-based competition;'''''
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 
 
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 
'''''(fe) where appropriate, any relevant intellectual property rights;'''''
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em'|
 
 
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em'|
 
'''''(g) the provision of pan-European services.'''''
 
|}
 
 
 
=== Amendment 985 - ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 985'''<br/>
 
Anna Záborská, Ivan Štefanec<br/>
 
'''EPP'''<br/>
 
Article 73
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
'''''[...]'''''
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
'''''deleted'''''
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
Cela ne parait pas approprié de supprimer l'art. 73
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 986 / ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 986'''<br/>
 
Edouard Martin<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
 
Article 73 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
Where a national regulatory authority imposes obligations relating to cost recovery and price controls on '''''operators designated as having significant market power on''''' a market for wholesale voice call termination, it shall set maximum symmetric termination rates based on the costs incurred by an efficient operator. The evaluation of efficient costs shall be based on current cost values. The cost methodology to calculate efficient costs shall be based on a bottom-up modelling approach using long-run incremental traffic-related costs of providing the wholesale voice call termination service to third parties.
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
Where a national regulatory authority imposes obligations relating to cost recovery and price controls on a market for wholesale voice call termination, it shall set maximum symmetric termination rates based on the costs incurred by an efficient operator. The evaluation of efficient costs shall be based on current cost values. The cost methodology to calculate efficient costs shall be based on a bottom-up modelling approach using long-run incremental traffic-related costs of providing the wholesale voice call termination service to third parties.
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
/!\ Me parait ok, mais à vérifier
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 987 - ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 987'''<br/>
 
Evžen Tošenovský<br/>
 
'''ECR'''<br/>
 
Article 73 – paragraph 2
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
'''''2.''''' '''''By [date] the Commission shall, after having consulted BEREC, adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 109 concerning a single maximum termination rate to be imposed by national regulatory authorities on undertakings designated as having significant market power in fixed and mobile voice termination markets respectively in the Union.'''''
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
'''''deleted'''''
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 989 - ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 989'''<br/>
 
Evžen Tošenovský<br/>
 
'''ECR'''<br/>
 
Article 73 – paragraph 3
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
'''''3.''''' '''''When adopting these delegated acts, the Commission shall follow the principles laid down in the first subparagraph of paragraph 1 and shall comply with the criteria and parameters provided in Annex III.'''''
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
'''''deleted'''''
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 991 - ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 991'''<br/>
 
Evžen Tošenovský<br/>
 
'''ECR'''<br/>
 
Article 73 – paragraph 4
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
'''''4.''''' '''''In applying paragraph 2, the Commission shall ensure that the single voice call termination rate in mobile networks shall not exceed 1.23 €cent per minute and the single voice call termination rate in fixed networks shall not exceed 0.14 €cent per minute. The Commission shall take into account the weighted average of maximum termination rates in fixed and mobile networks established in accordance with the principles provided in the first subparagraph of paragraph 1 applied across the Union when setting the single maximum termination rate for the first time.'''''
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
'''''deleted'''''
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 993 / ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 993'''<br/>
 
Dan Nica, Peter Kouroumbashev, Miapetra Kumpula-Natri<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
 
Article 73 – paragraph 4
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
4. '''''In applying paragraph 2,''''' the Commission shall ensure that the single voice call termination rate in mobile networks shall not exceed '''''1.23''''' €cent per minute and the single voice call termination rate in fixed networks shall not exceed '''''0.14''''' €cent per minute. '''''The Commission shall take into account the weighted average of maximum termination rates in fixed and mobile networks established in accordance with the principles provided in the first subparagraph of paragraph 1 applied across the Union when setting the single maximum termination rate for the first time.'''''
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
4. The Commission shall ensure that the single voice call termination rate in mobile networks shall not exceed '''''1''''' €cent per minute and the single voice call termination rate in fixed networks shall not exceed '''''0.12''''' €cent per minute.
 
|}
 
 
 
=== Amendment 994 / ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 994'''<br/>
 
Krišjānis Kariņš<br/>
 
'''EPP'''<br/>
 
Article 73 – paragraph 4
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
4. In applying paragraph 2, the Commission shall ensure that the single voice call termination rate in mobile networks shall not exceed '''''1.23''''' €cent per minute and the single voice call termination rate in fixed networks shall not exceed 0.14 €cent per minute. The Commission shall take into account the weighted average of maximum termination rates in fixed and mobile networks established in accordance with the principles provided in the first subparagraph of paragraph 1 applied across the Union when setting the single maximum termination rate for the first time.
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
4. In applying paragraph 2, the Commission shall ensure that the single voice call termination rate in mobile networks shall not exceed '''''0.94''''' €cent per minute and the single voice call termination rate in fixed networks shall not exceed 0.14 €cent per minute. The Commission shall take into account the weighted average of maximum termination rates in fixed and mobile networks established in accordance with the principles provided in the first subparagraph of paragraph 1 applied across the Union when setting the single maximum termination rate for the first time.
 
|}
 
 
 
=== Amendment 995 / ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 995'''<br/>
 
Dan Nica, Peter Kouroumbashev, Miapetra Kumpula-Natri<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
 
Article 73 – paragraph 5
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
'''''5.''''' '''''When adopting delegated acts pursuant to paragraph 2, the Commission shall take into account the total number of end-users in each Member State, in order to ensure a proper weighting of the maximum termination rates, as well as national circumstances which result in significant differences between Member States when determining the maximum termination rates in the Union'''''
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
'''''deleted'''''
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 997 - ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 997'''<br/>
 
Evžen Tošenovský<br/>
 
'''ECR'''<br/>
 
Article 73 – paragraph 6
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
'''''6.''''' '''''The Commission may request BEREC to develop an economic model in order to assist the Commission in determining the maximum termination rates in the Union. The Commission shall take into account market information provided by BEREC, national regulatory authorities or, directly, by undertakings providing electronic communications networks and services.'''''
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
'''''deleted'''''
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 998 -- ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #A60000; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 998'''<br/>
 
Dan Nica, Peter Kouroumbashev, Miapetra Kumpula-Natri<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
 
Article 73 – paragraph 7
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
'''''7.''''' '''''The Commission shall review the delegated acts adopted pursuant this Article every five years.'''''
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
'''''deleted'''''
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 1000 + ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 1000'''<br/>
 
David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano<br/>
 
'''EFD'''<br/>
 
Article 74
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-bottom:0em;'|
 
'''''Article 74'''''
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-bottom:0em;'|
 
'''''deleted'''''
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 
'''''Regulatory treatment of new network elements'''''
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 
 
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 
'''''1.'''''
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 
 
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 
'''''A national regulatory authority shall not impose obligations as regards new network elements that are part of the relevant market on which it intends to impose or maintain obligations in accordance with Articles 66 and Articles 67 to 72 and that the operator designated as significant market power on that relevant market has deployed or is planning to deploy, if the following cumulative conditions are met:'''''
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 
 
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 
'''''(a) the deployment of the new network elements is open to co-investment offers according to a transparent process and on terms which favour sustainable competition in the long term including inter alia fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory terms offered to potential co-investors; flexibility in terms of the value and timing of the commitment provided by each co-investor; possibility to increase such commitment in the future; reciprocal rights awarded by the co-investors after the deployment of the co-invested infrastructure;'''''
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 
 
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 
'''''(b) the deployment of the new network elements contributes significantly to the deployment of very high capacity networks;'''''
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 
 
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 
'''''(c) access seekers not participating in the co-investment can benefit from the same quality, speed, conditions and end-user reach as was available before the deployment, either through commercial agreements based on fair and reasonable terms or by means of regulated access maintained or adapted by the national regulatory authority;'''''
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 
 
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em'|
 
'''''When assessing co-investment offers and processes referred to in point (a) of the first subparagraph, national regulatory authorities shall ensure that those offers and processes comply with the criteria set out in Annex IV.'''''
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em'|
 
 
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
''Justification: Necessary because this article could pave the way for the existence of new fiber networks without allowing NRAs to intervene efficiently where it becomes necessary.''
 
|}
 
 
 
=== Amendment 1002 / ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 1002'''<br/>
 
Kaja Kallas<br/>
 
'''ALDE'''<br/>
 
Article 74 – title
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
Regulatory treatment of new network elements
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
Regulatory treatment of new network elements '''''of very high capacity networks'''''
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
''Justification: In accordance with rule 104 of the rules of procedure, this amendment is necessary for pressing reasons related to the internal logic of the text''
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 1005 - ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 1005'''<br/>
 
Edouard Martin<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
 
Article 74 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
A national regulatory authority shall not impose obligations as regards new network elements that are part of the relevant market on which it intends to impose or maintain obligations in accordance with Articles 66 and Articles 67 to 72 and that the operator designated as significant market power on that relevant market has deployed or is planning to deploy, if the following cumulative conditions are met:
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
A national regulatory authority shall not impose obligations as regards new network elements that are part of the relevant market on which it intends to impose or maintain obligations in accordance with Articles 66 and Articles 67 to 72 and that the operator designated as significant market power on that relevant market has deployed or is planning to deploy, if the '''''national regulatory authority concludes that the''''' following cumulative conditions are met:
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 1006 / ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 1006'''<br/>
 
José Blanco López, Inmaculada Rodríguez-Piñero Fernández, Soledad Cabezón Ruiz<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
 
Article 74 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
A national regulatory authority '''''shall''''' not impose obligations as regards new network elements that are part of the relevant market on which it intends to impose or maintain obligations in accordance with Articles 66 and Articles 67 to 72 and that the operator designated as significant market power on that relevant market has deployed or is planning to deploy, if the following cumulative conditions are met:
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
'''''Irrespective of its ex-post monitoring powers,''''' a national regulatory authority '''''may''''' not impose obligations as regards new network elements that are part of the relevant market on which it intends to impose or maintain obligations in accordance with Articles 66 and Articles 67 to 72 and that the operator designated as significant market power on that relevant market has deployed or is planning to deploy, if the following cumulative conditions are met:
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
Cet amendement me parait être le moins mauvais :-/
 
 
 
=== Amendment 1007 - ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 1007'''<br/>
 
Kaja Kallas<br/>
 
Article 74 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
A national regulatory authority '''''shall not''''' impose obligations as regards new network elements '''''that are part of the relevant market on which it intends to impose or maintain obligations''''' in accordance with Articles 66 and Articles 67 to 72 and that the operator designated as significant market power on that relevant market has deployed or is planning to deploy, '''''if''''' the following cumulative conditions '''''are met''''':
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
A national regulatory authority '''''which intends to''''' impose '''''or maintain''''' obligations as regards new network elements '''''of very high capacity networks''''' in accordance with Articles 66 and Articles 67 to 72 and that the operator designated as significant market power on that relevant market has deployed or is planning to deploy, '''''shall take into account''''' the following cumulative conditions '''''to ensure such obligations are proportionate and justified''''' :
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
''Justification: In accordance with rule 104 of the rules of procedure, this amendment is necessary for pressing reasons related to the internal logic of the text''
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 1008 / ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 1008'''<br/>
 
Evžen Tošenovský<br/>
 
'''ECR'''<br/>
 
Article 74 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
A national regulatory authority '''''shall not''''' impose obligations as regards new network elements that are part of the relevant market on which it intends to impose or maintain obligations in accordance with Articles 66 and Articles 67 to 72 and that the operator designated as significant market power on that relevant market has deployed or is planning to deploy, if the following cumulative conditions are met:
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
A national regulatory authority '''''may determine not to''''' impose obligations as regards new network elements that are part of the relevant market on which it intends to impose or maintain obligations in accordance with Articles 66 and Articles 67 to 72 and that the operator designated as significant market power on that relevant market has deployed or is planning to deploy, if the following cumulative conditions are met:
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
Cet AM me parait être le deuxième moins mauvais
 
 
 
=== Amendment 1010 - ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 1010'''<br/>
 
Eva Kaili<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
 
Article 74 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
(a) the deployment of the new network elements is open to co-investment offers according to a transparent process and on terms which favour sustainable competition in the long term including inter alia fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory terms offered to potential co-investors; flexibility in terms of the value and timing of the commitment provided by each co-investor; possibility to increase such commitment in the future; reciprocal rights awarded by the co-investors after the deployment of the co-invested infrastructure;
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
(a) the deployment of the new network elements'''''(i) is conducted by a joint venture established by two or more undertakings with shared ownership, and one or more undertaking participating in the joint venture provides wholesale access or competes on retail level; or''''''''''(ii)''''' is open to co-investment offers according to a transparent process and on terms which favour sustainable competition in the long term including inter alia fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory terms offered to potential co-investors; flexibility in terms of the value and timing of the commitment provided by each co-investor; possibility to increase such commitment in the future; reciprocal rights awarded by the co-investors after the deployment of the co-invested infrastructure; '''''or''''''''''(iii) is conducted by a single undertaking that provides a wholesale offer on terms which, similar to conditions for co-investment in subparagraph ii), favour competition in the long term by including, inter alia, fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory terms offered to potential access seekers; flexibility in terms of the value and timing of the commitment provided by each access seeker; possibility to increase such commitment in the future;'''''
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 1011 / ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 1011'''<br/>
 
José Blanco López, Inmaculada Rodríguez-Piñero Fernández, Soledad Cabezón Ruiz<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
 
Article 74 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
(a) the deployment of the new network elements is open to co-investment offers according to a transparent process and on terms which favour sustainable competition in the long term including inter alia fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory terms offered to potential co-investors; flexibility in terms of the value and timing of the commitment provided by each co-investor; possibility to increase such commitment in the future; reciprocal rights awarded by the co-investors after the deployment of the co-invested infrastructure;
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
(a) the deployment of the new network elements is '''''either:''''''''''i)''''' open to co-investment offers according to a transparent process and on terms which favour sustainable competition in the long term including inter alia fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory terms offered to potential co-investors; flexibility in terms of the value and timing of the commitment provided by each co-investor; possibility to increase such commitment in the future; reciprocal rights awarded by the co-investors after the deployment of the co-invested infrastructure; '''''compliance with the criteria set out in Annex IV; or''''''''''ii) is conducted by a single undertaking that provides a wholesale offer on terms which favour competition in the long term by including, inter alia, fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory terms offered to potential access seekers; mechanisms for risk-sharing; flexibility in terms of the value and timing of the commitment provided by each access seeker; possibility to increase such commitment in the future;'''''
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
''Justification: As indicated in the amendment to Article 71 2 e, recital 166 states the need to take into account newly concluded voluntary agreements between operators in order to provide regulatory flexibility. Co-investment is a particular case of a commercial agreement, but not the only one''
 
|}
 
 
 
Quota : La mention de « fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory terms offered to potential access seekers » me semble assez positive là comme ça.
 
