Difference between revisions of "Paquet Telecom 2017/amendements ITRE"

From La Quadrature du Net
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Amendment 306 /)
 
(148 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Introduction|Cette page représente un travail en cours, son contenu peut être modifié.}}
 
{{Introduction|Cette page représente un travail en cours, son contenu peut être modifié.}}
 +
 +
Les amendements de la commission IMCO sont visibles [[Paquet Telecom 2017/amendements IMCO|sur cette page]].
 +
 +
Les amendements de la commission LIBE sont visibles [[Paquet Telecom 2017/amendements LIBE|sur cette page]].
 +
 +
Voting list des amendements déposés en commission ITRE
 +
 +
=== Amendment 297 ++ ===
 +
 +
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 +
|-
 +
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
 +
'''Amendment 297'''<br/>
 +
Morten Helveg Petersen<br/>
 +
'''ALDE'''<br/>
 +
Article 1 – paragraph 3 – indent 1
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
- obligations imposed by national law in accordance with Union law or by Union law in respect of services provided using electronic communications networks and services ; - measures taken at Union or national level, in compliance with Union law, to pursue general interest objectives, in particular relating to '''''content regulation and audio-visual policy. - the provisions of Directive 2014/53/EU.'''''
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
- obligations imposed by national law in accordance with Union law or by Union law in respect of services provided using electronic communications networks and services ; - measures taken at Union or national level, in compliance with Union law, to pursue general interest objectives, in particular relating to '''''the protection of personal data and privacy, content regulation and audio-visual policy'''''
 +
|}
 +
 +
 +
Take into account the protection of personal data and privacy, content regulation and audio-visual policy
 +
  
 
=== Amendment 298 ++ ===
 
=== Amendment 298 ++ ===
Line 11: Line 37:
 
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1
 
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 
(1) ‘electronic communications network’ means transmission systems, whether or not based on a permanent infrastructure or centralised administration capacity, and, where applicable, switching or routing equipment and other resources, including network elements which are not active, which permit the conveyance of signals by wire, radio, optical or other electromagnetic means, including satellite networks, fixed (circuit- and packet-switched, including Internet) and mobile terrestrial networks, electricity cable systems, to the extent that they are used for the purpose of transmitting signals, networks used for radio and television broadcasting, and cable television networks, irrespective of the type of information conveyed;
 
(1) ‘electronic communications network’ means transmission systems, whether or not based on a permanent infrastructure or centralised administration capacity, and, where applicable, switching or routing equipment and other resources, including network elements which are not active, which permit the conveyance of signals by wire, radio, optical or other electromagnetic means, including satellite networks, fixed (circuit- and packet-switched, including Internet) and mobile terrestrial networks, electricity cable systems, to the extent that they are used for the purpose of transmitting signals, networks used for radio and television broadcasting, and cable television networks, irrespective of the type of information conveyed;
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 
(1) ‘electronic communications network’ means transmission systems, whether or not based on a permanent infrastructure or centralised administration capacity, and, where applicable, switching or routing equipment and other resources, including network elements which are not active, which permit the conveyance of signals by wire, radio, optical or other electromagnetic means, including satellite networks, fixed (circuit- and packet-switched, including Internet) and mobile terrestrial networks, electricity cable systems, to the extent that they are used for the purpose of transmitting signals, networks used for radio and television broadcasting, and cable television networks, irrespective of the type of information conveyed; '''''it does not include network elements managed by individuals in the context of not-for-profit activities;'''''
 
(1) ‘electronic communications network’ means transmission systems, whether or not based on a permanent infrastructure or centralised administration capacity, and, where applicable, switching or routing equipment and other resources, including network elements which are not active, which permit the conveyance of signals by wire, radio, optical or other electromagnetic means, including satellite networks, fixed (circuit- and packet-switched, including Internet) and mobile terrestrial networks, electricity cable systems, to the extent that they are used for the purpose of transmitting signals, networks used for radio and television broadcasting, and cable television networks, irrespective of the type of information conveyed; '''''it does not include network elements managed by individuals in the context of not-for-profit activities;'''''
 
|-
 
|-
Line 21: Line 47:
  
  
Inclusion des orga non-profit
+
Inclusion of not-for-profit organisations.
 
 
  
=== Amendment 299 -- ===
+
=== Amendment 299 - ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #A60000; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
 
'''Amendment 299'''<br/>
 
'''Amendment 299'''<br/>
 
Evžen Tošenovský<br/>
 
Evžen Tošenovský<br/>
Line 34: Line 59:
 
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2
 
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 
(2) 'very high capacity network' means an electronic communications network which either consists wholly '''''of optical fibre elements at least up to the distribution point at the serving location or which is capable of delivering under usual peak-time conditions similar network performance in terms of available down- and uplink bandwidth, resilience, error-related parameters, and latency and its variation. Network performance can be considered similar regardless of whether the end-user experience varies due to the inherently different characteristics of the medium by which the network ultimately connects with the network termination point'''''.
 
(2) 'very high capacity network' means an electronic communications network which either consists wholly '''''of optical fibre elements at least up to the distribution point at the serving location or which is capable of delivering under usual peak-time conditions similar network performance in terms of available down- and uplink bandwidth, resilience, error-related parameters, and latency and its variation. Network performance can be considered similar regardless of whether the end-user experience varies due to the inherently different characteristics of the medium by which the network ultimately connects with the network termination point'''''.
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 
(2) 'very high capacity network' means an '''''publicly available''''' electronic communications network which either consists wholly '''''or partially of optical fibre elements'''''.
 
(2) 'very high capacity network' means an '''''publicly available''''' electronic communications network which either consists wholly '''''or partially of optical fibre elements'''''.
 
|}
 
|}
  
 
+
=== Amendment 301 + ===
dérégulation sur la QoS + dérégulation sur les réseaux privés
 
 
 
=== Amendment 300 -- ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #A60000; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 300'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 301'''<br/>
Michał Boni, Jerzy Buzek, Gunnar Hökmark<br/>
+
Michel Reimon<br/>
'''EPP'''<br/>
+
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
 
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2
 
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(2) 'very high capacity network' means an electronic communications network which either consists wholly of optical fibre elements at least up to the distribution point at the serving location or which is capable of delivering under usual peak-time conditions similar network performance in terms of available down- and uplink bandwidth, resilience, error-related parameters, and latency and its variation. Network performance '''''can be considered similar regardless of whether''''' the end-user experience varies due to the inherently different characteristics of the medium by which the network ultimately connects with the network termination point.
+
(2) 'very high capacity network' means an electronic communications network which either consists wholly of optical fibre elements at least up to the distribution point at the serving location or which is capable of delivering under usual peak-time conditions '''''similar''''' network performance in terms of available down- and uplink bandwidth, resilience, error-related parameters, and latency and its variation. Network performance can be considered '''''similar''''' regardless of whether the end-user experience varies due to the inherently different characteristics of the medium by which the network ultimately connects with the network termination point.
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(2) 'very high capacity network' means an electronic communications network which either consists wholly of optical fibre elements at least up to the distribution point at the serving location or '''''any other type of network''''' which is capable of delivering under usual peak-time conditions similar network performance in terms of available down- and uplink bandwidth, resilience, error-related parameters, and latency and its variation. '''''Very high capacity networks are in any case fibre to the home networks or any other''''' network '''''which provides the technical''''' performance '''''requirements needed for the backhaul of 5G networks. Network performance will be assessed solely on the basis of technical parameters and not take into account''''' the end-user experience varies due to the inherently different characteristics of the medium by which the network ultimately connects with the network termination point.
+
(2) 'very high capacity network' means an electronic communications network which either consists wholly of optical fibre elements at least up to the distribution point at the serving location '''''corresponding in the fixed-line connection case to the premises and in the mobile connection case to the base station,''''' or which is capable of delivering under usual peak-time conditions '''''at least the same''''' network performance in terms of available down- and uplink bandwidth, resilience, error-related parameters, and latency and its variation. Network performance can be considered '''''at least the same''''' regardless of whether the end-user experience varies due to the inherently different characteristics of the medium by which the network ultimately connects with the network termination point.
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
| colspan='2' |
''Justification: The overarching objective of the Code is to stimulate the roll-out of networks which can serve the future demands of European businesses and citizens. The term very high capacity network seeks to define what future state of the art electronic communications infrastructure look like. It is suggested to clarify the definition in a way that ensures that very high capacity networks benefit the roll-out of 5G networks in the sense that they provide the backhaul for these mobile networks. Future 5G ultra-dense and heavy traffic cells have to be connected to a backhaul with very high requirements in terms of capacity, latency, and availability. The proposal also takes into account the need to ensure technology neutrality since the definition of very high capacity network is not based on any given technology.''
+
''Justification: Clarification included from the respective Recital 13. Moreover, strengthening the performance benchmark while lifting its upper limit. This clarifies that – independent of the used technology – better performing infrastructures would also be considered ‘very high capacity’.''
 
|}
 
|}
  
 +
=== Amendment 312 + ===
  
Pas de focus sur la QoS, la qualité seulement mesurée sur les paramètres du réseau
+
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 +
|-
 +
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
 +
'''Amendment 312'''<br/>
 +
Edouard Martin<br/>
 +
'''S&D'''<br/>
 +
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
(2) 'very high capacity network' means an electronic communications network which either consists wholly of optical fibre elements at least up to the '''''distribution point at the serving location''''' or which is capable of delivering under usual peak-time conditions similar network performance in terms of available down- and uplink bandwidth, resilience, error-related parameters, and latency and its variation. Network performance can be considered similar regardless of whether the end-user experience varies due to the inherently different characteristics of the medium by which the network ultimately connects with the network termination point.
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
(2) 'very high capacity network' means an electronic communications network which either consists wholly of optical fibre elements at least up to the '''''premises''''' or which is capable of delivering under usual peak-time conditions '''''at least''''' similar network performance in terms of available down- and uplink bandwidth, resilience, error-related parameters, and latency and its variation. Network performance can be considered similar regardless of whether the end-user experience varies due to the inherently different characteristics of the medium by which the network ultimately connects with the network termination point.
 +
|}
  
 
+
=== Amendment 313 + ===
=== Amendment 301 + ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 301'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 313'''<br/>
Michel Reimon<br/>
+
Anne Sander, Françoise Grossetête<br/>
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
+
'''S&D'''<br/>
 
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2
 
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(2) 'very high capacity network' means an electronic communications network which either consists wholly of optical fibre elements at least up to the distribution point at the serving location or which is capable of delivering under usual peak-time conditions '''''similar''''' network performance in terms of available down- and uplink bandwidth, resilience, error-related parameters, and latency and its variation. Network performance can be considered '''''similar''''' regardless of whether the end-user experience varies due to the inherently different characteristics of the medium by which the network ultimately connects with the network termination point.
+
(2) 'very high capacity network' means an electronic communications network which either consists wholly of optical fibre elements at least up to the '''''distribution point at the serving location''''' or which is capable of delivering under usual peak-time conditions '''''similar''''' network performance in terms of available down- and uplink bandwidth, resilience, error-related parameters, and latency and its variation. Network performance can be considered similar regardless of whether the end-user experience varies due to the inherently different characteristics of the medium by which the network ultimately connects with the network termination point.
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(2) 'very high capacity network' means an electronic communications network which either consists wholly of optical fibre elements at least up to the distribution point at the serving location '''''corresponding in the fixed-line connection case to the premises and in the mobile connection case to the base station,''''' or which is capable of delivering under usual peak-time conditions '''''at least the same''''' network performance in terms of available down- and uplink bandwidth, resilience, error-related parameters, and latency and its variation. Network performance can be considered '''''at least the same''''' regardless of whether the end-user experience varies due to the inherently different characteristics of the medium by which the network ultimately connects with the network termination point.
+
(2) 'very high capacity network' means an electronic communications network which either consists wholly of optical fibre elements at least up to the '''''premises''''' or which is capable of delivering under usual peak-time conditions '''''at least the same''''' network performance in terms of available down- and uplink bandwidth, resilience, error-related parameters, and latency and its variation. Network performance can be considered similar regardless of whether the end-user experience varies due to the inherently different characteristics of the medium by which the network ultimately connects with the network termination point.
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
''Justification: Clarification included from the respective Recital 13. Moreover, strengthening the performance benchmark while lifting its upper limit. This clarifies that – independent of the used technology – better performing infrastructures would also be considered ‘very high capacity’.''
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Tentative d'inclure une QoS
+
Same as 312
  
  
=== Amendment 302 / ===
+
=== Amendment 316 ++ ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 302'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 316'''<br/>
David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano<br/>
+
Michel Reimon<br/>
'''EFD'''<br/>
+
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2
+
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(2) 'very high capacity network' means an electronic communications network '''''which either consists''''' wholly of optical fibre elements at least up to the distribution point at the serving location or which is capable of delivering under usual peak-time conditions similar network performance in terms of available down- and uplink bandwidth, resilience, error-related parameters, and latency and its variation. '''''Network performance can be considered similar regardless of whether the end-user experience varies due to the inherently different characteristics of the medium by which the network ultimately connects with the network termination point.'''''
+
(4) ‘electronic communications service’ means a service '''''normally''''' provided for remuneration via electronic communications networks, which encompasses 'internet access service' as defined in Article 2(2) of Regulation (EU) 2015/2120; and/or 'interpersonal communications service'; and/or services consisting wholly or mainly in the conveyance of signals such as transmission services used for the provision of machine-to-machine services and for broadcasting, but excludes services providing, or exercising editorial control over, content transmitted using electronic communications networks and services;
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(2) 'very high capacity network' means an electronic communications network '''''consisting''''' wholly of optical fibre elements at least up to the distribution point at the serving location''''', corresponding in the fixed-line connection case to the premises and in the mobile connection case to the base station,''''' or which is capable of delivering under usual peak-time conditions similar network performance in terms of available down- and uplink bandwidth, resilience, error-related parameters, and latency and its variation.
+
(4) ‘electronic communications service’ means a service provided for remuneration via electronic communications networks, which encompasses 'internet access service' as defined in Article 2(2) of Regulation (EU) 2015/2120; and/or 'interpersonal communications service'; and/or services consisting wholly or mainly in the conveyance of signals such as transmission services used for the provision of machine-to-machine services and for broadcasting, but excludes services providing, or exercising editorial control over, content transmitted using electronic communications networks and services '''''as well as not-for-profit-services provided by individuals''''';
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
| colspan='2' |
''Justification: To clarify the "very high capacity network" definition in light of the technology landscape.''
+
''Justification: Individuals participating in a not-for-profit network (such as radio local area networks) or providing not-for-profit services shall not be subject to the obligations imposed on legal persons providing networks or services. Specifically, the strict obligations provided by the Directive 2002/58/CE would be disproportionate and impracticable if imposed on individual volunteers, who should only be subject to the obligations set by the General Data Protection Regulation.''
 
|}
 
|}
  
 
+
=== Amendment 318 - ===
À relire
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 304 - ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 304'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 318'''<br/>
Gunnar Hökmark, Michał Boni, Krišjānis Kariņš, Bendt Bendtsen<br/>
+
Kaja Kallas<br/>
'''EPP'''<br/>
+
'''ALDE'''<br/>
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2
+
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 5
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(2) 'very high capacity network' means an electronic communications network which either consists wholly of optical fibre elements at least up to the distribution point at the serving location or which is capable of delivering under usual peak-time conditions '''''similar''''' network performance in terms of available down- and uplink bandwidth, resilience, error-related parameters, and latency and its variation. Network performance '''''can be considered similar''''' regardless of whether the end-user experience varies due to the inherently different characteristics of the medium by which the network ultimately connects with the network termination point.
+
(5) 'interpersonal communications service’ means a service normally provided for remuneration '''''that enables''''' direct interpersonal and interactive exchange of information via electronic communications networks between a finite number of persons, whereby the persons initiating or participating in the communication determine its recipient(s); '''''it does not include services which enable interpersonal and interactive communication merely as a minor ancillary feature that is intrinsically linked to another service;'''''
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(2) 'very high capacity network' means an electronic communications network which either consists wholly of optical fibre elements at least up to the distribution point at the serving location or '''''any network''''' which is capable of delivering under usual peak-time conditions '''''at least equally consistent and reliable''''' network performance in terms of available down- and uplink bandwidth, resilience, error-related parameters, and latency and its variation. Network performance '''''shall be assessed on the basis of technical parameters,''''' regardless of whether the end-user experience varies due to the inherently different characteristics of the medium by which the network ultimately connects with the network termination point.
+
(5) 'interpersonal communications service’ means a service normally provided for remuneration '''''where the principal purpose of the service is devoted to enabling''''' direct interpersonal and interactive exchange of information via electronic communications networks between a finite number of persons, whereby the persons initiating or participating in the communication determine its recipient(s);
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
| colspan='2' |
''Justification: The aim of the EECC is to incentivise the roll-out of infrastructure capable of delivering the speeds necessary to accelerate the transition to a 5G society. Thus, the definition must, while taking into account future technological developments, thereby maintaining the technology neutrality principle, strictly be limited to include only state of the art infrastructure.''
+
''Justification: In accordance with rule 104 of the rules of procedure, this amendment is necessary for pressing reasons related to the internal logic of the text''
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Pas de focus sur la QoS, la qualité seulement mesurée sur les paramètres du réseau
+
Excludes ancillary interpersonal communication services from the scope
  
 
+
=== Amendment 319 - ===
=== Amendment 305 - ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 305'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 319'''<br/>
Kaja Kallas<br/>
+
Barbara Kappel, Angelo Ciocca, Lorenzo Fontana<br/>
'''ALDE'''<br/>
+
'''ENF'''<br/>
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2
+
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 5
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(2) 'very high capacity network' means an electronic communications network which '''''either consists wholly of optical fibre elements at least up to the distribution point at the serving location or which''''' is capable of delivering under usual peak-time conditions '''''similar''''' network performance in terms of available down- and uplink bandwidth, resilience, error-related parameters, and latency and its variation. Network performance '''''can be considered similar regardless of whether the''''' end-user experience '''''varies''''' due to the inherently different characteristics of the medium by which the network ultimately connects with the network termination point.
+
(5) 'interpersonal communications service’ means '''''a''''' service normally provided for remuneration that enables direct interpersonal and interactive exchange of information via electronic communications networks between a finite number of persons, whereby the persons initiating or participating in the communication determine its recipient(s); it does not include services which enable interpersonal and interactive communication merely as a minor ancillary feature that is intrinsically linked to another service;
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(2) 'very high capacity network' means an electronic communications network which is capable of delivering under usual peak-time conditions network performance''''',''''' in terms of available down- and uplink bandwidth, resilience, error-related parameters, and latency and its variation''''', meeting the needs of the most demanding, digitally intensive end-users, and in particular a network consisting of optical elements at least up to the distribution point at the serving location'''''. Network performance '''''should be assessed without regard to variations in''''' end-user experience due to the inherently different characteristics of the medium by which the network ultimately connects with the network termination point.
+
(5) 'interpersonal communications service' means '''''an electronic communications''''' service '''''whose primary purpose is to enable''''' normally provided for remuneration that enables direct interpersonal and interactive exchange of information via electronic communications networks between a finite number of persons, whereby the persons initiating or participating in the communication determine its recipient(s); it does not include services which enable interpersonal and interactive communication merely as '''''an''''' a minor ancillary feature that is intrinsically linked to another service;
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
''Justification: In accordance with rule 104 of the rules of procedure, this amendment is necessary for pressing reasons related to the internal logic of the text''
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
QoS ? Pas sur, à relire
+
Excludes ancillary interpersonal communication services from the scope
  
  
=== Amendment 306 / ===
+
=== Amendment 325 - ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 306'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 325'''<br/>
Anna Záborská, Ivan Štefanec<br/>
+
Barbara Kappel, Angelo Ciocca, Lorenzo Fontana<br/>
'''EPP'''<br/>
+
'''ENF'''<br/>
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2
+
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 7
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(2) 'very high capacity network' means '''''an''''' electronic communications network which '''''either''''' consists wholly of optical fibre elements '''''at least up to the distribution point at the serving location or which is capable of delivering under usual peak-time conditions similar''''' network '''''performance''''' in terms of available down- and uplink bandwidth, resilience, error-related parameters, and latency and its variation. Network performance can be considered similar regardless of whether the end-user experience varies due to the inherently different characteristics of the medium by which the network ultimately connects with the network termination point.
+
(7) 'number-independent interpersonal communications service' means an interpersonal communications service which does not connect with the public switched telephone network, either by means of assigned numbering resources, i.e. a number or numbers in '''''national or international''''' telephone numbering '''''plans''''', or by enabling communication with a number or numbers in national or international telephone numbering plans;
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(2) 'very high capacity network' means '''''high speed''''' electronic communications network which consists wholly '''''or partly''''' of optical fibre elements '''''with sufficient capacity to allow unconstrained use of the''''' network in terms of available down- and uplink bandwidth, resilience, error-related parameters, and latency and its variation. Network performance can be considered similar regardless of whether the end-user experience varies due to the inherently different characteristics of the medium by which the network ultimately connects with the network termination point.
+
(7) 'number-independent interpersonal communications service' means an interpersonal communications service which does not connect with the public switched telephone network, either by means of assigned numbering resources, i.e. a number or numbers in '''''the national''''' telephone numbering '''''plan''''', or by enabling communication with a number or numbers in national or international telephone numbering plans; '''''it does not include information society services that allow interpersonal and interactive communication as a secondary feature;'''''
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Pas comprise et ça a pas l'air bon
+
Excludes information society services that allow interpersonal and interactive communication as a secondary feature from the scope
Quota : « partly » -> ça, ça ouvre la porte à définir comme réseau à haute capacité un truc avec 3 morceaux de fibres dedans, pas bon, je trouve.
 
  
=== Amendment 307 -- ===
+
 
 +
=== Amendment 333 ++ ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #A60000; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 307'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 333'''<br/>
Kathleen Van Brempt<br/>
+
Michel Reimon<br/>
'''S&D'''<br/>
+
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2
+
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 23
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(2) 'very high capacity network' means an electronic communications network which either consists wholly of optical fibre elements '''''at least up to the distribution point at the serving location or''''' which is capable of delivering under usual peak-time conditions similar network performance in terms of available down- and uplink bandwidth, resilience, error-related parameters, and latency and its variation. Network performance can be considered similar regardless of whether the end-user experience varies due to the inherently different characteristics of the medium by which the network ultimately connects with the network termination point.
+
(23) ‘general authorisation’ means a legal framework established by the Member State ensuring rights for the provision of electronic communications networks or services and laying down sector-specific obligations that may apply to all or to specific types of electronic communications networks and services, in accordance with this Directive.
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(2) 'very high capacity network' means an electronic communications network which either consists wholly '''''or partly''''' of optical fibre elements '''''and/or''''' which is capable of delivering under usual peak-time conditions similar network performance in terms of available down- and uplink bandwidth, resilience, error-related parameters, and latency and its variation. Network performance can be considered similar regardless of whether the end-user experience varies due to the inherently different characteristics of the medium by which the network ultimately connects with the network termination point.
+
(23) ‘general authorisation’ means a legal framework established by the Member State ensuring rights for the provision of electronic communications networks or services and laying down sector-specific obligations that may apply to all or to specific types of electronic communications networks and services, in accordance with this Directive''''', excluding not-for-profit-services provided by individuals'''''.
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Pas clair, dérégulation
+
Excluding not-for-profit-services provided by individuals is a way to enable innovation and development of services by individuals who would be discouraged from proposing services with administrative obligations
  
  
=== Amendment 308 + ===
+
=== Amendment 334 - ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 308'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 334'''<br/>
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Dan Nica, Edouard Martin, Theresa Griffin, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Jeppe Kofod<br/>
+
Barbara Kappel, Angelo Ciocca, Lorenzo Fontana<br/>
'''S&D'''<br/>
+
'''ENF'''<br/>
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2
+
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 26
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(2) 'very high capacity network' means an electronic communications network which either consists wholly of optical fibre elements at least up to the distribution point at the serving location or which is capable of delivering under usual peak-time conditions '''''similar''''' network performance in terms of available down- and uplink bandwidth, resilience, error-related parameters, and latency and its variation. Network performance can be considered similar regardless of whether the end-user experience varies due to the inherently different characteristics of the medium by which the network ultimately connects with the network termination point.
+
(26) 'shared use of radio spectrum' means access by two or more users to use the same frequencies under a defined sharing arrangement, authorised by a national regulatory authority on the basis of a general authorisation, individual rights of use or a combination thereof''''', including regulatory approaches such as licenced shared access aiming to facilitate the shared use of a frequency band, subject to a binding agreement of all parties involved, in accordance with sharing rules as included in their rights of use so as to guarantee to all users predictable and reliable sharing arrangements, and without prejudice to the application of competition law''''';
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(2) 'very high capacity network' means an electronic communications network which either consists wholly of optical fibre elements at least up to the distribution point at the serving location or which is capable of delivering under usual peak-time conditions '''''at least the same''''' network performance in terms of available down- and uplink bandwidth, resilience, error-related parameters, and latency and its variation. Network performance can be considered similar regardless of whether the end-user experience varies due to the inherently different characteristics of the medium by which the network ultimately connects with the network termination point.
+
(26) 'shared use of radio spectrum' means access by two or more users to use the same frequencies under a defined sharing arrangement, authorised by a national regulatory authority on the basis of a general authorisation, individual rights of use or a combination thereof;
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
''Justification: The word ‘similar’ is too subjective. We should ensure consistency with our objectives.''
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
QoS mais doit aller plus loin mais cet amendement renforcerait l'obligation de bonne gestion des interconnexions comme demandée par FFDN
+
This AM deletes the part that promotes the development of licenced shared access.
  
