Difference between revisions of "EPLA resolution"

From La Quadrature du Net
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (typo)
m (Categorization)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
__NOEDITSECTION__
 
__NOEDITSECTION__
<div class="LanguageLinks"><table width="100%"><tr valign="top" style="background: #EEF3E2"><td style="width: 25px; padding-left: 0.5em;">[[Image:Geographylogo.png|25px|Languages]]</td><td style="padding: 1px 1em 0; background: #F6F9ED;">'''[[EPLA_resolution|English]]''' - '''[[Resolution_EPLA|Français]]'''</td></tr></table></div>
+
{{Infobox Version
 +
|en=EPLA_resolution
 +
|fr=Resolution_EPLA
 +
}}
  
 
==[[Political_Memory|Political Memory]]: Resolutions on European Patent Litigation Agreement (EPLA)==
 
==[[Political_Memory|Political Memory]]: Resolutions on European Patent Litigation Agreement (EPLA)==
Line 30: Line 33:
  
 
Back to home page of [[Political Memory]]
 
Back to home page of [[Political Memory]]
[[Category:EPLA]]
+
[[Category:EPLA resolutions]]
[[Category:Resolutions]]
+
 
 
[[Category:Political Memory]]
 
[[Category:Political Memory]]

Latest revision as of 15:41, 26 September 2011


Political Memory: Resolutions on European Patent Litigation Agreement (EPLA)

Vote on texts B6-0521/2006 - Brevets / RC B6-0522/2006 - Brevets, on 12/10/2006, results of rollcall votes on parts detailed below.

Results

Mean score of the European Parliament: 29.5/100

Rollcall Votes

  • résolution: Resolution from PSE, Verts/ALE and GUE/NGL rejecting EPLA - recommendation: for, coefficient: 4
  • am. 8: Deletion of "accessing to Munich Convention" - recommendation: for, coefficient: 3
  • am. 5: Opinion from ECJ examined by Parliament for the need of transparency and democracy - recommendation: for, coefficient: 3
  • am. 10: Opinion from ECJ - recommendation: for, coefficient: 2
  • par. 2: Opinion from legal service of the European Parliament - recommendation: for, coefficient: 1
  • cons. A: considérant impliquant qu'une solution sur les litiges doit être trouvée à court terme - recommendation: against, coefficient: 3
  • cons. B: Recital recalling the need of an efficient, competitive, cost-efficient and accessible patent system - recommendation: against, coefficient: 2
  • résolution_RC B6-0522/2006 - Brevets: Compromise resolution between EPP and PSE - recommendation: none

Back to home page of Political Memory