 
 
=== Amendment 1012 -- ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #A60000; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 1012'''<br/>
 
Anna Záborská, Ivan Štefanec<br/>
 
'''EPP'''<br/>
 
Article 74 – paragraph 1 subparagraph 1 – point a
 
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(a) the deployment of the new network elements '''''is open to co-investment offers according to a transparent process and on terms which favour sustainable competition in the long term including inter alia fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory terms offered to potential co-investors; flexibility in terms of the value and timing of the commitment provided by each co-investor; possibility to increase such commitment in the future; reciprocal rights awarded by the co-investors after the deployment of the co-invested infrastructure;'''''
+
- All undertakings have to be offered fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory terms and conditions for participation in the co-investment agreement relative to the time they join, including in terms of financial consideration required for the acquisition of specific rights, in terms of the protection awarded to the co-investors by those rights both during the building phase and during the exploitation phase, for example by granting indefeasible rights of use (IRUs) for the expected lifetime of the co-invested network and in terms of the conditions for joining and potentially terminating the co-investment agreement. Non-discriminatory terms in this context do not entail that all potential co-investors must be offered exactly the same terms, including financial terms, but that all variations of the terms offered must be justified on the basis of the same objective, transparent, non-discriminatory and predictable criteria such as the number of end user lines committed for.
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(a) the deployment of the new network elements
+
- All undertakings have to be offered fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory terms and conditions for participation in the co-investment agreement relative to the time they join, including in terms of financial consideration required for the acquisition of specific rights, in terms of '''''access to individual lines, in terms of''''' the protection awarded to the co-investors by those rights both during the building phase and during the exploitation phase, for example by granting indefeasible rights of use (IRUs) for the expected lifetime of the co-invested network and in terms of the conditions for joining and potentially terminating the co-investment agreement. Non-discriminatory terms in this context do not entail that all potential co-investors must be offered exactly the same terms, including financial terms, but that all variations of the terms offered must be justified on the basis of the same objective, transparent, non-discriminatory and predictable criteria such as the number of end user lines committed for.
|}
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 1015 / ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0; width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 1015'''<br/>
 
Kaja Kallas<br/>
 
'''ALDE'''<br/>
 
Article 74 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
(a) the deployment of the new network elements is '''''open to''''' co-investment '''''offers according to a transparent process and on terms which favour sustainable competition in the long term including inter alia''''' fair, reasonable '''''and non-discriminatory''''' terms '''''offered to potential co-investors;''''' flexibility in terms of the value and timing of the commitment provided by each co-investor; possibility to increase such commitment in the future; reciprocal rights awarded by the co-investors after the deployment of the co-invested infrastructure;
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
(a) the deployment of the new network elements is '''''subject to a''''' co-investment '''''agreement where co-investment terms are open to any potential co-investors and are agreed between undertakings on the basis of''''' fair, reasonable''''', non-discriminatory terms, including technical and financial''''' terms '''''; favour sustainable competition in the long term,''''' flexibility in terms of the value and timing of the commitment provided by each co-investor; possibility to increase such commitment in the future; reciprocal rights awarded by the co-investors after the deployment of the co-invested infrastructure;
 
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
| colspan='2' |
''Justification: In accordance with rule 104 of the rules of procedure, this amendment is necessary for pressing reasons related to the internal logic of the text''
+
''Justification: Current provisions for co-investment practices do not allow non-profit or local ISPs to participate in the investments, restricting this opportunity only to larger and incumbent actors. Although Community Networks (CN) and local actors have proven successful in connecting underprivileged communities both in urban and rural areas, it would be only normal to considered them equal members of the telecoms ecosystem, thus giving them fair and equal access to co-investment opportunities.''
|}
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 1017 / ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 1017'''<br/>
 
Edouard Martin<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
 
Article 74 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
(a) the deployment of the new network elements is '''''open to''''' co-investment '''''offers''''' according to a transparent process and on terms which favour sustainable competition in the long term including inter alia fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory terms offered to potential co-investors; flexibility in terms of the value and timing of the commitment provided by each co-investor; possibility to increase such commitment in the future; reciprocal rights awarded by the co-investors after the deployment of the co-invested infrastructure;
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
(a) the deployment of the new network elements is '''''the subject of a''''' co-investment '''''agreement''''' according to a transparent process and on terms which favour sustainable competition in the long term including inter alia fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory terms offered to potential co-investors; flexibility in terms of the value and timing of the commitment provided by each co-investor; possibility to increase such commitment in the future; reciprocal rights awarded by the co-investors after the deployment of the co-invested infrastructure;
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
=== Amendment 1018 - ===
+
If AM 1110 falls
  
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
+
[[Catégorie:Telecoms Package|2017]]
|-
+
[[Catégorie: Infrastructure et réseau]]
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 1018'''<br/>
 
Anne Sander, Françoise Grossetête<br/>
 
'''EPP'''<br/>
 
Article 74 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
(a) the deployment of the new network elements is open to co-investment '''''offers''''' according to a transparent process and on terms which favour sustainable competition in the long term including inter alia fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory terms offered to potential co-investors; flexibility in terms of the value and timing of the commitment provided by each co-investor; possibility to increase such commitment in the future; reciprocal rights awarded by the co-investors after the deployment of the co-invested infrastructure;
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
(a) the deployment of the new network elements is open to co-investment '''''agreement''''' according to a transparent process and on terms which favour sustainable competition in the long term including inter alia fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory terms offered to potential co-investors; flexibility in terms of the value and timing of the commitment provided by each co-investor; possibility to increase such commitment in the future; reciprocal rights awarded by the co-investors after the deployment of the co-invested infrastructure;
 
|}
 

Version actuelle datée du 7 septembre 2017 à 10:56

Cette page représente un travail en cours, son contenu peut être modifié.

Les amendements de la commission IMCO sont visibles sur cette page.

Les amendements de la commission LIBE sont visibles sur cette page.

Voting list des amendements déposés en commission ITRE

Sommaire

Amendment 297 ++[modifier]

Amendment 297
Morten Helveg Petersen
ALDE
Article 1 – paragraph 3 – indent 1

- obligations imposed by national law in accordance with Union law or by Union law in respect of services provided using electronic communications networks and services ; - measures taken at Union or national level, in compliance with Union law, to pursue general interest objectives, in particular relating to content regulation and audio-visual policy. - the provisions of Directive 2014/53/EU.

- obligations imposed by national law in accordance with Union law or by Union law in respect of services provided using electronic communications networks and services ; - measures taken at Union or national level, in compliance with Union law, to pursue general interest objectives, in particular relating to the protection of personal data and privacy, content regulation and audio-visual policy


Take into account the protection of personal data and privacy, content regulation and audio-visual policy


Amendment 298 ++[modifier]

Amendment 298
Michel Reimon
Verts/ALE
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1

(1) ‘electronic communications network’ means transmission systems, whether or not based on a permanent infrastructure or centralised administration capacity, and, where applicable, switching or routing equipment and other resources, including network elements which are not active, which permit the conveyance of signals by wire, radio, optical or other electromagnetic means, including satellite networks, fixed (circuit- and packet-switched, including Internet) and mobile terrestrial networks, electricity cable systems, to the extent that they are used for the purpose of transmitting signals, networks used for radio and television broadcasting, and cable television networks, irrespective of the type of information conveyed;

(1) ‘electronic communications network’ means transmission systems, whether or not based on a permanent infrastructure or centralised administration capacity, and, where applicable, switching or routing equipment and other resources, including network elements which are not active, which permit the conveyance of signals by wire, radio, optical or other electromagnetic means, including satellite networks, fixed (circuit- and packet-switched, including Internet) and mobile terrestrial networks, electricity cable systems, to the extent that they are used for the purpose of transmitting signals, networks used for radio and television broadcasting, and cable television networks, irrespective of the type of information conveyed; it does not include network elements managed by individuals in the context of not-for-profit activities;

Justification: Individuals participating in a not-for-profit network (such as radio local area networks) or providing not-for-profit services shall not be subject to the obligations imposed on legal persons providing networks or services. Specifically, the strict obligations provided by the Directive 2002/58/CE would be disproportionate and impracticable if imposed on individual volunteers, who should only be subject to the obligations set by the General Data Protection Regulation.


Inclusion of not-for-profit organisations.

Amendment 299 -[modifier]

Amendment 299
Evžen Tošenovský
ECR
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2

(2) 'very high capacity network' means an electronic communications network which either consists wholly of optical fibre elements at least up to the distribution point at the serving location or which is capable of delivering under usual peak-time conditions similar network performance in terms of available down- and uplink bandwidth, resilience, error-related parameters, and latency and its variation. Network performance can be considered similar regardless of whether the end-user experience varies due to the inherently different characteristics of the medium by which the network ultimately connects with the network termination point.

(2) 'very high capacity network' means an publicly available electronic communications network which either consists wholly or partially of optical fibre elements.

Amendment 301 +[modifier]

Amendment 301
Michel Reimon
Verts/ALE
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2

(2) 'very high capacity network' means an electronic communications network which either consists wholly of optical fibre elements at least up to the distribution point at the serving location or which is capable of delivering under usual peak-time conditions similar network performance in terms of available down- and uplink bandwidth, resilience, error-related parameters, and latency and its variation. Network performance can be considered similar regardless of whether the end-user experience varies due to the inherently different characteristics of the medium by which the network ultimately connects with the network termination point.

(2) 'very high capacity network' means an electronic communications network which either consists wholly of optical fibre elements at least up to the distribution point at the serving location corresponding in the fixed-line connection case to the premises and in the mobile connection case to the base station, or which is capable of delivering under usual peak-time conditions at least the same network performance in terms of available down- and uplink bandwidth, resilience, error-related parameters, and latency and its variation. Network performance can be considered at least the same regardless of whether the end-user experience varies due to the inherently different characteristics of the medium by which the network ultimately connects with the network termination point.

Justification: Clarification included from the respective Recital 13. Moreover, strengthening the performance benchmark while lifting its upper limit. This clarifies that – independent of the used technology – better performing infrastructures would also be considered ‘very high capacity’.

Amendment 312 +[modifier]

Amendment 312
Edouard Martin
S&D
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2

(2) 'very high capacity network' means an electronic communications network which either consists wholly of optical fibre elements at least up to the distribution point at the serving location or which is capable of delivering under usual peak-time conditions similar network performance in terms of available down- and uplink bandwidth, resilience, error-related parameters, and latency and its variation. Network performance can be considered similar regardless of whether the end-user experience varies due to the inherently different characteristics of the medium by which the network ultimately connects with the network termination point.

(2) 'very high capacity network' means an electronic communications network which either consists wholly of optical fibre elements at least up to the premises or which is capable of delivering under usual peak-time conditions at least similar network performance in terms of available down- and uplink bandwidth, resilience, error-related parameters, and latency and its variation. Network performance can be considered similar regardless of whether the end-user experience varies due to the inherently different characteristics of the medium by which the network ultimately connects with the network termination point.

Amendment 313 +[modifier]

Amendment 313
Anne Sander, Françoise Grossetête
S&D
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2

(2) 'very high capacity network' means an electronic communications network which either consists wholly of optical fibre elements at least up to the distribution point at the serving location or which is capable of delivering under usual peak-time conditions similar network performance in terms of available down- and uplink bandwidth, resilience, error-related parameters, and latency and its variation. Network performance can be considered similar regardless of whether the end-user experience varies due to the inherently different characteristics of the medium by which the network ultimately connects with the network termination point.

(2) 'very high capacity network' means an electronic communications network which either consists wholly of optical fibre elements at least up to the premises or which is capable of delivering under usual peak-time conditions at least the same network performance in terms of available down- and uplink bandwidth, resilience, error-related parameters, and latency and its variation. Network performance can be considered similar regardless of whether the end-user experience varies due to the inherently different characteristics of the medium by which the network ultimately connects with the network termination point.


Same as 312


Amendment 316 ++[modifier]

Amendment 316
Michel Reimon
Verts/ALE
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4

(4) ‘electronic communications service’ means a service normally provided for remuneration via electronic communications networks, which encompasses 'internet access service' as defined in Article 2(2) of Regulation (EU) 2015/2120; and/or 'interpersonal communications service'; and/or services consisting wholly or mainly in the conveyance of signals such as transmission services used for the provision of machine-to-machine services and for broadcasting, but excludes services providing, or exercising editorial control over, content transmitted using electronic communications networks and services;

(4) ‘electronic communications service’ means a service provided for remuneration via electronic communications networks, which encompasses 'internet access service' as defined in Article 2(2) of Regulation (EU) 2015/2120; and/or 'interpersonal communications service'; and/or services consisting wholly or mainly in the conveyance of signals such as transmission services used for the provision of machine-to-machine services and for broadcasting, but excludes services providing, or exercising editorial control over, content transmitted using electronic communications networks and services as well as not-for-profit-services provided by individuals;

Justification: Individuals participating in a not-for-profit network (such as radio local area networks) or providing not-for-profit services shall not be subject to the obligations imposed on legal persons providing networks or services. Specifically, the strict obligations provided by the Directive 2002/58/CE would be disproportionate and impracticable if imposed on individual volunteers, who should only be subject to the obligations set by the General Data Protection Regulation.

Amendment 318 -[modifier]

Amendment 318
Kaja Kallas
ALDE
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 5

(5) 'interpersonal communications service’ means a service normally provided for remuneration that enables direct interpersonal and interactive exchange of information via electronic communications networks between a finite number of persons, whereby the persons initiating or participating in the communication determine its recipient(s); it does not include services which enable interpersonal and interactive communication merely as a minor ancillary feature that is intrinsically linked to another service;

(5) 'interpersonal communications service’ means a service normally provided for remuneration where the principal purpose of the service is devoted to enabling direct interpersonal and interactive exchange of information via electronic communications networks between a finite number of persons, whereby the persons initiating or participating in the communication determine its recipient(s);

Justification: In accordance with rule 104 of the rules of procedure, this amendment is necessary for pressing reasons related to the internal logic of the text


Excludes ancillary interpersonal communication services from the scope

Amendment 319 -[modifier]

Amendment 319
Barbara Kappel, Angelo Ciocca, Lorenzo Fontana
ENF
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 5

(5) 'interpersonal communications service’ means a service normally provided for remuneration that enables direct interpersonal and interactive exchange of information via electronic communications networks between a finite number of persons, whereby the persons initiating or participating in the communication determine its recipient(s); it does not include services which enable interpersonal and interactive communication merely as a minor ancillary feature that is intrinsically linked to another service;

(5) 'interpersonal communications service' means an electronic communications service whose primary purpose is to enable normally provided for remuneration that enables direct interpersonal and interactive exchange of information via electronic communications networks between a finite number of persons, whereby the persons initiating or participating in the communication determine its recipient(s); it does not include services which enable interpersonal and interactive communication merely as an a minor ancillary feature that is intrinsically linked to another service;


Excludes ancillary interpersonal communication services from the scope


Amendment 325 -[modifier]

Amendment 325
Barbara Kappel, Angelo Ciocca, Lorenzo Fontana
ENF
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 7

(7) 'number-independent interpersonal communications service' means an interpersonal communications service which does not connect with the public switched telephone network, either by means of assigned numbering resources, i.e. a number or numbers in national or international telephone numbering plans, or by enabling communication with a number or numbers in national or international telephone numbering plans;

(7) 'number-independent interpersonal communications service' means an interpersonal communications service which does not connect with the public switched telephone network, either by means of assigned numbering resources, i.e. a number or numbers in the national telephone numbering plan, or by enabling communication with a number or numbers in national or international telephone numbering plans; it does not include information society services that allow interpersonal and interactive communication as a secondary feature;


Excludes information society services that allow interpersonal and interactive communication as a secondary feature from the scope


Amendment 333 ++[modifier]

Amendment 333
Michel Reimon
Verts/ALE
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 23

(23) ‘general authorisation’ means a legal framework established by the Member State ensuring rights for the provision of electronic communications networks or services and laying down sector-specific obligations that may apply to all or to specific types of electronic communications networks and services, in accordance with this Directive.

(23) ‘general authorisation’ means a legal framework established by the Member State ensuring rights for the provision of electronic communications networks or services and laying down sector-specific obligations that may apply to all or to specific types of electronic communications networks and services, in accordance with this Directive, excluding not-for-profit-services provided by individuals.


Excluding not-for-profit-services provided by individuals is a way to enable innovation and development of services by individuals who would be discouraged from proposing services with administrative obligations


Amendment 334 -[modifier]

Amendment 334
Barbara Kappel, Angelo Ciocca, Lorenzo Fontana
ENF
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 26

(26) 'shared use of radio spectrum' means access by two or more users to use the same frequencies under a defined sharing arrangement, authorised by a national regulatory authority on the basis of a general authorisation, individual rights of use or a combination thereof, including regulatory approaches such as licenced shared access aiming to facilitate the shared use of a frequency band, subject to a binding agreement of all parties involved, in accordance with sharing rules as included in their rights of use so as to guarantee to all users predictable and reliable sharing arrangements, and without prejudice to the application of competition law;

(26) 'shared use of radio spectrum' means access by two or more users to use the same frequencies under a defined sharing arrangement, authorised by a national regulatory authority on the basis of a general authorisation, individual rights of use or a combination thereof;


This AM deletes the part that promotes the development of licenced shared access.