  
=== Amendment 310 / ===
+
=== Amendment 343 + ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 310'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 343'''<br/>
Henna Virkkunen<br/>
+
Kaja Kallas, Marietje Schaake<br/>
'''EPP'''<br/>
+
'''ALDE'''<br/>
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2
+
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
National regulatory and other competent authorities may contribute within their competencies to ensuring the implementation of policies aimed at the promotion of cultural and linguistic diversity, as well as media pluralism.
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
National regulatory and other competent authorities may contribute within their competencies to ensuring the implementation of policies aimed at the promotion of '''''freedom of expression and information,''''' cultural and linguistic diversity, as well as media pluralism.
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
| colspan='2' |
(2) 'very high capacity network' means an electronic communications network which either consists wholly of optical fibre elements '''''at least up to the distribution point at the serving location or''''' which is capable of delivering under usual peak-time conditions '''''similar network performance''''' in terms of available down- and uplink bandwidth, resilience, error-related parameters, and latency and its variation. Network performance can be considered similar regardless of whether the end-user experience varies due to the inherently different characteristics of the medium by which the network ultimately connects with the network termination point.
+
''Justification: In accordance with rule 104 of the rules of procedure, this amendment is necessary for pressing reasons related to the internal logic of the text''
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
(2) 'very high capacity network' means an electronic communications network which either consists wholly '''''or partly''''' of optical fibre elements '''''and''''' which is capable of delivering under usual peak-time conditions '''''high-performing broadband access services''''' in terms of available down- and uplink bandwidth, resilience, error-related parameters, and latency and its variation. Network performance can be considered similar regardless of whether the end-user experience varies due to the inherently different characteristics of the medium by which the network ultimately connects with the network termination point.
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Utilité ?
+
Promotes freedom of expression and information
  
  
=== Amendment 311 + ===
+
=== Amendment 344 + ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 311'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 344'''<br/>
Eva Kaili<br/>
+
Morten Helveg Petersen<br/>
'''S&D'''<br/>
+
'''ALDE'''<br/>
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2
+
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(2) 'very high capacity network' means an electronic communications network which either consists wholly of optical fibre elements at least up to the distribution point at the serving location or which is capable of delivering under usual peak-time conditions '''''similar''''' network performance in terms of available down- and uplink bandwidth, resilience, error-related parameters, and latency and its variation. Network performance can be considered similar regardless of whether the end-user experience varies due to the inherently different characteristics of the medium by which the network ultimately connects with the network termination point.
+
National regulatory and other competent authorities may contribute within their competencies to ensuring the implementation of policies aimed at the promotion of cultural and linguistic diversity, as well as media pluralism.
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(2) 'very high capacity network' means an electronic communications network which either consists wholly of optical fibre elements at least up to the distribution point at the serving location or which is capable of delivering under usual peak-time conditions '''''at least the same''''' network performance in terms of available down- and uplink bandwidth, resilience, error-related parameters, and latency and its variation. Network performance can be considered similar regardless of whether the end-user experience varies due to the inherently different characteristics of the medium by which the network ultimately connects with the network termination point.
+
National regulatory and other competent authorities may contribute within their competencies to ensuring the implementation of policies aimed at the '''''protection of personal data and privacy, the''''' promotion of cultural and linguistic diversity, as well as media pluralism.
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Pareil que le 308
+
Promotes the protection of personal data and privacy
  
  
=== Amendment 312 / ===
+
=== Amendment 345 + ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 312'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 345'''<br/>
Edouard Martin<br/>
+
Michel Reimon<br/>
'''S&D'''<br/>
+
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2
+
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
National regulatory and other competent authorities '''''may''''' contribute within their competencies to ensuring the implementation of policies aimed at the promotion of cultural and linguistic diversity, as well as media pluralism.
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
National regulatory and other competent authorities '''''shall''''' contribute within their competencies to ensuring the implementation of policies aimed at the promotion of cultural and linguistic diversity, as well as media pluralism.
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
| colspan='2' |
(2) 'very high capacity network' means an electronic communications network which either consists wholly of optical fibre elements at least up to the '''''distribution point at the serving location''''' or which is capable of delivering under usual peak-time conditions similar network performance in terms of available down- and uplink bandwidth, resilience, error-related parameters, and latency and its variation. Network performance can be considered similar regardless of whether the end-user experience varies due to the inherently different characteristics of the medium by which the network ultimately connects with the network termination point.
+
''Justification: Despite the fact that the Directive does not lay down substantive rules regarding content and only on networks and services, national authorities need to play close attention to the impact that markets have on each other. The degree of competition in telecommunications markets can significantly impact media and content pluralism in Europe, reducing consumers’ ability to access the content and services of their choice.''
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
(2) 'very high capacity network' means an electronic communications network which either consists wholly of optical fibre elements at least up to the '''''premises''''' or which is capable of delivering under usual peak-time conditions '''''at least''''' similar network performance in terms of available down- and uplink bandwidth, resilience, error-related parameters, and latency and its variation. Network performance can be considered similar regardless of whether the end-user experience varies due to the inherently different characteristics of the medium by which the network ultimately connects with the network termination point.
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Fibrage type FTTH (premises?) + QoS idem 308 et 311
+
This AM give the NRAs the obligation to take into account policies such as media pluralism
  
  
=== Amendment 313 + ===
+
=== Amendment 346 + ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 313'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 346'''<br/>
Anne Sander, Françoise Grossetête<br/>
+
José Blanco López, Inmaculada Rodríguez-Piñero Fernández, Soledad Cabezón Ruiz<br/>
'''EPP'''<br/>
+
'''S&D'''<br/>
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2
+
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
National regulatory and other competent authorities '''''may''''' contribute within their competencies to ensuring the implementation of policies aimed at the promotion of cultural and linguistic diversity, as well as media pluralism.
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
National regulatory and other competent authorities '''''shall''''' contribute within their competencies to ensuring the implementation of policies aimed at the promotion of cultural and linguistic diversity, as well as media pluralism.
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
| colspan='2' |
(2) 'very high capacity network' means an electronic communications network which either consists wholly of optical fibre elements at least up to the '''''distribution point at the serving location''''' or which is capable of delivering under usual peak-time conditions '''''similar''''' network performance in terms of available down- and uplink bandwidth, resilience, error-related parameters, and latency and its variation. Network performance can be considered similar regardless of whether the end-user experience varies due to the inherently different characteristics of the medium by which the network ultimately connects with the network termination point.
+
''Justification: This provision aims at ensuring a strong commitment of NRA and other competent authorities with the promotion of cultural and linguistic diversity, and media pluralism.''
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
(2) 'very high capacity network' means an electronic communications network which either consists wholly of optical fibre elements at least up to the '''''premises''''' or which is capable of delivering under usual peak-time conditions '''''at least the same''''' network performance in terms of available down- and uplink bandwidth, resilience, error-related parameters, and latency and its variation. Network performance can be considered similar regardless of whether the end-user experience varies due to the inherently different characteristics of the medium by which the network ultimately connects with the network termination point.
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Pareil 308, 311
+
Same as AM 344 -  This AM give the NRAs the obligation to take into account policies such as media pluralism
  
  
=== Amendment 315 / ===
+
=== Amendment 347 + ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 315'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 347'''<br/>
Anne Sander, Françoise Grossetête<br/>
+
David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano<br/>
'''EPP'''<br/>
+
'''EFDD'''<br/>
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4
+
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
|-
+
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(4) ‘electronic communications service’ means a service normally provided for remuneration via electronic communications networks, which encompasses 'internet access service' as defined in Article 2(2) of Regulation (EU) 2015/2120; and/or 'interpersonal communications service'; and/or services consisting wholly or mainly in the conveyance of signals such as transmission services used for the provision of machine-to-machine services and for broadcasting, but excludes services providing, or exercising editorial control over, content transmitted using electronic communications networks and services;
+
National regulatory and other competent authorities '''''may''''' contribute within their competencies to ensuring the implementation of policies aimed at the promotion of cultural and linguistic diversity, as well as media pluralism.
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(4) ‘electronic communications service’ means a service normally provided for remuneration via electronic communications networks, which encompasses 'internet access service' as defined in Article 2(2) of Regulation (EU) 2015/2120; and/or 'interpersonal communications service'; and/or services consisting wholly or mainly in the conveyance of signals such as transmission services used for the provision of machine-to-machine services and for broadcasting, but excludes '''''interpersonal communication services as defined in paragraph (5) of the present Article, information society services, as defined in Article 1 of Directive 98/34/EC and''''' services providing, or exercising editorial control over, content transmitted using electronic communications networks and services;
+
National regulatory and other competent authorities '''''shall''''' contribute within their competencies to ensuring the implementation of policies aimed at the promotion of cultural and linguistic diversity, as well as media pluralism.
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
| colspan='2' |
''Justification: To ensure legal certainty and a level playing field between providers of "electronic communications service," the aim of this amendment is to clarify that the scope of the third category of Electronic Communications Services “consisting wholly or mainly in the conveyance of signal” only concerns pure transmission services, excluding services which qualify as Interpersonal Communication Services or as Information Society Services notably subject to the e-commerce directive.''
+
''Justification: National authorities need to play close attention to the impact that markets have on each other.''
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Pas compris
+
Same as AM 344 -  This AM give the NRAs the obligation to take into account policies such as media pluralism
  
  
=== Amendment 316 ++ ===
+
=== Amendment 348 + ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 316'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 348'''<br/>
Michel Reimon<br/>
+
Pervenche Berès<br/>
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
+
'''S&D'''<br/>
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4
+
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
(4) ‘electronic communications service’ means a service '''''normally''''' provided for remuneration via electronic communications networks, which encompasses 'internet access service' as defined in Article 2(2) of Regulation (EU) 2015/2120; and/or 'interpersonal communications service'; and/or services consisting wholly or mainly in the conveyance of signals such as transmission services used for the provision of machine-to-machine services and for broadcasting, but excludes services providing, or exercising editorial control over, content transmitted using electronic communications networks and services;
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
(4) ‘electronic communications service’ means a service provided for remuneration via electronic communications networks, which encompasses 'internet access service' as defined in Article 2(2) of Regulation (EU) 2015/2120; and/or 'interpersonal communications service'; and/or services consisting wholly or mainly in the conveyance of signals such as transmission services used for the provision of machine-to-machine services and for broadcasting, but excludes services providing, or exercising editorial control over, content transmitted using electronic communications networks and services '''''as well as not-for-profit-services provided by individuals''''';
 
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' |
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
''Justification: Individuals participating in a not-for-profit network (such as radio local area networks) or providing not-for-profit services shall not be subject to the obligations imposed on legal persons providing networks or services. Specifically, the strict obligations provided by the Directive 2002/58/CE would be disproportionate and impracticable if imposed on individual volunteers, who should only be subject to the obligations set by the General Data Protection Regulation.''
+
Les autorités de régulation nationales et les autres autorités compétentes '''''peuvent contribuer''''', dans la limite de leurs compétences, à la mise en œuvre des politiques visant à promouvoir la diversité culturelle et linguistique ainsi que le pluralisme dans les médias.
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
Les autorités de régulation nationales et les autres autorités compétentes '''''contribuent''''', dans la limite de leurs compétences, à la mise en œuvre des politiques visant à promouvoir la diversité culturelle et linguistique ainsi que le pluralisme dans les médias.
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
inclusion des non-profit
+
Same as AM 344 - This AM give the NRAs the obligation to take into account policies such as media pluralism
  
  
=== Amendment 317 / ===
+
=== Amendment 356 + ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 317'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 356'''<br/>
Evžen Tošenovský<br/>
+
Michel Reimon<br/>
'''ECR'''<br/>
+
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4
+
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point a
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
(a) promote '''''access to, and take-up of,''''' very high capacity data connectivity, both fixed and mobile, by all Union citizens and businesses;
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
(a) promote '''''the availability and affordability of and access to''''' very high capacity data connectivity, both fixed and mobile '''''and of interpersonal communications services''''', by all Union citizens and businesses;
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
| colspan='2' |
(4) ‘electronic communications service’ means a service normally provided for remuneration via electronic communications networks, which encompasses 'internet access service' as defined in Article 2(2) of Regulation (EU) 2015/2120; and/or 'interpersonal communications service'; and/or services consisting wholly '''''or mainly''''' in the conveyance of signals such as transmission '''''services''''' used for the provision of machine-to-machine services and for broadcasting, but excludes services providing, or exercising editorial control over, content transmitted using electronic communications networks and services;
+
''Justification: In a market economy where consumers can leverage their collective power, it should always be them (and not governments, regulators or companies) who freely decide whether they want to take up a new service or not. The objective of EU telecom regulation has always been to guide regulatory intervention towards the offer side of the market, ensuring wholesale and retail competition, and the availability of services and networks. If regulation would aim to guide the demand side of the market too, it could condition the promotion of efficiency, transparency and fairness in markets, and of consumer protection. The regulatory framework must therefore continue focusing on availability and affordability of services.''
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
(4) 'electronic communications service' means a '''''publicly available''''' service normally provided for remuneration via electronic communications networks, which encompasses 'internet access service' as defined in Article 2(2) of Regulation (EU) 2015/2120; and/or 'interpersonal communications service'; and/or services consisting wholly in the conveyance of signals such as transmission '''''of signals''''' used for the provision of machine-to-machine services and for broadcasting, but excludes services providing, or exercising editorial control over, content transmitted using electronic communications networks and services;
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
 
+
=== Amendment 357 + ===
Pas compris
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 318 / ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 318'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 357'''<br/>
Kaja Kallas<br/>
+
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Dan Nica, Edouard Martin, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Jeppe Kofod<br/>
'''ALDE'''<br/>
+
'''S&D'''<br/>
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 5
+
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point a
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(5) 'interpersonal communications service’ means a service normally provided for remuneration '''''that enables''''' direct interpersonal and interactive exchange of information via electronic communications networks between a finite number of persons, whereby the persons initiating or participating in the communication determine its recipient(s); '''''it does not include services which enable interpersonal and interactive communication merely as a minor ancillary feature that is intrinsically linked to another service;'''''
+
(a) promote access to, and take-up of, very high capacity data connectivity, both fixed and mobile, by all Union citizens and businesses;
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(5) 'interpersonal communications service’ means a service normally provided for remuneration '''''where the principal purpose of the service is devoted to enabling''''' direct interpersonal and interactive exchange of information via electronic communications networks between a finite number of persons, whereby the persons initiating or participating in the communication determine its recipient(s);
+
(a) promote '''''the availability and affordability of and''''' access to, and take-up of, very high capacity data connectivity, both fixed and mobile, by all Union citizens and businesses;
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
| colspan='2' |
''Justification: In accordance with rule 104 of the rules of procedure, this amendment is necessary for pressing reasons related to the internal logic of the text''
+
''Justification: Both availability and affordability are important for bridging digital divide.''
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Pas sur
+
Same as 356
  
 +
=== Amendment 363 - ===
  
 +
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 +
|-
 +
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
 +
'''Amendment 363'''<br/>
 +
Anne Sander, Françoise Grossetête<br/>
 +
'''EPP'''<br/>
 +
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point b
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
(b) promote competition in the provision of electronic communications networks and associated facilities, including efficient infrastructure-based competition, and in the provision of electronic communications services and associated services;
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
(b) promote '''''sustainable''''' competition in the provision of electronic communications networks and associated facilities, including efficient infrastructure-based competition, and in the provision of electronic communications services and associated services;
 +
|}
  
=== Amendment 319 / ===
+
=== Amendment 382 + ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 319'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 382'''<br/>
Barbara Kappel, Angelo Ciocca, Lorenzo Fontana<br/>
+
Michel Reimon<br/>
'''ENF'''<br/>
+
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 5
+
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – point f
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(5) 'interpersonal communications service’ means '''''a''''' service normally provided for remuneration that enables direct interpersonal and interactive exchange of information via electronic communications networks between a finite number of persons, whereby the persons initiating or participating in the communication determine its recipient(s); it does not include services which enable interpersonal and interactive communication merely as a minor ancillary feature that is intrinsically linked to another service;
+
'''''(f)''''' '''''imposing ex ante regulatory obligations only to the extent necessary to secure effective and sustainable competition on the retail market concerned and relaxing or lifting such obligations as soon as that condition is fulfilled.'''''
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(5) 'interpersonal communications service' means '''''an electronic communications''''' service '''''whose primary purpose is to enable''''' normally provided for remuneration that enables direct interpersonal and interactive exchange of information via electronic communications networks between a finite number of persons, whereby the persons initiating or participating in the communication determine its recipient(s); it does not include services which enable interpersonal and interactive communication merely as '''''an''''' a minor ancillary feature that is intrinsically linked to another service;
+
'''''deleted'''''
 
|}
 
|}
  
 
+
=== Amendment 392 + ===
Primar purpose pour la communication électronique mais quid des autres services ? Qu'est-ce une communication électronique ?
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 320 / ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 320'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 392'''<br/>
Evžen Tošenovský<br/>
+
Morten Helveg Petersen<br/>
'''ECR'''<br/>
+
'''ALDE'''<br/>
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 5
+
Article 4 – paragraph 1
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
1. Member States shall cooperate with each other and with the Commission in the strategic planning, coordination and harmonisation of the use of radio spectrum in the Union. To this end, they shall take into consideration, inter alia, the economic, safety, health, public interest, public security and defence, freedom of expression, cultural, scientific, social and technical aspects of EU policies as well as the various interests of radio spectrum user communities with the aim of optimising the use of radio spectrum and avoiding harmful interference.
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
1. Member States shall cooperate with each other and with the Commission in the strategic planning, coordination and harmonisation of the use of radio spectrum in the Union. To this end, they shall take into consideration, inter alia, the economic, safety, health, public interest, public security and defence, '''''data protection and privacy,''''' freedom of expression, cultural, scientific, social and technical aspects of EU policies as well as the various interests of radio spectrum user communities with the aim of optimising the use of radio spectrum and avoiding harmful interference.
 +
|}
 +
 
 +
 
 +
Includes data protection
 +
 
 +
 
 +
=== Amendment 393 - ===
 +
 
 +
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 +
|-
 +
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
 +
'''Amendment 393'''<br/>
 +
Barbara Kappel, Angelo Ciocca, Lorenzo Fontana<br/>
 +
'''ENF'''<br/>
 +
Article 4 – paragraph 1
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(5) 'interpersonal communications service’ means '''''a''''' service normally provided for '''''remuneration''''' that enables direct interpersonal and interactive exchange of information via electronic communications networks between a finite number of persons, whereby the persons initiating or participating in the communication determine its recipient(s); it does not include services which enable interpersonal and interactive communication merely as a minor ancillary feature that is intrinsically linked to another service;
+
1. Member States shall cooperate with each other and with the Commission in the strategic planning, coordination and harmonisation of the use of radio spectrum '''''in the Union. To this end, they shall''''' take into consideration, inter alia, the economic, safety, health, public interest, public security and defence, freedom of expression, cultural, scientific, social and technical aspects of EU policies as well as the various interests of radio spectrum user communities with the aim of optimising the use of radio spectrum and avoiding harmful interference.
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(5) 'interpersonal communications service' means '''''an electronic communications''''' service normally provided for '''''remunerations''''' that enables direct interpersonal and interactive exchange of information via electronic communications networks between a finite number of persons, whereby the persons initiating or participating in the communication determine its recipient(s); it does not include services which enable interpersonal and interactive communication merely as a minor ancillary feature that is intrinsically linked to another service;
+
1. Member States shall cooperate with each other and with the Commission in the strategic planning, coordination and harmonisation of the use of radio spectrum''''', a scarce resource that belongs to the Member States. They might''''' take into consideration, inter alia, the economic, safety, health, public interest, public security and defence, freedom of expression, cultural, scientific, social and technical aspects of EU policies as well as the various interests of radio spectrum user communities with the aim of optimising the use of radio spectrum and avoiding harmful interference.
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Forme, précision sur "electronic"
+
We promotes the shared spectrum => emphasizing that spectrum belongs to the MS would diminish the scope and possibility to develop the shared spectrum.
  
  
=== Amendment 321 + ===
+
=== Amendment 403 + ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 321'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 403'''<br/>
 
Michel Reimon<br/>
 
Michel Reimon<br/>
 
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
 
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 5
+
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – indent 8
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(5) 'interpersonal communications service’ means a service '''''normally''''' provided for remuneration that enables direct interpersonal and interactive exchange of information via electronic communications networks between a finite number of persons, whereby the persons initiating or participating in the communication determine its recipient(s); it does not include services which enable interpersonal and interactive communication merely as a minor ancillary feature that is intrinsically linked to another service;
+
- '''''dealing with issues''''' related to open internet access;
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(5) 'interpersonal communications service’ means a service provided for remuneration that enables direct interpersonal and interactive exchange of information via electronic communications networks between a finite number of persons, whereby the persons initiating or participating in the communication determine its recipient(s); it does not include services which enable interpersonal and interactive communication merely as a minor ancillary feature that is intrinsically linked to another service;
+
- '''''ensuring compliance with rules''''' related to open internet access;
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Retrait de "normally", précision
+
Reinforce the importance of the open internet access rules
  
  
=== Amendment 322 / ===
+
=== Amendment 404 + ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 322'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 404'''<br/>
Kaja Kallas<br/>
+
Eva Kaili<br/>
'''ALDE'''<br/>
+
'''S&D'''<br/>
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 6
+
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – indent 8
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
(6) ‘number-based interpersonal communications service’ means an interpersonal communications service which connects with the public switched telephone network, either by means of assigned numbering resources, i.e. a number or numbers in national or international telephone numbering plans, or by enabling communication with a number or numbers in national or international telephone numbering plans;
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
(6) ‘number-based interpersonal communications service’ means an interpersonal communications service which connects with the public switched telephone network, either by means of assigned numbering resources, i.e. a number or numbers in national or international telephone numbering plans, or by enabling communication with a number or numbers in national or international telephone numbering plans''''', and where the provider of the service has substantial control over the network used for enabling the communication''''' ;
 
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' |
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
''Justification: There is a need to differentiate between services delivered over their own infrastructure and therefore can control the quality of the service and services which do not have such a control. In accordance with rule 104 of the rules of procedure, this amendment is necessary for pressing reasons related to the internal logic of the text''
+
- '''''dealing with issues''''' related to open internet access;
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
- '''''ensuring compliance with rules''''' related to open internet access;
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Pas compris, quelle contrôle "significant" pour les MVNO ?
+
Same as 403 - Reinforce the importance of the open internet access rules
  
  
=== Amendment 323 / ===
+
=== Amendment 415 ++ ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 323'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 415'''<br/>
Barbara Kappel, Angelo Ciocca, Lorenzo Fontana<br/>
+
Michel Reimon<br/>
'''ENF'''<br/>
+
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 6
+
Article 10 – paragraph 2 a (new)
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
 
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
'''''2 a.''''' '''''Member States shall ensure that national regulatory authorities apply Regulation 2015/2120 and BEREC Guidelines adopted pursuant to Article 5.3 of the abovementioned Regulation and coordinate within BEREC with other national regulatory authorities when implementing it.'''''
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
| colspan='2' |
(6) ‘number-based interpersonal communications service’ means an interpersonal communications service '''''which connects with the public switched telephone network, either''''' by means of '''''assigned numbering resources, i.e.''''' a number '''''or numbers in national or international''''' telephone numbering '''''plans, or by enabling communication with''''' a number or numbers in national or international telephone numbering plans;
+
''Justification: The implementation of the regulation 2015/2120 is made on a national basis without any coordination of national regulation authorities, despite the BEREC guidelines.A harmonised implementation within the EU is of the utmost importance for predictability of law and for ensuring end-users rights.''
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
(6) 'number-based interpersonal communications service' means an interpersonal communications service '''''for receiving communications''''' by means of '''''an assignment of''''' a number '''''in the national''''' telephone numbering '''''plan, or for originating communications to''''' a number or numbers in national or international telephone numbering plans;
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Précision sur la définition de number-based service, à confirmer avec notre position
+
The implementation of the regulation 2015/2120 is made on a national basis without any coordination of national regulation authorities, despite the BEREC guidelines. A harmonised implementation within the EU is of the utmost importance for predictability of law and for ensuring end-users rights.
  
  
=== Amendment 324 / ===
+
=== Amendment 417 ++ ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 324'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 417'''<br/>
Kaja Kallas<br/>
+
Morten Helveg Petersen<br/>
 
'''ALDE'''<br/>
 
'''ALDE'''<br/>
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 7
+
Article 12 – paragraph 1
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
1. Member States shall ensure the freedom to provide electronic communications networks and services, subject to the conditions set out in this Directive. To this end, Member States shall not prevent an undertaking from providing electronic communications networks or services, except where this is necessary for the reasons set out in Article 52 (1) of the Treaty. Any such limitation to the freedom to provide electronic communications networks and services shall be duly reasoned '''''and shall be''''' notified to the Commission.
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
1. Member States shall ensure the freedom to provide electronic communications networks and services, subject to the conditions set out in this Directive. To this end, Member States shall not prevent an undertaking from providing electronic communications networks or services, except where this is necessary for the reasons set out in Article 52 (1) of the Treaty. Any such limitation to the freedom to provide electronic communications networks and services shall be duly reasoned''''', provided for by law, respect the essence of the rights and freedoms recognised by the Charter and be subject to the principle of proportionality, in accordance with Article 52 (1) of the Charter and''''' notified to the Commission.
 +
|}
 +
 
 +
=== Amendment 420 - ===
 +
 
 +
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 +
|-
 +
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
 +
'''Amendment 420'''<br/>
 +
Michał Boni, Françoise Grossetête, Anne Sander<br/>
 +
'''EPP'''<br/>
 +
Article 18 – paragraph 1
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(7) 'number-independent interpersonal communications service' means an interpersonal communications service which does not connect with the public switched telephone network, either by means of assigned numbering resources, i.e. a number or numbers in national or international telephone numbering plans, or by enabling communication with a number or numbers in national or international telephone numbering plans;
+
1. Member States shall ensure that the rights, conditions and procedures concerning general authorisations and rights of use for radio spectrum or for numbers or rights to install facilities may only be amended in objectively justified cases and in a proportionate manner, taking into consideration, where appropriate, the specific conditions applicable to transferable rights of use for radio spectrum and for numbers.
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(7) 'number-independent interpersonal communications service' means an interpersonal communications service which does not connect with the public switched telephone network, either by means of assigned numbering resources, i.e. a number or numbers in national or international telephone numbering plans, or by enabling communication with a number or numbers in national or international telephone numbering plans '''''or where a number-based interpersonal communication service provider does not have substantial control over the network used for enabling the communication''''';
+
1. Member States shall ensure that the rights, conditions and procedures concerning general authorisations and rights of use for radio spectrum or for numbers or rights to install facilities may only be amended in objectively justified cases and in a proportionate manner, taking into consideration, where appropriate, the specific conditions applicable to transferable rights of use for radio spectrum and for numbers. '''''In the case of right of use for spectrum, the right holder shall have the right to object to any proposed amendment based on its existing and future spectrum usage plan and the need to safeguard investment.'''''
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
| colspan='2' |
''Justification: There is a need to differentiate between services delivered over their own infrastructure and therefore can control the quality of the service and services which do not have such a control. In accordance with rule 104 of the rules of procedure, this amendment is necessary for pressing reasons related to the internal logic of the text''
+
''Justification: Legal certainty as to spectrum usage rights is key to the promotion of investment in mobile networks and in particular in the next generation of mobile, 5G. It is proposed that operators be given the opportunity of objecting to spectrum rights changes on the basis of limited conditions such as future networks spectrum usage plans and the need to safeguard investment not yet fully depreciated.''
 
|}
 
|}
  
 
+
=== Amendment 430 + ===
Inverse du 322, à revoir
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 325 / ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 325'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 430'''<br/>
Barbara Kappel, Angelo Ciocca, Lorenzo Fontana<br/>
+
José Blanco López, Inmaculada Rodríguez-Piñero Fernández, Soledad Cabezón Ruiz<br/>
'''ENF'''<br/>
+
'''S&D'''<br/>
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 7
+
Article 20 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
Member States shall ensure that '''''undertakings providing electronic communications networks and services associated facilities, or associated services provide all the''''' information, including financial information, '''''necessary for national regulatory authorities, other competent authorities and BEREC to''''' ensure conformity with the provisions of, or decisions made in accordance with, this Directive. In particular, national regulatory authorities shall have the power to require those undertakings to submit information concerning '''''future''''' network or service developments that could have an impact on the wholesale services that they make available to competitors. They may also require information on electronic communications networks and associated facilities which is disaggregated at local level and sufficiently detailed for the national regulatory authority to be able to conduct the geographical survey and to designate digital exclusion areas in accordance with Article 22. '''''In accordance with Article 29, national regulatory authorities may sanction undertakings deliberately providing misleading, erroneous or incomplete information.'''''
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
Member States shall ensure that '''''national regulatory authorities, other competent authorities and BEREC have legal powers to request''''' information, including financial information, '''''from all relevant parties necessary to fulfilling their tasks and''''' ensure conformity with the provisions of, or decisions made in accordance with, this Directive. In particular, national regulatory authorities shall have the power to require those undertakings to submit information concerning network or service developments that could have an impact on the wholesale services that they make available to competitors. They may also require information on electronic communications networks and associated facilities which is disaggregated at local level and sufficiently detailed for the national regulatory authority to be able to conduct the geographical survey and to designate digital exclusion areas in accordance with Article 22.
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
| colspan='2' |
(7) 'number-independent interpersonal communications service' means an interpersonal communications service which does not connect with the public switched telephone network, either by means of assigned numbering resources, i.e. a number or numbers in '''''national or international''''' telephone numbering '''''plans''''', or by enabling communication with a number or numbers in national or international telephone numbering plans;
+
''Justification: NRAs should have legal powers to request information to carry out their duties from any undertaking, whether or not it is defined as Electronic Communication Network/Service provider. This information is particularly relevant for market analyses''
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
(7) 'number-independent interpersonal communications service' means an interpersonal communications service which does not connect with the public switched telephone network, either by means of assigned numbering resources, i.e. a number or numbers in '''''the national''''' telephone numbering '''''plan''''', or by enabling communication with a number or numbers in national or international telephone numbering plans; '''''it does not include information society services that allow interpersonal and interactive communication as a secondary feature;'''''
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Exclusion de services dont la communication est un "secondary feature". A confirmer
+
This AM reinforces the powers of NRAs to request information.
  
