Difference between revisions of "EPLA resolution details LV"

From La Quadrature du Net
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (Categorization)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
__NOEDITSECTION__
 
__NOEDITSECTION__
<div class="LanguageLinks"><table width="100%"><tr valign="top" style="background: #EEF3E2"><td style="width: 25px; padding-left: 0.5em;">[[Image:Geographylogo.png|25px|Languages]]</td><td style="padding: 1px 1em 0; background: #F6F9ED;">'''[[EPLA_resolution_details_LV|English]]''' - '''[[Resolution_EPLA_details_LV|Français]]'''</td></tr></table></div>
+
{{Infobox Version
 +
|en=EPLA_resolution_details_LV
 +
|fr=Resolution_EPLA_details_LV
 +
}}
  
 
==[[Political_Memory|Political Memory]]: Resolutions on European Patent Litigation Agreement (EPLA), Results in Detail for Latvia {{#icon:LV.png|Latvia}}==
 
==[[Political_Memory|Political Memory]]: Resolutions on European Patent Litigation Agreement (EPLA), Results in Detail for Latvia {{#icon:LV.png|Latvia}}==
Line 37: Line 40:
  
 
[[EPLA_resolution_LV|Back to results for Latvia]]
 
[[EPLA_resolution_LV|Back to results for Latvia]]
[[Category:EPLA]]] [[Category:Resolutions]] [[Category:Political_Memory]]
+
[[Category:EPLA resolutions]]]

Latest revision as of 15:55, 26 September 2011


Political Memory: Resolutions on European Patent Litigation Agreement (EPLA), Results in Detail for Latvia {{#icon:LV.png|Latvia}}

Rank MEP Final score résolution am. 8 am. 5 am. 10 par. 2 cons. A cons. B résolution_RC B6-0522/2006 - Brevets

Show details for all MEPs


  • résolution: Resolution from PSE, Verts/ALE and GUE/NGL rejecting EPLA - recommendation: for, coefficient: 4
  • am. 8: Deletion of "accessing to Munich Convention" - recommendation: for, coefficient: 3
  • am. 5: Opinion from ECJ examined by Parliament for the need of transparency and democracy - recommendation: for, coefficient: 3
  • am. 10: Opinion from ECJ - recommendation: for, coefficient: 2
  • par. 2: Opinion from legal service of the European Parliament - recommendation: for, coefficient: 1
  • cons. A: considérant impliquant qu'une solution sur les litiges doit être trouvée à court terme - recommendation: against, coefficient: 3
  • cons. B: Recital recalling the need of an efficient, competitive, cost-efficient and accessible patent system - recommendation: against, coefficient: 2
  • résolution_RC B6-0522/2006 - Brevets: Compromise resolution between EPP and PSE - recommendation: none



Back to results for Latvia]