Difference between revisions of "EPLA resolution"
From La Quadrature du Net
Jump to navigationJump to search (Nouvelle page : __NOEDITSECTION__ <div class="LanguageLinks"><table width="100%"><tr valign="top" style="background: #EEF3E2"><td style="width: 25px; padding-left: 0.5em;">[[Image:Geographylogo.png|...) |
m (Categorization) |
||
| (8 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOEDITSECTION__ | __NOEDITSECTION__ | ||
| − | + | {{Infobox Version | |
| + | |en=EPLA_resolution | ||
| + | |fr=Resolution_EPLA | ||
| + | }} | ||
==[[Political_Memory|Political Memory]]: Resolutions on European Patent Litigation Agreement (EPLA)== | ==[[Political_Memory|Political Memory]]: Resolutions on European Patent Litigation Agreement (EPLA)== | ||
| − | Vote on texts '''B6-0521/2006 - Brevets / RC B6-0522/2006 - Brevets''', on 12/10/2006, results of rollcall | + | Vote on texts '''B6-0521/2006 - Brevets / RC B6-0522/2006 - Brevets''', on 12/10/2006, results of rollcall votes on parts detailed below. |
| + | |||
| + | ===Results=== | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''Mean score of the European Parliament: 29.5/100''' | ||
| + | |||
| + | * [[EPLA_resolution_by_score|Results sorted by final score]] | ||
| + | * [[EPLA_resolution_by_name|Results sorted by alphabetical order]] | ||
| + | * [[EPLA_resolution_by_country|Results sorted by country]] | ||
| + | * [[EPLA_resolution_by_group|Results sorted by political group]] | ||
| + | * [[EPLA_resolution_by_committee|Results sorted by committee]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===Rollcall Votes=== | ||
* résolution: Resolution from PSE, Verts/ALE and GUE/NGL rejecting EPLA - recommendation: for, coefficient: 4 | * résolution: Resolution from PSE, Verts/ALE and GUE/NGL rejecting EPLA - recommendation: for, coefficient: 4 | ||
| Line 14: | Line 29: | ||
* cons. B: Recital recalling the need of an efficient, competitive, cost-efficient and accessible patent system - recommendation: against, coefficient: 2 | * cons. B: Recital recalling the need of an efficient, competitive, cost-efficient and accessible patent system - recommendation: against, coefficient: 2 | ||
* résolution_RC B6-0522/2006 - Brevets: Compromise resolution between EPP and PSE - recommendation: none | * résolution_RC B6-0522/2006 - Brevets: Compromise resolution between EPP and PSE - recommendation: none | ||
| − | |||
| − | + | ---- | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | + | Back to home page of [[Political Memory]] | |
| + | [[Category:EPLA resolutions]] | ||
| − | + | [[Category:Political Memory]] | |
Latest revision as of 15:41, 26 September 2011
Political Memory: Resolutions on European Patent Litigation Agreement (EPLA)
Vote on texts B6-0521/2006 - Brevets / RC B6-0522/2006 - Brevets, on 12/10/2006, results of rollcall votes on parts detailed below.
Results
Mean score of the European Parliament: 29.5/100
- Results sorted by final score
- Results sorted by alphabetical order
- Results sorted by country
- Results sorted by political group
- Results sorted by committee
Rollcall Votes
- résolution: Resolution from PSE, Verts/ALE and GUE/NGL rejecting EPLA - recommendation: for, coefficient: 4
- am. 8: Deletion of "accessing to Munich Convention" - recommendation: for, coefficient: 3
- am. 5: Opinion from ECJ examined by Parliament for the need of transparency and democracy - recommendation: for, coefficient: 3
- am. 10: Opinion from ECJ - recommendation: for, coefficient: 2
- par. 2: Opinion from legal service of the European Parliament - recommendation: for, coefficient: 1
- cons. A: considérant impliquant qu'une solution sur les litiges doit être trouvée à court terme - recommendation: against, coefficient: 3
- cons. B: Recital recalling the need of an efficient, competitive, cost-efficient and accessible patent system - recommendation: against, coefficient: 2
- résolution_RC B6-0522/2006 - Brevets: Compromise resolution between EPP and PSE - recommendation: none
Back to home page of Political Memory