  
=== Amendment 326 - ===
+
=== Amendment 565 ++ ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 326'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 565'''<br/>
Evžen Tošenovský<br/>
+
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Dan Nica, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Jeppe Kofod, Martina Werner<br/>
'''ECR'''<br/>
+
'''S&D'''<br/>
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 11
+
Article 40 – paragraph 1
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
1. Member States shall ensure that undertakings providing public communications networks or publicly available electronic communications services take appropriate technical and organisational measures to appropriately manage the risks posed to security of networks and services. Having regard to the state of the art, these measures shall ensure a level of security appropriate to the risk presented. In particular, measures shall be taken to prevent and minimise the impact of security incidents on users and on other networks and services.
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
1. Member States shall ensure that undertakings providing public communications networks or publicly available electronic communications services take appropriate technical and organisational measures to appropriately manage the risks posed to security of networks and services. Having regard to the state of the art, these measures shall ensure a level of security appropriate to the risk presented. In particular, measures shall be taken to '''''ensure that, when necessary for confidentiality, electronic communications content is encrypted from end-to-end by default, in order to''''' prevent and minimise the impact of security incidents on users and on other networks and services.
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
| colspan='2' |
(11) ‘associated services’ means those services associated with an electronic communications network and/or an electronic communications service which enable and/or support the provision of services''''', self-provision or automated-provision''''' via that network and/or service or have the potential to do so and include, inter alia, number translation or systems offering equivalent functionality, conditional access systems and electronic programme guides, '''''voice command, multi-language or language translation''''' as well as other services such as identity, location and presence service;
+
''Justification: Encrypting communications content from end to end by default is the best way to effectively minimise the impact of security incidents.''
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
(11) 'associated services' means those services associated with an electronic communications network and/or an electronic communications service which enable and/or support the provision of services via that network and/or service or have the potential to do so and include, inter alia, number translation or systems offering equivalent functionality, conditional access systems and electronic programme guides, as well as other services such as identity, location and presence service;
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Dérégulation
+
Encrypting communications content from end to end by default is the best way to effectively minimise the impact of security incidents.
  
  
=== Amendment 327 + ===
+
=== Amendment 566 ++ ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 327'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 566'''<br/>
Barbara Kappel, Angelo Ciocca, Lorenzo Fontana<br/>
+
Eva Kaili<br/>
'''ENF'''<br/>
+
'''S&D'''<br/>
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 15 a (new)
+
Article 40 – paragraph 1
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 
+
1. Member States shall ensure that undertakings providing public communications networks or publicly available electronic communications services take appropriate technical and organisational measures to appropriately manage the risks posed to security of networks and services. Having regard to the state of the art, these measures shall ensure a level of security appropriate to the risk presented. In particular, measures shall be taken to prevent and minimise the impact of security incidents on users and on other networks and services.
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
'''''(15 a)''''' ''''''subscriber' means any person or legal entity who or which is party to a contract with the provider of publicly available electronic communications services for the supply of such services;'''''
+
1. Member States shall ensure that undertakings providing public communications networks or publicly available electronic communications services take appropriate technical and organisational measures to appropriately manage the risks posed to security of networks and services. Having regard to the state of the art, these measures shall ensure a level of security appropriate to the risk presented. In particular, measures shall be taken to '''''ensure that, when necessary for confidentiality, electronic communications content is encrypted from end-to-end by default, in order to''''' prevent and minimise the impact of security incidents on users and on other networks and services.
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Définition de subscriber
+
Encrypting communications content from end to end by default is the best way to effectively minimise the impact of security incidents.
  
  
=== Amendment 328 + ===
+
=== Amendment 567 ++ ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 328'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 567'''<br/>
 
Michel Reimon<br/>
 
Michel Reimon<br/>
 
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
 
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 20
+
Article 40 – paragraph 1
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
1. Member States shall ensure that undertakings providing public communications networks or publicly available electronic communications services take appropriate technical and organisational measures to appropriately manage the risks posed to security of networks and services. Having regard to the state of the art, these measures shall ensure a level of security appropriate to the risk presented. In particular, measures shall be taken to prevent and minimise the impact of security incidents on users and on other networks and services.
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
1. Member States shall ensure that undertakings providing public communications networks or publicly available electronic communications services take appropriate technical and organisational measures to '''''ensure that electronic communications content are encrypted from end-to-end by default, in order to''''' appropriately manage the risks posed to security of networks and services. Having regard to the state of the art, these measures shall ensure a level of security appropriate to the risk presented. In particular, measures shall be taken to prevent and minimise the impact of security incidents on users and on other networks and services.
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
| colspan='2' |
(20) ‘harmful interference’ means interference which endangers the functioning of a radio navigation service or of other safety services or which otherwise seriously degrades, obstructs or repeatedly interrupts a radio communications service operating in accordance with the applicable international, Union or national regulations;
+
''Justification: Encrypting communications content from end to end by default is the only way to effectively minimise the impact of security incidents. Any other measure would barely has any effect.Furthermore, such an obligation would be the mere implementation of Directive 2002/58/EC, article 5(1), which prohibits any “kinds of interception or surveillance of communications (...) by persons other than users, without the consent of the users concerned”.''
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
(20) ‘harmful interference’ means interference which endangers the functioning of a radio navigation service or of other safety '''''and mission-critical''''' services or which otherwise seriously degrades, obstructs or repeatedly interrupts a radio communications service operating in accordance with the applicable international, Union or national regulations;
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Service de sécurité et d'urgence
+
Encrypting communications content from end to end by default is the best way to effectively minimise the impact of security incidents.
  
  
=== Amendment 329 + ===
+
=== Amendment 568 ++ ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 329'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 568'''<br/>
Françoise Grossetête, Anne Sander<br/>
+
Kaja Kallas, Marietje Schaake<br/>
'''EPP'''<br/>
+
'''ALDE'''<br/>
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 20
+
Article 40 – paragraph 1
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(20) ‘harmful interference’ means interference which endangers the functioning of a radio navigation service or of other safety services or which otherwise seriously degrades, obstructs or repeatedly interrupts a radio communications service operating in accordance with the applicable international, Union or national regulations;
+
1. Member States shall ensure that undertakings providing public communications networks or publicly available electronic communications services take appropriate technical and organisational measures to appropriately manage the risks posed to security of networks and services. Having regard to the state of the art, these measures shall ensure a level of security appropriate to the risk presented. In particular, measures shall be taken to prevent and minimise the impact of security incidents on users and on other networks and services.
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(20) ‘harmful interference’ means interference which endangers the functioning of a radio navigation service or of other safety '''''and mission-critical''''' services or which otherwise seriously degrades, obstructs or repeatedly interrupts a radio communications service operating in accordance with the applicable international, Union or national regulations;
+
1. Member States shall ensure that undertakings providing public communications networks or publicly available electronic communications services take appropriate technical and organisational measures to appropriately manage the risks posed to security of networks and services. Having regard to the state of the art, these measures shall ensure a level of security appropriate to the risk presented. In particular, measures shall be taken to '''''ensure that electronic communications content are encrypted from end-to-end by default, in order to''''' prevent and minimise the impact of security incidents on users and on other networks and services.
|}
+
|-
 +
| colspan='2' |
 +
''Justification: In accordance with rule 104 of the rules of procedure, this amendment is necessary for pressing reasons related to the internal logic of the text''
 +
|}
  
  
Idem 328
+
Encrypting communications content from end to end by default is the best way to effectively minimise the impact of security incidents.
  
  
=== Amendment 330 + ===
+
=== Amendment 570 + ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 330'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 570'''<br/>
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Dan Nica, Edouard Martin, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Jeppe Kofod, Martina Werner<br/>
+
Kaja Kallas, Marietje Schaake<br/>
'''S&D'''<br/>
+
'''ALDE'''<br/>
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 20
+
Article 40 – paragraph 1 a (new)
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(20) ‘harmful interference’ means interference which endangers the functioning of a radio navigation service or of other safety services or which otherwise seriously degrades, obstructs or repeatedly interrupts a radio communications service operating in accordance with the applicable international, Union or national regulations;
+
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(20) 'harmful interference' means interference which endangers the functioning of a radio navigation service or of other safety '''''and mission-critical''''' services or which otherwise seriously degrades, obstructs or repeatedly interrupts a radio communications service operating in accordance with the applicable international, Union or national regulations;
+
'''''1 a.''''' '''''Member States shall not impose any obligation to undertakings providing public communications networks or publicly available electronic communications services that would result in the weakening of the security of their networks and services.'''''
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
''Justification: ERTMS is the European railway traffic management system controlling the spacing between trains and the respect of their speed limitation; thus providing safety-related mission-critical services to railway operations. It relies on a radio-based communication service. On-board ERTMS subsystems shall be protected against interference, fulfilling the requirements specified in Annex A of the technical specification for interoperability relating to the ‘control-command and signalling’ subsystems of the rail system in the European Union (EU) 2016 919, which otherwise would seriously endanger the functioning of ERTMS.''
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
 
+
=== Amendment 575 + ===
Idem 328, 329
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 331 + ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 331'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 575'''<br/>
José Blanco López<br/>
+
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri<br/>
'''S&D'''<br/>
+
Article 40 – paragraph 3 subparagraph 4 a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 1 point 20
 
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(20) ‘harmful interference’ means interference which endangers the functioning of a radio navigation service or of other safety services or which otherwise seriously degrades, obstructs or repeatedly interrupts a radio communications service operating in accordance with the applicable international, Union or national regulations;
+
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(20) 'harmful interference' means interference which endangers the functioning of a radio navigation service or of other safety '''''and mission-critical''''' services or which otherwise seriously degrades, obstructs or repeatedly interrupts a radio communications service operating in accordance with the applicable international, Union or national regulations;
+
'''''Member States shall ensure that in case of a particular risk of a security incident in public communications networks or publicly available electronic communications services providers of such networks or services shall inform their end-users of such a risk and of any possible protective measures or remedies which can be taken by the end-users.'''''
 
|}
 
|}
  
 
+
=== Amendment 578 + ===
Idem 328, 329, 330
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 332 / ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 332'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 578'''<br/>
Morten Helveg Petersen<br/>
+
Kaja Kallas, Marietje Schaake<br/>
 
'''ALDE'''<br/>
 
'''ALDE'''<br/>
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 22
+
Article 40 – paragraph 5 a (new)
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(22) ‘security’ of networks and services means the ability of electronic communications networks and services to resist, at a given level of confidence, any action that compromises the availability, authenticity, integrity or confidentiality of stored or transmitted or processed data or the related services offered by, or accessible via, those networks or services.
+
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(22) 'security' of networks and services means the '''''technical and structural''''' ability of electronic communications networks and services to resist, at a given level of confidence, any action that compromises the availability, authenticity, integrity or confidentiality of stored or transmitted or processed data or the related services offered by, or accessible via, those networks or services.
+
'''''5 a.''''' '''''By ...[date] in order to contribute to the consistent application of measures for the security of networks and services, ENISA, shall, after consulting stakeholders and in close cooperation with the Commission and BEREC issue guidelines on minimum criteria and common approaches for the security of networks and services and the promotion of the use of end-to-end encryption.'''''
 
|}
 
|}
  
 
+
=== Amendment 601 + ===
Précision, impact ?
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 333 ++ ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 333'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 601'''<br/>
Michel Reimon<br/>
+
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Dan Nica, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Jeppe Kofod<br/>
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
+
'''S&D'''<br/>
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 23
+
Article 45 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point e
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
(e) promoting the shared use of radio spectrum between similar and/or different uses of spectrum through appropriate established sharing rules and conditions, including the protection of existing rights of use, in accordance with Union law;
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
(e) promoting the shared use of radio spectrum between similar and/or different uses of spectrum'''''; promoting competition''''' through appropriate established sharing rules and conditions, including the protection of existing rights of use, in accordance with Union law;
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
| colspan='2' |
(23) ‘general authorisation’ means a legal framework established by the Member State ensuring rights for the provision of electronic communications networks or services and laying down sector-specific obligations that may apply to all or to specific types of electronic communications networks and services, in accordance with this Directive.
+
''Justification: Competition criteria in radio spectrum procedures are important when the procedures are designed. Fair and non-discriminatory wholesale access conditions and consumer choice should be enhanced.''
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
(23) ‘general authorisation’ means a legal framework established by the Member State ensuring rights for the provision of electronic communications networks or services and laying down sector-specific obligations that may apply to all or to specific types of electronic communications networks and services, in accordance with this Directive''''', excluding not-for-profit-services provided by individuals'''''.
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
exclusion des obligations pour les non profits
+
Competition criteria in radio spectrum procedures is important. Fair and non-discriminatory wholesale access conditions and consumer choice should be enhanced.
  
=== Amendment 334 - ===
+
=== Amendment 602 + ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 334'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 602'''<br/>
Barbara Kappel, Angelo Ciocca, Lorenzo Fontana<br/>
+
David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano<br/>
'''ENF'''<br/>
+
'''EFDD'''<br/>
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 26
+
Article 45 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point e
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
(e) promoting the shared use of radio spectrum between similar and/or different uses of spectrum through appropriate established sharing rules and conditions, including the protection of existing rights of use, in accordance with Union law;
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
(e) promoting the shared use of radio spectrum between similar and/or different uses of spectrum '''''promoting competition''''' through appropriate established sharing rules and conditions, including the protection of existing rights of use, in accordance with Union law;
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
| colspan='2' |
(26) 'shared use of radio spectrum' means access by two or more users to use the same frequencies under a defined sharing arrangement, authorised by a national regulatory authority on the basis of a general authorisation, individual rights of use or a combination thereof''''', including regulatory approaches such as licenced shared access aiming to facilitate the shared use of a frequency band, subject to a binding agreement of all parties involved, in accordance with sharing rules as included in their rights of use so as to guarantee to all users predictable and reliable sharing arrangements, and without prejudice to the application of competition law''''';
+
''Justification: The amendment aims to promote competition in radio spectrum assignment procedures.''
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
(26) 'shared use of radio spectrum' means access by two or more users to use the same frequencies under a defined sharing arrangement, authorised by a national regulatory authority on the basis of a general authorisation, individual rights of use or a combination thereof;
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
dérégulation
+
Same as AM 601 - The amendment aims to promote competition in radio spectrum assignment procedures.
  
  
=== Amendment 335 -- ===
+
=== Amendment 603 ++ ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #A60000; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 335'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 603'''<br/>
Evžen Tošenovský<br/>
+
Michel Reimon<br/>
'''ECR'''<br/>
+
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 28
+
Article 45 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point e a (new)
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
 
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
'''''(e a)''''' '''''The Commission shall establish a programme aiming to release spectrum for shared and unlicensed uses. This programme shall include the development of a European database of shared and unlicensed spectrum.'''''
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
| colspan='2' |
(28) ‘access’ means the making available of facilities and/or services to another undertaking, under defined conditions, on either an exclusive or non-exclusive basis, for the purpose of providing electronic communications services, including when they are used for the delivery of information society services or broadcast content services. It covers inter alia: access to network elements and associated facilities, which may involve the connection of equipment, by fixed or non-fixed means (in particular this includes access to the local loop and to facilities and services necessary to provide services over the local loop); access to physical infrastructure including buildings, ducts and masts; access to relevant software systems including operational support systems; access to information systems or databases for pre-ordering, provisioning, ordering, maintaining and repair requests, and billing; access to number translation or systems offering equivalent functionality; access to fixed and mobile networks, '''''including software emulated networks,''''' in particular for roaming; access to conditional access systems for digital television services and access to virtual network services;
+
''Justification: Innovation and freedom of expression need a broad access to shared and unlicensed uses of , as stressed in article 6 of the 2012 Radio Spectrum Policy Programme. Increasing this access is thus a major challenge. Following the success of the release of the 1,2 Ghz frequencies within the Radio spectrum policy programme (Article 3 of Decision 243/2012/EU), the European Commission shall launch such a programme aiming at the release of shared spectrum. A database of shared spectrum would greatly facilitate and encourage the release of shared spectrum.''
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
(28) 'access' means the making available of facilities and/or services to another undertaking, under defined conditions, on either an exclusive or non-exclusive basis, for the purpose of providing electronic communications services, including when they are used for the delivery of information society services or broadcast content services. It covers inter alia: access to network elements and associated facilities, which may involve the connection of equipment, by fixed or non-fixed means (in particular this includes access to the local loop and to facilities and services necessary to provide services over the local loop); access to physical infrastructure including buildings, ducts and masts; access to relevant software systems including operational support systems; access to information systems or databases for pre-ordering, provisioning, ordering, maintaining and repair requests, and billing; access to number translation or systems offering equivalent functionality; access to fixed and mobile networks, in particular for roaming; access to conditional access systems for digital television services and access to virtual network services;
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
 +
=== Amendment 636 - ===
  
exclusion des réseaux privés virtuel (genre via VPN) ou locaux (LAN)
+
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
+
|-
 +
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
 +
'''Amendment 636'''<br/>
 +
Kaja Kallas, Marietje Schaake<br/>
 +
'''ALDE'''<br/>
 +
Article 46 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 – introductory part
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
'''''When applying a general authorisation or individual rights taking in account measures adopted under Decision No 676/2002/EC where the radio spectrum band concerned has been harmonised, Member States''''' shall '''''seek to minimise problems of harmful interference, including in cases of shared use of radio spectrum on the basis of a combination of general authorisation and individual rights of use. In so doing, they shall have regard to the need:'''''
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
'''''2. Where appropriate, Member States shall consider the possibility to authorise the use of radio spectrum based on a combination of general authorisation and individual rights of use. They''''' shall '''''in particular consider the possibility of the gradual transfer from general authorisation to individual rights of use where necessary to foster innovation and facilitate market entry of smaller market participants. They shall favour technological solutions for the management of potential harmful interference with a view to choose the least restrictive authorisation regime possible.'''''
 +
|-
 +
| colspan='2' |
 +
''Justification: There is a need to simplify the procedure as proposed. In addition, in accordance with rule 104 of the rules of procedure, this amendment is necessary for pressing reasons related to the internal logic of the text''
 +
|}
  
=== Amendment 336 -- ===
+
=== Amendment 645 - ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #A60000; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 336'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 645'''<br/>
Barbara Kappel, Angelo Ciocca, Lorenzo Fontana<br/>
+
Kaja Kallas, Marietje Schaake<br/>
'''ENF'''<br/>
+
'''ALDE'''<br/>
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 32
+
Article 46 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 a (new)
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(32) voice communications’ means a service made available to the public for originating and receiving, directly or indirectly, national or national '''''and international''''' calls through a number or numbers in a national or international telephone numbering plan;
+
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(32) '''''''''''voice communications '''''service'''''' means a '''''number-based interpersonal communications''''' service made available to the public for originating and receiving, directly or indirectly, national or national calls through a number or numbers in a national or international telephone numbering plan;
+
'''''When authorising the shared use of spectrum, Member States shall minimise the restrictions to the use of radio spectrum to what is necessary to avoid harmful interference, including by limiting to the best extent possible the application of the non-interference, non-protection principle. Where such principles shall apply, Member States shall take measures to ensure protection against out-of-and interference from adjacent bands.'''''
 
|}
 
|}
  
 +
=== Amendment 665 + ===
 +
 +
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 +
|-
 +
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
 +
'''Amendment 665'''<br/>
 +
András Gyürk<br/>
 +
'''EPP'''<br/>
 +
Article 49 – paragraph 2
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
'''''2.''''' '''''Where Member States grant rights of use for harmonised radio spectrum for a limited period of time, those rights of use for harmonised radio spectrum shall be valid for a duration of at least 25 years, except in the case of temporary rights, temporary extension of rights pursuant to paragraph 3 and rights for secondary use in harmonised bands.'''''
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
'''''deleted'''''
 +
|}
  
retrait de la VOIP comme service non-numbered based
 
  
 +
Removes the duration of 25 years licencing
  
=== Amendment 414 / ===
+
=== Amendment 670 + ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 414'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 670'''<br/>
Edouard Martin<br/>
+
Kaja Kallas, Marietje Schaake<br/>
'''S&D'''<br/>
+
'''ALDE'''<br/>
Article 10 – paragraph 2
+
Article 49 – paragraph 2
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
2. Member States shall ensure that national regulatory authorities take utmost account of opinions '''''and''''' common positions adopted by BEREC when adopting their own decisions for their national markets.
+
2. Where Member States grant rights of use for harmonised radio spectrum for a limited period of time, those rights of use for harmonised radio spectrum shall be valid for a duration of '''''at least''''' 25 years, except in the case of temporary rights, temporary extension of rights pursuant to paragraph 3 and rights for secondary use in harmonised bands.
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
2. Member States shall ensure that national regulatory authorities take utmost account of opinions''''',''''' common positions '''''or decisions''''' adopted by BEREC when adopting their own decisions for their national markets.
+
2. Where Member States grant rights of use for harmonised radio spectrum for a limited period of time, those rights of use for harmonised radio spectrum shall be valid for a '''''maximum''''' duration of 25 years, except in the case of temporary rights, temporary extension of rights pursuant to paragraph 3 and rights for secondary use in harmonised bands.'''''Where rights of use have been granted for a duration of 25 years, Member states shall conduct reviews at regular intervals of every 5 years to assess if the use of spectrum is the most efficient in light of technological or market evolution, and where justified and necessary shall amend such rights in accordance with articles 50 and 51.'''''
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
| colspan='2' |
''Justification: If BEREC is to become an agency, its role and powers should be enhanced adequately (especially in articles 32-33)''
+
''Justification: In accordance with rule 104 of the rules of procedure, this amendment is necessary for pressing reasons related to the internal logic of the text''
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Comprends pas l'intérêt
+
Maximum 25 years with a review every 5 years
  
  
=== Amendment 415 ++ ===
+
=== Amendment 674 ++ ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 415'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 674'''<br/>
 
Michel Reimon<br/>
 
Michel Reimon<br/>
 
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
 
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
Article 10 – paragraph 2 a (new)
+
Article 49 – paragraph 2
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 
+
2. Where Member States grant rights of use for harmonised radio spectrum for a limited period of time, those rights of use for harmonised radio spectrum shall be valid for a duration of '''''at least''''' 25 years, '''''except in the case of temporary rights, temporary extension of rights pursuant to paragraph 3 and rights for secondary use in harmonised bands'''''.
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
'''''2 a.''''' '''''Member States shall ensure that national regulatory authorities apply Regulation 2015/2120 and BEREC Guidelines adopted pursuant to Article 5.3 of the abovementioned Regulation and coordinate within BEREC with other national regulatory authorities when implementing it.'''''
+
2. Where Member States grant rights of use for harmonised radio spectrum for a limited period of time, those rights of use for harmonised radio spectrum shall be valid for a '''''maximum''''' duration of 25 years, '''''reviewed at regular intervals of maximum 5 years for assessing and amending the rights according to laydown procedures'''''.
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
| colspan='2' |
''Justification: The implementation of the regulation 2015/2120 is made on a national basis without any coordination of national regulation authorities, despite the BEREC guidelines. A harmonised implementation within the EU is of the utmost importance for predictability of law and for ensuring end-users rights.Amendment''
+
''Justification: The draft Code proposes to extend to a minimum of 25 years the duration of rights to use the radio spectrum. This is disproportionate and unnecessary. Experience shows us that 20 years is already too long, especially considering that the regulation does not enable regulators to act when necessary, e.g. by withdrawing authorisation, even if the operator fails to honor its commitments. Allocating spectrum for more than 5 years would necessitate adding a revision clause/sunset date regularly, with sanctions if the operator fails its obligations. The maximum length of allocation shall be 25 years, with such scheduled sunset dates.The "use it or lose it" clause proposed in the Code is insufficient to enable NRAs to withdraw authorisation if necessary. The capacities of the NRAs should thus be enhanced and more detailed in order to control the use of the licences, preventing holders from "parking" frequencies for too long, thereby hindering connectivity and innovation.''
 