Amendment 343 +[modifier]

Amendment 343
Kaja Kallas, Marietje Schaake
ALDE
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2

National regulatory and other competent authorities may contribute within their competencies to ensuring the implementation of policies aimed at the promotion of cultural and linguistic diversity, as well as media pluralism.

National regulatory and other competent authorities may contribute within their competencies to ensuring the implementation of policies aimed at the promotion of freedom of expression and information, cultural and linguistic diversity, as well as media pluralism.

Justification: In accordance with rule 104 of the rules of procedure, this amendment is necessary for pressing reasons related to the internal logic of the text


Promotes freedom of expression and information


Amendment 344 +[modifier]

Amendment 344
Morten Helveg Petersen
ALDE
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2

National regulatory and other competent authorities may contribute within their competencies to ensuring the implementation of policies aimed at the promotion of cultural and linguistic diversity, as well as media pluralism.

National regulatory and other competent authorities may contribute within their competencies to ensuring the implementation of policies aimed at the protection of personal data and privacy, the promotion of cultural and linguistic diversity, as well as media pluralism.


Promotes the protection of personal data and privacy


Amendment 345 +[modifier]

Amendment 345
Michel Reimon
Verts/ALE
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2

National regulatory and other competent authorities may contribute within their competencies to ensuring the implementation of policies aimed at the promotion of cultural and linguistic diversity, as well as media pluralism.

National regulatory and other competent authorities shall contribute within their competencies to ensuring the implementation of policies aimed at the promotion of cultural and linguistic diversity, as well as media pluralism.

Justification: Despite the fact that the Directive does not lay down substantive rules regarding content and only on networks and services, national authorities need to play close attention to the impact that markets have on each other. The degree of competition in telecommunications markets can significantly impact media and content pluralism in Europe, reducing consumers’ ability to access the content and services of their choice.


This AM give the NRAs the obligation to take into account policies such as media pluralism


Amendment 346 +[modifier]

Amendment 346
José Blanco López, Inmaculada Rodríguez-Piñero Fernández, Soledad Cabezón Ruiz
S&D
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2

National regulatory and other competent authorities may contribute within their competencies to ensuring the implementation of policies aimed at the promotion of cultural and linguistic diversity, as well as media pluralism.

National regulatory and other competent authorities shall contribute within their competencies to ensuring the implementation of policies aimed at the promotion of cultural and linguistic diversity, as well as media pluralism.

Justification: This provision aims at ensuring a strong commitment of NRA and other competent authorities with the promotion of cultural and linguistic diversity, and media pluralism.


Same as AM 344 - This AM give the NRAs the obligation to take into account policies such as media pluralism


Amendment 347 +[modifier]

Amendment 347
David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano
EFDD
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2

National regulatory and other competent authorities may contribute within their competencies to ensuring the implementation of policies aimed at the promotion of cultural and linguistic diversity, as well as media pluralism.

National regulatory and other competent authorities shall contribute within their competencies to ensuring the implementation of policies aimed at the promotion of cultural and linguistic diversity, as well as media pluralism.

Justification: National authorities need to play close attention to the impact that markets have on each other.


Same as AM 344 - This AM give the NRAs the obligation to take into account policies such as media pluralism


Amendment 348 +[modifier]

Amendment 348
Pervenche Berès
S&D
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2

Les autorités de régulation nationales et les autres autorités compétentes peuvent contribuer, dans la limite de leurs compétences, à la mise en œuvre des politiques visant à promouvoir la diversité culturelle et linguistique ainsi que le pluralisme dans les médias.

Les autorités de régulation nationales et les autres autorités compétentes contribuent, dans la limite de leurs compétences, à la mise en œuvre des politiques visant à promouvoir la diversité culturelle et linguistique ainsi que le pluralisme dans les médias.


Same as AM 344 - This AM give the NRAs the obligation to take into account policies such as media pluralism


Amendment 356 +[modifier]

Amendment 356
Michel Reimon
Verts/ALE
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point a

(a) promote access to, and take-up of, very high capacity data connectivity, both fixed and mobile, by all Union citizens and businesses;

(a) promote the availability and affordability of and access to very high capacity data connectivity, both fixed and mobile and of interpersonal communications services, by all Union citizens and businesses;

Justification: In a market economy where consumers can leverage their collective power, it should always be them (and not governments, regulators or companies) who freely decide whether they want to take up a new service or not. The objective of EU telecom regulation has always been to guide regulatory intervention towards the offer side of the market, ensuring wholesale and retail competition, and the availability of services and networks. If regulation would aim to guide the demand side of the market too, it could condition the promotion of efficiency, transparency and fairness in markets, and of consumer protection. The regulatory framework must therefore continue focusing on availability and affordability of services.

Amendment 357 +[modifier]

Amendment 357
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Dan Nica, Edouard Martin, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Jeppe Kofod
S&D
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point a

(a) promote access to, and take-up of, very high capacity data connectivity, both fixed and mobile, by all Union citizens and businesses;

(a) promote the availability and affordability of and access to, and take-up of, very high capacity data connectivity, both fixed and mobile, by all Union citizens and businesses;

Justification: Both availability and affordability are important for bridging digital divide.


Same as 356

Amendment 363 -[modifier]

Amendment 363
Anne Sander, Françoise Grossetête
EPP
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point b

(b) promote competition in the provision of electronic communications networks and associated facilities, including efficient infrastructure-based competition, and in the provision of electronic communications services and associated services;

(b) promote sustainable competition in the provision of electronic communications networks and associated facilities, including efficient infrastructure-based competition, and in the provision of electronic communications services and associated services;

Amendment 382 +[modifier]

Amendment 382
Michel Reimon
Verts/ALE
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – point f

(f) imposing ex ante regulatory obligations only to the extent necessary to secure effective and sustainable competition on the retail market concerned and relaxing or lifting such obligations as soon as that condition is fulfilled.

deleted

Amendment 392 +[modifier]

Amendment 392
Morten Helveg Petersen
ALDE
Article 4 – paragraph 1

1. Member States shall cooperate with each other and with the Commission in the strategic planning, coordination and harmonisation of the use of radio spectrum in the Union. To this end, they shall take into consideration, inter alia, the economic, safety, health, public interest, public security and defence, freedom of expression, cultural, scientific, social and technical aspects of EU policies as well as the various interests of radio spectrum user communities with the aim of optimising the use of radio spectrum and avoiding harmful interference.

1. Member States shall cooperate with each other and with the Commission in the strategic planning, coordination and harmonisation of the use of radio spectrum in the Union. To this end, they shall take into consideration, inter alia, the economic, safety, health, public interest, public security and defence, data protection and privacy, freedom of expression, cultural, scientific, social and technical aspects of EU policies as well as the various interests of radio spectrum user communities with the aim of optimising the use of radio spectrum and avoiding harmful interference.


Includes data protection


Amendment 393 -[modifier]

Amendment 393
Barbara Kappel, Angelo Ciocca, Lorenzo Fontana
ENF
Article 4 – paragraph 1

1. Member States shall cooperate with each other and with the Commission in the strategic planning, coordination and harmonisation of the use of radio spectrum in the Union. To this end, they shall take into consideration, inter alia, the economic, safety, health, public interest, public security and defence, freedom of expression, cultural, scientific, social and technical aspects of EU policies as well as the various interests of radio spectrum user communities with the aim of optimising the use of radio spectrum and avoiding harmful interference.

1. Member States shall cooperate with each other and with the Commission in the strategic planning, coordination and harmonisation of the use of radio spectrum, a scarce resource that belongs to the Member States. They might take into consideration, inter alia, the economic, safety, health, public interest, public security and defence, freedom of expression, cultural, scientific, social and technical aspects of EU policies as well as the various interests of radio spectrum user communities with the aim of optimising the use of radio spectrum and avoiding harmful interference.


We promotes the shared spectrum => emphasizing that spectrum belongs to the MS would diminish the scope and possibility to develop the shared spectrum.


Amendment 403 +[modifier]

Amendment 403
Michel Reimon
Verts/ALE
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – indent 8

- dealing with issues related to open internet access;

- ensuring compliance with rules related to open internet access;


Reinforce the importance of the open internet access rules


Amendment 404 +[modifier]

Amendment 404
Eva Kaili
S&D
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – indent 8

- dealing with issues related to open internet access;

- ensuring compliance with rules related to open internet access;


Same as 403 - Reinforce the importance of the open internet access rules


Amendment 415 ++[modifier]

Amendment 415
Michel Reimon
Verts/ALE
Article 10 – paragraph 2 a (new)

2 a. Member States shall ensure that national regulatory authorities apply Regulation 2015/2120 and BEREC Guidelines adopted pursuant to Article 5.3 of the abovementioned Regulation and coordinate within BEREC with other national regulatory authorities when implementing it.

Justification: The implementation of the regulation 2015/2120 is made on a national basis without any coordination of national regulation authorities, despite the BEREC guidelines.A harmonised implementation within the EU is of the utmost importance for predictability of law and for ensuring end-users rights.


The implementation of the regulation 2015/2120 is made on a national basis without any coordination of national regulation authorities, despite the BEREC guidelines. A harmonised implementation within the EU is of the utmost importance for predictability of law and for ensuring end-users rights.


Amendment 417 ++[modifier]

Amendment 417
Morten Helveg Petersen
ALDE
Article 12 – paragraph 1

1. Member States shall ensure the freedom to provide electronic communications networks and services, subject to the conditions set out in this Directive. To this end, Member States shall not prevent an undertaking from providing electronic communications networks or services, except where this is necessary for the reasons set out in Article 52 (1) of the Treaty. Any such limitation to the freedom to provide electronic communications networks and services shall be duly reasoned and shall be notified to the Commission.

1. Member States shall ensure the freedom to provide electronic communications networks and services, subject to the conditions set out in this Directive. To this end, Member States shall not prevent an undertaking from providing electronic communications networks or services, except where this is necessary for the reasons set out in Article 52 (1) of the Treaty. Any such limitation to the freedom to provide electronic communications networks and services shall be duly reasoned, provided for by law, respect the essence of the rights and freedoms recognised by the Charter and be subject to the principle of proportionality, in accordance with Article 52 (1) of the Charter and notified to the Commission.

Amendment 420 -[modifier]

Amendment 420
Michał Boni, Françoise Grossetête, Anne Sander
EPP
Article 18 – paragraph 1

1. Member States shall ensure that the rights, conditions and procedures concerning general authorisations and rights of use for radio spectrum or for numbers or rights to install facilities may only be amended in objectively justified cases and in a proportionate manner, taking into consideration, where appropriate, the specific conditions applicable to transferable rights of use for radio spectrum and for numbers.

1. Member States shall ensure that the rights, conditions and procedures concerning general authorisations and rights of use for radio spectrum or for numbers or rights to install facilities may only be amended in objectively justified cases and in a proportionate manner, taking into consideration, where appropriate, the specific conditions applicable to transferable rights of use for radio spectrum and for numbers. In the case of right of use for spectrum, the right holder shall have the right to object to any proposed amendment based on its existing and future spectrum usage plan and the need to safeguard investment.

Justification: Legal certainty as to spectrum usage rights is key to the promotion of investment in mobile networks and in particular in the next generation of mobile, 5G. It is proposed that operators be given the opportunity of objecting to spectrum rights changes on the basis of limited conditions such as future networks spectrum usage plans and the need to safeguard investment not yet fully depreciated.

Amendment 430 +[modifier]

Amendment 430
José Blanco López, Inmaculada Rodríguez-Piñero Fernández, Soledad Cabezón Ruiz
S&D
Article 20 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1

Member States shall ensure that undertakings providing electronic communications networks and services associated facilities, or associated services provide all the information, including financial information, necessary for national regulatory authorities, other competent authorities and BEREC to ensure conformity with the provisions of, or decisions made in accordance with, this Directive. In particular, national regulatory authorities shall have the power to require those undertakings to submit information concerning future network or service developments that could have an impact on the wholesale services that they make available to competitors. They may also require information on electronic communications networks and associated facilities which is disaggregated at local level and sufficiently detailed for the national regulatory authority to be able to conduct the geographical survey and to designate digital exclusion areas in accordance with Article 22. In accordance with Article 29, national regulatory authorities may sanction undertakings deliberately providing misleading, erroneous or incomplete information.

Member States shall ensure that national regulatory authorities, other competent authorities and BEREC have legal powers to request information, including financial information, from all relevant parties necessary to fulfilling their tasks and ensure conformity with the provisions of, or decisions made in accordance with, this Directive. In particular, national regulatory authorities shall have the power to require those undertakings to submit information concerning network or service developments that could have an impact on the wholesale services that they make available to competitors. They may also require information on electronic communications networks and associated facilities which is disaggregated at local level and sufficiently detailed for the national regulatory authority to be able to conduct the geographical survey and to designate digital exclusion areas in accordance with Article 22.

Justification: NRAs should have legal powers to request information to carry out their duties from any undertaking, whether or not it is defined as Electronic Communication Network/Service provider. This information is particularly relevant for market analyses


This AM reinforces the powers of NRAs to request information.


Amendment 565 ++[modifier]

Amendment 565
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Dan Nica, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Jeppe Kofod, Martina Werner
S&D
Article 40 – paragraph 1

1. Member States shall ensure that undertakings providing public communications networks or publicly available electronic communications services take appropriate technical and organisational measures to appropriately manage the risks posed to security of networks and services. Having regard to the state of the art, these measures shall ensure a level of security appropriate to the risk presented. In particular, measures shall be taken to prevent and minimise the impact of security incidents on users and on other networks and services.

1. Member States shall ensure that undertakings providing public communications networks or publicly available electronic communications services take appropriate technical and organisational measures to appropriately manage the risks posed to security of networks and services. Having regard to the state of the art, these measures shall ensure a level of security appropriate to the risk presented. In particular, measures shall be taken to ensure that, when necessary for confidentiality, electronic communications content is encrypted from end-to-end by default, in order to prevent and minimise the impact of security incidents on users and on other networks and services.

Justification: Encrypting communications content from end to end by default is the best way to effectively minimise the impact of security incidents.


Encrypting communications content from end to end by default is the best way to effectively minimise the impact of security incidents.


Amendment 566 ++[modifier]

Amendment 566
Eva Kaili
S&D
Article 40 – paragraph 1

1. Member States shall ensure that undertakings providing public communications networks or publicly available electronic communications services take appropriate technical and organisational measures to appropriately manage the risks posed to security of networks and services. Having regard to the state of the art, these measures shall ensure a level of security appropriate to the risk presented. In particular, measures shall be taken to prevent and minimise the impact of security incidents on users and on other networks and services.

1. Member States shall ensure that undertakings providing public communications networks or publicly available electronic communications services take appropriate technical and organisational measures to appropriately manage the risks posed to security of networks and services. Having regard to the state of the art, these measures shall ensure a level of security appropriate to the risk presented. In particular, measures shall be taken to ensure that, when necessary for confidentiality, electronic communications content is encrypted from end-to-end by default, in order to prevent and minimise the impact of security incidents on users and on other networks and services.


Encrypting communications content from end to end by default is the best way to effectively minimise the impact of security incidents.


Amendment 567 ++[modifier]

Amendment 567
Michel Reimon
Verts/ALE
Article 40 – paragraph 1

1. Member States shall ensure that undertakings providing public communications networks or publicly available electronic communications services take appropriate technical and organisational measures to appropriately manage the risks posed to security of networks and services. Having regard to the state of the art, these measures shall ensure a level of security appropriate to the risk presented. In particular, measures shall be taken to prevent and minimise the impact of security incidents on users and on other networks and services.