|}
 
|}
  
 
+
=== Amendment 702 ++ ===
Coordination ++ entre MS dans l'implémentation du travail du BEREC
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 565 ++ ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 565'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 702'''<br/>
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Dan Nica, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Jeppe Kofod, Martina Werner<br/>
+
Michel Reimon<br/>
'''S&D'''<br/>
+
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
Article 40 – paragraph 1
+
Article 55 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
1. Member States shall ensure that undertakings providing public communications networks or publicly available electronic communications services take appropriate technical and organisational measures to appropriately manage the risks posed to security of networks and services. Having regard to the state of the art, these measures shall ensure a level of security appropriate to the risk presented. In particular, measures shall be taken to prevent and minimise the impact of security incidents on users and on other networks and services.
+
Where that provision is not commercial in character or is ancillary to another commercial activity or public service which is not dependent on the conveyance of signals on those networks, any undertaking, public authority or '''''end-user''''' providing such access shall not be subject to any general authorisation for the provision of electronic communications networks or services pursuant to Article 12, to obligations regarding '''''end-users''''' rights pursuant to Title III of Part III of this Directive nor to obligations to interconnect their networks pursuant to Article 59 (1).
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
1. Member States shall ensure that undertakings providing public communications networks or publicly available electronic communications services take appropriate technical and organisational measures to appropriately manage the risks posed to security of networks and services. Having regard to the state of the art, these measures shall ensure a level of security appropriate to the risk presented. In particular, measures shall be taken to '''''ensure that, when necessary for confidentiality, electronic communications content is encrypted from end-to-end by default, in order to''''' prevent and minimise the impact of security incidents on users and on other networks and services.
+
Where that provision is not commercial in character or is ancillary to another commercial activity or public service which is not dependent on the conveyance of signals on those networks, any undertaking, public authority or '''''user''''' providing such access shall not be subject to any general authorisation for the provision of electronic communications networks or services pursuant to Article 12, to obligations regarding '''''users''''' rights pursuant to Title III of Part III of this Directive nor to obligations to interconnect their networks pursuant to Article 59 (1). '''''Individuals providing such access not-for-profit shall not be liable for information transmitted by third parties over such access.'''''
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
| colspan='2' |
''Justification: Encrypting communications content from end to end by default is the best way to effectively minimise the impact of security incidents.''
+
''Justification: The Proposal intends to foster the development of radio local area networks, especially where they provide services which are not commercial in character. The development of such networks mainly depends on the personal participation of individual volunteers, who expend the networks by managing their own relays and access points. However, such a participation is hindered by several laws which seek to prevent the sharing of Internet connections amongst several users by making people responsible (and potentially liable) for all communication made through their Wi-Fi connection, and create legal risks for people sharing their connection.In Germany, rights-holders have used a "secondary liability" doctrine to chill the growth of the community networks movement. In France too, copyright law imposes a secondary liability regime that creates significant legal uncertainty for people sharing their network connections with other users. The so-called "mere conduit", inscribed in EU law since 2000 in the directive on information society services, needs to be clearly guaranteed and expanded to small-area wireless access points.In the same spirit, contract clauses that forbid subscribers to share their connections with others should be prohibited in any case: the possibility to share their connections should not be limited to specific offers.Promoting a right to share Internet connections is all the more vital considering the economic and ecological crises, as well as the rapid increase of populations that cannot afford access to the Internet. In this context, connection sharing can play a critical role in fostering a more equitable and sustainable use of telecommunications infrastructure.''
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Chiffrement par défaut
+
This AM aims to avoid legal risks for people sharing their connection
  
  
=== Amendment 566 ++ ===
+
=== Amendment 703 ++ ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 566'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 703'''<br/>
Eva Kaili<br/>
+
Kaja Kallas, Marietje Schaake<br/>
'''S&D'''<br/>
+
'''ALDE'''<br/>
Article 40 – paragraph 1
+
Article 55 – paragraph 2
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
2. Competent authorities shall not prevent providers of public communications networks or publicly available electronic communications services from allowing access to their networks to the public, through radio local area networks, which may be located at an end-user's premises, subject to compliance with the applicable general authorisation conditions and the prior informed agreement of the end-user.
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
2. Competent authorities shall not prevent providers of public communications networks or publicly available electronic communications services from allowing access to their networks to the public, through radio local area networks, which may be located at an end-user's premises, subject to compliance with the applicable general authorisation conditions and the prior informed agreement of the end-user. '''''Individuals providing access to their networks for non-commercial purposes shall not be liable for information transmitted by third parties through the use of such access.'''''
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
| colspan='2' |
1. Member States shall ensure that undertakings providing public communications networks or publicly available electronic communications services take appropriate technical and organisational measures to appropriately manage the risks posed to security of networks and services. Having regard to the state of the art, these measures shall ensure a level of security appropriate to the risk presented. In particular, measures shall be taken to prevent and minimise the impact of security incidents on users and on other networks and services.
+
''Justification: In accordance with rule 104 of the rules of procedure, this amendment is necessary for pressing reasons related to the internal logic of the text''
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
1. Member States shall ensure that undertakings providing public communications networks or publicly available electronic communications services take appropriate technical and organisational measures to appropriately manage the risks posed to security of networks and services. Having regard to the state of the art, these measures shall ensure a level of security appropriate to the risk presented. In particular, measures shall be taken to '''''ensure that, when necessary for confidentiality, electronic communications content is encrypted from end-to-end by default, in order to''''' prevent and minimise the impact of security incidents on users and on other networks and services.
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Idem 565
+
This AM aims to avoid legal risks for people sharing their connection
  
  
=== Amendment 567 ++ ===
+
=== Amendment 706 ++ ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 567'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 706'''<br/>
Michel Reimon<br/>
+
José Blanco López, Sergio Gutiérrez Prieto, Inmaculada Rodríguez-Piñero Fernández, Soledad Cabezón Ruiz<br/>
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
+
'''S&D'''<br/>
Article 40 – paragraph 1
+
Article 55 – paragraph 2 a (new)
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
1. Member States shall ensure that undertakings providing public communications networks or publicly available electronic communications services take appropriate technical and organisational measures to appropriately manage the risks posed to security of networks and services. Having regard to the state of the art, these measures shall ensure a level of security appropriate to the risk presented. In particular, measures shall be taken to prevent and minimise the impact of security incidents on users and on other networks and services.
+
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
1. Member States shall ensure that undertakings providing public communications networks or publicly available electronic communications services take appropriate technical and organisational measures to '''''ensure that electronic communications content are encrypted from end-to-end by default, in order to''''' appropriately manage the risks posed to security of networks and services. Having regard to the state of the art, these measures shall ensure a level of security appropriate to the risk presented. In particular, measures shall be taken to prevent and minimise the impact of security incidents on users and on other networks and services.
+
'''''2 a.''''' '''''End-users allowing access to their internet access service as set out in paragraph 2 shall not be liable for any use that other end-users might do while connected to their network.'''''
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
| colspan='2' |
''Justification: Encrypting communications content from end to end by default is the only way to effectively minimise the impact of security incidents. Any other measure would barely has any effect.Furthermore, such an obligation would be the mere implementation of Directive 2002/58/EC, article 5(1), which prohibits any “kinds of interception or surveillance of communications (...) by persons other than users, without the consent of the users concerned”.''
+
''Justification: Sharing of consumers' private Wi-Fi networks may bring benefits to consumers as they can use additional access points. However, it is imperative that such additional networks are only installed on consumers' private equipment with their explicit consent and that the consumer whose internet access service is being shared is under no circumstance responsible nor liable for any use that other person might do while connected to his Wi-Fi network.''
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Idem 565, 566
+
This AM aims to avoid legal risks for people sharing their connection
  
  
=== Amendment 568 ++ ===
+
=== Amendment 708 -- ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #A60000; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 568'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 708'''<br/>
Kaja Kallas, Marietje Schaake<br/>
+
Evžen Tošenovský<br/>
'''ALDE'''<br/>
+
'''ECR'''<br/>
Article 40 – paragraph 1
+
Article 55 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point a
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
1. Member States shall ensure that undertakings providing public communications networks or publicly available electronic communications services take appropriate technical and organisational measures to appropriately manage the risks posed to security of networks and services. Having regard to the state of the art, these measures shall ensure a level of security appropriate to the risk presented. In particular, measures shall be taken to prevent and minimise the impact of security incidents on users and on other networks and services.
+
'''''a)''''' '''''the right of end-users to accede to radio local area networks of their choice provided by third parties;'''''
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
1. Member States shall ensure that undertakings providing public communications networks or publicly available electronic communications services take appropriate technical and organisational measures to appropriately manage the risks posed to security of networks and services. Having regard to the state of the art, these measures shall ensure a level of security appropriate to the risk presented. In particular, measures shall be taken to '''''ensure that electronic communications content are encrypted from end-to-end by default, in order to''''' prevent and minimise the impact of security incidents on users and on other networks and services.
+
'''''deleted'''''
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
''Justification: In accordance with rule 104 of the rules of procedure, this amendment is necessary for pressing reasons related to the internal logic of the text''
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Idem 565, 566, 567
+
This AM removes the right of users to accede to radio local area networks of their choice.
  
 
+
=== Amendment 710 -- ===
=== Amendment 569 / ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #A60000; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 569'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 710'''<br/>
 
Evžen Tošenovský<br/>
 
Evžen Tošenovský<br/>
 
'''ECR'''<br/>
 
'''ECR'''<br/>
Article 40 – paragraph 1
+
Article 55 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point b
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
1. Member States shall ensure that undertakings providing public communications networks or publicly available electronic communications services take appropriate technical and organisational measures to appropriately manage the risks posed to security of networks and services. Having regard to the state of the art, these measures shall ensure a level of security appropriate to the risk presented. In particular, measures shall be taken to prevent and minimise the impact of security incidents on users and on other networks and services.
+
'''''b)''''' '''''the right of end-users to allow reciprocally or more generally access to the networks of such providers by other end-users through radio local area networks, including on the basis of third-party initiatives which aggregate and make publicly accessible the radio local area networks of different end-users.'''''
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
1. Member States shall ensure that undertakings providing public communications networks or publicly available '''''number-based''''' electronic communications services take appropriate technical and organisational measures to appropriately manage the risks posed to security of networks and services. Having regard to the state of the art, these measures shall ensure a level of security appropriate to the risk presented. In particular, measures shall be taken to prevent and minimise the impact of security incidents on users and on other networks and services.
+
'''''deleted'''''
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
What about public funded OTT (genre l'application SAIP)
+
This AM removes the provisions giving end-users the rights to share their own access with other uses.
 
 
  
=== Amendment 570 + ===
+
=== Amendment 712 + ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 570'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 712'''<br/>
Kaja Kallas, Marietje Schaake<br/>
+
Evžen Tošenovský<br/>
'''ALDE'''<br/>
+
'''ECR'''<br/>
Article 40 – paragraph 1 a (new)
+
Article 55 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 
+
'''''To that end, providers of public communications networks or publicly available electronic communications services shall make available and actively offer, clearly and transparently, products or specific offers allowing its end-users to provide access to third parties through a radio local area network.'''''
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
'''''1 a.''''' '''''Member States shall not impose any obligation to undertakings providing public communications networks or publicly available electronic communications services that would result in the weakening of the security of their networks and services.'''''
+
'''''deleted'''''
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Impératif de sécurité pour tout service de communication électronic qui a un financement public
+
Contract clauses that forbid subscribers to share their connections with others should be prohibited in any case: the possibility to share their connections should not be limited to specific offers.
  
  
=== Amendment 571 + ===
+
=== Amendment 713 + ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 571'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 713'''<br/>
Evžen Tošenovský<br/>
+
Michel Reimon<br/>
'''ECR'''<br/>
+
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
Article 40 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
+
Article 55 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
'''''To that end, providers of public communications networks or publicly available electronic communications services shall make available and actively offer, clearly and transparently, products or specific offers allowing its end-users to provide access to third parties through a radio local area network.'''''
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
'''''deleted'''''
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
| colspan='2' |
Member States shall ensure that undertakings providing public communications networks or publicly available electronic communications services notify without undue delay the competent authority of a '''''breach of security''''' that has had a significant impact on the operation of networks or services.
+
''Justification: Contract clauses that forbid subscribers to share their connections with others should be prohibited in any case: the possibility to share their connections should not be limited to specific offers.''
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
Member States shall ensure that undertakings providing public communications networks or publicly available electronic communications services notify without undue delay the competent authority of a '''''security incident''''' that has had a significant impact on the operation of networks or services.
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Précision qu'un problème de sécurité n'est pas nécessairement une faille
+
Contract clauses that forbid subscribers to share their connections with others should be prohibited in any case: the possibility to share their connections should not be limited to specific offers.
  
  
=== Amendment 572 + ===
+
=== Amendment 717 + ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 572'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 717'''<br/>
Evžen Tošenovský<br/>
+
Pervenche Berès, Edouard Martin<br/>
'''ECR'''<br/>
+
'''S&D'''<br/>
Article 40 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 – point d
+
Article 59 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(d) the extent to which the functioning of the service is disrupted;
+
Pour réaliser les objectifs exposés à l’article 3, les autorités de régulation nationales encouragent et, le cas échéant, assurent, conformément aux dispositions de la présente directive, un accès et une interconnexion adéquats, ainsi que l’interopérabilité des services et elles s’acquittent de leur tâche de façon à promouvoir l’efficacité économique, à favoriser une concurrence durable '''''et''''' le déploiement de réseaux à très haute capacité, à encourager des investissements efficients et l’innovation et à procurer un avantage maximal à l’utilisateur final. Elles fournissent des orientations et rendent publiques les procédures applicables pour l’obtention de l’accès et de l’interconnexion, afin que les petites et moyennes entreprises et les opérateurs actifs dans une zone géographique limitée puissent bénéficier des obligations imposées.
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(d) the extent to which the functioning of the '''''network or''''' service is disrupted;
+
Pour réaliser les objectifs exposés à l’article 3, les autorités de régulation nationales encouragent et, le cas échéant, assurent, conformément aux dispositions de la présente directive, un accès et une interconnexion adéquats, ainsi que l’interopérabilité des services et elles s’acquittent de leur tâche de façon à promouvoir l’efficacité économique, à favoriser une concurrence durable''''', le pluralisme des médias, la diversité culturelle,''''' le déploiement de réseaux à très haute capacité, à encourager des investissements efficients et l’innovation et à procurer un avantage maximal à l’utilisateur final. Elles fournissent des orientations et rendent publiques les procédures applicables pour l’obtention de l’accès et de l’interconnexion, afin que les petites et moyennes entreprises et les opérateurs actifs dans une zone géographique limitée puissent bénéficier des obligations imposées.
 
|}
 
|}
  
 
+
=== Amendment 722 / ===
Précision pour la sécurité sur les réseaux et pas seulement le service
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 573 / ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 573'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 722'''<br/>
Kaja Kallas, Marietje Schaake<br/>
+
Michel Reimon<br/>
'''ALDE'''<br/>
+
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
Article 40 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 – point e
+
Article 59 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point c
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
'''''(e)''''' '''''the impact on economic and societal activities.'''''
+
'''''(c)''''' '''''in justified cases, obligations on providers of number-independent interpersonal communications services to make their services interoperable, namely where access to emergency services or end-to-end connectivity between end-users is endangered due to a lack of interoperability between interpersonal communications services.'''''
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 
'''''deleted'''''
 
'''''deleted'''''
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
''Justification: There is a need to align these provisions with the NIS directive''
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
 
+
=== Amendment 731 ++ ===
Quel impact pour cet amendement ?
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 574 / ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 574'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 731'''<br/>
Evžen Tošenovský<br/>
+
Michel Reimon<br/>
'''ECR'''<br/>
+
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
Article 40 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 – point e
+
Article 59 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 – point i
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
(i) to the extent necessary to ensure interoperability of interpersonal communications services and may include '''''obligations relating to''''' the use '''''and implementation''''' of standards or specifications listed in Article 39(1) or of any other relevant European or international standards; and
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
(i) to the extent necessary to ensure interoperability of interpersonal communications services and may include '''''an obligation to publish and authorize''''' the use''''', modification and redistribution of any relevant information or an obligation to use or implement''''' of standards or specifications listed in Article 39(1) or of any other relevant European or international standards; and
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
| colspan='2' |
'''''(e)''''' '''''the impact on economic and societal activities.'''''
+
''Justification: Ensuring interoperability of interpersonal communications services requires that the technical information necessary to communicate with the users of such services can be freely accessed, used, modified and redistributed by anyone, whether this information is already public or held by the providers of these services. Encryption should not be jeopardized by such standards.''
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
'''''deleted'''''
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
 
+
=== Amendment 732 + ===
Idem 573
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 575 ++ ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 575'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 732'''<br/>
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri<br/>
+
Kaja Kallas, Marietje Schaake<br/>
'''S&D'''<br/>
+
'''ALDE'''<br/>
Article 40 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 4 a (new)
+
Article 59 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 – point i
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
(i) to the extent necessary to ensure interoperability of interpersonal communications services and may include obligations relating to the use and implementation of standards or specifications listed in Article 39(1) or of any other relevant European or international standards; '''''and'''''
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
(i) to the extent necessary to ensure interoperability of interpersonal communications services and may include obligations relating to the use and implementation of standards or specifications listed in Article 39(1) or of any other relevant European or international standards; '''''such obligations shall not lead to the weakening of security standards of these services.'''''
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
| colspan='2' |
 
+
''Justification: In accordance with rule 104 of the rules of procedure, this amendment is necessary for pressing reasons related to the internal logic of the text''
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
'''''Member States shall ensure that in case of a particular risk of a security incident in public communications networks or publicly available electronic communications services providers of such networks or services shall inform their end-users of such a risk and of any possible protective measures or remedies which can be taken by the end-users.'''''
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
 
+
=== Amendment 734 - ===
Communication sur les incidents de sécurité
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 576 / ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 576'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 734'''<br/>
Evžen Tošenovský<br/>
+
Angelika Niebler, Herbert Reul, Markus Pieper<br/>
'''ECR'''<br/>
+
'''EPP'''<br/>
Article 40 – paragraph 5
+
Article 59 – paragraph 2
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-bottom:0em;'|
'''''5.''''' '''''The Commission, shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 109 with a view to specifying the measures referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2, including measures defining the circumstances, format and procedures applicable to notification requirements. The delegated acts shall be based on European and international standards to the greatest extent possible, and shall not prevent Member States from adopting additional requirements in order to pursue the objectives set out in paragraphs 1 and 2.'''''
+
'''''2.''''' '''''National regulatory authorities shall impose obligations upon reasonable request to grant access to wiring and cables inside buildings or up to the first concentration or distribution point where that point is located outside the building, on the owners of such wiring and cable or on undertakings that have the right to use such wiring and cables, where this is justified on the grounds that replication of such network elements would be economically inefficient or physically impracticable. The access conditions imposed may include specific rules on access, transparency and non-discrimination and for apportioning the costs of access, which, where appropriate, are adjusted to take into account risk factors.'''''
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-bottom:0em;'|
 
'''''deleted'''''
 
'''''deleted'''''
|}
+
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
'''''National regulatory authorities may extend to those owners or undertakings the imposition of such access obligations, on fair and reasonable terms and conditions, beyond the first concentration or distribution point to a concentration point as close as possible to end-users, to the extent strictly necessary to address insurmountable economic or physical barriers to replication in areas with lower population density.'''''
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
 
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
'''''National regulatory authorities shall not impose obligations in accordance with the second subparagraph where:'''''
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
  
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
'''''(a)a viable and similar alternative means of access to end-users is made available to any undertaking, provided that the access is offered on fair and reasonable terms and conditions to a very high capacity network by an undertaking meeting the criteria listed in Article 77 paragraphs (a) and (b); and'''''
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
  
Pas compris
+
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em'|
 +
'''''(b)in the case of recently deployed network elements, in particular by smaller local projects, the granting of that access would compromise the economic or financial viability of their deployment.'''''
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em'|
  
 +
|-
 +
| colspan='2' |
 +
''Justification: The EU cost reduction directive (2014/61/EU) contains additional elements of symmetrical regulation. The Commission is to submit a report on the implementation of this directive to the European Parliament and the Council by 1 July 2018. No action should be taken until the findings of the implementation report, which can provide a basis for deciding whether additional elements of symmetrical regulation are needed, are available.''
 +
|}
  
=== Amendment 577 + ===
+
=== Amendment 735 - ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 577'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 735'''<br/>
Kaja Kallas, Marietje Schaake<br/>
+
Kaja Kallas<br/>
 
'''ALDE'''<br/>
 
'''ALDE'''<br/>
Article 40 – paragraph 5
+
Article 59 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
5. The Commission, shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 109 with a view to specifying the measures referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2, including measures defining the circumstances, format and procedures applicable to notification requirements. The delegated acts shall be based on European and international standards to the greatest extent possible, and shall not prevent Member States from adopting additional requirements in order to pursue the objectives set out in paragraphs 1 and 2.
+
National regulatory authorities shall impose obligations upon reasonable request to grant access to wiring and cables inside buildings or up to the first concentration or distribution point where that point is located outside the building''''',''''' on the owners of such wiring and cable or on undertakings that have the right to use such wiring and cables''''', where this is justified on the grounds that replication of such network elements would be economically inefficient or physically impracticable'''''. The access conditions imposed may include specific rules on access, '''''transparency and''''' non-discrimination and for apportioning the costs of access, which, where appropriate, are adjusted to take into account risk factors.
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
5. The Commission, shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 109 with a view to specifying the measures referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2, including measures defining the circumstances, format and procedures applicable to notification requirements. The delegated acts shall be based on European and international standards to the greatest extent possible, and shall not prevent Member States from adopting additional requirements in order to pursue the objectives set out in paragraphs 1 and 2. '''''Where Member States impose additional requirements on undertakings providing public communications networks or publicly available electronic communications services in more than one Member state, they should notify these measures to the Commission and ENISA. ENISA shall assist Member states in coordinating the measures taken to avoid duplication or diverging requirements that may create security risks and barriers to the internal market.'''''
+
'''''Where this is justified on the grounds that replication of such network elements would be economically inefficient or technically impossible and the access to such elements is necessary to foster sustainable competition,''''' national regulatory authorities shall impose obligations upon reasonable request''''',''''' to grant access to wiring and cables inside buildings or up to the first concentration or distribution point where that point is located outside the building on the owners of such wiring and cable or on undertakings that have the right to use such wiring and cables. The access conditions imposed may include specific rules on access, '''''including where necessary to the required associated facilities, on transparency,''''' non-discrimination and for apportioning the costs of access, which, where appropriate, are adjusted to take into account risk factors.'''''Such obligations shall only be imposed following a market analysis procedure in accordance with article 65 and shall complement but not replace regulatory measures taken in accordance with article 66 to ensure the effectiveness of the actions of national regulatory authorities to comply with the objectives set out in article 3 of this Directive.'''''
 +
|-
 +
| colspan='2' |
 +
''Justification: Symmetric obligations being imposed on all undertaking without regard to their market power shall only be imposed where justified and necessary given their potential negative impact on investment and competition. They should therefore be linked to a market analysis procedure to prevent that they achieve the opposite goals that the obligations taken by regulators under the SMP regime seek to achieve. In accordance with rule 104 of the rules of procedure, this amendment is necessary for pressing reasons related to the internal logic of the text''
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Notification à l'ENISA + coopération MS/ENISA
+
Limits regulation possibilities
  
  
=== Amendment 578 + ===
+
=== Amendment 737 + ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 578'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 737'''<br/>
Kaja Kallas, Marietje Schaake<br/>
+
Eva Kaili<br/>
'''ALDE'''<br/>
+
'''S&D'''<br/>
Article 40 – paragraph 5 a (new)
+
Article 59 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 
+
National regulatory authorities shall impose obligations '''''upon''''' reasonable '''''request''''' to grant access to wiring and cables inside buildings or up to the first concentration or distribution point where that point is located outside the building, on the owners of such wiring and cable or on undertakings that have the right to use such wiring and cables, where this is justified on the grounds that replication of such network elements would be economically inefficient or physically impracticable. The access conditions imposed may include specific rules on access, transparency and non-discrimination and for apportioning the costs of access''''', which, where appropriate, are adjusted to take into account risk factors.'''''
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
'''''5 a.''''' '''''By ...[date] in order to contribute to the consistent application of measures for the security of networks and services, ENISA, shall, after consulting stakeholders and in close cooperation with the Commission and BEREC issue guidelines on minimum criteria and common approaches for the security of networks and services and the promotion of the use of end-to-end encryption.'''''
+
'''''Without prejudice to 59(1),''''' national regulatory authorities shall''''', taking full account of the principle of proportionality''''' impose obligations '''''to meet''''' reasonable '''''requests''''' to grant access to wiring and cables inside buildings or up to the first concentration or distribution point where that point is located outside '''''but close to''''' the building, '''''or beyond it to a concentration point close to end-users,''''' on the owners of such wiring and cable or on undertakings '''''on providers of electronic communications networks or electronic communications services''''' that have the right to use such wiring and cables, where this is justified on the grounds that replication of such network elements would be economically inefficient or physically impracticable. The access conditions imposed '''''shall be objective, transparent, non-discriminatory and proportionate in accordance with the principles set out in Article 3(3), and''''' may include specific rules on access, transparency and non-discrimination and for apportioning the costs of access'''''. These measures should be consistent with the provisions of [Broadband Cost reductions Directive]'''''
 
|}
 
|}
  
 +
=== Amendment 738 + ===
  
ENISA + promotion du chiffrement
+
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 +
|-
 +
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
 +
'''Amendment 738'''<br/>
 +
Michel Reimon<br/>
 +
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
 +
Article 59 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
National regulatory authorities '''''shall''''' impose obligations '''''upon''''' reasonable '''''request to grant''''' access to wiring and cables inside buildings or up to the first concentration or distribution point where that point is located outside the building''''', on the owners of such wiring and cable or on undertakings''''' that have the right to use such wiring and cables, where this is justified on the grounds that replication of such network elements would be economically inefficient or physically impracticable. The access conditions imposed may include specific rules on access, transparency '''''and''''' non-discrimination and '''''for apportioning the costs''''' of access, which, where appropriate, are adjusted to take into account risk factors.
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
'''''In particular, and without prejudice to the generalities of 59(1),''''' national regulatory authorities '''''may''''' impose obligations '''''to meet''''' reasonable '''''requests for''''' access to wiring and cables inside buildings or up to the first concentration or distribution point where that point is located outside the building '''''or beyond it to a concentration point close to end-users on providers of electronic communications networks or electronic communications services''''' that have the right to use such wiring and cables, where this is justified on the grounds that replication of such network elements would be economically inefficient or physically impracticable. The access conditions imposed may include specific rules on access, transparency''''',''''' non-discrimination and '''''the price''''' of access, which, where appropriate, are adjusted to take into account risk factors.'''''When imposing access regulation beyond the first concentration or distribution point, national regulatory authorities may under special circumstances impose active or virtual access to such wiring and cables.'''''
 +
|}
  
 
+
=== Amendment 739 -- ===
=== Amendment 592 / ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #A60000; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 592'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 739'''<br/>
David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano<br/>
+
Lieve Wierinck, Hilde Vautmans<br/>
'''EFDD'''<br/>
+
'''ALDE'''<br/>
Article 45 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
+
Article 59 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
 
|-
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
Taking due account of the fact that radio spectrum is a public good that has an important social, cultural and economic value, Member States shall ensure the effective management of radio spectrum for electronic communications services and networks in their territory in accordance with Articles 3 and 4. They shall ensure that radio spectrum allocation used for electronic communications services and networks and issuing general authorisations or individual rights of use for such radio spectrum by competent authorities are based on objective, transparent, non-discriminatory and proportionate criteria.
+
National regulatory authorities '''''shall''''' impose obligations '''''upon''''' reasonable '''''request to grant''''' access to wiring and cables inside buildings or up to the first concentration or distribution point where that point is located outside the building, on the owners of such wiring and cable or on undertakings that have the right to use such wiring and cables, where this is justified on the grounds that replication of such network elements would be economically inefficient or physically impracticable. '''''The''''' access conditions imposed may include specific rules on access, transparency and non-discrimination and for apportioning the costs of access, which, where appropriate, are adjusted to take into account risk factors.
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
Taking due account of the fact that radio spectrum is a public good that has an important social, cultural and economic value, Member States shall ensure the effective management of radio spectrum for electronic communications services and networks in their territory in accordance with Articles 3 and 4. They shall ensure that radio spectrum allocation used for electronic communications services and networks and issuing general authorisations or individual rights of use for such radio spectrum by competent authorities are based on objective, transparent, '''''pro-competitive,''''' non-discriminatory and proportionate criteria.
+
National regulatory authorities '''''may''''' impose obligations '''''to meet''''' reasonable '''''requests for''''' access to wiring and cables inside buildings or up to the first concentration or distribution point where that point is located outside the building, '''''or beyond it to a concentration point close to end-users,''''' on the owners of such wiring and cable or on undertakings that have the right to use such wiring and cables, where this is justified on the grounds that replication of such network elements would be economically inefficient or physically impracticable. '''''These''''' access conditions '''''should be''''' imposed '''''on fair and reasonable terms and conditions, and''''' may include specific rules on access, transparency and non-discrimination and for apportioning the costs of access, which, where appropriate, are adjusted to take into account risk factors. '''''When imposing access regulation beyond the first concentration or distribution point, national regulatory authorities may, under special circumstances, impose active or virtual access to such wiring and cables.'''''
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
''Justification: The amendment aims to promote competition criteria in radio spectrum assignment procedures.''
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Ajout du pro-competitive, pourquoi ?
+
Removes the obligation to develop broadband networks for false solutions such as VDSL.
  
 
+
=== Amendment 740 + ===
=== Amendment 593 / ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 593'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 740'''<br/>
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Dan Nica, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Jeppe Kofod, Martina Werner, Flavio Zanonato<br/>
+
Kathleen Van Brempt<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
Article 45 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
+
Article 59 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
Taking due account of the fact that radio spectrum is a public good that has an important social, cultural and economic value, Member States shall ensure the effective management of radio spectrum for electronic communications services and networks in their territory in accordance with Articles 3 and 4. They shall ensure that radio spectrum allocation used for electronic communications services and networks and issuing general authorisations or individual rights of use for such radio spectrum by competent authorities are based on objective, transparent, non-discriminatory and proportionate criteria.
+
National regulatory authorities '''''shall''''' impose obligations '''''upon reasonable request to grant''''' access to wiring and cables inside buildings '''''or''''' up to the first concentration or distribution point where that point is located outside the building, on the owners of such wiring and cable or on undertakings that have the right to use such wiring and cables, where this is justified on the grounds that replication of such network elements would be economically inefficient or physically impracticable. The access conditions imposed may include specific rules on access, transparency and non-discrimination and for apportioning the costs of access, which, where appropriate, are adjusted to take into account risk factors.
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
Taking due account of the fact that radio spectrum is a public good that has an important social, cultural and economic value, Member States shall ensure the effective management of radio spectrum for electronic communications services and networks in their territory in accordance with Articles 3 and 4. They shall ensure that radio spectrum allocation used for electronic communications services and networks and issuing general authorisations or individual rights of use for such radio spectrum by competent authorities are based on objective, transparent, '''''pro-competitive,''''' non-discriminatory and proportionate criteria.
+
National regulatory authorities '''''may''''' impose obligations '''''to address reasonable requests for''''' access to wiring and cables inside buildings''''',''''' up to the first concentration or distribution point where that point is located outside the building, '''''or beyond that point at a concentration point in proximity of the end-user, '''''on the owners of such wiring and cable or on undertakings that have the right to use such wiring and cables, where this is justified on the grounds that replication of such network elements would be economically inefficient or physically impracticable. The access conditions imposed may include specific rules on access, transparency and non-discrimination and for apportioning the costs of access, which, where appropriate, are adjusted to take into account risk factors. '''''National regulatory authorities may, when circumstances require it, impose active or virtual access to wiring and cables, in the event of imposing access regulation beyond the first concentration or distribution point.'''''
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
''Justification: Member states should ensure that spectrum is allocated in a way that takes into account the possibility to promote competition in the markets.''
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
 +
=== Amendment 741 + ===
  
Idem 592
+
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
+
|-
 +
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
 +
'''Amendment 741'''<br/>
 +
Gunnar Hökmark, Henna Virkkunen, Bendt Bendtsen<br/>
 +
'''EPP'''<br/>
 +
Article 59 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
National regulatory authorities shall impose obligations '''''upon reasonable request to grant''''' access to wiring and cables inside buildings or up to '''''the first''''' concentration or distribution point '''''where that point is located outside the building''''', on the owners of such wiring and cable or on undertakings that have the right to use such wiring and cables, where this is justified on the grounds that replication of such network elements would be economically inefficient or physically impracticable. The access conditions imposed may include specific rules on access, transparency and non-discrimination and for apportioning the costs of access, which, where appropriate, are adjusted to take into account risk factors.
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
National regulatory authorities shall impose obligations '''''to meet reasonable requests for''''' access to wiring and cables inside buildings or up to '''''a''''' concentration or distribution point '''''as close to end-users as possible''''', on the owners of such wiring and cable or on undertakings that have the right to use such wiring and cables, where this is justified on the grounds that replication of such network elements would be economically inefficient or physically impracticable. The access conditions imposed may include specific rules on access, transparency and non-discrimination and for apportioning the costs of access, which, where appropriate, are adjusted to take into account risk factors. '''''Under special circumstances, when access regulation is imposed beyond the first concentration or distribution point, national regulatory authorities may impose active or virtual access to such wiring and cables.'''''
 +
|}
  
=== Amendment 594 / ===
+
=== Amendment 742 + ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 594'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 742'''<br/>
José Blanco López<br/>
+
Olle Ludvigsson<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
Article 45 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
+
Article 59 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
Taking due account of the fact that radio spectrum is a public good that has an important social, cultural and economic value, Member States shall ensure the effective management of radio spectrum for electronic communications services and networks in their territory in accordance with Articles 3 and 4. They shall ensure that radio spectrum allocation used for electronic communications services and networks and issuing general authorisations or individual rights of use for such radio spectrum by competent authorities are based on objective, transparent, non-discriminatory and proportionate criteria.
+
National regulatory authorities shall impose obligations '''''upon reasonable request to grant''''' access to wiring and cables inside buildings or up to '''''the first''''' concentration or distribution point '''''where that point is located outside the building''''', on the owners of such wiring and cable or on undertakings that have the right to use such wiring and cables, where this is justified on the grounds that replication of such network elements would be economically inefficient or physically impracticable. The access conditions imposed may include specific rules on access, transparency '''''and''''' non-discrimination and '''''for apportioning the costs''''' of access, which, where appropriate, are adjusted to take into account risk '''''factors'''''.
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
Taking due account of the fact that radio spectrum is a public good that has an important social, cultural and economic value, Member States shall ensure the effective management of radio spectrum for electronic communications services and networks in their territory in accordance with Articles 3 and 4. They shall ensure that radio spectrum allocation used for electronic communications services and networks and issuing general authorisations or individual rights of use for such radio spectrum by competent authorities are based on objective, transparent, '''''pro-competitive,''''' non-discriminatory and proportionate criteria.
+
National regulatory authorities shall impose obligations '''''to meet reasonable requests for''''' access to wiring and cables inside buildings or up to '''''a''''' concentration or distribution point '''''as close as possible to end-users''''', on the owners of such wiring and cable or on undertakings that have the right to use such wiring and cables, where this is justified on the grounds that replication of such network elements would be economically inefficient or physically impracticable. The access conditions imposed may include specific rules on access, transparency''''',''''' non-discrimination and '''''the price''''' of access, which, where appropriate, are adjusted to take into account risk '''''factors.When imposing access regulation beyond the first concentration or distribution point, national regulatory authorities may under special circumstances impose active or virtual access to such wiring and cables'''''.
 
|}
 
|}
  
 
+
=== Amendment 753 + ===
Idem 592, 592
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 595 / ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 595'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 753'''<br/>
David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano<br/>
+
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Dan Nica, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Jeppe Kofod, Flavio Zanonato<br/>
'''EFDD'''<br/>
+
'''S&D'''<br/>
Article 45 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a
+
Article 59 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(a) ensuring coverage of their national territory and population at high quality and speed, both indoors and outdoors, including along major transport paths, including the trans-European transport network;
+
'''''National regulatory authorities may extend to those owners or undertakings the imposition of such access obligations, on fair and reasonable terms and conditions,''''' beyond the first concentration or distribution point to a concentration point as close as possible to end-users, to the extent strictly necessary to address insurmountable economic or physical barriers to replication in areas with lower population density.
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(a) ensuring coverage of their national territory and population at high quality and speed, both indoors and outdoors, including along major transport paths, including the trans-European transport network '''''as defined in Regulation 1315/2013''''';
+
'''''When imposing access regulation beyond the first concentration or distribution point, national regulatory authorities may under special circumstances impose active or virtual access to such wiring and cables''''' beyond the first concentration or distribution point to a concentration point as close as possible to end-users, to the extent strictly necessary to address insurmountable economic or physical barriers to replication in areas with lower population density.
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
| colspan='2' |
''Justification: The reference to the Regulation clarifies the definition of TEN-T.''
+
''Justification: National regulatory authorities should have ability to impose regulation as close as possible to end-users if necessary to address economic or physical barriers, especially in areas with low population density.''
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Pas compris, vérifier les références
+
National regulatory authorities should have ability to impose regulation as close as possible to end-users if necessary to address economic or physical barriers, especially in areas with low population density.
  
  
=== Amendment 596 / ===
+
=== Amendment 757 ++ ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 596'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 757'''<br/>
Michel Reimon<br/>
+
José Blanco López, Inmaculada Rodríguez-Piñero Fernández, Soledad Cabezón Ruiz<br/>
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
+
Article 59 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3
Article 45 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a
 
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-bottom:0em;'|
(a) ensuring coverage of their national territory and population at high quality and speed, both indoors and outdoors, including along major transport paths, including the trans-European transport network;
+
'''''National regulatory authorities shall not impose obligations in accordance with the second subparagraph where:'''''
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-bottom:0em;'|
(a) ensuring coverage of their national territory and population at high quality and speed, both indoors and outdoors, including along major transport paths, including the trans-European transport network '''''as defined in Regulation 1315/2013''''';
+
'''''deleted'''''
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
'''''(a) a viable and similar alternative means of access to end-users is made available to any undertaking, provided that the access is offered on fair and reasonable terms and conditions to a very high capacity network by an undertaking meeting the criteria listed in Article 77 paragraphs (a) and (b); and'''''
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
 
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em'|
 +
'''''(b) in the case of recently deployed network elements, in particular by smaller local projects, the granting of that access would compromise the economic or financial viability of their deployment.'''''
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em'|
 +
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Vérifier la régulation de référence
+
Removes limitations to regulation
 
 
  
=== Amendment 597 / ===
+
=== Amendment 790 - ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 597'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 790'''<br/>
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Dan Nica, Martina Werner, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Jeppe Kofod<br/>
+
Evžen Tošenovský<br/>
'''S&D'''<br/>
+
'''ECR'''<br/>
Article 45 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a
+
Article 59 – paragraph 6
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(a) ensuring coverage of their national territory and population at high quality and speed, both indoors and outdoors, including along major transport paths, including the trans-European transport network;
+
'''''6.''''' '''''By [entry into force plus 18 months in order to contribute to a consistent definition of the location of network termination points by national regulatory authorities, BEREC shall, after consulting stakeholders and in close cooperation with the Commission, adopt guidelines on common approaches to the identification of the network termination point in different network topologies. National regulatory authorities shall take utmost account of those guidelines when defining the location of network termination points.'''''
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(a) ensuring coverage of their national territory and population at high quality and speed, both indoors and outdoors, including along major transport paths, including the trans-European transport network '''''as defined in Regulation 1315/2013''''';
+
'''''deleted'''''
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
''Justification: The reference to the Trans-European networks clarifies the definition, keeping railways in the scope.''
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Idem 596
+
A common approach within the EU would ensure a predictability for all EU users.
  
  
=== Amendment 598 / ===
+
=== Amendment 792 ++ ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 598'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 792'''<br/>
José Blanco López<br/>
+
Michel Reimon<br/>
'''S&D'''<br/>
+
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
Article 45 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a
+
Article 61 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
An undertaking shall be deemed to have significant market power if, either individually or jointly with others, it enjoys a position equivalent to dominance, that is to say a position of economic strength affording it the power to behave to an appreciable extent independently of competitors, customers and ultimately consumers.
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
An undertaking shall be deemed to have significant market power if, either individually or jointly with others, '''''including through a commercial or a co-investment agreement,''''' it enjoys a position equivalent to dominance, that is to say a position of economic strength affording it the power to behave to an appreciable extent independently of competitors, customers and ultimately consumers.
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
| colspan='2' |
(a) ensuring coverage of their national territory and population at high quality and speed, both indoors and outdoors, including along major transport paths, including the trans-European transport network;
+
''Justification: Co-investment in a certain area must be considered an oligopoly of a few powerful actors (on the local level), as the FDN Federation showed in their analysis of the fixed-line market (www.ffdn.org/en/node/129 ) written for a consultation of the ARCEP in 2016. These oligopolies work as a cartel. The co-investors, in a given area, should be regarded as having the position of the incumbent in that area. Such symmetric regulation would allow welcoming all actors into the market.''
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
(a) ensuring coverage of their national territory and population at high quality and speed, both indoors and outdoors, including along major transport paths, including the trans-European transport network '''''as defined in Regulation 1315/2013''''';
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
 +
=== Amendment 793 + ===
  
Idem 596, 597
+
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
+
|-
 +
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
 +
'''Amendment 793'''<br/>
 +
Kathleen Van Brempt<br/>
 +
'''S&D'''<br/>
 +
Article 61 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
An undertaking shall be deemed to have significant market power if, either individually or jointly with others, it enjoys a position equivalent to dominance, that is to say a position of economic strength affording it the power to behave to an appreciable extent independently of competitors, customers and ultimately consumers.
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
An undertaking shall be deemed to have significant market power if, either individually or jointly with others, it enjoys a position equivalent to dominance, that is to say a position of economic strength affording it the power to behave to an appreciable extent independently of competitors, customers and ultimately consumers '''''or when it is able to disrupt effective competition'''''.
 +
|}
  
=== Amendment 599 / ===
+
=== Amendment 794 + ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 599'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 794'''<br/>
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Dan Nica, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Jeppe Kofod, Flavio Zanonato, Theresa Griffin<br/>
+
Kaja Kallas<br/>
'''S&D'''<br/>
+
'''ALDE'''<br/>
Article 45 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point c a (new)
+
Article 61 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
  
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
'''''(c a)''''' '''''ensuring predictability and consistency in the way rights are granted, renewed or modified in order to promote long term investments'''''
+
'''''Two or more undertakings may each be deemed to enjoy a position equivalent to having significant market power when they have the possibility to significantly impede effective competition, taking into account the relevant markets including but not limited to the market shares of other market participants, the market power of an undertaking on closely related markets, barriers to entry, market concentration, product differentiation, capacity constraints and switching costs.'''''
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
| colspan='2' |
''Justification: Predictability lowers the risk for investments''
+
''Justification: In light of the increasing trend of convergence between markets, and development of oligopolies in Europe, there is a need to include situations where two or more undertakings can foreclose the markets even without tacit collusion.In accordance with rule 104 of the rules of procedure, this amendment is necessary for pressing reasons related to the internal logic of the text''
 
|}
 
|}
  
 
+
=== Amendment 800 + ===
Pas compris
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 600 / ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 600'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 800'''<br/>
José Blanco López<br/>
+
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Edouard Martin, Flavio Zanonato, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Dan Nica, Jeppe Kofod<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
Article 45 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point c a (new)
+
Article 61 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 b (new)
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
  
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
'''''(c a)''''' '''''ensuring predictability and consistency in the way rights are granted, renewed or modified in order to promote long term investments'''''
+
'''''An undertaking shall be deemed to have unilateral market power where, in the absence of significant market power, it enjoys a position of economic strength by virtue of the weakness of competitive constraints in an oligopolistic market, enabling it to act in a manner which is detrimental to consumer welfare.'''''
 +
|-
 +
| colspan='2' |
 +
''Justification: Defining unilateral market power can bring tools for NRAs to ensure competition in markets. Oligopolies have become increasingly commonplace in the EU.''
 
|}
 
|}
  
 
+
=== Amendment 818 + ===
Idem 599
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 601 / ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 601'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 818'''<br/>
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Dan Nica, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Jeppe Kofod<br/>
+
Michel Reimon<br/>
'''S&D'''<br/>
+
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
Article 45 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point e
+
Article 65 – paragraph 2 – point a
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(e) promoting the shared use of radio spectrum between similar and/or different uses of spectrum through appropriate established sharing rules and conditions, including the protection of existing rights of use, in accordance with Union law;
+
'''''(a)''''' '''''the existence of market developments which may increase the likelihood of the relevant market tending towards effective competition, such as those commercial co-investment or access agreements between operators which benefit competitive dynamics sustainably;'''''
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(e) promoting the shared use of radio spectrum between similar and/or different uses of spectrum'''''; promoting competition''''' through appropriate established sharing rules and conditions, including the protection of existing rights of use, in accordance with Union law;
+
'''''deleted'''''
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
| colspan='2' |
''Justification: Competition criteria in radio spectrum procedures are important when the procedures are designed. Fair and non-discriminatory wholesale access conditions and consumer choice should be enhanced.''
+
''Justification: The Commission’s proposal weakens the SMP regime. The way in which the 3-criteria test is described in the draft Code differs from the version of the test that has been applied, successfully, by NRAs over the last 15 years and which is set out in Recommendation 2014/710/EU. Article 65 (2) (a) as proposed by the Commission adds a purely speculative element into the market analysis framework. According to BEREC opinion BoR (16) 213 (p.10): “In particular, in order to determine whether a market can be considered for regulation, the new test requires NRAs to take account of market developments which “may increase the likelihood” of a relevant market tending towards effective competition, ultimately making it difficult for NRAs to find that a market can be assessed for SMP.” Constraints on NRAs’ ability to impose regulations have to be avoided. The focus on commercial agreements undermines the SMP regime, as it is linked to a deregulatory promise and might in the long run create cartel-like oligopolies that cannot easily be treated with anti-trust law. The proposal also neglects the connection between cause and effect. Sufficient competition on the retail market results from functioning wholesale markets and should hence by no means be taken as a criterion to deregulate wholesale access. Effective access regulation to the SMP operator’s network is crucial to maintain sustainable retail competition, which in turn leads to lower prices and more choice for consumers.''
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Promotion de la compétition dans l'usage du spectre, lien avec la question pour l'amendement 592
+
The Commission’s proposal weakens the SMP regime.
  
  
=== Amendment 602 / ===
+
=== Amendment 831 + ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 602'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 831'''<br/>
David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano<br/>
+
Michel Reimon<br/>
'''EFDD'''<br/>
+
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
Article 45 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point e
+
Article 65 – paragraph 2 – point b
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(e) promoting the shared use of radio spectrum between similar and/or different uses of spectrum through appropriate established sharing rules and conditions, including the protection of existing rights of use, in accordance with Union law;
+
(b) all relevant competitive constraints, '''''including at retail''''' level, irrespective of whether the sources of such constraints are deemed to be electronic communications networks, electronic communications services, or other types of services or applications which are comparable from the perspective of the end-user''''', and irrespective of whether such constraints are part of the relevant market''''';
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(e) promoting the shared use of radio spectrum between similar and/or different uses of spectrum '''''promoting competition''''' through appropriate established sharing rules and conditions, including the protection of existing rights of use, in accordance with Union law;
+
(b) all relevant competitive constraints, '''''especially at wholesale''''' level, irrespective of whether the sources of such constraints are deemed to be electronic communications networks, electronic communications services, or other types of services or applications which are comparable from the perspective of the end-user;
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
''Justification: The amendment aims to promote competition in radio spectrum assignment procedures.''
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
 +
=== Amendment 832 + ===
  
Idem 601
+
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 +
|-
 +
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
 +
'''Amendment 832'''<br/>
 +
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Dan Nica, Jeppe Kofod, Flavio Zanonato<br/>
 +
'''S&D'''<br/>
 +
Article 65 – paragraph 2 – point b
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
(b) all relevant competitive constraints, '''''including at''''' retail level, irrespective of whether the sources of such constraints are deemed to be electronic communications networks, electronic communications services, or other types of services or applications which are comparable from the perspective of the end-user''''', and irrespective of whether such constraints are part of the relevant market''''';
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
(b) all relevant competitive constraints, '''''on wholesale and''''' retail level '''''level''''', irrespective of whether the sources of such constraints are deemed to be electronic communications networks, electronic communications services, or other types of services or applications which are comparable from the perspective of the end-user;
 +
|-
 +
| colspan='2' |
 +
''Justification: Avoiding the possibility to deregulate on the sole basis of the existence of commercial access agreements is necessary. Putting the focus on commercial agreements for deregulating would weaken and undermine the SMP regime already in place. At the same time, we should avoid the focus on only retail market, as narrowing the scope of competition to the retail level introduces great uncertainty as regards one of the cornerstones of the regulatory framework. Effective access wholesale regulation to the SMP operator’s network is pivotal to establish and maintain an intensive and sustainable retail competition. Sufficient competition on the retail market results from functioning wholesale markets and should hence by no means be taken as a criterion to deregulate wholesale access. Consequently the mere prospect of removing access regulation undermines investments of alternative network operators, which are sensitive to expectations on the (un)reliability of wholesale access products. Therefore, deregulation subject to weak safeguards has to be prevented.''
 +
|}
  
  
=== Amendment 603 ++ ===
+
=== Amendment 872 -- ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #A60000; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 603'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 872'''<br/>
Michel Reimon<br/>
+
Anna Záborská, Ivan Štefanec<br/>
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
+
'''EPP'''<br/>
Article 45 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point e a (new)
+
Article 70
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-bottom:0em;'|
 +
'''''Article 70'''''
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-bottom:0em;'|
 +
'''''deleted'''''
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
'''''Access to civil engineering'''''
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
 
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
'''''1. A national regulatory authority may, in accordance with Article 66, impose obligations on operators to meet reasonable requests for access to, and use of, civil engineering including, without limitation, buildings or entries to buildings, building cables including wiring, antennae, towers and other supporting constructions, poles, masts, ducts, conduits, inspection chambers, manholes, and cabinets, in situations where the market analysis indicates that denial of access or access given under unreasonable terms and conditions having a similar effect would hinder the emergence of a sustainable competitive market at the retail level and would not be in the end-user's interest.'''''
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
  
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
'''''(e a)''''' '''''The Commission shall establish a programme aiming to release spectrum for shared and unlicensed uses. This programme shall include the development of a European database of shared and unlicensed spectrum.'''''
 