1. Member States shall ensure that undertakings providing public communications networks or publicly available electronic communications services take appropriate technical and organisational measures to ensure that electronic communications content are encrypted from end-to-end by default, in order to appropriately manage the risks posed to security of networks and services. Having regard to the state of the art, these measures shall ensure a level of security appropriate to the risk presented. In particular, measures shall be taken to prevent and minimise the impact of security incidents on users and on other networks and services.

Justification: Encrypting communications content from end to end by default is the only way to effectively minimise the impact of security incidents. Any other measure would barely has any effect.Furthermore, such an obligation would be the mere implementation of Directive 2002/58/EC, article 5(1), which prohibits any “kinds of interception or surveillance of communications (...) by persons other than users, without the consent of the users concerned”.


Encrypting communications content from end to end by default is the best way to effectively minimise the impact of security incidents.


Amendment 568 ++[modifier]

Amendment 568
Kaja Kallas, Marietje Schaake
ALDE
Article 40 – paragraph 1

1. Member States shall ensure that undertakings providing public communications networks or publicly available electronic communications services take appropriate technical and organisational measures to appropriately manage the risks posed to security of networks and services. Having regard to the state of the art, these measures shall ensure a level of security appropriate to the risk presented. In particular, measures shall be taken to prevent and minimise the impact of security incidents on users and on other networks and services.

1. Member States shall ensure that undertakings providing public communications networks or publicly available electronic communications services take appropriate technical and organisational measures to appropriately manage the risks posed to security of networks and services. Having regard to the state of the art, these measures shall ensure a level of security appropriate to the risk presented. In particular, measures shall be taken to ensure that electronic communications content are encrypted from end-to-end by default, in order to prevent and minimise the impact of security incidents on users and on other networks and services.

Justification: In accordance with rule 104 of the rules of procedure, this amendment is necessary for pressing reasons related to the internal logic of the text


Encrypting communications content from end to end by default is the best way to effectively minimise the impact of security incidents.


Amendment 570 +[modifier]

Amendment 570
Kaja Kallas, Marietje Schaake
ALDE
Article 40 – paragraph 1 a (new)

1 a. Member States shall not impose any obligation to undertakings providing public communications networks or publicly available electronic communications services that would result in the weakening of the security of their networks and services.

Amendment 575 +[modifier]

Amendment 575
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri
Article 40 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 4 a (new)

Member States shall ensure that in case of a particular risk of a security incident in public communications networks or publicly available electronic communications services providers of such networks or services shall inform their end-users of such a risk and of any possible protective measures or remedies which can be taken by the end-users.

Amendment 578 +[modifier]

Amendment 578
Kaja Kallas, Marietje Schaake
ALDE
Article 40 – paragraph 5 a (new)

5 a. By ...[date] in order to contribute to the consistent application of measures for the security of networks and services, ENISA, shall, after consulting stakeholders and in close cooperation with the Commission and BEREC issue guidelines on minimum criteria and common approaches for the security of networks and services and the promotion of the use of end-to-end encryption.

Amendment 601 +[modifier]

Amendment 601
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Dan Nica, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Jeppe Kofod
S&D
Article 45 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point e

(e) promoting the shared use of radio spectrum between similar and/or different uses of spectrum through appropriate established sharing rules and conditions, including the protection of existing rights of use, in accordance with Union law;

(e) promoting the shared use of radio spectrum between similar and/or different uses of spectrum; promoting competition through appropriate established sharing rules and conditions, including the protection of existing rights of use, in accordance with Union law;

Justification: Competition criteria in radio spectrum procedures are important when the procedures are designed. Fair and non-discriminatory wholesale access conditions and consumer choice should be enhanced.


Competition criteria in radio spectrum procedures is important. Fair and non-discriminatory wholesale access conditions and consumer choice should be enhanced.

Amendment 602 +[modifier]

Amendment 602
David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano
EFDD
Article 45 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point e

(e) promoting the shared use of radio spectrum between similar and/or different uses of spectrum through appropriate established sharing rules and conditions, including the protection of existing rights of use, in accordance with Union law;

(e) promoting the shared use of radio spectrum between similar and/or different uses of spectrum promoting competition through appropriate established sharing rules and conditions, including the protection of existing rights of use, in accordance with Union law;

Justification: The amendment aims to promote competition in radio spectrum assignment procedures.


Same as AM 601 - The amendment aims to promote competition in radio spectrum assignment procedures.


Amendment 603 ++[modifier]

Amendment 603
Michel Reimon
Verts/ALE
Article 45 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point e a (new)

(e a) The Commission shall establish a programme aiming to release spectrum for shared and unlicensed uses. This programme shall include the development of a European database of shared and unlicensed spectrum.

Justification: Innovation and freedom of expression need a broad access to shared and unlicensed uses of , as stressed in article 6 of the 2012 Radio Spectrum Policy Programme. Increasing this access is thus a major challenge. Following the success of the release of the 1,2 Ghz frequencies within the Radio spectrum policy programme (Article 3 of Decision 243/2012/EU), the European Commission shall launch such a programme aiming at the release of shared spectrum. A database of shared spectrum would greatly facilitate and encourage the release of shared spectrum.

Amendment 636 -[modifier]

Amendment 636
Kaja Kallas, Marietje Schaake
ALDE
Article 46 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 – introductory part

When applying a general authorisation or individual rights taking in account measures adopted under Decision No 676/2002/EC where the radio spectrum band concerned has been harmonised, Member States shall seek to minimise problems of harmful interference, including in cases of shared use of radio spectrum on the basis of a combination of general authorisation and individual rights of use. In so doing, they shall have regard to the need:

2. Where appropriate, Member States shall consider the possibility to authorise the use of radio spectrum based on a combination of general authorisation and individual rights of use. They shall in particular consider the possibility of the gradual transfer from general authorisation to individual rights of use where necessary to foster innovation and facilitate market entry of smaller market participants. They shall favour technological solutions for the management of potential harmful interference with a view to choose the least restrictive authorisation regime possible.

Justification: There is a need to simplify the procedure as proposed. In addition, in accordance with rule 104 of the rules of procedure, this amendment is necessary for pressing reasons related to the internal logic of the text

Amendment 645 -[modifier]

Amendment 645
Kaja Kallas, Marietje Schaake
ALDE
Article 46 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 a (new)

When authorising the shared use of spectrum, Member States shall minimise the restrictions to the use of radio spectrum to what is necessary to avoid harmful interference, including by limiting to the best extent possible the application of the non-interference, non-protection principle. Where such principles shall apply, Member States shall take measures to ensure protection against out-of-and interference from adjacent bands.

Amendment 665 +[modifier]

Amendment 665
András Gyürk
EPP
Article 49 – paragraph 2

2. Where Member States grant rights of use for harmonised radio spectrum for a limited period of time, those rights of use for harmonised radio spectrum shall be valid for a duration of at least 25 years, except in the case of temporary rights, temporary extension of rights pursuant to paragraph 3 and rights for secondary use in harmonised bands.

deleted


Removes the duration of 25 years licencing

Amendment 670 +[modifier]

Amendment 670
Kaja Kallas, Marietje Schaake
ALDE
Article 49 – paragraph 2

2. Where Member States grant rights of use for harmonised radio spectrum for a limited period of time, those rights of use for harmonised radio spectrum shall be valid for a duration of at least 25 years, except in the case of temporary rights, temporary extension of rights pursuant to paragraph 3 and rights for secondary use in harmonised bands.

2. Where Member States grant rights of use for harmonised radio spectrum for a limited period of time, those rights of use for harmonised radio spectrum shall be valid for a maximum duration of 25 years, except in the case of temporary rights, temporary extension of rights pursuant to paragraph 3 and rights for secondary use in harmonised bands.Where rights of use have been granted for a duration of 25 years, Member states shall conduct reviews at regular intervals of every 5 years to assess if the use of spectrum is the most efficient in light of technological or market evolution, and where justified and necessary shall amend such rights in accordance with articles 50 and 51.

Justification: In accordance with rule 104 of the rules of procedure, this amendment is necessary for pressing reasons related to the internal logic of the text


Maximum 25 years with a review every 5 years


Amendment 674 ++[modifier]

Amendment 674
Michel Reimon
Verts/ALE
Article 49 – paragraph 2

2. Where Member States grant rights of use for harmonised radio spectrum for a limited period of time, those rights of use for harmonised radio spectrum shall be valid for a duration of at least 25 years, except in the case of temporary rights, temporary extension of rights pursuant to paragraph 3 and rights for secondary use in harmonised bands.

2. Where Member States grant rights of use for harmonised radio spectrum for a limited period of time, those rights of use for harmonised radio spectrum shall be valid for a maximum duration of 25 years, reviewed at regular intervals of maximum 5 years for assessing and amending the rights according to laydown procedures.

Justification: The draft Code proposes to extend to a minimum of 25 years the duration of rights to use the radio spectrum. This is disproportionate and unnecessary. Experience shows us that 20 years is already too long, especially considering that the regulation does not enable regulators to act when necessary, e.g. by withdrawing authorisation, even if the operator fails to honor its commitments. Allocating spectrum for more than 5 years would necessitate adding a revision clause/sunset date regularly, with sanctions if the operator fails its obligations. The maximum length of allocation shall be 25 years, with such scheduled sunset dates.The "use it or lose it" clause proposed in the Code is insufficient to enable NRAs to withdraw authorisation if necessary. The capacities of the NRAs should thus be enhanced and more detailed in order to control the use of the licences, preventing holders from "parking" frequencies for too long, thereby hindering connectivity and innovation.

Amendment 702 ++[modifier]

Amendment 702
Michel Reimon
Verts/ALE
Article 55 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2

Where that provision is not commercial in character or is ancillary to another commercial activity or public service which is not dependent on the conveyance of signals on those networks, any undertaking, public authority or end-user providing such access shall not be subject to any general authorisation for the provision of electronic communications networks or services pursuant to Article 12, to obligations regarding end-users rights pursuant to Title III of Part III of this Directive nor to obligations to interconnect their networks pursuant to Article 59 (1).

Where that provision is not commercial in character or is ancillary to another commercial activity or public service which is not dependent on the conveyance of signals on those networks, any undertaking, public authority or user providing such access shall not be subject to any general authorisation for the provision of electronic communications networks or services pursuant to Article 12, to obligations regarding users rights pursuant to Title III of Part III of this Directive nor to obligations to interconnect their networks pursuant to Article 59 (1). Individuals providing such access not-for-profit shall not be liable for information transmitted by third parties over such access.

Justification: The Proposal intends to foster the development of radio local area networks, especially where they provide services which are not commercial in character. The development of such networks mainly depends on the personal participation of individual volunteers, who expend the networks by managing their own relays and access points. However, such a participation is hindered by several laws which seek to prevent the sharing of Internet connections amongst several users by making people responsible (and potentially liable) for all communication made through their Wi-Fi connection, and create legal risks for people sharing their connection.In Germany, rights-holders have used a "secondary liability" doctrine to chill the growth of the community networks movement. In France too, copyright law imposes a secondary liability regime that creates significant legal uncertainty for people sharing their network connections with other users. The so-called "mere conduit", inscribed in EU law since 2000 in the directive on information society services, needs to be clearly guaranteed and expanded to small-area wireless access points.In the same spirit, contract clauses that forbid subscribers to share their connections with others should be prohibited in any case: the possibility to share their connections should not be limited to specific offers.Promoting a right to share Internet connections is all the more vital considering the economic and ecological crises, as well as the rapid increase of populations that cannot afford access to the Internet. In this context, connection sharing can play a critical role in fostering a more equitable and sustainable use of telecommunications infrastructure.


This AM aims to avoid legal risks for people sharing their connection


Amendment 703 ++[modifier]

Amendment 703
Kaja Kallas, Marietje Schaake
ALDE
Article 55 – paragraph 2

2. Competent authorities shall not prevent providers of public communications networks or publicly available electronic communications services from allowing access to their networks to the public, through radio local area networks, which may be located at an end-user's premises, subject to compliance with the applicable general authorisation conditions and the prior informed agreement of the end-user.

2. Competent authorities shall not prevent providers of public communications networks or publicly available electronic communications services from allowing access to their networks to the public, through radio local area networks, which may be located at an end-user's premises, subject to compliance with the applicable general authorisation conditions and the prior informed agreement of the end-user. Individuals providing access to their networks for non-commercial purposes shall not be liable for information transmitted by third parties through the use of such access.

Justification: In accordance with rule 104 of the rules of procedure, this amendment is necessary for pressing reasons related to the internal logic of the text


This AM aims to avoid legal risks for people sharing their connection


Amendment 706 ++[modifier]

Amendment 706
José Blanco López, Sergio Gutiérrez Prieto, Inmaculada Rodríguez-Piñero Fernández, Soledad Cabezón Ruiz
S&D
Article 55 – paragraph 2 a (new)

2 a. End-users allowing access to their internet access service as set out in paragraph 2 shall not be liable for any use that other end-users might do while connected to their network.

Justification: Sharing of consumers' private Wi-Fi networks may bring benefits to consumers as they can use additional access points. However, it is imperative that such additional networks are only installed on consumers' private equipment with their explicit consent and that the consumer whose internet access service is being shared is under no circumstance responsible nor liable for any use that other person might do while connected to his Wi-Fi network.


This AM aims to avoid legal risks for people sharing their connection


Amendment 708 --[modifier]

Amendment 708
Evžen Tošenovský
ECR
Article 55 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point a

a) the right of end-users to accede to radio local area networks of their choice provided by third parties;

deleted


This AM removes the right of users to accede to radio local area networks of their choice.

Amendment 710 --[modifier]

Amendment 710
Evžen Tošenovský
ECR
Article 55 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point b

b) the right of end-users to allow reciprocally or more generally access to the networks of such providers by other end-users through radio local area networks, including on the basis of third-party initiatives which aggregate and make publicly accessible the radio local area networks of different end-users.

deleted


This AM removes the provisions giving end-users the rights to share their own access with other uses.

Amendment 712 +[modifier]

Amendment 712
Evžen Tošenovský
ECR
Article 55 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2

To that end, providers of public communications networks or publicly available electronic communications services shall make available and actively offer, clearly and transparently, products or specific offers allowing its end-users to provide access to third parties through a radio local area network.

deleted


Contract clauses that forbid subscribers to share their connections with others should be prohibited in any case: the possibility to share their connections should not be limited to specific offers.


Amendment 713 +[modifier]

Amendment 713
Michel Reimon
Verts/ALE
Article 55 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2

To that end, providers of public communications networks or publicly available electronic communications services shall make available and actively offer, clearly and transparently, products or specific offers allowing its end-users to provide access to third parties through a radio local area network.

deleted

Justification: Contract clauses that forbid subscribers to share their connections with others should be prohibited in any case: the possibility to share their connections should not be limited to specific offers.


Contract clauses that forbid subscribers to share their connections with others should be prohibited in any case: the possibility to share their connections should not be limited to specific offers.


Amendment 717 +[modifier]

Amendment 717
Pervenche Berès, Edouard Martin
S&D
Article 59 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1

Pour réaliser les objectifs exposés à l’article 3, les autorités de régulation nationales encouragent et, le cas échéant, assurent, conformément aux dispositions de la présente directive, un accès et une interconnexion adéquats, ainsi que l’interopérabilité des services et elles s’acquittent de leur tâche de façon à promouvoir l’efficacité économique, à favoriser une concurrence durable et le déploiement de réseaux à très haute capacité, à encourager des investissements efficients et l’innovation et à procurer un avantage maximal à l’utilisateur final. Elles fournissent des orientations et rendent publiques les procédures applicables pour l’obtention de l’accès et de l’interconnexion, afin que les petites et moyennes entreprises et les opérateurs actifs dans une zone géographique limitée puissent bénéficier des obligations imposées.