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' |
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em'|
''Justification: Innovation and freedom of expression need a broad access to shared and unlicensed uses of , as stressed in article 6 of the 2012 Radio Spectrum Policy Programme. Increasing this access is thus a major challenge. Following the success of the release of the 1,2 Ghz frequencies within the Radio spectrum policy programme (Article 3 of Decision 243/2012/EU), the European Commission shall launch such a programme aiming at the release of shared spectrum. A database of shared spectrum would greatly facilitate and encourage the release of shared spectrum.''
+
'''''2. National regulatory authorities may impose obligations on an operator to provide access in accordance with this Article, irrespective of whether the assets that are affected by the obligation are part of the relevant market in accordance with the market analysis, provided that the obligation is necessary and proportionate to meet the objectives of Article 3.'''''
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em'|
 +
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Mise en place d'un régime de partage du spectre non-soumis à license
+
This AM reduces the operators' obligations on access to network
  
 
+
=== Amendment 880 -- ===
=== Amendment 604 - ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #A60000; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 604'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 880'''<br/>
Evžen Tošenovský<br/>
+
Michał Boni, Henna Virkkunen, Jerzy Buzek<br/>
'''ECR'''<br/>
+
'''EPP'''<br/>
Article 45 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
+
Article 70 – paragraph 1
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
1. A national regulatory authority may, in accordance with Article 66, impose obligations on operators to meet reasonable requests for access to, and use of, civil engineering including, without limitation, buildings or entries to buildings, building cables including wiring, antennae, towers and other supporting constructions, poles, masts, ducts, conduits, inspection chambers, manholes, and cabinets, in situations where the market analysis indicates that denial of access or access given under unreasonable terms and conditions having a similar effect would hinder the emergence of a sustainable competitive market at the retail level and would not be in the end-user's interest.
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
1. A national regulatory authority may, in accordance with Article 66, impose obligations on operators to meet reasonable requests for access to, and use of, civil engineering '''''and passive infrastructure''''' including, without limitation, buildings or entries to buildings, building cables including wiring, antennae, towers and other supporting constructions, poles, masts, ducts''''', inactive wireline transmission infrastructure including cable and fiber''''', conduits, inspection chambers, manholes, and cabinets, in situations where the market analysis indicates that denial of access or access given under unreasonable terms and conditions having a similar effect would hinder the emergence of a sustainable competitive market at the retail level and would not be in the end-user's interest.
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
| colspan='2' |
'''''When adopting technical harmonisation measures under Decision No 676/2002/EC, the Commission may, taking utmost account of the opinion of Radio Spectrum Policy Group, adopt an implementing measure setting out whether, pursuant to Article 46 of this Directive, rights in the harmonised band shall be subject to a general authorisation or to individual rights of use. Those implementing measures shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 110(4).'''''
+
''Justification: It is proposed to extend the scope of this Article to all passive infrastructure.''
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
'''''deleted'''''
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
 
+
=== Amendment 889 - ===
Dérégulation dangereuse
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 605 + ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 605'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 889'''<br/>
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Dan Nica, Edouard Martin, Theresa Griffin, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Jeppe Kofod<br/>
+
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Edouard Martin, Dan Nica, Jeppe Kofod, Carlos Zorrinho, Victor Negrescu, Zigmantas Balčytis<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
Article 45 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3
+
Article 70 – paragraph 1 a (new)
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-bottom:0em;'|
Where the Commission is considering acting to provide for measures in accordance with Article 39, it '''''may''''' seek the advice of the Radio Spectrum Policy Group with regard to the implications of any such standard or specification for the coordination, harmonisation and availability of radio spectrum. The Commission shall take utmost account of the advice of the Radio Spectrum Policy Group in taking any subsequent steps.
+
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-bottom:0em;'|
Where the Commission is considering acting to provide for measures in accordance with Article 39, it '''''shall''''' seek the advice of the Radio Spectrum Policy Group with regard to the implications of any such standard or specification for the coordination, harmonisation and availability of radio spectrum. The Commission shall take utmost account of the advice of the Radio Spectrum Policy Group in taking any subsequent steps.
+
'''''1 a.''''' '''''National regulatory authorities shall take account in particular of the following factors:'''''
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' |
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
''Justification: Advice of RSPG is essential to assess the impact of measures linked to spectrum harmonisation.''
 
|}
 
  
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
'''''(a) the technical and economic viability of using or installing competing facilities, in the light of the rate of market development, taking into account the nature and type of interconnection and/or access involved, including the viability of other upstream access products such as access to ducts;'''''
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
  
Obligation de l'avis du RSPG
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
'''''(b) the technological evolution affecting network design and management'''''
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
  
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
'''''(cb) the feasibility of providing the access proposed, in relation to the capacity available;'''''
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
  
=== Amendment 606 / ===
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
'''''(dc) the initial investment by the facility owner, taking account of any public investment made and the risks involved in making the investment;'''''
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
  
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0; width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
'''''(ed) the need to safeguard competition in the long term, with particular attention to economically efficient infrastructure-based competition;'''''
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
'''Amendment 606'''<br/>
+
 
Pervenche Berès, Edouard Martin<br/>
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
'''S&D'''<br/>
+
'''''(fe) where appropriate, any relevant intellectual property rights;'''''
Article 45 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
+
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em'|
 +
 
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em'|
 +
'''''(g) the provision of pan-European services.'''''
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
| colspan='2' |
Si l’utilisation d’une bande harmonisée ne suscite pas de demande sur le marché national ou régional, et sous réserve de la mesure d’harmonisation adoptée en vertu de la décision n° 676/2002/CE, les États membres peuvent autoriser une utilisation alternative de tout ou partie de cette bande, y compris l’utilisation existante, conformément aux paragraphes 4 et 5, à condition:
+
''Justification: Civil engineering access enhances infrastructure-based-competition but should not be treated as the sole or primary remedy. That is what it is necessary to include the complementary obligation of giving access to the entire physical network elements (i.e. passive access). Passive remedies, compared to active ones, remain the main wholesale access products that ensure and promote sustainable infrastructure-based competition. The amendment therefore gives priority to passive over active remedies.''
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
Si l’utilisation d’une bande harmonisée ne suscite pas de demande sur le marché national ou régional, et sous réserve de la mesure d’harmonisation adoptée en vertu de la décision n° 676/2002/CE, '''''et sans préjudice de la décision 243/2012 / UE établissant un programme pluriannuel de politique du spectre radioélectrique (RSPP) et la décision n ° ... / 2017 / UE concernant l'utilisation de la bande de fréquences 470-790 MHz dans l'Union,''''' les États membres peuvent autoriser une utilisation alternative de tout ou partie de cette bande, y compris l’utilisation existante, conformément aux paragraphes 4 et 5, à condition:
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
 
+
=== Amendment 890 - ===
Pas compris l'intérêt
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 607 / ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 607'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 890'''<br/>
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Dan Nica, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Jeppe Kofod, Edouard Martin<br/>
+
Eva Kaili<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
Article 45 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
+
Article 70 – paragraph 1 a (new)
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-bottom:0em;'|
In case of a national or regional lack of market demand for the use of a harmonised band, and subject to the harmonisation measure adopted under Decision No 676/2002/EC, Member States may allow an alternative use of all or part of that band, including the existing use, in accordance with paragraphs 4 and 5, provided that:
+
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-bottom:0em;'|
In case of a national or regional lack of market demand for the use of a harmonised band, and subject to the harmonisation measure adopted under Decision No 676/2002/EC '''''and without prejudice to Decision 243/2012/EU establishing a multiannual radio spectrum policy programme (RSPP) and Decision No .../2017/EU on the use of the 470-790 MHz frequency band in the Union''''', Member States may allow an alternative use of all or part of that band, including the existing use, in accordance with paragraphs 4 and 5, provided that:
+
'''''1 a.''''' '''''National regulatory authorities shall take account in particular of the following factors:'''''
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' |
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
''Justification: Any of the proposed measures in Article 45, paragraph 3 should not put into question the specific solutions retained in Decision 243/2012/EU establishing a multiannual radio spectrum policy programme (RSPP) and Decision No …/2017/EU on the use of the UHF band.''
 
|}
 
  
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
'''''(a) the technical and economic viability of using or installing competing facilities, in the light of the rate of market development, taking into account the nature and type of interconnection and/or access involved, including the viability of other upstream access products such as access to ducts;'''''
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
  
Idem 606
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
'''''(b) the technological evolution affecting network design and management'''''
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
  
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
'''''(cb) the feasibility of providing the access proposed, in relation to the capacity available;'''''
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
  
=== Amendment 608 / ===
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
'''''(dc) the initial investment by the facility owner, taking account of any public investment made and the risks involved in making the investment;'''''
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
  
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0; width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
'''''(ed) the need to safeguard competition in the long term, with particular attention to economically efficient infrastructure-based competition;'''''
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
'''Amendment 608'''<br/>
+
 
José Blanco López<br/>
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
'''S&D'''<br/>
+
'''''(fe) where appropriate, any relevant intellectual property rights;'''''
Article 45 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
 
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em'|
In case of a national or regional lack of market demand for the use of a harmonised band, and subject to the harmonisation measure adopted under Decision No 676/2002/EC, Member States may allow an alternative use of all or part of that band, including the existing use, in accordance with paragraphs 4 and 5, provided that:
+
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em'|
In case of a national or regional lack of market demand for the use of a harmonised band, and subject to the harmonisation measure adopted under Decision No 676/2002/EC '''''and without prejudice to Decision 243/2012/EU establishing a multiannual radio spectrum policy programme (RSPP) and Decision No .../2017/EU on the use of the 470-790 MHz frequency band in the Union''''', Member States may allow an alternative use of all or part of that band, including the existing use, in accordance with paragraphs 4 and 5, provided that:
+
'''''(g) the provision of pan-European services.'''''
 
|}
 
|}
  
 +
=== Amendment 891 - ===
  
Idem 606, 607
+
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 609 / ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 609'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 891'''<br/>
Eva Kaili<br/>
+
Patrizia Toia<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
Article 45 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
+
Article 70 – paragraph 1 a (new)
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
In case of a national or regional lack of market demand for the use of a harmonised band, and subject to the harmonisation measure adopted under Decision No 676/2002/EC, Member States may allow an alternative use of all or part of that band, including the existing use, in accordance with paragraphs 4 and 5, provided that:
+
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
In case of a national or regional lack of market demand for the use of a harmonised band, and subject to the harmonisation measure adopted under Decision No 676/2002/EC '''''and without prejudice to Decision 243/2012/EU establishing a multiannual radio spectrum policy programme (RSPP) and Decision No .../2017/EU on the use of the 470-790 MHz frequency band in the Union''''', Member States may allow an alternative use of all or part of that band, including the existing use, in accordance with paragraphs 4 and 5, provided that:
+
'''''1 a.''''' '''''National regulators should however not impose access to ducts, conduits, inspection chambers, manholes, and cabinets from wholesale-only operators in the sense of Article 77, when these operators offer a viable and similar alternative means of access to end-users in accordance with Article 3(3) of the Directive 2014/61/EU.'''''
 +
|-
 +
| colspan='2' |
 +
''Justification: In order to make the business model of vertically separate undertakings sustainable, wholesale only operators should not be obliged to provide access to their ducts to for example vertically integrated operators. This would take away economic incentives of the latter to use the networks of wholesale only operators and put at risk the prospective returns of investors in wholesale only networks.''
 
|}
 
|}
  
 
+
=== Amendment 892 - ===
Idem 606, 607, 608
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 610 - ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 610'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 892'''<br/>
 
Kaja Kallas<br/>
 
Kaja Kallas<br/>
 
'''ALDE'''<br/>
 
'''ALDE'''<br/>
Article 45 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point a
+
Article 70 – paragraph 1 a (new)
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(a) the finding of a lack of market demand for the use of the harmonised band is based on a public consultation in line with Article 23;
+
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
(a) the finding of a lack of market demand for the use of the harmonised band is based on a public consultation in line with Article 23 '''''and on a forward-looking assessment of the market competitive conditions''''' ;
+
'''''1 a.''''' '''''A national regulatory authority shall ensure that where access to civil engineering such as access to ducts is limited due to availability, alternatives means of access such as dark fiber are imposed in accordance with article 71.'''''
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
| colspan='2' |
''Justification: There is a need to simplify the procedure as proposed. In addition, in accordance with rule 104 of the rules of procedure, this amendment is necessary for pressing reasons related to the internal logic of the text''
+
''Justification: Access to civil engineering is important to contribute to sustainable competition, however it should take into account the limited availability or physical constraints of granting such access''
 
|}
 
|}
  
 
+
=== Amendment 893 - ===
Vocabulaire ETNO, warning !
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 611 + ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 611'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 893'''<br/>
Michel Reimon<br/>
+
Pavel Telička<br/>
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
+
'''ALDE'''<br/>
Article 45 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 – introductory part
+
Article 70 – paragraph 2
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
Member States '''''may, however,''''' provide for proportionate and non-discriminatory restrictions to the types of radio network or wireless access technology used for electronic communications services '''''where this is necessary''''' to:
+
2. National regulatory authorities '''''may impose obligations on an operator to provide access in accordance with this Article, irrespective of whether the assets that are affected by the obligation are part of the relevant market in accordance with the market analysis, provided that the obligation is necessary and proportionate to meet the objectives of Article 3'''''.
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
Member States '''''shall''''' provide for proportionate and non-discriminatory restrictions to the types of radio network or wireless access technology used for electronic communications services '''''in order''''' to:
+
2. National regulatory authorities '''''shall take account in particular of the following factors:''''''''''(a) the technical and economic viability of using or installing competing facilities, in the light of the rate of market development, taking into account the nature and type of interconnection and/or access involved, including the viability of other upstream access products such as access to ducts;''''''''''(b) the technological evolution affecting network design and management''''''''''(c) the feasibility of providing the access proposed, in relation to the capacity available;''''''''''(d) the initial investment by the facility owner, taking account of any public investment made and the risks involved in making the investment;''''''''''(e) the need to safeguard competition in the long term, with particular attention to economically efficient infrastructure-based competition;''''''''''(f) where appropriate, any relevant intellectual property rights;''''''''''(g) the provision of pan-European services'''''.
 
|}
 
|}
  
 
+
=== Amendment 894 - ===
Renforcement et obligation pour les MS de prendre des restrictions proportionnelles et non-discriminatoires
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 612 + ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 612'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 894'''<br/>
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Dan Nica, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Jeppe Kofod, Edouard Martin, Theresa Griffin<br/>
+
Michel Reimon<br/>
'''S&D'''<br/>
+
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
Article 45 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 – introductory part
+
Article 70 – paragraph 2
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
Member States '''''may''''', however, provide for proportionate and non-discriminatory restrictions to the types of radio network or wireless access technology used for electronic communications services '''''where this is necessary''''' to:
+
2. National regulatory authorities '''''may impose obligations on an operator to provide access in accordance with this Article, irrespective of whether the assets that are affected by the obligation are part''''' of the '''''relevant market in accordance with the market analysis, provided that the obligation is necessary and proportionate to meet the objectives of Article 3.'''''
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
Member States '''''shall''''', however, provide for proportionate and non-discriminatory restrictions to the types of radio network or wireless access technology used for electronic communications services '''''in order''''' to:
+
2. National regulatory authorities '''''shall take account in particular''''' of the '''''following factors:'''''
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
| colspan='2' |
''Justification: Avoiding harmful interferences in the safety-critical tasks can be an obligation for safety reasons.''
+
''Justification: Civil engineering access enhances infrastructure-based-competition but should not be treated as the sole or primary remedy. That is what it is necessary to include the complementary obligation of giving access to the entire physical network elements (i.e. passive access). Passive remedies, compared to active ones, remain the main wholesale access products that ensure and promote sustainable infrastructure-based competition. The amendment therefore gives priority to passive over active remedies.''
 
|}
 
|}
  
 +
=== Amendment 895 - ===
  
Idem 611
+
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 +
|-
 +
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
 +
'''Amendment 895'''<br/>
 +
Michel Reimon<br/>
 +
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
 +
Article 70 – paragraph 2 – point a (new)
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
  
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
'''''(a)''''' '''''the technical and economic viability of using or installing competing facilities, in the light of the rate of market development, taking into account the nature and type of interconnection and/or access involved, including the viability of other upstream access products such as access to ducts;'''''
 +
|}
  
=== Amendment 613 + ===
+
=== Amendment 896 - ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 613'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 896'''<br/>
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Dan Nica, Theresa Griffin, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Jeppe Kofod, Martina Werner<br/>
+
Michel Reimon<br/>
'''S&D'''<br/>
+
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
Article 45 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 – point d a (new)
+
Article 70 – paragraph 2 – point b (new)
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
  
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
'''''(d a)''''' '''''promote interconnection in Europe along major transport paths;'''''
+
'''''(b)''''' '''''the technological evolution affecting network design and management'''''
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
''Justification: Achieving interoperability is essential for the creation of smart, single transportation area in Europe. The seamless and safe circulation of passengers and goods on roads and railways across the EU. Seamless interconnection can boost the efficiency and safety of logistics and passenger traffic and contribute to environment-friendly transport in the internal market.''
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
 +
=== Amendment 897 - ===
  
Promotion de l'interconnexion
+
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 +
|-
 +
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
 +
'''Amendment 897'''<br/>
 +
Michel Reimon<br/>
 +
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
 +
Article 70 – paragraph 2 – point c (new)
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
  
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
'''''(c)''''' '''''the feasibility of providing the access proposed, in relation to the capacity available;'''''
 +
|}
  
=== Amendment 614 + ===
+
=== Amendment 898 - ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 614'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 898'''<br/>
José Blanco López<br/>
+
Michel Reimon<br/>
'''S&D'''<br/>
+
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
Article 45 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 – point d a (new)
+
Article 70 – paragraph 2 – point d (new)
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
  
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
'''''(d a)''''' '''''promote interconnection in Europe along major transport paths;'''''
+
'''''(d)''''' '''''the initial investment by the facility owner, taking account of any public investment made and the risks involved in making the investment;'''''
 
|}
 
|}
  
 +
=== Amendment 899 - ===
  
Idem 613
+
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 615 + ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 615'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 899'''<br/>
Françoise Grossetête, Anne Sander<br/>
+
Michel Reimon<br/>
'''EPP'''<br/>
+
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
Article 45 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2 – point d a (new)
+
Article 70 – paragraph 2 – point e (new)
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
  
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
'''''(d a)''''' '''''the promotion of interconnection in Europe along major transport paths.'''''
+
'''''(e)''''' '''''the need to safeguard competition in the long term, with particular attention to economically efficient infrastructure based competition;'''''
 
|}
 
|}
  
 
+
=== Amendment 900 - ===
Idem 613, 614
 
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 616 + ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 616'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 900'''<br/>
 
Michel Reimon<br/>
 
Michel Reimon<br/>
 
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
 
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
Article 45 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2 – point d a (new)
+
Article 70 – paragraph 2 – point f (new)
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
  
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
'''''(d a)''''' '''''the promotion of interconnection in Europe along major transport paths'''''
+
'''''(f)''''' '''''the provision of pan-European services.'''''
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Idem 613, 614, 615
 
  
 
+
=== Amendment 901 - ===
=== Amendment 617 + ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 617'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 901'''<br/>
Michel Reimon<br/>
+
Anna Záborská, Ivan Štefanec<br/>
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
+
'''EPP'''<br/>
Article 45 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 3
+
Article 70 a (new)
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-bottom:0em;'|
A measure which prohibits the provision of any other electronic communications service in a specific band may only be provided for where justified by the need to protect safety of life services. Member States may, exceptionally, also extend such a measure in order to fulfil other general interest objectives as defined by Member States in accordance with Union law.
+
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-bottom:0em;'|
A measure which prohibits the provision of any other electronic communications service in a specific band may only be provided for where justified by the need to protect safety of life services. Member States may, exceptionally, also extend such a measure in order to fulfil other general interest objectives as defined by '''''the Union and''''' Member States in accordance with Union law.
+
'''''Article 70 a'''''
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
 
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
'''''Access obligations beyond civil engineering'''''
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em'|
 +
 
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em'|
 +
'''''In geographic areas where two access networks can be expected on a forward-looking basis and where at least one of the network operators offers wholesale access to any interested undertaking, on reasonable commercial terms permitting sustainable competition on the retail market, national regulatory authorities shall not impose or maintain wholesale access obligations, beyond access to civil infrastructure according to Article 3 of Directive 2014/61/EU.'''''
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Inclusion de l'Union européenne dans la prise des décisions
 
  
  
=== Amendment 618 + ===
+
=== Amendment 907 + ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 618'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 907'''<br/>
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Dan Nica, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Jeppe Kofod<br/>
+
Michel Reimon<br/>
'''S&D'''<br/>
+
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
Article 45 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 3
+
Article 71 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
A measure which prohibits the provision of any other electronic communications service in a specific band may only be provided for where justified by the need to protect safety of life services. Member States may, exceptionally, also extend such a measure in order to fulfil other general interest objectives as defined by Member States in accordance with Union law.
+
'''''Only where''''' a national regulatory authority '''''concludes that the obligations imposed in accordance with Article 70 would not on their own lead to the achievement of the objectives set out in Article 3, it''''' may, in accordance with the provisions of Article 66, impose obligations on operators to meet reasonable requests for access to, and use of, specific network elements and associated facilities, in situations where the national regulatory authority considers that denial of access or unreasonable terms and conditions having a similar effect would hinder the emergence of a sustainable competitive market at the retail level, and would not be in the end-user's interest.
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
A measure which prohibits the provision of any other electronic communications service in a specific band may only be provided for where justified by the need to protect safety of life services. Member States may, exceptionally, also extend such a measure in order to fulfil other general interest objectives as defined by Member States '''''and the EU''''' in accordance with Union law.
+
A national regulatory authority may, in accordance with the provisions of Article 66, impose obligations on operators to meet reasonable requests for access to, and use of, specific network elements and associated facilities, in situations where the national regulatory authority considers that denial of access or unreasonable terms and conditions having a similar effect would hinder the emergence of a sustainable competitive market at the retail level, and would not be in the end-user's interest.
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
''Justification: Safety of life services need to be acknowledged on Member State and EU level.''
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Essentiellement idem 617
 
  
  
=== Amendment 619 + ===
+
=== Amendment 908 + ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 619'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 908'''<br/>
José Blanco López<br/>
+
José Blanco López, Inmaculada Rodríguez-Piñero Fernández, Soledad Cabezón Ruiz<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
Article 45 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 3
+
Article 71 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
A measure which prohibits the provision of any other electronic communications service in a specific band may only be provided for where justified by the need to protect safety of life services. Member States may, exceptionally, also extend such a measure in order to fulfil other general interest objectives as defined by Member States in accordance with Union law.
+
'''''Only where''''' a national regulatory authority '''''concludes that the obligations imposed in accordance with Article 70 would not on their own lead to the achievement of the objectives set out in Article 3, it''''' may, in accordance with the provisions of Article 66, impose obligations on operators to meet reasonable requests for access to, and use of, specific network elements and associated facilities, in situations where the national regulatory authority considers that denial of access or unreasonable terms and conditions having a similar effect would hinder the emergence of a sustainable competitive market at the retail level, and would not be in the end-user's interest.
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
A measure which prohibits the provision of any other electronic communications service in a specific band may only be provided for where justified by the need to protect safety of life services. Member States may, exceptionally, also extend such a measure in order to fulfil other general interest objectives as defined by Member States '''''and the EU''''' in accordance with Union law.
+
A national regulatory authority may, in accordance with the provisions of Article 66, impose obligations on operators to meet reasonable requests for access to, and use of, specific network elements and associated facilities, in situations where the national regulatory authority considers that denial of access or unreasonable terms and conditions having a similar effect would hinder the emergence of a sustainable competitive market at the retail level, and would not be in the end-user's interest.
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Essentiellement idem 617, 618
+
Same as AM 907
  
  
=== Amendment 663 - ===
+
=== Amendment 914 - ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 663'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 914'''<br/>
Kaja Kallas, Marietje Schaake<br/>
+
Pavel Telička<br/>
'''ALDE'''<br/>
+
'''EFDD'''<br/>
Article 49 – paragraph 1
+
Article 71 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point a
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
1. Where Member States authorise the use of radio spectrum through individual rights of use for a limited period of time, they shall ensure that the authorisation is granted for a period that is appropriate in view of the objective pursued taking due account of the need to ensure effective and efficient use '''''and''''' promote efficient investments, including by allowing for an appropriate period for investment amortisation.
+
(a) to give third parties access to specified '''''network elements and/or facilities, as appropriate including access to''''' network elements '''''which are either not''''' active '''''or physical and/or active or virtual unbundled access to the local loop''''';
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
1. Where Member States authorise the use of radio spectrum through individual rights of use for a limited period of time, they shall ensure that the authorisation is granted for a period that is appropriate in view of the objective pursued taking due account of the need to ensure effective and efficient use''''',''''' promote efficient investments, including by allowing for an appropriate period for investment amortisation ''''', promote innovation and allow for the evolution of services and technologies'''''.
+
(a) to give third parties access to specified '''''non-physical''''' network elements '''''including''''' active '''''services''''';
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
''Justification: in accordance with rule 104 of the rules of procedure, this amendment is necessary for pressing reasons related to the internal logic of the text''
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
BS ETNO
+
This amendment gives the priority of passive access over active access remedies which is not always the best solution especially for enabling small actors to enter the market and thus foster competition.
  
  
=== Amendment 664 / ===
+
=== Amendment 916 - ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 664'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 916'''<br/>
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Dan Nica, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Jeppe Kofod, Martina Werner<br/>
+
David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano<br/>
'''S&D'''<br/>
+
'''EPP'''<br/>
Article 49 – paragraph 1
+
Article 71 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point a
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
1. Where Member States authorise the use of radio spectrum through individual rights of use for a limited period of time, they shall ensure that the authorisation is granted for a period that is appropriate in view of the objective pursued taking due account of the need to ensure effective and efficient use and promote efficient investments, including by allowing for an appropriate period for investment amortisation.
+
(a) to give third parties access to specified '''''network elements and/or facilities, as appropriate including access to''''' network elements '''''which are either not''''' active '''''or physical and/or active or virtual unbundled access to the local loop''''';
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
1. Where Member States authorise the use of radio spectrum through individual rights of use for a limited period of time, they shall ensure that the authorisation is granted for a period that is appropriate in view of the objective pursued taking due account of the need to ensure '''''competition as well as''''' effective and efficient use and promote efficient investments, including by allowing for an appropriate period for investment amortisation.
+
(a) to give third parties access to specified '''''non-physical''''' network elements '''''including''''' active '''''services''''';
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
| colspan='2' |
''Justification: We should strengthen the criteria not only towards investment but also competition.''
+
''Justification: This amendment aims at ensuring the priority of passive access over active access remedies.''
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Inclusion de la compétition
 
  
  
=== Amendment 665 + ===
+
=== Amendment 917 + ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 665'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 917'''<br/>
András Gyürk<br/>
+
Michel Reimon<br/>
'''EPP'''<br/>
+
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
Article 49 – paragraph 2
+
Article 71 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point a
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
'''''2.''''' '''''Where Member States grant rights of use for harmonised radio spectrum for a limited period of time, those rights of use for harmonised radio spectrum shall be valid for a duration of at least 25 years, except in the case of temporary rights, temporary extension of rights pursuant to paragraph 3 and rights for secondary use in harmonised bands.'''''
+
(a) to give third parties access to specified network elements and/or facilities, as appropriate including '''''access to network elements''''' which '''''are either not active or physical and/or active or virtual unbundled access to the local loop''''';
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
'''''deleted'''''
+
(a) to give third parties access to specified '''''non-physical''''' network elements and/or facilities, as appropriate including '''''active services under transparent and regulated tariff conditions,''''' which '''''at least make it possible to reproduce the tariffs of the retail offers of the regulated operator''''';
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Retrait de l'obligation de 25 ans (! à voir si c'est remplacé)
+
This AM shall be adopted together with AM 923
  
  
=== Amendment 666 -- ===
+
=== Amendment 923 + ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #A60000; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 666'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 923'''<br/>
Edouard Martin<br/>
+
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Edouard Martin, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Dan Nica, Jeppe Kofod, Patrizia Toia<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
Article 49 – paragraph 2
+
Article 71 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point a a (new)
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
2. Where Member States grant rights of use for harmonised radio spectrum for a limited period of time, those rights of use for harmonised radio spectrum shall be valid for a duration of at least '''''25''''' years, except in the case of temporary rights, temporary extension of rights pursuant to paragraph 3 and rights for secondary use in harmonised bands.
+
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
2. Where Member States grant rights of use for harmonised radio spectrum for a limited period of time, those rights of use for harmonised radio spectrum shall be valid for a duration of at least '''''15''''' years, except in the case of temporary rights, temporary extension of rights pursuant to paragraph 3 and rights for secondary use in harmonised bands''''', and subject to the provisions of Article 19 and 30. Where the rights of use duration goes beyond 15 years, a mid-term assessment shall be convened after 10 years of granting the rights of use. Rights of use may be withdrawn or adjusted by the Member States pursuant to this assessment if such allocation prevents:''''''''''- ensuring the efficient and effective use of radio spectrum,''''''''''- pursuing a general interest objective, such as the achievement of the Union connectivity targets, or''''''''''- organising and using radio spectrum for public order, public security purposes or defence.''''''''''In case of withdrawal, the rights of use can only be revoked after a transitional period'''''.
+
'''''(a a)''''' '''''obligations to share with third parties specified network elements, including shared access to the metallic local loop and sub-loop as well as shared access to fibre loops and fibre terminating segments, including wavelength division multiplexing and similar sharing solutions;'''''
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
''Justification: The harmonised license duration is a set as a minimum but it remains up to the MS to decide to grant it for a longer period. The proposal here aims at guaranteeing at the same time a degree of visibility and certainty for market players (15 years) across the EU, while introducing flexibility safeguards in case MS decide to grant rights of use for a longer period.''
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
15 ans, ça reste trop + revue de tous les 10 ans
+
This AM shall be adopted together with AM 917
  