Pour réaliser les objectifs exposés à l’article 3, les autorités de régulation nationales encouragent et, le cas échéant, assurent, conformément aux dispositions de la présente directive, un accès et une interconnexion adéquats, ainsi que l’interopérabilité des services et elles s’acquittent de leur tâche de façon à promouvoir l’efficacité économique, à favoriser une concurrence durable, le pluralisme des médias, la diversité culturelle, le déploiement de réseaux à très haute capacité, à encourager des investissements efficients et l’innovation et à procurer un avantage maximal à l’utilisateur final. Elles fournissent des orientations et rendent publiques les procédures applicables pour l’obtention de l’accès et de l’interconnexion, afin que les petites et moyennes entreprises et les opérateurs actifs dans une zone géographique limitée puissent bénéficier des obligations imposées.

Amendment 722 /[modifier]

Amendment 722
Michel Reimon
Verts/ALE
Article 59 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point c

(c) in justified cases, obligations on providers of number-independent interpersonal communications services to make their services interoperable, namely where access to emergency services or end-to-end connectivity between end-users is endangered due to a lack of interoperability between interpersonal communications services.

deleted

Amendment 731 ++[modifier]

Amendment 731
Michel Reimon
Verts/ALE
Article 59 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 – point i

(i) to the extent necessary to ensure interoperability of interpersonal communications services and may include obligations relating to the use and implementation of standards or specifications listed in Article 39(1) or of any other relevant European or international standards; and

(i) to the extent necessary to ensure interoperability of interpersonal communications services and may include an obligation to publish and authorize the use, modification and redistribution of any relevant information or an obligation to use or implement of standards or specifications listed in Article 39(1) or of any other relevant European or international standards; and

Justification: Ensuring interoperability of interpersonal communications services requires that the technical information necessary to communicate with the users of such services can be freely accessed, used, modified and redistributed by anyone, whether this information is already public or held by the providers of these services. Encryption should not be jeopardized by such standards.

Amendment 732 +[modifier]

Amendment 732
Kaja Kallas, Marietje Schaake
ALDE
Article 59 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 – point i

(i) to the extent necessary to ensure interoperability of interpersonal communications services and may include obligations relating to the use and implementation of standards or specifications listed in Article 39(1) or of any other relevant European or international standards; and

(i) to the extent necessary to ensure interoperability of interpersonal communications services and may include obligations relating to the use and implementation of standards or specifications listed in Article 39(1) or of any other relevant European or international standards; such obligations shall not lead to the weakening of security standards of these services.

Justification: In accordance with rule 104 of the rules of procedure, this amendment is necessary for pressing reasons related to the internal logic of the text

Amendment 734 -[modifier]

Amendment 734
Angelika Niebler, Herbert Reul, Markus Pieper
EPP
Article 59 – paragraph 2

2. National regulatory authorities shall impose obligations upon reasonable request to grant access to wiring and cables inside buildings or up to the first concentration or distribution point where that point is located outside the building, on the owners of such wiring and cable or on undertakings that have the right to use such wiring and cables, where this is justified on the grounds that replication of such network elements would be economically inefficient or physically impracticable. The access conditions imposed may include specific rules on access, transparency and non-discrimination and for apportioning the costs of access, which, where appropriate, are adjusted to take into account risk factors.

deleted

National regulatory authorities may extend to those owners or undertakings the imposition of such access obligations, on fair and reasonable terms and conditions, beyond the first concentration or distribution point to a concentration point as close as possible to end-users, to the extent strictly necessary to address insurmountable economic or physical barriers to replication in areas with lower population density.

National regulatory authorities shall not impose obligations in accordance with the second subparagraph where:

(a)a viable and similar alternative means of access to end-users is made available to any undertaking, provided that the access is offered on fair and reasonable terms and conditions to a very high capacity network by an undertaking meeting the criteria listed in Article 77 paragraphs (a) and (b); and

(b)in the case of recently deployed network elements, in particular by smaller local projects, the granting of that access would compromise the economic or financial viability of their deployment.

Justification: The EU cost reduction directive (2014/61/EU) contains additional elements of symmetrical regulation. The Commission is to submit a report on the implementation of this directive to the European Parliament and the Council by 1 July 2018. No action should be taken until the findings of the implementation report, which can provide a basis for deciding whether additional elements of symmetrical regulation are needed, are available.

Amendment 735 -[modifier]

Amendment 735
Kaja Kallas
ALDE
Article 59 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1

National regulatory authorities shall impose obligations upon reasonable request to grant access to wiring and cables inside buildings or up to the first concentration or distribution point where that point is located outside the building, on the owners of such wiring and cable or on undertakings that have the right to use such wiring and cables, where this is justified on the grounds that replication of such network elements would be economically inefficient or physically impracticable. The access conditions imposed may include specific rules on access, transparency and non-discrimination and for apportioning the costs of access, which, where appropriate, are adjusted to take into account risk factors.

Where this is justified on the grounds that replication of such network elements would be economically inefficient or technically impossible and the access to such elements is necessary to foster sustainable competition, national regulatory authorities shall impose obligations upon reasonable request, to grant access to wiring and cables inside buildings or up to the first concentration or distribution point where that point is located outside the building on the owners of such wiring and cable or on undertakings that have the right to use such wiring and cables. The access conditions imposed may include specific rules on access, including where necessary to the required associated facilities, on transparency, non-discrimination and for apportioning the costs of access, which, where appropriate, are adjusted to take into account risk factors.Such obligations shall only be imposed following a market analysis procedure in accordance with article 65 and shall complement but not replace regulatory measures taken in accordance with article 66 to ensure the effectiveness of the actions of national regulatory authorities to comply with the objectives set out in article 3 of this Directive.

Justification: Symmetric obligations being imposed on all undertaking without regard to their market power shall only be imposed where justified and necessary given their potential negative impact on investment and competition. They should therefore be linked to a market analysis procedure to prevent that they achieve the opposite goals that the obligations taken by regulators under the SMP regime seek to achieve. In accordance with rule 104 of the rules of procedure, this amendment is necessary for pressing reasons related to the internal logic of the text


Limits regulation possibilities


Amendment 737 +[modifier]

Amendment 737
Eva Kaili
S&D
Article 59 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1

National regulatory authorities shall impose obligations upon reasonable request to grant access to wiring and cables inside buildings or up to the first concentration or distribution point where that point is located outside the building, on the owners of such wiring and cable or on undertakings that have the right to use such wiring and cables, where this is justified on the grounds that replication of such network elements would be economically inefficient or physically impracticable. The access conditions imposed may include specific rules on access, transparency and non-discrimination and for apportioning the costs of access, which, where appropriate, are adjusted to take into account risk factors.

Without prejudice to 59(1), national regulatory authorities shall, taking full account of the principle of proportionality impose obligations to meet reasonable requests to grant access to wiring and cables inside buildings or up to the first concentration or distribution point where that point is located outside but close to the building, or beyond it to a concentration point close to end-users, on the owners of such wiring and cable or on undertakings on providers of electronic communications networks or electronic communications services that have the right to use such wiring and cables, where this is justified on the grounds that replication of such network elements would be economically inefficient or physically impracticable. The access conditions imposed shall be objective, transparent, non-discriminatory and proportionate in accordance with the principles set out in Article 3(3), and may include specific rules on access, transparency and non-discrimination and for apportioning the costs of access. These measures should be consistent with the provisions of [Broadband Cost reductions Directive]

Amendment 738 +[modifier]

Amendment 738
Michel Reimon
Verts/ALE
Article 59 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1

National regulatory authorities shall impose obligations upon reasonable request to grant access to wiring and cables inside buildings or up to the first concentration or distribution point where that point is located outside the building, on the owners of such wiring and cable or on undertakings that have the right to use such wiring and cables, where this is justified on the grounds that replication of such network elements would be economically inefficient or physically impracticable. The access conditions imposed may include specific rules on access, transparency and non-discrimination and for apportioning the costs of access, which, where appropriate, are adjusted to take into account risk factors.

In particular, and without prejudice to the generalities of 59(1), national regulatory authorities may impose obligations to meet reasonable requests for access to wiring and cables inside buildings or up to the first concentration or distribution point where that point is located outside the building or beyond it to a concentration point close to end-users on providers of electronic communications networks or electronic communications services that have the right to use such wiring and cables, where this is justified on the grounds that replication of such network elements would be economically inefficient or physically impracticable. The access conditions imposed may include specific rules on access, transparency, non-discrimination and the price of access, which, where appropriate, are adjusted to take into account risk factors.When imposing access regulation beyond the first concentration or distribution point, national regulatory authorities may under special circumstances impose active or virtual access to such wiring and cables.

Amendment 739 --[modifier]

Amendment 739
Lieve Wierinck, Hilde Vautmans
ALDE
Article 59 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1

National regulatory authorities shall impose obligations upon reasonable request to grant access to wiring and cables inside buildings or up to the first concentration or distribution point where that point is located outside the building, on the owners of such wiring and cable or on undertakings that have the right to use such wiring and cables, where this is justified on the grounds that replication of such network elements would be economically inefficient or physically impracticable. The access conditions imposed may include specific rules on access, transparency and non-discrimination and for apportioning the costs of access, which, where appropriate, are adjusted to take into account risk factors.

National regulatory authorities may impose obligations to meet reasonable requests for access to wiring and cables inside buildings or up to the first concentration or distribution point where that point is located outside the building, or beyond it to a concentration point close to end-users, on the owners of such wiring and cable or on undertakings that have the right to use such wiring and cables, where this is justified on the grounds that replication of such network elements would be economically inefficient or physically impracticable. These access conditions should be imposed on fair and reasonable terms and conditions, and may include specific rules on access, transparency and non-discrimination and for apportioning the costs of access, which, where appropriate, are adjusted to take into account risk factors. When imposing access regulation beyond the first concentration or distribution point, national regulatory authorities may, under special circumstances, impose active or virtual access to such wiring and cables.


Removes the obligation to develop broadband networks for false solutions such as VDSL.

Amendment 740 +[modifier]

Amendment 740
Kathleen Van Brempt
S&D
Article 59 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1

National regulatory authorities shall impose obligations upon reasonable request to grant access to wiring and cables inside buildings or up to the first concentration or distribution point where that point is located outside the building, on the owners of such wiring and cable or on undertakings that have the right to use such wiring and cables, where this is justified on the grounds that replication of such network elements would be economically inefficient or physically impracticable. The access conditions imposed may include specific rules on access, transparency and non-discrimination and for apportioning the costs of access, which, where appropriate, are adjusted to take into account risk factors.

National regulatory authorities may impose obligations to address reasonable requests for access to wiring and cables inside buildings, up to the first concentration or distribution point where that point is located outside the building, or beyond that point at a concentration point in proximity of the end-user, on the owners of such wiring and cable or on undertakings that have the right to use such wiring and cables, where this is justified on the grounds that replication of such network elements would be economically inefficient or physically impracticable. The access conditions imposed may include specific rules on access, transparency and non-discrimination and for apportioning the costs of access, which, where appropriate, are adjusted to take into account risk factors. National regulatory authorities may, when circumstances require it, impose active or virtual access to wiring and cables, in the event of imposing access regulation beyond the first concentration or distribution point.

Amendment 741 +[modifier]

Amendment 741
Gunnar Hökmark, Henna Virkkunen, Bendt Bendtsen
EPP
Article 59 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1

National regulatory authorities shall impose obligations upon reasonable request to grant access to wiring and cables inside buildings or up to the first concentration or distribution point where that point is located outside the building, on the owners of such wiring and cable or on undertakings that have the right to use such wiring and cables, where this is justified on the grounds that replication of such network elements would be economically inefficient or physically impracticable. The access conditions imposed may include specific rules on access, transparency and non-discrimination and for apportioning the costs of access, which, where appropriate, are adjusted to take into account risk factors.

National regulatory authorities shall impose obligations to meet reasonable requests for access to wiring and cables inside buildings or up to a concentration or distribution point as close to end-users as possible, on the owners of such wiring and cable or on undertakings that have the right to use such wiring and cables, where this is justified on the grounds that replication of such network elements would be economically inefficient or physically impracticable. The access conditions imposed may include specific rules on access, transparency and non-discrimination and for apportioning the costs of access, which, where appropriate, are adjusted to take into account risk factors. Under special circumstances, when access regulation is imposed beyond the first concentration or distribution point, national regulatory authorities may impose active or virtual access to such wiring and cables.

Amendment 742 +[modifier]

Amendment 742
Olle Ludvigsson
S&D
Article 59 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1

National regulatory authorities shall impose obligations upon reasonable request to grant access to wiring and cables inside buildings or up to the first concentration or distribution point where that point is located outside the building, on the owners of such wiring and cable or on undertakings that have the right to use such wiring and cables, where this is justified on the grounds that replication of such network elements would be economically inefficient or physically impracticable. The access conditions imposed may include specific rules on access, transparency and non-discrimination and for apportioning the costs of access, which, where appropriate, are adjusted to take into account risk factors.

National regulatory authorities shall impose obligations to meet reasonable requests for access to wiring and cables inside buildings or up to a concentration or distribution point as close as possible to end-users, on the owners of such wiring and cable or on undertakings that have the right to use such wiring and cables, where this is justified on the grounds that replication of such network elements would be economically inefficient or physically impracticable. The access conditions imposed may include specific rules on access, transparency, non-discrimination and the price of access, which, where appropriate, are adjusted to take into account risk factors.When imposing access regulation beyond the first concentration or distribution point, national regulatory authorities may under special circumstances impose active or virtual access to such wiring and cables.

Amendment 753 +[modifier]

Amendment 753
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Dan Nica, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Jeppe Kofod, Flavio Zanonato
S&D
Article 59 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2

National regulatory authorities may extend to those owners or undertakings the imposition of such access obligations, on fair and reasonable terms and conditions, beyond the first concentration or distribution point to a concentration point as close as possible to end-users, to the extent strictly necessary to address insurmountable economic or physical barriers to replication in areas with lower population density.

When imposing access regulation beyond the first concentration or distribution point, national regulatory authorities may under special circumstances impose active or virtual access to such wiring and cables beyond the first concentration or distribution point to a concentration point as close as possible to end-users, to the extent strictly necessary to address insurmountable economic or physical barriers to replication in areas with lower population density.

Justification: National regulatory authorities should have ability to impose regulation as close as possible to end-users if necessary to address economic or physical barriers, especially in areas with low population density.


National regulatory authorities should have ability to impose regulation as close as possible to end-users if necessary to address economic or physical barriers, especially in areas with low population density.


Amendment 757 ++[modifier]

Amendment 757
José Blanco López, Inmaculada Rodríguez-Piñero Fernández, Soledad Cabezón Ruiz
Article 59 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3

National regulatory authorities shall not impose obligations in accordance with the second subparagraph where:

deleted

(a) a viable and similar alternative means of access to end-users is made available to any undertaking, provided that the access is offered on fair and reasonable terms and conditions to a very high capacity network by an undertaking meeting the criteria listed in Article 77 paragraphs (a) and (b); and

(b) in the case of recently deployed network elements, in particular by smaller local projects, the granting of that access would compromise the economic or financial viability of their deployment.


Removes limitations to regulation

Amendment 790 -[modifier]

Amendment 790
Evžen Tošenovský
ECR
Article 59 – paragraph 6

6. By [entry into force plus 18 months in order to contribute to a consistent definition of the location of network termination points by national regulatory authorities, BEREC shall, after consulting stakeholders and in close cooperation with the Commission, adopt guidelines on common approaches to the identification of the network termination point in different network topologies. National regulatory authorities shall take utmost account of those guidelines when defining the location of network termination points.

deleted


A common approach within the EU would ensure a predictability for all EU users.


Amendment 792 ++[modifier]

Amendment 792
Michel Reimon
Verts/ALE
Article 61 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1

An undertaking shall be deemed to have significant market power if, either individually or jointly with others, it enjoys a position equivalent to dominance, that is to say a position of economic strength affording it the power to behave to an appreciable extent independently of competitors, customers and ultimately consumers.

An undertaking shall be deemed to have significant market power if, either individually or jointly with others, including through a commercial or a co-investment agreement, it enjoys a position equivalent to dominance, that is to say a position of economic strength affording it the power to behave to an appreciable extent independently of competitors, customers and ultimately consumers.

Justification: Co-investment in a certain area must be considered an oligopoly of a few powerful actors (on the local level), as the FDN Federation showed in their analysis of the fixed-line market (www.ffdn.org/en/node/129 ) written for a consultation of the ARCEP in 2016. These oligopolies work as a cartel. The co-investors, in a given area, should be regarded as having the position of the incumbent in that area. Such symmetric regulation would allow welcoming all actors into the market.

Amendment 793 +[modifier]

Amendment 793
Kathleen Van Brempt
S&D
Article 61 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1

An undertaking shall be deemed to have significant market power if, either individually or jointly with others, it enjoys a position equivalent to dominance, that is to say a position of economic strength affording it the power to behave to an appreciable extent independently of competitors, customers and ultimately consumers.

An undertaking shall be deemed to have significant market power if, either individually or jointly with others, it enjoys a position equivalent to dominance, that is to say a position of economic strength affording it the power to behave to an appreciable extent independently of competitors, customers and ultimately consumers or when it is able to disrupt effective competition.

Amendment 794 +[modifier]

Amendment 794
Kaja Kallas
ALDE
Article 61 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 a (new)

Two or more undertakings may each be deemed to enjoy a position equivalent to having significant market power when they have the possibility to significantly impede effective competition, taking into account the relevant markets including but not limited to the market shares of other market participants, the market power of an undertaking on closely related markets, barriers to entry, market concentration, product differentiation, capacity constraints and switching costs.

Justification: In light of the increasing trend of convergence between markets, and development of oligopolies in Europe, there is a need to include situations where two or more undertakings can foreclose the markets even without tacit collusion.In accordance with rule 104 of the rules of procedure, this amendment is necessary for pressing reasons related to the internal logic of the text

Amendment 800 +[modifier]

Amendment 800
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Edouard Martin, Flavio Zanonato, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Dan Nica, Jeppe Kofod
S&D
Article 61 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 b (new)

An undertaking shall be deemed to have unilateral market power where, in the absence of significant market power, it enjoys a position of economic strength by virtue of the weakness of competitive constraints in an oligopolistic market, enabling it to act in a manner which is detrimental to consumer welfare.

Justification: Defining unilateral market power can bring tools for NRAs to ensure competition in markets. Oligopolies have become increasingly commonplace in the EU.

Amendment 818 +[modifier]

Amendment 818
Michel Reimon
Verts/ALE
Article 65 – paragraph 2 – point a

(a) the existence of market developments which may increase the likelihood of the relevant market tending towards effective competition, such as those commercial co-investment or access agreements between operators which benefit competitive dynamics sustainably;

deleted

Justification: The Commission’s proposal weakens the SMP regime. The way in which the 3-criteria test is described in the draft Code differs from the version of the test that has been applied, successfully, by NRAs over the last 15 years and which is set out in Recommendation 2014/710/EU. Article 65 (2) (a) as proposed by the Commission adds a purely speculative element into the market analysis framework. According to BEREC opinion BoR (16) 213 (p.10): “In particular, in order to determine whether a market can be considered for regulation, the new test requires NRAs to take account of market developments which “may increase the likelihood” of a relevant market tending towards effective competition, ultimately making it difficult for NRAs to find that a market can be assessed for SMP.” Constraints on NRAs’ ability to impose regulations have to be avoided. The focus on commercial agreements undermines the SMP regime, as it is linked to a deregulatory promise and might in the long run create cartel-like oligopolies that cannot easily be treated with anti-trust law. The proposal also neglects the connection between cause and effect. Sufficient competition on the retail market results from functioning wholesale markets and should hence by no means be taken as a criterion to deregulate wholesale access. Effective access regulation to the SMP operator’s network is crucial to maintain sustainable retail competition, which in turn leads to lower prices and more choice for consumers.


The Commission’s proposal weakens the SMP regime.


Amendment 831 +[modifier]

Amendment 831
Michel Reimon
Verts/ALE
Article 65 – paragraph 2 – point b

(b) all relevant competitive constraints, including at retail level, irrespective of whether the sources of such constraints are deemed to be electronic communications networks, electronic communications services, or other types of services or applications which are comparable from the perspective of the end-user, and irrespective of whether such constraints are part of the relevant market;

(b) all relevant competitive constraints, especially at wholesale level, irrespective of whether the sources of such constraints are deemed to be electronic communications networks, electronic communications services, or other types of services or applications which are comparable from the perspective of the end-user;

Amendment 832 +[modifier]

Amendment 832
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Dan Nica, Jeppe Kofod, Flavio Zanonato
S&D
Article 65 – paragraph 2 – point b

(b) all relevant competitive constraints, including at retail level, irrespective of whether the sources of such constraints are deemed to be electronic communications networks, electronic communications services, or other types of services or applications which are comparable from the perspective of the end-user, and irrespective of whether such constraints are part of the relevant market;

(b) all relevant competitive constraints, on wholesale and retail level level, irrespective of whether the sources of such constraints are deemed to be electronic communications networks, electronic communications services, or other types of services or applications which are comparable from the perspective of the end-user;

Justification: Avoiding the possibility to deregulate on the sole basis of the existence of commercial access agreements is necessary. Putting the focus on commercial agreements for deregulating would weaken and undermine the SMP regime already in place. At the same time, we should avoid the focus on only retail market, as narrowing the scope of competition to the retail level introduces great uncertainty as regards one of the cornerstones of the regulatory framework. Effective access wholesale regulation to the SMP operator’s network is pivotal to establish and maintain an intensive and sustainable retail competition. Sufficient competition on the retail market results from functioning wholesale markets and should hence by no means be taken as a criterion to deregulate wholesale access. Consequently the mere prospect of removing access regulation undermines investments of alternative network operators, which are sensitive to expectations on the (un)reliability of wholesale access products. Therefore, deregulation subject to weak safeguards has to be prevented.


Amendment 872 --[modifier]

Amendment 872
Anna Záborská, Ivan Štefanec
EPP
Article 70

Article 70

deleted

Access to civil engineering

1. A national regulatory authority may, in accordance with Article 66, impose obligations on operators to meet reasonable requests for access to, and use of, civil engineering including, without limitation, buildings or entries to buildings, building cables including wiring, antennae, towers and other supporting constructions, poles, masts, ducts, conduits, inspection chambers, manholes, and cabinets, in situations where the market analysis indicates that denial of access or access given under unreasonable terms and conditions having a similar effect would hinder the emergence of a sustainable competitive market at the retail level and would not be in the end-user's interest.

2. National regulatory authorities may impose obligations on an operator to provide access in accordance with this Article, irrespective of whether the assets that are affected by the obligation are part of the relevant market in accordance with the market analysis, provided that the obligation is necessary and proportionate to meet the objectives of Article 3.


This AM reduces the operators' obligations on access to network

Amendment 880 --[modifier]

Amendment 880
Michał Boni, Henna Virkkunen, Jerzy Buzek
EPP
Article 70 – paragraph 1

1. A national regulatory authority may, in accordance with Article 66, impose obligations on operators to meet reasonable requests for access to, and use of, civil engineering including, without limitation, buildings or entries to buildings, building cables including wiring, antennae, towers and other supporting constructions, poles, masts, ducts, conduits, inspection chambers, manholes, and cabinets, in situations where the market analysis indicates that denial of access or access given under unreasonable terms and conditions having a similar effect would hinder the emergence of a sustainable competitive market at the retail level and would not be in the end-user's interest.

1. A national regulatory authority may, in accordance with Article 66, impose obligations on operators to meet reasonable requests for access to, and use of, civil engineering and passive infrastructure including, without limitation, buildings or entries to buildings, building cables including wiring, antennae, towers and other supporting constructions, poles, masts, ducts, inactive wireline transmission infrastructure including cable and fiber, conduits, inspection chambers, manholes, and cabinets, in situations where the market analysis indicates that denial of access or access given under unreasonable terms and conditions having a similar effect would hinder the emergence of a sustainable competitive market at the retail level and would not be in the end-user's interest.

Justification: It is proposed to extend the scope of this Article to all passive infrastructure.

Amendment 889 -[modifier]

Amendment 889
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Edouard Martin, Dan Nica, Jeppe Kofod, Carlos Zorrinho, Victor Negrescu, Zigmantas Balčytis
S&D
Article 70 – paragraph 1 a (new)

1 a. National regulatory authorities shall take account in particular of the following factors:

(a) the technical and economic viability of using or installing competing facilities, in the light of the rate of market development, taking into account the nature and type of interconnection and/or access involved, including the viability of other upstream access products such as access to ducts;

(b) the technological evolution affecting network design and management

(cb) the feasibility of providing the access proposed, in relation to the capacity available;

(dc) the initial investment by the facility owner, taking account of any public investment made and the risks involved in making the investment;

(ed) the need to safeguard competition in the long term, with particular attention to economically efficient infrastructure-based competition;

(fe) where appropriate, any relevant intellectual property rights;

(g) the provision of pan-European services.

Justification: Civil engineering access enhances infrastructure-based-competition but should not be treated as the sole or primary remedy. That is what it is necessary to include the complementary obligation of giving access to the entire physical network elements (i.e. passive access). Passive remedies, compared to active ones, remain the main wholesale access products that ensure and promote sustainable infrastructure-based competition. The amendment therefore gives priority to passive over active remedies.

Amendment 890 -[modifier]

Amendment 890
Eva Kaili
S&D
Article 70 – paragraph 1 a (new)

1 a. National regulatory authorities shall take account in particular of the following factors:

(a) the technical and economic viability of using or installing competing facilities, in the light of the rate of market development, taking into account the nature and type of interconnection and/or access involved, including the viability of other upstream access products such as access to ducts;

(b) the technological evolution affecting network design and management

(cb) the feasibility of providing the access proposed, in relation to the capacity available;

(dc) the initial investment by the facility owner, taking account of any public investment made and the risks involved in making the investment;

(ed) the need to safeguard competition in the long term, with particular attention to economically efficient infrastructure-based competition;

(fe) where appropriate, any relevant intellectual property rights;

(g) the provision of pan-European services.

Amendment 891 -[modifier]

Amendment 891
Patrizia Toia
S&D
Article 70 – paragraph 1 a (new)

1 a. National regulators should however not impose access to ducts, conduits, inspection chambers, manholes, and cabinets from wholesale-only operators in the sense of Article 77, when these operators offer a viable and similar alternative means of access to end-users in accordance with Article 3(3) of the Directive 2014/61/EU.

Justification: In order to make the business model of vertically separate undertakings sustainable, wholesale only operators should not be obliged to provide access to their ducts to for example vertically integrated operators. This would take away economic incentives of the latter to use the networks of wholesale only operators and put at risk the prospective returns of investors in wholesale only networks.

Amendment 892 -[modifier]

Amendment 892
Kaja Kallas
ALDE
Article 70 – paragraph 1 a (new)

1 a. A national regulatory authority shall ensure that where access to civil engineering such as access to ducts is limited due to availability, alternatives means of access such as dark fiber are imposed in accordance with article 71.

Justification: Access to civil engineering is important to contribute to sustainable competition, however it should take into account the limited availability or physical constraints of granting such access

Amendment 893 -[modifier]

Amendment 893
Pavel Telička
ALDE
Article 70 – paragraph 2

2. National regulatory authorities may impose obligations on an operator to provide access in accordance with this Article, irrespective of whether the assets that are affected by the obligation are part of the relevant market in accordance with the market analysis, provided that the obligation is necessary and proportionate to meet the objectives of Article 3.

2. National regulatory authorities shall take account in particular of the following factors:'''''(a) the technical and economic viability of using or installing competing facilities, in the light of the rate of market development, taking into account the nature and type of interconnection and/or access involved, including the viability of other upstream access products such as access to ducts;'''''(b) the technological evolution affecting network design and management'''''(c) the feasibility of providing the access proposed, in relation to the capacity available;'''''(d) the initial investment by the facility owner, taking account of any public investment made and the risks involved in making the investment;'''''(e) the need to safeguard competition in the long term, with particular attention to economically efficient infrastructure-based competition;'''''(f) where appropriate, any relevant intellectual property rights;'''''(g) the provision of pan-European services.

Amendment 894 -[modifier]

Amendment 894
Michel Reimon
Verts/ALE
Article 70 – paragraph 2

2. National regulatory authorities may impose obligations on an operator to provide access in accordance with this Article, irrespective of whether the assets that are affected by the obligation are part of the relevant market in accordance with the market analysis, provided that the obligation is necessary and proportionate to meet the objectives of Article 3.

2. National regulatory authorities shall take account in particular of the following factors:

Justification: Civil engineering access enhances infrastructure-based-competition but should not be treated as the sole or primary remedy. That is what it is necessary to include the complementary obligation of giving access to the entire physical network elements (i.e. passive access). Passive remedies, compared to active ones, remain the main wholesale access products that ensure and promote sustainable infrastructure-based competition. The amendment therefore gives priority to passive over active remedies.

Amendment 895 -[modifier]

Amendment 895
Michel Reimon
Verts/ALE
Article 70 – paragraph 2 – point a (new)

(a) the technical and economic viability of using or installing competing facilities, in the light of the rate of market development, taking into account the nature and type of interconnection and/or access involved, including the viability of other upstream access products such as access to ducts;

Amendment 896 -[modifier]

Amendment 896
Michel Reimon
Verts/ALE
Article 70 – paragraph 2 – point b (new)

(b) the technological evolution affecting network design and management

Amendment 897 -[modifier]

Amendment 897
Michel Reimon
Verts/ALE
Article 70 – paragraph 2 – point c (new)

(c) the feasibility of providing the access proposed, in relation to the capacity available;

Amendment 898 -[modifier]

Amendment 898
Michel Reimon
Verts/ALE
Article 70 – paragraph 2 – point d (new)

(d) the initial investment by the facility owner, taking account of any public investment made and the risks involved in making the investment;

Amendment 899 -[modifier]

Amendment 899
Michel Reimon
Verts/ALE
Article 70 – paragraph 2 – point e (new)

(e) the need to safeguard competition in the long term, with particular attention to economically efficient infrastructure based competition;

Amendment 900 -[modifier]

Amendment 900
Michel Reimon
Verts/ALE
Article 70 – paragraph 2 – point f (new)

(f) the provision of pan-European services.


Amendment 901 -[modifier]

Amendment 901
Anna Záborská, Ivan Štefanec
EPP
Article 70 a (new)

Article 70 a

Access obligations beyond civil engineering

In geographic areas where two access networks can be expected on a forward-looking basis and where at least one of the network operators offers wholesale access to any interested undertaking, on reasonable commercial terms permitting sustainable competition on the retail market, national regulatory authorities shall not impose or maintain wholesale access obligations, beyond access to civil infrastructure according to Article 3 of Directive 2014/61/EU.



Amendment 907 +[modifier]

Amendment 907
Michel Reimon
Verts/ALE
Article 71 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1

Only where a national regulatory authority concludes that the obligations imposed in accordance with Article 70 would not on their own lead to the achievement of the objectives set out in Article 3, it may, in accordance with the provisions of Article 66, impose obligations on operators to meet reasonable requests for access to, and use of, specific network elements and associated facilities, in situations where the national regulatory authority considers that denial of access or unreasonable terms and conditions having a similar effect would hinder the emergence of a sustainable competitive market at the retail level, and would not be in the end-user's interest.