  
=== Amendment 667 -- ===
+
=== Amendment 932 - ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #A60000; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 667'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 932'''<br/>
Eva Kaili<br/>
+
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Edouard Martin, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Dan Nica, Jeppe Kofod, Patrizia Toia<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
Article 49 – paragraph 2
+
Article 71 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point e
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
2. Where Member States grant rights of use for harmonised radio spectrum for a limited period of time, those rights of use '''''for harmonised radio spectrum shall be valid for a duration of at least 25''''' years''''', except in the case of temporary''''' rights''''', temporary extension of rights pursuant to paragraph 3 and rights for secondary use in harmonised bands'''''.
+
'''''(e)''''' '''''to provide co-location or other forms of associated facilities sharing;'''''
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
2. Where Member States grant rights of use for harmonised radio spectrum for a limited period of time, '''''they shall ensure''''' those rights of use '''''remain valid for a minimum period of [15] years subject to a mid-term assessment after [7-10]''''' years '''''of granting the rights of use. Rights of use may be withdrawn or adjusted by the Member States after the mid-term assessment if such''''' rights '''''prevent:''''''''''- ensuring the efficient and effective use of radio spectrum,''''''''''- pursuing a general interest objective, such as the achievement of the Union connectivity targets, or''''''''''- organising and using radio spectrum for public order, public security purposes or defence.''''''''''In case of withdrawal, the rights of use can only be revoked after a transitional period'''''.
+
'''''deleted'''''
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Idem 666
+
=== Amendment 933 - ===
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 668 -- ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #A60000; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 668'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 933'''<br/>
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Dan Nica, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Jeppe Kofod, Martina Werner<br/>
+
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Edouard Martin, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Dan Nica, Jeppe Kofod, Patrizia Toia<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
Article 49 – paragraph 2
+
Article 71 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point f
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
2. Where Member States grant rights of use for harmonised radio spectrum for a limited period of time, those rights of use '''''for harmonised radio spectrum shall be valid for a duration of at least 25''''' years''''', except in the case of temporary''''' rights''''', temporary extension of rights pursuant to paragraph 3 and rights for secondary use in harmonised bands'''''.
+
'''''(f)''''' '''''to provide specified services needed to ensure interoperability of end-to-end services to users, including facilities for software emulated networks or roaming on mobile networks;'''''
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
2. Where Member States grant rights of use for harmonised radio spectrum for a limited period of time, '''''they shall ensure''''' those rights of use '''''remain valid for a minimum period of [15] years subject to a mid-term assessment after [7-10]''''' years '''''of granting the rights of use. Rights of use may be withdrawn or adjusted by the Member States after the mid-term assessment if such''''' rights '''''prevent:''''''''''- ensuring the efficient and effective use of radio spectrum,''''''''''- pursuing a general interest objective, such as the achievement of the Union connectivity targets, or''''''''''- organising and using radio spectrum for public order, public security purposes or defence.''''''''''In case of withdrawal, the rights of use can only be revoked after a transitional period'''''.
+
'''''deleted'''''
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
''Justification: We need to ensure effective and efficient use of spectrum and promotion of efficient investments by bringing certainty to the markets. Setting a licence duration might be one means to achieve this. However, trusting the scarce resource of radio spectrum to limited amount of players in society for a long time may hamper innovations and technological development as well as harm the competitive market dynamics and the ability of new entrants to access spectrum reliant markets, which all may result in less positive impact for citizens and consumers. We should keep in mind that there might not be a single duration that is suitable for all situations and Member States. Further than that, betting the 30 years licence to a wrong horse in 1987 could have created significant obstacles for European digital development.''
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Idem 666, 667
+
=== Amendment 935 - ===
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 669 -- ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #A60000; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 669'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 935'''<br/>
José Blanco López<br/>
+
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Edouard Martin, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Dan Nica, Jeppe Kofod, Patrizia Toia<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
Article 49 – paragraph 2
+
Article 71 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point g
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
2. Where Member States grant rights of use for harmonised radio spectrum for a limited period of time, those rights of use '''''for harmonised radio spectrum shall be valid for a duration of at least 25''''' years''''', except in the case of temporary''''' rights''''', temporary extension of rights pursuant to paragraph 3 and rights for secondary use in harmonised bands'''''.
+
'''''(g)''''' '''''to provide access to operational support systems or similar software systems necessary to ensure fair competition in the provision of services;'''''
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
2. Where Member States grant rights of use for harmonised radio spectrum for a limited period of time, '''''they shall ensure''''' those rights of use '''''remain valid for a minimum period of [15] years subject to a mid-term assessment after [7-10]''''' years '''''of granting the rights of use. Rights of use may be withdrawn or adjusted by the Member States after the mid-term assessment if such''''' rights '''''prevent:''''''''''- ensuring the efficient and effective use of radio spectrum,''''''''''- pursuing a general interest objective, such as the achievement of the Union connectivity targets, or''''''''''- organising and using radio spectrum for public order, public security purposes or defence.''''''''''In case of withdrawal, the rights of use can only be revoked after a transitional period'''''.
+
'''''deleted'''''
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Idem 666, 667, 668
+
=== Amendment 936 - ===
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 670 - ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 670'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 936'''<br/>
Kaja Kallas, Marietje Schaake<br/>
+
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Edouard Martin, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Dan Nica, Jeppe Kofod, Patrizia Toia<br/>
'''ALDE'''<br/>
+
'''S&D'''<br/>
Article 49 – paragraph 2
+
Article 71 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point h
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
2. Where Member States grant rights of use for harmonised radio spectrum for a limited period of time, those rights of use for harmonised radio spectrum shall be valid for a duration of '''''at least''''' 25 years, except in the case of temporary rights, temporary extension of rights pursuant to paragraph 3 and rights for secondary use in harmonised bands.
+
'''''(h)''''' '''''to interconnect networks or network facilities;'''''
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
2. Where Member States grant rights of use for harmonised radio spectrum for a limited period of time, those rights of use for harmonised radio spectrum shall be valid for a '''''maximum''''' duration of 25 years, except in the case of temporary rights, temporary extension of rights pursuant to paragraph 3 and rights for secondary use in harmonised bands.'''''Where rights of use have been granted for a duration of 25 years, Member states shall conduct reviews at regular intervals of every 5 years to assess if the use of spectrum is the most efficient in light of technological or market evolution, and where justified and necessary shall amend such rights in accordance with articles 50 and 51.'''''
+
'''''deleted'''''
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
''Justification: In accordance with rule 104 of the rules of procedure, this amendment is necessary for pressing reasons related to the internal logic of the text''
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
25 ans trop long, même si revue tous les 5 ans
+
=== Amendment 937 - ===
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 671 -- ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #A60000; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 671'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 937'''<br/>
Gunnar Hökmark, Michał Boni, Bendt Bendtsen<br/>
+
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Edouard Martin, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Dan Nica, Jeppe Kofod, Patrizia Toia<br/>
'''EPP'''<br/>
+
'''S&D'''<br/>
Article 49 – paragraph 2
+
Article 71 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point i
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
2. Where Member States grant rights of use for harmonised radio spectrum for a limited period of time, those rights of use for harmonised radio spectrum shall be valid for a duration of at least '''''25''''' years, except in the case of temporary rights, temporary extension of rights pursuant to paragraph 3 and rights for secondary use in harmonised bands.
+
'''''(i)''''' '''''to provide access to associated services such as identity, location and presence service.'''''
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
2. Where Member States grant rights of use for harmonised radio spectrum for a limited period of time, those rights of use for harmonised radio spectrum shall be valid for a duration of at least '''''30''''' years''''', provided there are conditions to facilitate trading, leasing and sharing of rights''''', except in the case of temporary rights, temporary extension of rights pursuant to paragraph 3 and rights for secondary use in harmonised bands.
+
'''''deleted'''''
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
30 ans, trop long
+
=== Amendment 939 + ===
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 672 - ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 672'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 939'''<br/>
David Borrelli, Dario Tamburrano<br/>
+
Michel Reimon<br/>
'''EFDD'''<br/>
+
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
Article 49 – paragraph 2
+
Article 71 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
2. Where Member States grant rights of use for harmonised radio spectrum for a limited period of time, those rights of use for harmonised radio spectrum shall be valid for a duration of at least '''''25''''' years, except in the case of temporary rights, temporary extension of rights pursuant to paragraph 3 and rights for secondary use in harmonised bands.
+
2. '''''When national regulatory authorities are considering the appropriateness of imposing any of the possible specific obligations referred in paragraph 1, and in particular when assessing, in conformity with the principle of proportionality, whether and how such obligations should be imposed, they shall analyse whether other forms of access to wholesale inputs either on the same or a related wholesale market, would already be sufficient to address the identified problem at the retail level. The assessment shall include existing or prospective commercial access offers, regulated access pursuant to Article 59, or existing or contemplated regulated access to other wholesale inputs pursuant to this Article.''''' They shall take account in particular of the following factors:
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
2. Where Member States grant rights of use for harmonised radio spectrum for a limited period of time, those rights of use for harmonised radio spectrum shall be valid for a duration of at least '''''10''''' years, except in the case of temporary rights, temporary extension of rights pursuant to paragraph 3 and rights for secondary use in harmonised bands.
+
2. They shall take account in particular of the following factors:
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
| colspan='2' |
''Justification: The amendment aims to shorten the duration of 25 years for licenses, which is too long.''
+
''Justification: Before intervening in wholesale markets, NRAs would have to demonstrate that their intervention corresponds to a retail problem. The focus on retail markets would lead to the automatic de-regulation of wholesale markets in many cases, and would ultimately lead to the monopolisation or ‘duopolisation’. In addition, retail competition of the kind where all retail providers are dependent on one wholesale provider is not sustainable in the long run and only amounts to ‘fake-competition’ and could lead to higher prices and less innovation and choice for end-users.The mere existence of a “prospective commercial access offer” should not be a sufficient basis upon which to require regulatory forbearance – if it were, then the absence of take-up could result in a de facto unregulated monopoly (see also BEREC opinion BoR (16) 213 (p. 7)).''
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
10 ans trop long
+
=== Amendment 948 ++ ===
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 673 -- ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #A60000; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 673'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 948'''<br/>
Evžen Tošenovský<br/>
+
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Edouard Martin, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Dan Nica, Jeppe Kofod, Patrizia Toia<br/>
'''ECR'''<br/>
+
'''S&D'''<br/>
Article 49 – paragraph 2
+
Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point a
 
|-
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
2. Where Member States grant rights of use for harmonised radio spectrum for a limited period of time, those rights of use for harmonised radio spectrum shall be valid for '''''a duration of at least 25 years''''', except in the case of temporary rights, temporary extension of rights pursuant to paragraph 3 and rights for secondary use in harmonised bands.
+
'''''(a)''''' '''''the technical and economic viability of using or installing competing facilities, in the light of the rate of market development, taking into account the nature and type of interconnection and/or access involved, including the viability of other upstream access products such as access to ducts;'''''
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
2. Where Member States grant rights of use for harmonised radio spectrum for a limited period of time, those rights of use for harmonised radio spectrum shall be valid for '''''an appropriate duration''''', except in the case of temporary rights, temporary extension of rights pursuant to paragraph 3 and rights for secondary use in harmonised bands.
+
'''''deleted'''''
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Dérégulation et laissé vide
+
The role of NRAs is not to secure the investments of operators but to ensure a harmonious development in the territories and give to all equal access to the market and services.
 +
 
 +
=== Amendment 949 - ===
 +
 
 +
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 +
|-
 +
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
 +
'''Amendment 949'''<br/>
 +
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Edouard Martin, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Dan Nica, Jeppe Kofod, Patrizia Toia<br/>
 +
'''S&D'''<br/>
 +
Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point b
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
'''''(b)''''' '''''the expected technological evolution affecting network design and management'''''
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
'''''deleted'''''
 +
|}
  
  
=== Amendment 674 ++ ===
+
=== Amendment 953 ++ ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 674'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 953'''<br/>
Michel Reimon<br/>
+
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Edouard Martin, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Dan Nica, Jeppe Kofod, Patrizia Toia<br/>
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
+
'''S&D'''<br/>
Article 49 – paragraph 2
+
Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point c
 
|-
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
2. Where Member States grant rights of use for harmonised radio spectrum for a limited period of time, those rights of use for harmonised radio spectrum shall be valid for a duration of '''''at least''''' 25 years, '''''except in the case of temporary rights, temporary extension of rights pursuant to paragraph 3 and rights for secondary use in harmonised bands'''''.
+
'''''(c)''''' '''''the feasibility of providing the access proposed, in relation to the capacity available;'''''
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
2. Where Member States grant rights of use for harmonised radio spectrum for a limited period of time, those rights of use for harmonised radio spectrum shall be valid for a '''''maximum''''' duration of 25 years, '''''reviewed at regular intervals of maximum 5 years for assessing and amending the rights according to laydown procedures'''''.
+
'''''deleted'''''
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
''Justification: The draft Code proposes to extend to a minimum of 25 years the duration of rights to use the radio spectrum. This is disproportionate and unnecessary. Experience shows us that 20 years is already too long, especially considering that the regulation does not enable regulators to act when necessary, e.g. by withdrawing authorisation, even if the operator fails to honor its commitments. Allocating spectrum for more than 5 years would necessitate adding a revision clause/sunset date regularly, with sanctions if the operator fails its obligations. The maximum length of allocation shall be 25 years, with such scheduled sunset dates. The "use it or lose it" clause proposed in the Code is insufficient to enable NRAs to withdraw authorisation if necessary. The capacities of the NRAs should thus be enhanced and more detailed in order to control the use of the licences, preventing holders from "parking" frequencies for too long, thereby hindering connectivity and innovation.''
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Maximum 25 ans et revue tous les 5 ans
+
The role of NRAs is not to secure the investments of operators but to ensure a harmonious development in the territories and give to all equal access to the market and services.
  
 
+
=== Amendment 954 ++ ===
=== Amendment 675 - ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 675'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 954'''<br/>
Michał Boni, Françoise Grossetête, Anne Sander<br/>
+
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Edouard Martin, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Dan Nica, Jeppe Kofod, Patrizia Toia<br/>
'''EPP'''<br/>
+
'''S&D'''<br/>
Article 49 – paragraph 3
+
Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point d
 
|-
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
3. Member States may extend the duration of rights of use for a '''''short''''' period of time to ensure the simultaneous expiry of rights in one or several bands.
+
'''''(d)''''' '''''the initial investment by the facility owner, taking account of any public investment made and the risks involved in making the investment with particular regard to investments in and risk levels associated with very high capacity networks;'''''
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
3. Member States may '''''without prejudice to Article 53,'''''extend the duration of rights of use for a period of time to ensure the simultaneous expiry of rights in one or several bands''''', which shall be as short as possible'''''.
+
'''''deleted'''''
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
''Justification: It is important that any attempt to ensure the simultaneous expiry of rights does not interfere with attempts to secure the coordinated use of harmonised radio spectrum in the Union in accordance with Article 53. Amendment''
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Donne la possibilité d'étendre
+
The role of NRAs is not to secure the investments of operators but to ensure a harmonious development in the territories and give to all equal access to the market and services.
 
 
  
=== Amendment 702 ++ ===
+
=== Amendment 955 + ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 702'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 955'''<br/>
Michel Reimon<br/>
+
Fulvio Martusciello<br/>
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
+
'''EPP'''<br/>
Article 55 – paragraph 1 subparagraph 2
+
Article 71 – paragraph 2 point d
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
Where that provision is not commercial in character or is ancillary to another commercial activity or public service which is not dependent on the conveyance of signals on those networks, any undertaking, public authority or '''''end-user''''' providing such access shall not be subject to any general authorisation for the provision of electronic communications networks or services pursuant to Article 12, to obligations regarding '''''end-users''''' rights pursuant to Title III of Part III of this Directive nor to obligations to interconnect their networks pursuant to Article 59 (1).
+
(d) the initial investment by the facility owner, taking account of any public investment made and the risks involved in making the investment '''''with particular regard to investments in and risk levels associated with very high capacity networks''''';
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
Where that provision is not commercial in character or is ancillary to another commercial activity or public service which is not dependent on the conveyance of signals on those networks, any undertaking, public authority or '''''user''''' providing such access shall not be subject to any general authorisation for the provision of electronic communications networks or services pursuant to Article 12, to obligations regarding '''''users''''' rights pursuant to Title III of Part III of this Directive nor to obligations to interconnect their networks pursuant to Article 59 (1). '''''Individuals providing such access not-for-profit shall not be liable for information transmitted by third parties over such access.'''''
+
(d) the initial investment by the facility owner, taking account of any public investment made and the risks involved in making the investment;
 +
|}
 +
 
 +
 
 +
=== Amendment 959 + ===
 +
 
 +
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 +
|-
 +
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
 +
'''Amendment 959'''<br/>
 +
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Edouard Martin, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Dan Nica, Jeppe Kofod, Patrizia Toia<br/>
 +
'''S&D'''<br/>
 +
Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point e
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' |
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
''Justification: The Proposal intends to foster the development of radio local area networks, especially where they provide services which are not commercial in character. The development of such networks mainly depends on the personal participation of individual volunteers, who expend the networks by managing their own relays and access points. However, such a participation is hindered by several laws which seek to prevent the sharing of Internet connections amongst several users by making people responsible (and potentially liable) for all communication made through their Wi-Fi connection, and create legal risks for people sharing their connection.In Germany, rights-holders have used a "secondary liability" doctrine to chill the growth of the community networks movement. In France too, copyright law imposes a secondary liability regime that creates significant legal uncertainty for people sharing their network connections with other users. The so-called "mere conduit", inscribed in EU law since 2000 in the directive on information society services, needs to be clearly guaranteed and expanded to small-area wireless access points.In the same spirit, contract clauses that forbid subscribers to share their connections with others should be prohibited in any case: the possibility to share their connections should not be limited to specific offers.Promoting a right to share Internet connections is all the more vital considering the economic and ecological crises, as well as the rapid increase of populations that cannot afford access to the Internet. In this context, connection sharing can play a critical role in fostering a more equitable and sustainable use of telecommunications infrastructure.''
+
'''''(e)''''' '''''the need to safeguard competition in the long term, with particular attention to economically efficient infrastructure-based competition and to sustainable competition based on co-investment in networks;'''''
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
'''''deleted'''''
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
mise en place de protections et d'avantages pour les non-profit
+
=== Amendment 961 - ===
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 703 ++ ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 703'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 961'''<br/>
Kaja Kallas, Marietje Schaake<br/>
+
José Blanco López, Inmaculada Rodríguez-Piñero Fernández, Soledad Cabezón Ruiz<br/>
'''ALDE'''<br/>
+
'''S&D'''<br/>
Article 55 – paragraph 2
+
Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point e
 
|-
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
2. Competent authorities shall not prevent providers of public communications networks or publicly available electronic communications services from allowing access to their networks to the public, through radio local area networks, which may be located at an end-user's premises, subject to compliance with the applicable general authorisation conditions and the prior informed agreement of the end-user.
+
(e) the need to safeguard competition in the long term, with particular attention to economically efficient infrastructure-based competition and to sustainable competition based on co-investment in networks;
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
2. Competent authorities shall not prevent providers of public communications networks or publicly available electronic communications services from allowing access to their networks to the public, through radio local area networks, which may be located at an end-user's premises, subject to compliance with the applicable general authorisation conditions and the prior informed agreement of the end-user. '''''Individuals providing access to their networks for non-commercial purposes shall not be liable for information transmitted by third parties through the use of such access.'''''
+
(e) the need to safeguard competition in the long term, with particular attention to economically efficient infrastructure-based competition and to sustainable competition based on '''''innovative commercial business models such as, but not only,''''' co-investment in networks;
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
| colspan='2' |
''Justification: In accordance with rule 104 of the rules of procedure, this amendment is necessary for pressing reasons related to the internal logic of the text''
+
''Justification: Recital 166 introduces the need to take into account newly concluded voluntary agreements between operators in order to provide regulatory flexibility. Co-investment is a particular case, but not the only one''
 
|}
 
|}
  
 +
=== Amendment 965 + ===
  
Idem 702
+
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 +
|-
 +
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
 +
'''Amendment 965'''<br/>
 +
Michel Reimon<br/>
 +
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
 +
Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point e
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
(e) the need to safeguard competition in the long term, with particular attention to economically efficient infrastructure-based competition '''''and to sustainable competition based on co-investment in networks''''';
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
(e) the need to safeguard competition in the long term, with particular attention to economically efficient infrastructure-based competition;
 +
|-
 +
| colspan='2' |
 +
''Justification: Concerning, co-investment schemes: some of them have the potential to create ineffectively competitive market outcomes. The Commission’s proposal includes criteria in Annex IV as well as conditions against which co-investment offers should be judged (compliance with which would entitle the co-investment to effectively benefit from a regulatory holiday). However, these do not provide sufficient competition protections to warrant a relaxation of SMP regulation. It is also worth bearing in mind that co-investments by their nature can lead to coordinated behaviour, which in turn could produce uncompetitive outcomes. Ultimately, the resulting reduction in competition could lead to higher prices and less innovation and choice for end-users. In its opinion BoR (16) 213 (p. 7), BEREC recognises “[T]he risk is that in seeking to incentivise investment through regulatory forbearance, the Commission’s proposals could undermine competition, which in turn would impact on the virtuous cycle of competition- and demand driven investment. The Commission’s proposals would therefore undermine their own ultimate goal of increasing high-speed connectivity.”''
 +
|}
  
  
=== Amendment 704 ++ ===
+
=== Amendment 968 ++ ===
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 704'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 968'''<br/>
José Blanco López, Sergio Gutiérrez Prieto, Inmaculada Rodríguez-Piñero Fernández, Soledad Cabezón Ruiz<br/>
+
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Edouard Martin, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Dan Nica, Jeppe Kofod, Patrizia Toia<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
 
'''S&D'''<br/>
Article 55 – paragraph 2
+
Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point g
 
|-
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
2. Competent authorities shall not prevent providers of public communications networks or publicly available electronic communications services from allowing access to their networks to the public, through radio local area networks, which may be located at an end-user's premises, subject to compliance with the applicable general authorisation conditions and the prior informed agreement of the end-user.
+
'''''(g)''''' '''''the provision of pan-European services.'''''
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
2. Competent authorities shall not prevent providers of public communications networks or publicly available electronic communications services from allowing access to their networks to the public, through radio local area networks, which may be located at an end-user's premises, subject to compliance with the applicable general authorisation conditions and the prior informed '''''and explicit''''' agreement of the end-user.
+
'''''deleted'''''
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
''Justification: Sharing of consumers' private Wi-Fi networks may bring benefits to consumers as they can use additional access points. However, it is imperative that such additional networks are only installed on consumers' private equipment with their explicit consent and that the consumer whose internet access service is being shared is under no circumstance responsible nor liable for any use that other person might do while connected to his Wi-Fi network.''
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Consentement explicite
+
The role of NRAs is not to secure the investments of operators but to ensure a harmonious development in the territories and give to all equal access to the market and services.
  
 
+
=== Amendment 969 ++ ===
=== Amendment 705 / ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 705'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 969'''<br/>
 
Michel Reimon<br/>
 
Michel Reimon<br/>
 
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
 
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
Article 55 – paragraph 2
+
Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point g a (new)
 
|-
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
2. Competent authorities shall not prevent providers of public communications networks or publicly available electronic communications services from allowing access to their networks to the public, through radio local area networks, which may be located at an '''''end-user's''''' premises, subject to compliance with the applicable general authorisation conditions and the prior informed agreement of the '''''end-user'''''.
+
 
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
2. Competent authorities shall not prevent providers of public communications networks or publicly available electronic communications services from allowing access to their networks to the public, through radio local area networks, which may be located at an '''''user's''''' premises, subject to compliance with the applicable general authorisation conditions and the prior informed agreement of the '''''user'''''.
+
'''''(g a)''''' '''''the existence of a broad choice of offers and providers for fixed and mobile access, for each consumer in Europe irrespective of their place of residence;'''''
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
End user > user, quel intérêt ?
+
The role of NRAs is not to secure the investments of operators but to ensure a harmonious development in the territories and give to all equal access to the market and services.
  
 +
=== Amendment 970 ++ ===
  
=== Amendment 706 ++ ===
+
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 706'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 970'''<br/>
José Blanco López, Sergio Gutiérrez Prieto, Inmaculada Rodríguez-Piñero Fernández, Soledad Cabezón Ruiz<br/>
+
Michel Reimon<br/>
'''S&D'''<br/>
+
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
Article 55 – paragraph 2 a (new)
+
Article 71 – paragraph 2 – point g b (new)
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
  
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
'''''2 a.''''' '''''End-users allowing access to their internet access service as set out in paragraph 2 shall not be liable for any use that other end-users might do while connected to their network.'''''
+
'''''(g b)''''' '''''the development of a democratic society in the digital era allowing free access to information and expression for all citizens of Europe;'''''
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
''Justification: Sharing of consumers' private Wi-Fi networks may bring benefits to consumers as they can use additional access points. However, it is imperative that such additional networks are only installed on consumers' private equipment with their explicit consent and that the consumer whose internet access service is being shared is under no circumstance responsible nor liable for any use that other person might do while connected to his Wi-Fi network.''
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Partage de connexion wifi et pas de résponsabilité de l'utilisation
+
=== Amendment 971 -- ===
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 707 / ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #A60000; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 707'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 971'''<br/>
Evžen Tošenovský<br/>
+
Anna Záborská, Ivan Štefanec<br/>
'''ECR'''<br/>
+
'''EPP'''<br/>
Article 55 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
+
Article 71 – paragraph 2 a (new)
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
In line in particular with Article 3(1) of Regulation 2015/2120 of the European Parliament and of the Council,48 competent authorities shall ensure that providers of public communications networks or publicly available electronic communications services do not unilaterally restrict:
+
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
In line in particular with Article 3(1) of Regulation 2015/2120 of the European Parliament and of the Council,48 competent authorities shall ensure that providers of public communications networks or '''''number-based''''' publicly available electronic communications services do not unilaterally restrict:
+
'''''2 a.''''' '''''In order to account for the long-term interest of end-users, national regulatory authorities should focus more on facilitating network investments by all operators. Regulation should not be to the detriment of innovative developments, in particular very high capacity networks, software defined networks and network function virtualisation. Only where strictly necessary to safeguard competition and where no alternative access possibilities, including access based on commercial agreements, exist, regulated access should be maintained in an appropriate and balanced manner, i.e. at a single network layer. Regulated access at multiple network layers has led to unnecessarily high complexity with regard to the consistency of regulated wholesale products at different network layers and unduly restricts flexibility and commercial freedom in the dynamic telecoms market environment. Limiting access to a single network layer that best addresses the problem identified at the retail level will significantly reduce regulatory costs and the potential for regulatory gaming by market players, leading to more efficient and appropriate outcomes. In this regard, national regulatory authorities should assess whether active or passive access is more appropriate in consideration of national or local circumstances. As unbundling is detrimental to network investments by allowing 'cream-skimming' of the most profitable customers at average cost, there should no longer be an obligation to provide unbundled access, which undermines investment models based on product and price differentiation.'''''
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Pas compris
+
=== Amendment 973 - ===
  
 
+
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
=== Amendment 708 -- ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #A60000; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 708'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 973'''<br/>
Evžen Tošenovský<br/>
+
Anna Záborská, Ivan Štefanec<br/>
'''ECR'''<br/>
+
'''EPP'''<br/>
Article 55 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point a
+
Article 72 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
'''''a)''''' '''''the right of end-users to accede to radio local area networks of their choice provided by third parties;'''''
+
A national regulatory authority may, in accordance with the provisions of Article 66, impose obligations relating to cost recovery and price controls, including obligations '''''for cost orientation of prices and obligations''''' concerning cost accounting systems, for the provision of specific types of interconnection and/or access, in situations where a market analysis indicates '''''that''''' a lack of effective competition '''''means that the operator concerned may sustain prices at an excessively high level, or may apply a''''' price '''''squeeze,''''' to the detriment of '''''end-users'''''.
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
'''''deleted'''''
+
A national regulatory authority may, in accordance with the provisions of Article 66, impose obligations relating to cost recovery and price controls, including obligations concerning cost accounting systems, for the provision of specific types of interconnection and/or access, in situations where a market analysis indicates a lack of effective competition'''''. A national regulatory authority may only impose price controls that ensure fair and reasonable prices and do not negatively impact investments. When applied, a price control shall meet the following cumulative conditions:''''''''''(a) the price control ensures recovery of all investments connected to the deployment of new networks and fully incorporates the risks associated with these investments;''''''''''(b) the price control does not lead to a situation where the investing operator is put at a disadvantage compared to non-investing operators or lead to a situation under which an investment would not have been made in the first place;''''''''''(c) the''''' price '''''control avoids undue profit margins for access seekers''''' to the detriment of '''''the investing operator and appropriately reflects differences in the risks taken by different access seekers'''''.
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Pas le choix de réseau tiers par les utilisateurs
+
=== Amendment 976 + ===
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 709 / ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 709'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 976'''<br/>
 
Michel Reimon<br/>
 
Michel Reimon<br/>
 
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
 
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
Article 55 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point a
+
Article 72 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
'''''In determining whether or not price control obligations would be appropriate, national regulatory authorities shall take into account long-term end-user interests related to the deployment and take-up of next-generation networks, and in particular of very high capacity networks. In particular,''''' to encourage investments by the operator, including in next-generation networks, national regulatory authorities shall take into account the investment made by the operator. Where the national regulatory authorities deem price controls appropriate, they shall allow the operator a reasonable rate of return on adequate capital employed, taking into account any risks specific to a particular new investment network project.
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
To encourage investments by the operator, including in next-generation networks, national regulatory authorities shall take into account the investment made by the operator. Where the national regulatory authorities deem price controls appropriate, they shall allow the operator a reasonable rate of return on adequate capital employed, taking into account any risks specific to a particular new investment network project.
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
| colspan='2' |
a) the right of '''''end-users''''' to accede to radio local area networks of their choice provided by third parties;
+
''Justification: Price control is an essential element of access regulation and should not be conditioned to any other criteria.''
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
a) the right of '''''users''''' to accede to radio local area networks of their choice provided by third parties;
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Question Idem 705
+
=== Amendment 977 + ===
  
 
+
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
=== Amendment 710 -- ===
+
|-
 
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
+
'''Amendment 977'''<br/>
 +
Kaja Kallas<br/>
 +
'''ALDE'''<br/>
 +
Article 72 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #A60000; text-align:center;' |
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
'''Amendment 710'''<br/>
+
In determining whether or not price control obligations would be appropriate, national regulatory authorities shall take into account long-term end-user interests related to the deployment and take-up of next-generation networks, and in particular of very high capacity networks. In particular, to encourage investments by the operator, including in next-generation networks, national regulatory authorities shall take into account the investment made by the operator. '''''Where the national regulatory authorities deem price controls appropriate, they shall allow the operator a reasonable rate of return on adequate capital employed, taking into account any risks specific to a particular new investment network project.'''''
Evžen Tošenovský<br/>
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
'''ECR'''<br/>
+
In determining whether or not price control obligations would be appropriate, national regulatory authorities shall take into account long-term end-user interests related to the deployment and take-up of next-generation networks, and in particular of very high capacity networks. In particular, to encourage investments by the operator, including in next-generation networks, national regulatory authorities shall take into account the investment made by the operator.
Article 55 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point b
 
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
| colspan='2' |
'''''b)''''' '''''the right of end-users to allow reciprocally or more generally access to the networks of such providers by other end-users through radio local area networks, including on the basis of third-party initiatives which aggregate and make publicly accessible the radio local area networks of different end-users.'''''
+
''Justification: In accordance with rule 104 of the rules of procedure, this amendment is necessary for pressing reasons related to the internal logic of the text''
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
'''''deleted'''''
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Pas le choix pour les utilisateurs
+
=== Amendment 978 - ===
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 711 / ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 711'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 978'''<br/>
Michel Reimon<br/>
+
Anna Záborská, Ivan Štefanec<br/>
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
+
'''EPP'''<br/>
Article 55 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point b
+
Article 72 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
In determining whether or not price control obligations would be appropriate, national regulatory authorities shall take into account long-term end-user interests related to '''''the deployment and take-up of next-generation networks, and in particular of very high capacity''''' networks. In particular, to encourage investments by the operator, including in next-generation networks, national regulatory authorities shall take into account the investment made by the operator. Where the national regulatory authorities deem price controls appropriate, they shall allow the operator a reasonable rate of return on adequate capital employed, taking into account any risks specific to a particular new investment network project.
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
In determining whether or not price control obligations would be appropriate, national regulatory authorities shall take into account long-term end-user interests related to '''''investment in, the deployment of and take-up of next-generation''''' networks. In particular, to encourage investments by the operator, including in next-generation networks, national regulatory authorities shall take into account the investment made by the operator. Where the national regulatory authorities deem price controls appropriate, they shall allow the operator a reasonable rate of return on adequate capital employed, taking into account any risks specific to a particular new investment network project.
 +
|}
 +
 
 +
 
 +
=== Amendment 979 ++ ===
 +
 
 +
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 +
|-
 +
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
 +
'''Amendment 979'''<br/>
 +
Kaja Kallas<br/>
 +
'''ALDE'''<br/>
 +
Article 72 paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3
 
|-
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
b) the right of '''''end-users''''' to allow reciprocally or more generally access to the networks of such providers by other end-users through radio local area networks, including on the basis of third-party initiatives which aggregate and make publicly accessible the radio local area networks of different end-users.
+
'''''National regulatory authorities shall not impose or maintain obligations pursuant to this Article, where they establish that a demonstrable retail price constraint is present and that any obligations imposed in accordance with Articles 67 to 71, including in particular any economic replicability test imposed in accordance with Article 68 ensures effective and non discriminatory access.'''''
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
b) the right of '''''users''''' to allow reciprocally or more generally access to the networks of such providers by other end-users through radio local area networks, including on the basis of third-party initiatives which aggregate and make publicly accessible the radio local area networks of different end-users.
+
'''''deleted'''''
 +
|-
 +
| colspan='2' |
 +
''Justification: In accordance with rule 104 of the rules of procedure, this amendment is necessary for pressing reasons related to the internal logic of the text''
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Question idem 705, 709
+
Current provisions for co-investment practices do not allow non-profit or local ISPs to participate in the investments, restricting this opportunity only to larger and incumbent actors. Although Community Networks (CN) and local actors have proven successful in connecting underprivileged communities both in urban and rural areas, it would be only normal to considered them equal members of the telecoms ecosystem, thus giving them fair and equal access to co-investment opportunities. Moreover, co-investment in a certain area must be considered as an oligopoly of a few powerful actors that work as a cartel. This is thus not acceptable to reduce the obligations. Furthermore, the access to co-investment agreement shall be affordable for small operators.
  
=== Amendment 792 ++ ===
+
=== Amendment 980 ++ ===
  
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;' cellpadding='30'
+
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
 
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 792'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 980'''<br/>
 
Michel Reimon<br/>
 
Michel Reimon<br/>
 
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
 
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
Article 61 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
+
Article 72 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
An undertaking shall be deemed to have significant market power if, either individually or jointly with others, it enjoys a position equivalent to dominance, that is to say a position of economic strength affording it the power to behave to an appreciable extent independently of competitors, customers and ultimately consumers.
+
'''''National regulatory authorities shall not impose or maintain obligations pursuant to this Article, where they establish that a demonstrable retail price constraint is present and that any obligations imposed in accordance with Articles 67 to 71, including in particular any economic replicability test imposed in accordance with Article 68 ensures effective and non discriminatory access.'''''
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
An undertaking shall be deemed to have significant market power if, either individually or jointly with others, '''''including through a commercial or a co-investment agreement,''''' it enjoys a position equivalent to dominance, that is to say a position of economic strength affording it the power to behave to an appreciable extent independently of competitors, customers and ultimately consumers.
+
'''''deleted'''''
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
| colspan='2' |
''Justification: Co-investment in a certain area must be considered an oligopoly of a few powerful actors (on the local level), as the FDN Federation showed in their analysis of the fixed-line market (www.ffdn.org/en/node/129 ) written for a consultation of the ARCEP in 2016. These oligopolies work as a cartel. The co-investors, in a given area, should be regarded as having the position of the incumbent in that area. Such symmetric regulation would allow welcoming all actors into the market.''
+
''Justification: Current provisions for co-investment practices do not allow non-profit or local ISPs to participate in the investments, restricting this opportunity only to larger and incumbent actors. Although Community Networks (CN) and local actors have proven succesful in connecting underprivileged communities both in urban and rural areas, it would be only normal to considered them equal members of the telecoms ecosystem, thus giving them fair and equal access to co-investment opportunities.Moreover, co-investment in a certain area must be considered as an oligopoly of a few powerful actors that work as a cartel.This is thus not acceptable to reduce the obligations. Furthermore, the access to co-investment agreement shall be affordable for small operators.''
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Commercial agreements and co-investment can be considered as oligopolies
+
=== Amendment 982 - ===
  
 
+
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
=== Amendment 793 + ===
 
 
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;' cellpadding='30'
 
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 793'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 982'''<br/>
Kathleen Van Brempt<br/>
+
Anna Záborská, Ivan Štefanec<br/>
'''S&D'''<br/>
+
'''EPP'''<br/>
Article 61 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
+
Article 72 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
An undertaking shall be deemed to have significant market power if, either individually or jointly with others, it enjoys a position equivalent to dominance, that is to say a position of economic strength affording it the power to behave to an appreciable extent independently of competitors, customers and ultimately consumers.
+
National regulatory authorities shall not impose or maintain obligations pursuant to this Article, where they establish that a demonstrable retail price constraint is present and that any obligations imposed in accordance with Articles 67 to 71, including in particular any economic replicability test imposed in accordance with Article 68 ensures effective '''''and non discriminatory''''' access.
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
An undertaking shall be deemed to have significant market power if, either individually or jointly with others, it enjoys a position equivalent to dominance, that is to say a position of economic strength affording it the power to behave to an appreciable extent independently of competitors, customers and ultimately consumers '''''or when it is able to disrupt effective competition'''''.
+
National regulatory authorities shall not impose or maintain obligations pursuant to this Article, '''''either for new network elements in case a network roll-out contributes to the availability of very-high capacity networks or''''' where they establish that a demonstrable retail price constraint is present and that any obligations imposed in accordance with Articles 67 to 71, including in particular any economic replicability test imposed in accordance with Article 68 ensures effective '''''non discrimination of''''' access.
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Élargissement de la définition de SMP (significant market power)
+
=== Amendment 983 - ===
  
 +
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 +
|-
 +
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
 +
'''Amendment 983'''<br/>
 +
Anna Záborská, Ivan Štefanec<br/>
 +
'''EPP'''<br/>
 +
Article 72 – paragraph 3
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
'''''3.''''' '''''Where an operator has an obligation regarding the cost orientation of its prices, the burden of proof that charges are derived from costs including a reasonable rate of return on investment shall lie with the operator concerned. For the purpose of calculating the cost of efficient provision of services, national regulatory authorities may use cost accounting methods independent of those used by the undertaking. National regulatory authorities may require an operator to provide full justification for its prices, and may, where appropriate, require prices to be adjusted.'''''
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;'|
 +
'''''deleted'''''
 +
|}
  
=== Amendment 794 ++ ===
+
=== Amendment 984 - ===
  
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;' cellpadding='30'
+
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #44C92C; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 794'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 984'''<br/>
Kaja Kallas<br/>
+
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Edouard Martin, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Dan Nica, Jeppe Kofod, Patrizia Toia<br/>
'''ALDE'''<br/>
+
'''S&D'''<br/>
Article 61 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
+
Article 72 a (new)
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-bottom:0em;'|
 +
 
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-bottom:0em;'|
 +
'''''Article 72 a'''''
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
  
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
'''''Two or more undertakings may each be deemed to enjoy a position equivalent to having significant market power when they have the possibility to significantly impede effective competition, taking into account the relevant markets including but not limited to the market shares of other market participants, the market power of an undertaking on closely related markets, barriers to entry, market concentration, product differentiation, capacity constraints and switching costs.'''''
+
'''''Other access-related obligations'''''
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' |
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
''Justification: In light of the increasing trend of convergence between markets, and development of oligopolies in Europe, there is a need to include situations where two or more undertakings can foreclose the markets even without tacit collusion. In accordance with rule 104 of the rules of procedure, this amendment is necessary for pressing reasons related to the internal logic of the text''
 
|}
 
  
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
'''''1. A national regulatory authority'''''
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
  
Élargissement de la définition de SMP (significant market power)
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
'''''may, in accordance with the provisions of Article 66, impose:'''''
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
  
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
'''''(a) to give third parties access to specified active network elements and services;'''''
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
  
=== Amendment 795 + ===
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
'''''(b) to provide specified services on a wholesale basis for resale by third parties;'''''
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
  
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;' cellpadding='30'
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
'''''(c) to negotiate in good faith with undertakings requesting access;'''''
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
'''Amendment 795'''<br/>
+
 
Michel Reimon<br/>
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
+
'''''(d) not to withdraw access to facilities already granted;'''''
Article 61 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
 
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
  
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
'''''3. Where an undertaking has significant market power on a specific market (the first market), it may also be designated as having significant market power on a closely related market (the second market), where the links between the two markets are such as to allow the market power held in the first market to be leveraged into the second market, thereby strengthening the market power of the undertaking. Consequently, remedies aimed at preventing such leverage may be applied in the second market pursuant to this Directive.'''''
+
'''''(ee) to grant open access to technical interfaces, protocols or other key technologies that are indispensable for the interoperability of services or virtual network services;'''''
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' |
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
''Justification: The Commission’s proposal weakens the SMP regime. The deleted provision aims at preventing SMP operators from leveraging their market power from one market to a closely related market. The SMP regime has been instrumental in promoting the objectives of the framework and should therefore remain at its centre. The reinstated provision supports a strong regulatory ‘safety net’ that provides clarity, predictability, and hence investor certainty. Reinstating the provision also closes an inconsistency in the Commission’s proposal, given that the Commission proposes in Article 65 (2)(d) that “regulation imposed on other relevant markets” shall be taken into account during the market analysis. If regulation on relevant markets is taken into account when analysing if a market should be subject to ex ante regulation, then SMP in relevant markets also needs to be taken into account when defining an SMP-operator in the first place.''
 
|}
 
  
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
'''''(ff) to provide co-location or other forms of associated facilities sharing;'''''
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
  
AM identique aux AMs 796, 797, 798 - Réinsertion du §3 de la directive 2009/140
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
'''''(gg) to provide specified services needed to ensure interoperability of end-to-end services to users, including facilities for software emulated networks or roaming on mobile networks;'''''
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
  
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
'''''(hh) to provide access to operational support systems or similar software systems necessary to ensure fair competition in the provision of services;'''''
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
  
=== Amendment 799 / ===
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
'''''(i) to interconnect networks or network facilities;'''''
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
  
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;' cellpadding='30'
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
'''''(j) to provide access to associated services such as identity, location and presence service.'''''
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #BABABA; text-align:center;' |
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
'''Amendment 799'''<br/>
+
 
Evžen Tošenovský<br/>
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
'''ECR'''<br/>
+
'''''National regulatory authorities may attach to those obligations conditions covering fairness, reasonableness and timeliness.'''''
Article 61 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
 
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
  
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
'''''Two or more undertakings are each deemed to enjoy a position equivalent to having significant market power when they might significantly impede effective competition.'''''
+
'''''2. They shall take account in particular of the following factors:'''''
|}
+
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
  
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
'''''(a) the technical and economic viability of using or installing competing facilities, in the light of the rate of market development, taking into account the nature and type of interconnection and/or access involved, including the viability of other upstream access products such as access to ducts;'''''
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
  
Moins intéressant et complet que d'autres AM
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
'''''(b) the technological evolution affecting network design and management'''''
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
  
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
'''''(cb) the feasibility of providing the access proposed, in relation to the capacity available;'''''
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
  
=== Amendment 800 + ===
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
'''''(dc) the initial investment by the facility owner, taking account of any public investment made and the risks involved in making the investment ;'''''
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
  
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;' cellpadding='30'
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
'''''(ed) the need to safeguard competition in the long term, with particular attention to economically efficient infrastructure-based competition;'''''
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
'''Amendment 800'''<br/>
+
 
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Edouard Martin, Flavio Zanonato, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Dan Nica, Jeppe Kofod<br/>
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
'''S&D'''<br/>
+
'''''(fe) where appropriate, any relevant intellectual property rights;'''''
Article 61 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 b (new)
 
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em'|
  
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em'|
'''''An undertaking shall be deemed to have unilateral market power where, in the absence of significant market power, it enjoys a position of economic strength by virtue of the weakness of competitive constraints in an oligopolistic market, enabling it to act in a manner which is detrimental to consumer welfare.'''''
+
'''''(g) the provision of pan-European services.'''''
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Élargissement de la définition de SMP (significant market power)
+
=== Amendment 1001 + ===
 
 
=== Amendment 872 -- ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #A60000; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 872'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 1001'''<br/>
Anna Záborská, Ivan Štefanec<br/>
+
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Zigmantas Balčytis, Victor Negrescu, Carlos Zorrinho, Dan Nica, Jeppe Kofod, Patrizia Toia<br/>
'''EPP'''<br/>
+
'''S&D'''<br/>
Article 70
+
Article 74
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-bottom:0em;'|
'''''Article 70'''''
+
'''''Article 74'''''
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-bottom:0em;'|
'''''deleted'''''
+
'''''deleted'''''
|}
+
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
'''''Regulatory treatment of new network elements'''''
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
  
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
'''''1.'''''
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
  
Suppression de l'art 70
+
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
'''''A national regulatory authority shall not impose obligations as regards new network elements that are part of the relevant market on which it intends to impose or maintain obligations in accordance with Articles 66 and Articles 67 to 72 and that the operator designated as significant market power on that relevant market has deployed or is planning to deploy, if the following cumulative conditions are met:'''''
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
  
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
'''''(a) the deployment of the new network elements is open to co-investment offers according to a transparent process and on terms which favour sustainable competition in the long term including inter alia fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory terms offered to potential co-investors; flexibility in terms of the value and timing of the commitment provided by each co-investor; possibility to increase such commitment in the future; reciprocal rights awarded by the co-investors after the deployment of the co-invested infrastructure;'''''
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
  
=== Amendment 880 -- ===
+
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
'''''(b) the deployment of the new network elements contributes significantly to the deployment of very high capacity networks;'''''
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
  
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #A60000; text-align:center;' |
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
'''Amendment 880'''<br/>
+
'''''(c) access seekers not participating in the co-investment can benefit from the same quality, speed, conditions and end-user reach as was available before the deployment, either through commercial agreements based on fair and reasonable terms or by means of regulated access maintained or adapted by the national regulatory authority;'''''
Michał Boni, Henna Virkkunen, Jerzy Buzek<br/>
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
'''EPP'''<br/>
+
 
Article 70 – paragraph 1
 
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em'|
1. A national regulatory authority may, in accordance with Article 66, impose obligations on operators to meet reasonable requests for access to, and use of, civil engineering including, without limitation, buildings or entries to buildings, building cables including wiring, antennae, towers and other supporting constructions, poles, masts, ducts, conduits, inspection chambers, manholes, and cabinets, in situations where the market analysis indicates that denial of access or access given under unreasonable terms and conditions having a similar effect would hinder the emergence of a sustainable competitive market at the retail level and would not be in the end-user's interest.
+
'''''When assessing co-investment offers and processes referred to in point (a) of the first subparagraph, national regulatory authorities shall ensure that those offers and processes comply with the criteria set out in Annex IV.'''''
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em'|
1. A national regulatory authority may, in accordance with Article 66, impose obligations on operators to meet reasonable requests for access to, and use of, civil engineering '''''and passive infrastructure''''' including, without limitation, buildings or entries to buildings, building cables including wiring, antennae, towers and other supporting constructions, poles, masts, ducts''''', inactive wireline transmission infrastructure including cable and fiber''''', conduits, inspection chambers, manholes, and cabinets, in situations where the market analysis indicates that denial of access or access given under unreasonable terms and conditions having a similar effect would hinder the emergence of a sustainable competitive market at the retail level and would not be in the end-user's interest.
+
 
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
| colspan='2' |
''Justification: It is proposed to extend the scope of this Article to all passive infrastructure.''
+
''Justification: Current framework does not prevent co-investment. While the article may help to facilitate new fiber networks, it will not allow NRAs to intervene efficiently where it becomes necessary. It is problematic that the reference made in Art 74 (b) to the “deployment of very high capacity networks” establishes a hierarchy between the regulatory objectives set out in Article 3. Also, co-investments by their nature can lead to coordinated behaviour, which in turn yield uncompetitive outcomes.''
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Cherche à focaliser l'art. 70 sur l'accès au passif
+
=== Amendment 1003 + ===
  
 +
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 +
|-
 +
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
 +
'''Amendment 1003'''<br/>
 +
Michel Reimon<br/>
 +
'''Verts/ALE'''<br/>
 +
Article 74 – paragraph 1
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-bottom:0em;'|
 +
'''''1.''''' '''''A national regulatory authority shall not impose obligations as regards new network elements that are part of the relevant market on which it intends to impose or maintain obligations in accordance with Articles 66 and Articles 67 to 72 and that the operator designated as significant market power on that relevant market has deployed or is planning to deploy, if the following cumulative conditions are met:'''''
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-bottom:0em;'|
 +
'''''deleted'''''
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
'''''(a) the deployment of the new network elements is open to co-investment offers according to a transparent process and on terms which favour sustainable competition in the long term including inter alia fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory terms offered to potential co-investors; flexibility in terms of the value and timing of the commitment provided by each co-investor; possibility to increase such commitment in the future; reciprocal rights awarded by the co-investors after the deployment of the co-invested infrastructure;'''''
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
  
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
'''''(b) the deployment of the new network elements contributes significantly to the deployment of very high capacity networks;'''''
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
  
=== Amendment 889 -- ===
+
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
 +
'''''(c) access seekers not participating in the co-investment can benefit from the same quality, speed, conditions and end-user reach as was available before the deployment, either through commercial agreements based on fair and reasonable terms or by means of regulated access maintained or adapted by the national regulatory authority;'''''
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
  
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #A60000; text-align:center;' |
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em'|
'''Amendment 889'''<br/>
+
'''''When assessing co-investment offers and processes referred to in point (a) of the first subparagraph, national regulatory authorities shall ensure that those offers and processes comply with the criteria set out in Annex IV.'''''
Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Edouard Martin, Dan Nica, Jeppe Kofod, Carlos Zorrinho, Victor Negrescu, Zigmantas Balčytis<br/>
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em'|
'''S&D'''<br/>
 
Article 70 – paragraph 1 a (new)
 
|-
 
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
  
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
 
'''''1 a.''''' '''''National regulatory authorities shall take account in particular of the following factors:'''''
 
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan='2' |
 
| colspan='2' |
''Justification: Civil engineering access enhances infrastructure-based-competition but should not be treated as the sole or primary remedy. That is what it is necessary to include the complementary obligation of giving access to the entire physical network elements (i.e. passive access). Passive remedies, compared to active ones, remain the main wholesale access products that ensure and promote sustainable infrastructure-based competition. The amendment therefore gives priority to passive over active remedies.''
+
''Justification: The proposed provisions on “new network elements” in Article 74 are problematic firstly because the concept remains undefined. Secondly, Article 74 impedes NRAs from intervening on “new network elements” if there are co-investment offers. This could be problematic because SMP operators can use their market position to the detriment of smaller companies. Operators investing in VHC networks should not profit from regulatory holidays. The successful ex-ante regulatory regime should apply as much to VHC networks as to Next Generation Networks and legacy networks (e.g. copper).The explicit reference made in Art 74 (b) to the “deployment of very high capacity networks” establishes a hierarchy between the regulatory objectives set out in Article 3.In addition, co-investment schemes are diverse, and some of them have the potential to create ineffectively competitive market outcomes. While the Commission’s proposal includes criteria in Annex IV as well as conditions against which co-investment offers should be judged (compliance with which would entitle the co-investment to effectively benefit from a regulatory holiday), these do not provide sufficient competition protections to warrant a relaxation of SMP regulation. It is also worth bearing in mind that co-investments by their nature can lead to coordinated behaviour, which in turn could produce uncompetitive outcomes. Deregulation subject to weak safeguards has to be prevented. Independent from the concept of co-investment, commercial agreements must not artificially lead to non-SMP findings and to the removal of the wholesale access obligations that are necessary to enable and maintain sustainable competition and thus consumer well-being in the form of lower prices, increased choice and more innovative products.''
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
Cf. AM 943 sur l'art. 71
+
=== Amendment 1045 + ===
 
 
 
 
=== Amendment 893 - ===
 
  
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
{| border='1' style='border-spacing:0;  width:100%;' cellpadding='30'
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #F55E33; text-align:center;' |
+
| colspan='2' style='background-color: #AEF279; text-align:center;' |
'''Amendment 893'''<br/>
+
'''Amendment 1045'''<br/>
Pavel Telička<br/>
+
Evžen Tošenovský<br/>
'''ALDE'''<br/>
+
'''ECR'''<br/>
Article 70 – paragraph 2
+
Article 77
 +
|-
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-bottom:0em;'|
 +
'''''Article 77'''''
 +
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-bottom:0em;'|
 +
'''''deleted'''''
 
|-
 
|-
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|
2. National regulatory authorities '''''may impose obligations on an operator to provide access in accordance with this Article, irrespective of whether the assets that are affected by the obligation are part of the relevant market in accordance with the market analysis, provided that the obligation is necessary and proportionate to meet the objectives of Article 3'''''.
+
'''''Vertically separate undertakings'''''
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;'|
+
|width='50%' style='vertical-align:top;border-top:none;border-bottom:none;padding-top:0em; padding-bottom:0em'|