A national regulatory authority may, in accordance with the provisions of Article 66, impose obligations on operators to meet reasonable requests for access to, and use of, specific network elements and associated facilities, in situations where the national regulatory authority considers that denial of access or unreasonable terms and conditions having a similar effect would hinder the emergence of a sustainable competitive market at the retail level, and would not be in the end-user's interest.



Amendment 908 +[modifier]

Amendment 908
José Blanco López, Inmaculada Rodríguez-Piñero Fernández, Soledad Cabezón Ruiz
S&D
Article 71 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1

Only where a national regulatory authority concludes that the obligations imposed in accordance with Article 70 would not on their own lead to the achievement of the objectives set out in Article 3, it may, in accordance with the provisions of Article 66, impose obligations on operators to meet reasonable requests for access to, and use of, specific network elements and associated facilities, in situations where the national regulatory authority considers that denial of access or unreasonable terms and conditions having a similar effect would hinder the emergence of a sustainable competitive market at the retail level, and would not be in the end-user's interest.

A national regulatory authority may, in accordance with the provisions of Article 66, impose obligations on operators to meet reasonable requests for access to, and use of, specific network elements and associated facilities, in situations where the national regulatory authority considers that denial of access or unreasonable terms and conditions having a similar effect would hinder the emergence of a sustainable competitive market at the retail level, and would not be in the end-user's interest.


Same as AM 907


Amendment 914 -[modifier]

Amendment 914
Pavel Telička
EFDD
Article 71 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point a

(a) to give third parties access to specified network elements and/or facilities, as appropriate including access to network elements which are either not active or physical and/or active or virtual unbundled access to the local loop;

(a) to give third parties access to specified non-physical network elements including active services;


This amendment gives the priority of passive access over active access remedies which is not always the best solution especially for enabling small actors to enter the market and thus foster competition.


Amendment 916 -[modifier]

Amendment 916
David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano
EPP
Article 71 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point a

(a) to give third parties access to specified network elements and/or facilities, as appropriate including access to network elements which are either not active or physical and/or active or virtual unbundled access to the local loop;

(a) to give third parties access to specified non-physical network elements including active services;

Justification: This amendment aims at ensuring the priority of passive access over active access remedies.



Amendment 917 +[modifier]

Amendment 917
Michel Reimon
Verts/ALE
Article 71 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point a

(a) to give third parties access to specified network elements and/or facilities, as appropriate including access to network elements which are either not active or physical and/or active or virtual unbundled access to the local loop;

(a) to give third parties access to specified non-physical network elements and/or facilities, as appropriate including active services under transparent and regulated tariff conditions, which at least make it possible to reproduce the tariffs of the retail offers of the regulated operator;


This AM shall be adopted together with AM 923


Amendment 923 +[modifier]

Amendment 923
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Edouard Martin, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Dan Nica, Jeppe Kofod, Patrizia Toia
S&D
Article 71 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point a a (new)

(a a) obligations to share with third parties specified network elements, including shared access to the metallic local loop and sub-loop as well as shared access to fibre loops and fibre terminating segments, including wavelength division multiplexing and similar sharing solutions;


This AM shall be adopted together with AM 917


Amendment 932 -[modifier]

Amendment 932
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Edouard Martin, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Dan Nica, Jeppe Kofod, Patrizia Toia
S&D
Article 71 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point e

(e) to provide co-location or other forms of associated facilities sharing;

deleted


Amendment 933 -[modifier]

Amendment 933
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Edouard Martin, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Dan Nica, Jeppe Kofod, Patrizia Toia
S&D
Article 71 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point f

(f) to provide specified services needed to ensure interoperability of end-to-end services to users, including facilities for software emulated networks or roaming on mobile networks;

deleted


Amendment 935 -[modifier]

Amendment 935
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Edouard Martin, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Dan Nica, Jeppe Kofod, Patrizia Toia
S&D
Article 71 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point g

(g) to provide access to operational support systems or similar software systems necessary to ensure fair competition in the provision of services;

deleted


Amendment 936 -[modifier]

Amendment 936
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Edouard Martin, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Dan Nica, Jeppe Kofod, Patrizia Toia
S&D
Article 71 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point h

(h) to interconnect networks or network facilities;

deleted


Amendment 937 -[modifier]

Amendment 937
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Edouard Martin, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Dan Nica, Jeppe Kofod, Patrizia Toia
S&D
Article 71 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point i

(i) to provide access to associated services such as identity, location and presence service.

deleted


Amendment 939 +[modifier]

Amendment 939
Michel Reimon
Verts/ALE
Article 71 – paragraph 2 – introductory part

2. When national regulatory authorities are considering the appropriateness of imposing any of the possible specific obligations referred in paragraph 1, and in particular when assessing, in conformity with the principle of proportionality, whether and how such obligations should be imposed, they shall analyse whether other forms of access to wholesale inputs either on the same or a related wholesale market, would already be sufficient to address the identified problem at the retail level. The assessment shall include existing or prospective commercial access offers, regulated access pursuant to Article 59, or existing or contemplated regulated access to other wholesale inputs pursuant to this Article. They shall take account in particular of the following factors:

2. They shall take account in particular of the following factors:

Justification: Before intervening in wholesale markets, NRAs would have to demonstrate that their intervention corresponds to a retail problem. The focus on retail markets would lead to the automatic de-regulation of wholesale markets in many cases, and would ultimately lead to the monopolisation or ‘duopolisation’. In addition, retail competition of the kind where all retail providers are dependent on one wholesale provider is not sustainable in the long run and only amounts to ‘fake-competition’ and could lead to higher prices and less innovation and choice for end-users.The mere existence of a “prospective commercial access offer” should not be a sufficient basis upon which to require regulatory forbearance – if it were, then the absence of take-up could result in a de facto unregulated monopoly (see also BEREC opinion BoR (16) 213 (p. 7)).


Amendment 948 ++[modifier]

Amendment 948
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Edouard Martin, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Dan Nica, Jeppe Kofod, Patrizia Toia
S&D
Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point a

(a) the technical and economic viability of using or installing competing facilities, in the light of the rate of market development, taking into account the nature and type of interconnection and/or access involved, including the viability of other upstream access products such as access to ducts;

deleted


The role of NRAs is not to secure the investments of operators but to ensure a harmonious development in the territories and give to all equal access to the market and services.

Amendment 949 -[modifier]

Amendment 949
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Edouard Martin, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Dan Nica, Jeppe Kofod, Patrizia Toia
S&D
Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point b

(b) the expected technological evolution affecting network design and management

deleted


Amendment 953 ++[modifier]

Amendment 953
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Edouard Martin, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Dan Nica, Jeppe Kofod, Patrizia Toia
S&D
Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point c

(c) the feasibility of providing the access proposed, in relation to the capacity available;

deleted


The role of NRAs is not to secure the investments of operators but to ensure a harmonious development in the territories and give to all equal access to the market and services.

Amendment 954 ++[modifier]

Amendment 954
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Edouard Martin, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Dan Nica, Jeppe Kofod, Patrizia Toia
S&D
Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point d

(d) the initial investment by the facility owner, taking account of any public investment made and the risks involved in making the investment with particular regard to investments in and risk levels associated with very high capacity networks;

deleted


The role of NRAs is not to secure the investments of operators but to ensure a harmonious development in the territories and give to all equal access to the market and services.

Amendment 955 +[modifier]

Amendment 955
Fulvio Martusciello
EPP
Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point d

(d) the initial investment by the facility owner, taking account of any public investment made and the risks involved in making the investment with particular regard to investments in and risk levels associated with very high capacity networks;

(d) the initial investment by the facility owner, taking account of any public investment made and the risks involved in making the investment;


Amendment 959 +[modifier]

Amendment 959
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Edouard Martin, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Dan Nica, Jeppe Kofod, Patrizia Toia
S&D
Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point e

(e) the need to safeguard competition in the long term, with particular attention to economically efficient infrastructure-based competition and to sustainable competition based on co-investment in networks;

deleted


Amendment 961 -[modifier]

Amendment 961
José Blanco López, Inmaculada Rodríguez-Piñero Fernández, Soledad Cabezón Ruiz
S&D
Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point e

(e) the need to safeguard competition in the long term, with particular attention to economically efficient infrastructure-based competition and to sustainable competition based on co-investment in networks;

(e) the need to safeguard competition in the long term, with particular attention to economically efficient infrastructure-based competition and to sustainable competition based on innovative commercial business models such as, but not only, co-investment in networks;

Justification: Recital 166 introduces the need to take into account newly concluded voluntary agreements between operators in order to provide regulatory flexibility. Co-investment is a particular case, but not the only one

Amendment 965 +[modifier]

Amendment 965
Michel Reimon
Verts/ALE
Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point e

(e) the need to safeguard competition in the long term, with particular attention to economically efficient infrastructure-based competition and to sustainable competition based on co-investment in networks;

(e) the need to safeguard competition in the long term, with particular attention to economically efficient infrastructure-based competition;

Justification: Concerning, co-investment schemes: some of them have the potential to create ineffectively competitive market outcomes. The Commission’s proposal includes criteria in Annex IV as well as conditions against which co-investment offers should be judged (compliance with which would entitle the co-investment to effectively benefit from a regulatory holiday). However, these do not provide sufficient competition protections to warrant a relaxation of SMP regulation. It is also worth bearing in mind that co-investments by their nature can lead to coordinated behaviour, which in turn could produce uncompetitive outcomes. Ultimately, the resulting reduction in competition could lead to higher prices and less innovation and choice for end-users. In its opinion BoR (16) 213 (p. 7), BEREC recognises “[T]he risk is that in seeking to incentivise investment through regulatory forbearance, the Commission’s proposals could undermine competition, which in turn would impact on the virtuous cycle of competition- and demand driven investment. The Commission’s proposals would therefore undermine their own ultimate goal of increasing high-speed connectivity.”


Amendment 968 ++[modifier]

Amendment 968
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Edouard Martin, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Dan Nica, Jeppe Kofod, Patrizia Toia
S&D
Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point g

(g) the provision of pan-European services.

deleted


The role of NRAs is not to secure the investments of operators but to ensure a harmonious development in the territories and give to all equal access to the market and services.

Amendment 969 ++[modifier]

Amendment 969
Michel Reimon
Verts/ALE
Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point g a (new)

(g a) the existence of a broad choice of offers and providers for fixed and mobile access, for each consumer in Europe irrespective of their place of residence;


The role of NRAs is not to secure the investments of operators but to ensure a harmonious development in the territories and give to all equal access to the market and services.

Amendment 970 ++[modifier]

Amendment 970
Michel Reimon
Verts/ALE
Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point g b (new)

(g b) the development of a democratic society in the digital era allowing free access to information and expression for all citizens of Europe;


Amendment 971 --[modifier]

Amendment 971
Anna Záborská, Ivan Štefanec
EPP
Article 71 – paragraph 2 a (new)

2 a. In order to account for the long-term interest of end-users, national regulatory authorities should focus more on facilitating network investments by all operators. Regulation should not be to the detriment of innovative developments, in particular very high capacity networks, software defined networks and network function virtualisation. Only where strictly necessary to safeguard competition and where no alternative access possibilities, including access based on commercial agreements, exist, regulated access should be maintained in an appropriate and balanced manner, i.e. at a single network layer. Regulated access at multiple network layers has led to unnecessarily high complexity with regard to the consistency of regulated wholesale products at different network layers and unduly restricts flexibility and commercial freedom in the dynamic telecoms market environment. Limiting access to a single network layer that best addresses the problem identified at the retail level will significantly reduce regulatory costs and the potential for regulatory gaming by market players, leading to more efficient and appropriate outcomes. In this regard, national regulatory authorities should assess whether active or passive access is more appropriate in consideration of national or local circumstances. As unbundling is detrimental to network investments by allowing 'cream-skimming' of the most profitable customers at average cost, there should no longer be an obligation to provide unbundled access, which undermines investment models based on product and price differentiation.


Amendment 973 -[modifier]

Amendment 973
Anna Záborská, Ivan Štefanec
EPP
Article 72 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1

A national regulatory authority may, in accordance with the provisions of Article 66, impose obligations relating to cost recovery and price controls, including obligations for cost orientation of prices and obligations concerning cost accounting systems, for the provision of specific types of interconnection and/or access, in situations where a market analysis indicates that a lack of effective competition means that the operator concerned may sustain prices at an excessively high level, or may apply a price squeeze, to the detriment of end-users.

A national regulatory authority may, in accordance with the provisions of Article 66, impose obligations relating to cost recovery and price controls, including obligations concerning cost accounting systems, for the provision of specific types of interconnection and/or access, in situations where a market analysis indicates a lack of effective competition. A national regulatory authority may only impose price controls that ensure fair and reasonable prices and do not negatively impact investments. When applied, a price control shall meet the following cumulative conditions:'''''(a) the price control ensures recovery of all investments connected to the deployment of new networks and fully incorporates the risks associated with these investments;'''''(b) the price control does not lead to a situation where the investing operator is put at a disadvantage compared to non-investing operators or lead to a situation under which an investment would not have been made in the first place;'''''(c) the price control avoids undue profit margins for access seekers to the detriment of the investing operator and appropriately reflects differences in the risks taken by different access seekers.


Amendment 976 +[modifier]

Amendment 976
Michel Reimon
Verts/ALE
Article 72 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2

In determining whether or not price control obligations would be appropriate, national regulatory authorities shall take into account long-term end-user interests related to the deployment and take-up of next-generation networks, and in particular of very high capacity networks. In particular, to encourage investments by the operator, including in next-generation networks, national regulatory authorities shall take into account the investment made by the operator. Where the national regulatory authorities deem price controls appropriate, they shall allow the operator a reasonable rate of return on adequate capital employed, taking into account any risks specific to a particular new investment network project.

To encourage investments by the operator, including in next-generation networks, national regulatory authorities shall take into account the investment made by the operator. Where the national regulatory authorities deem price controls appropriate, they shall allow the operator a reasonable rate of return on adequate capital employed, taking into account any risks specific to a particular new investment network project.

Justification: Price control is an essential element of access regulation and should not be conditioned to any other criteria.


Amendment 977 +[modifier]

Amendment 977
Kaja Kallas
ALDE
Article 72 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2

In determining whether or not price control obligations would be appropriate, national regulatory authorities shall take into account long-term end-user interests related to the deployment and take-up of next-generation networks, and in particular of very high capacity networks. In particular, to encourage investments by the operator, including in next-generation networks, national regulatory authorities shall take into account the investment made by the operator. Where the national regulatory authorities deem price controls appropriate, they shall allow the operator a reasonable rate of return on adequate capital employed, taking into account any risks specific to a particular new investment network project.

In determining whether or not price control obligations would be appropriate, national regulatory authorities shall take into account long-term end-user interests related to the deployment and take-up of next-generation networks, and in particular of very high capacity networks. In particular, to encourage investments by the operator, including in next-generation networks, national regulatory authorities shall take into account the investment made by the operator.

Justification: In accordance with rule 104 of the rules of procedure, this amendment is necessary for pressing reasons related to the internal logic of the text


Amendment 978 -[modifier]

Amendment 978
Anna Záborská, Ivan Štefanec
EPP
Article 72 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2

In determining whether or not price control obligations would be appropriate, national regulatory authorities shall take into account long-term end-user interests related to the deployment and take-up of next-generation networks, and in particular of very high capacity networks. In particular, to encourage investments by the operator, including in next-generation networks, national regulatory authorities shall take into account the investment made by the operator. Where the national regulatory authorities deem price controls appropriate, they shall allow the operator a reasonable rate of return on adequate capital employed, taking into account any risks specific to a particular new investment network project.

In determining whether or not price control obligations would be appropriate, national regulatory authorities shall take into account long-term end-user interests related to investment in, the deployment of and take-up of next-generation networks. In particular, to encourage investments by the operator, including in next-generation networks, national regulatory authorities shall take into account the investment made by the operator. Where the national regulatory authorities deem price controls appropriate, they shall allow the operator a reasonable rate of return on adequate capital employed, taking into account any risks specific to a particular new investment network project.


Amendment 979 ++[modifier]

Amendment 979
Kaja Kallas
ALDE
Article 72 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3

National regulatory authorities shall not impose or maintain obligations pursuant to this Article, where they establish that a demonstrable retail price constraint is present and that any obligations imposed in accordance with Articles 67 to 71, including in particular any economic replicability test imposed in accordance with Article 68 ensures effective and non discriminatory access.

deleted

Justification: In accordance with rule 104 of the rules of procedure, this amendment is necessary for pressing reasons related to the internal logic of the text


Current provisions for co-investment practices do not allow non-profit or local ISPs to participate in the investments, restricting this opportunity only to larger and incumbent actors. Although Community Networks (CN) and local actors have proven successful in connecting underprivileged communities both in urban and rural areas, it would be only normal to considered them equal members of the telecoms ecosystem, thus giving them fair and equal access to co-investment opportunities. Moreover, co-investment in a certain area must be considered as an oligopoly of a few powerful actors that work as a cartel. This is thus not acceptable to reduce the obligations. Furthermore, the access to co-investment agreement shall be affordable for small operators.

Amendment 980 ++[modifier]

Amendment 980
Michel Reimon
Verts/ALE
Article 72 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3

National regulatory authorities shall not impose or maintain obligations pursuant to this Article, where they establish that a demonstrable retail price constraint is present and that any obligations imposed in accordance with Articles 67 to 71, including in particular any economic replicability test imposed in accordance with Article 68 ensures effective and non discriminatory access.

deleted

Justification: Current provisions for co-investment practices do not allow non-profit or local ISPs to participate in the investments, restricting this opportunity only to larger and incumbent actors. Although Community Networks (CN) and local actors have proven succesful in connecting underprivileged communities both in urban and rural areas, it would be only normal to considered them equal members of the telecoms ecosystem, thus giving them fair and equal access to co-investment opportunities.Moreover, co-investment in a certain area must be considered as an oligopoly of a few powerful actors that work as a cartel.This is thus not acceptable to reduce the obligations. Furthermore, the access to co-investment agreement shall be affordable for small operators.


Amendment 982 -[modifier]

Amendment 982
Anna Záborská, Ivan Štefanec
EPP
Article 72 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3

National regulatory authorities shall not impose or maintain obligations pursuant to this Article, where they establish that a demonstrable retail price constraint is present and that any obligations imposed in accordance with Articles 67 to 71, including in particular any economic replicability test imposed in accordance with Article 68 ensures effective and non discriminatory access.

National regulatory authorities shall not impose or maintain obligations pursuant to this Article, either for new network elements in case a network roll-out contributes to the availability of very-high capacity networks or where they establish that a demonstrable retail price constraint is present and that any obligations imposed in accordance with Articles 67 to 71, including in particular any economic replicability test imposed in accordance with Article 68 ensures effective non discrimination of access.


Amendment 983 -[modifier]

Amendment 983
Anna Záborská, Ivan Štefanec
EPP
Article 72 – paragraph 3

3. Where an operator has an obligation regarding the cost orientation of its prices, the burden of proof that charges are derived from costs including a reasonable rate of return on investment shall lie with the operator concerned. For the purpose of calculating the cost of efficient provision of services, national regulatory authorities may use cost accounting methods independent of those used by the undertaking. National regulatory authorities may require an operator to provide full justification for its prices, and may, where appropriate, require prices to be adjusted.

deleted

Amendment 984 -[modifier]

Amendment 984
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Edouard Martin, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Dan Nica, Jeppe Kofod, Patrizia Toia
S&D
Article 72 a (new)

Article 72 a

Other access-related obligations

1. A national regulatory authority

may, in accordance with the provisions of Article 66, impose:

(a) to give third parties access to specified active network elements and services;

(b) to provide specified services on a wholesale basis for resale by third parties;

(c) to negotiate in good faith with undertakings requesting access;

(d) not to withdraw access to facilities already granted;

(ee) to grant open access to technical interfaces, protocols or other key technologies that are indispensable for the interoperability of services or virtual network services;

(ff) to provide co-location or other forms of associated facilities sharing;

(gg) to provide specified services needed to ensure interoperability of end-to-end services to users, including facilities for software emulated networks or roaming on mobile networks;

(hh) to provide access to operational support systems or similar software systems necessary to ensure fair competition in the provision of services;

(i) to interconnect networks or network facilities;

(j) to provide access to associated services such as identity, location and presence service.

National regulatory authorities may attach to those obligations conditions covering fairness, reasonableness and timeliness.

2. They shall take account in particular of the following factors:

(a) the technical and economic viability of using or installing competing facilities, in the light of the rate of market development, taking into account the nature and type of interconnection and/or access involved, including the viability of other upstream access products such as access to ducts;

(b) the technological evolution affecting network design and management

(cb) the feasibility of providing the access proposed, in relation to the capacity available;

(dc) the initial investment by the facility owner, taking account of any public investment made and the risks involved in making the investment ;

(ed) the need to safeguard competition in the long term, with particular attention to economically efficient infrastructure-based competition;

(fe) where appropriate, any relevant intellectual property rights;

(g) the provision of pan-European services.


Amendment 1001 +[modifier]

Amendment 1001
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Dan Nica, Jeppe Kofod, Patrizia Toia
S&D
Article 74

Article 74

deleted

Regulatory treatment of new network elements

1.

A national regulatory authority shall not impose obligations as regards new network elements that are part of the relevant market on which it intends to impose or maintain obligations in accordance with Articles 66 and Articles 67 to 72 and that the operator designated as significant market power on that relevant market has deployed or is planning to deploy, if the following cumulative conditions are met:

(a) the deployment of the new network elements is open to co-investment offers according to a transparent process and on terms which favour sustainable competition in the long term including inter alia fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory terms offered to potential co-investors; flexibility in terms of the value and timing of the commitment provided by each co-investor; possibility to increase such commitment in the future; reciprocal rights awarded by the co-investors after the deployment of the co-invested infrastructure;

(b) the deployment of the new network elements contributes significantly to the deployment of very high capacity networks;

(c) access seekers not participating in the co-investment can benefit from the same quality, speed, conditions and end-user reach as was available before the deployment, either through commercial agreements based on fair and reasonable terms or by means of regulated access maintained or adapted by the national regulatory authority;

When assessing co-investment offers and processes referred to in point (a) of the first subparagraph, national regulatory authorities shall ensure that those offers and processes comply with the criteria set out in Annex IV.

Justification: Current framework does not prevent co-investment. While the article may help to facilitate new fiber networks, it will not allow NRAs to intervene efficiently where it becomes necessary. It is problematic that the reference made in Art 74 (b) to the “deployment of very high capacity networks” establishes a hierarchy between the regulatory objectives set out in Article 3. Also, co-investments by their nature can lead to coordinated behaviour, which in turn yield uncompetitive outcomes.


Amendment 1003 +[modifier]

Amendment 1003
Michel Reimon
Verts/ALE
Article 74 – paragraph 1

1. A national regulatory authority shall not impose obligations as regards new network elements that are part of the relevant market on which it intends to impose or maintain obligations in accordance with Articles 66 and Articles 67 to 72 and that the operator designated as significant market power on that relevant market has deployed or is planning to deploy, if the following cumulative conditions are met:

deleted

(a) the deployment of the new network elements is open to co-investment offers according to a transparent process and on terms which favour sustainable competition in the long term including inter alia fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory terms offered to potential co-investors; flexibility in terms of the value and timing of the commitment provided by each co-investor; possibility to increase such commitment in the future; reciprocal rights awarded by the co-investors after the deployment of the co-invested infrastructure;

(b) the deployment of the new network elements contributes significantly to the deployment of very high capacity networks;

(c) access seekers not participating in the co-investment can benefit from the same quality, speed, conditions and end-user reach as was available before the deployment, either through commercial agreements based on fair and reasonable terms or by means of regulated access maintained or adapted by the national regulatory authority;

When assessing co-investment offers and processes referred to in point (a) of the first subparagraph, national regulatory authorities shall ensure that those offers and processes comply with the criteria set out in Annex IV.

Justification: The proposed provisions on “new network elements” in Article 74 are problematic firstly because the concept remains undefined. Secondly, Article 74 impedes NRAs from intervening on “new network elements” if there are co-investment offers. This could be problematic because SMP operators can use their market position to the detriment of smaller companies. Operators investing in VHC networks should not profit from regulatory holidays. The successful ex-ante regulatory regime should apply as much to VHC networks as to Next Generation Networks and legacy networks (e.g. copper).The explicit reference made in Art 74 (b) to the “deployment of very high capacity networks” establishes a hierarchy between the regulatory objectives set out in Article 3.In addition, co-investment schemes are diverse, and some of them have the potential to create ineffectively competitive market outcomes. While the Commission’s proposal includes criteria in Annex IV as well as conditions against which co-investment offers should be judged (compliance with which would entitle the co-investment to effectively benefit from a regulatory holiday), these do not provide sufficient competition protections to warrant a relaxation of SMP regulation. It is also worth bearing in mind that co-investments by their nature can lead to coordinated behaviour, which in turn could produce uncompetitive outcomes. Deregulation subject to weak safeguards has to be prevented. Independent from the concept of co-investment, commercial agreements must not artificially lead to non-SMP findings and to the removal of the wholesale access obligations that are necessary to enable and maintain sustainable competition and thus consumer well-being in the form of lower prices, increased choice and more innovative products.


Amendment 1045 +[modifier]

Amendment 1045
Evžen Tošenovský
ECR
Article 77

Article 77

deleted

Vertically separate undertakings

1. A national regulatory authority that designates an undertaking which is absent from any retail markets for electronic communications services as having significant market power in one or several wholesale markets in accordance with Article 65 shall consider whether that undertaking has the following characteristics:

(a) all companies and business units within the undertaking, including all companies that are controlled but not necessarily wholly owned by the same ultimate owner(s), only have activities, current and planned for the future, in wholesale markets for electronic communications services and therefore do not have activities in any retail market for electronic communications services provided to end-users in the Union;

(b) the undertaking does not hold an exclusive agreement, or an agreement which de facto amounts to an exclusive agreement, with a single and separate undertaking operating downstream that is active in any retail market for electronic communications services provided to private or commercial end-users.

2. If the national regulatory authority concludes that the conditions laid down in points (a) and (b) of paragraph 1 of this Article are fulfilled, it may only impose on that undertaking obligations pursuant to Articles 70 or 71.

3. The national regulatory authority shall review obligations imposed on the undertaking in accordance with this Article at any time if it concludes that the conditions laid down in points (a) and (b) of paragraph 1 of this Article are no longer met and shall apply Articles 65 to 72, as appropriate.

4. The national regulatory authority shall also review obligations imposed on the undertaking in accordance with this Article if on the basis of evidence of terms and conditions offered by the undertaking to its downstream customers, the authority concludes that competition problems have arisen to the detriment of end-users which require the imposition of one or more obligations provided in Articles 67, 68, 69 or 72, or the modification of the obligations imposed in accordance with paragraph 2.

5. The imposition of obligations and their review in accordance with this Article shall be implemented in accordance with the procedures referred to in Articles 23, 32 and 33.


Amendment 1056 +[modifier]

Amendment 1056
Michel Reimon
Verts/ALE
Article 79 – paragraph 1

1. Member States shall ensure that all end-users in their territory have access at an affordable price, in the light of specific national conditions, to available functional internet access and voice communications services at the quality specified in their territory, including the underlying connection, at least at a fixed location.

1. Member States shall ensure that all end-users in their territory have access at an affordable price, in the light of specific national conditions, to available broadband internet access and voice communications services at the quality specified in their territory, including the underlying connection, at least at a fixed location.


Amendment 1057 +[modifier]

Amendment 1057
Michel Reimon
Verts/ALE
Article 79 – paragraph 2

2. Member States shall define the functional internet access service referred to in paragraph 1 with a view to adequately reflect services used by the majority of end-users in their territory. To that end, the functional internet access service shall be capable of supporting the minimum set of services set out in Annex V.

deleted


Amendment 1069 +[modifier]

Amendment 1069
Morten Helveg Petersen
ALDE
Article 92 – paragraph 1

Providers of electronic communications networks or services shall not apply any discriminatory requirements or conditions of access or use to end-users based on the end-user's nationality or place of residence unless such differences are objectively justified.

Providers of electronic communications networks or services shall not apply any discriminatory requirements or conditions of access or use to end-users based on the end-user's nationality or place of residence unless such differences are objectively justified and in compliance with the scope and interpretation of fundamental rights as provided for in Article 52 of the Charter.


Amendment 1078 +[modifier]

Amendment 1078
José Blanco López, Sergio Gutiérrez Prieto, Inmaculada Rodríguez-Piñero Fernández, Soledad Cabezón Ruiz
S&D
Article 94 – paragraph 1

Member States shall not maintain or introduce in their national law end-user protection provisions on the subject-matters covered by this Title and diverging from the provisions laid down in this Title, including more or less stringent provisions to ensure a different level of protection, unless otherwise provided for in this Title.

Member States shall under no circumstance introduce in their national law end-user protection provisions that undermine the provisions laid down in this Title as it constitutes the minimum level of end-user protection to be pursued in the Union.


Amendment 1097 +[modifier]

Amendment 1097
Morten Helveg Petersen
ALDE
Article 114 – paragraph 3 a (new)

3 a. The Commission shall periodically review the application of the fundamental rights safeguard referred to in Article 93. Such review shall be carried out every five year.


Amendment 1099 ++[modifier]

Amendment 1099
Michel Reimon
Verts/ALE
Annex I – part A – point 4

4. Enabling of legal interception by competent national authorities in conformity with Directive 2002/58/EC and Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data'''''54''''' .

deleted

_________________

54 OJ L 281, 23.11.1995, p. 31.


Amendment 1110 +[modifier]

Amendment 1110
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Dan Nica, Jeppe Kofod, Carlos Zorrinho, Victor Negrescu, Zigmantas Balčytis
S&D
Annex IV

[...]

deleted


Amendment 1130 +[modifier]

Amendment 1130
Michel Reimon
Verts/ALE
Annex IV – paragraph 1 – point c – indent 1

- All undertakings have to be offered fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory terms and conditions for participation in the co-investment agreement relative to the time they join, including in terms of financial consideration required for the acquisition of specific rights, in terms of the protection awarded to the co-investors by those rights both during the building phase and during the exploitation phase, for example by granting indefeasible rights of use (IRUs) for the expected lifetime of the co-invested network and in terms of the conditions for joining and potentially terminating the co-investment agreement. Non-discriminatory terms in this context do not entail that all potential co-investors must be offered exactly the same terms, including financial terms, but that all variations of the terms offered must be justified on the basis of the same objective, transparent, non-discriminatory and predictable criteria such as the number of end user lines committed for.

- All undertakings have to be offered fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory terms and conditions for participation in the co-investment agreement relative to the time they join, including in terms of financial consideration required for the acquisition of specific rights, in terms of access to individual lines, in terms of the protection awarded to the co-investors by those rights both during the building phase and during the exploitation phase, for example by granting indefeasible rights of use (IRUs) for the expected lifetime of the co-invested network and in terms of the conditions for joining and potentially terminating the co-investment agreement. Non-discriminatory terms in this context do not entail that all potential co-investors must be offered exactly the same terms, including financial terms, but that all variations of the terms offered must be justified on the basis of the same objective, transparent, non-discriminatory and predictable criteria such as the number of end user lines committed for.

Justification: Current provisions for co-investment practices do not allow non-profit or local ISPs to participate in the investments, restricting this opportunity only to larger and incumbent actors. Although Community Networks (CN) and local actors have proven successful in connecting underprivileged communities both in urban and rural areas, it would be only normal to considered them equal members of the telecoms ecosystem, thus giving them fair and equal access to co-investment opportunities.


If AM 1110 falls