Difference between revisions of "Cultural industries resolution details LU"
From La Quadrature du Net
Jump to navigationJump to searchm (Categorization) |
|||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOEDITSECTION__ | __NOEDITSECTION__ | ||
− | + | {{Infobox Version | |
+ | |en=Cultural_industries_resolution_details_LU | ||
+ | |fr=Resolution_industries_culturelles_details_LU | ||
+ | }} | ||
==[[Political_Memory|Political Memory]]: Rapport Bono on cultural industries in Europe, Results in Detail for Luxembourg {{#icon:LU.png|Luxembourg}}== | ==[[Political_Memory|Political Memory]]: Rapport Bono on cultural industries in Europe, Results in Detail for Luxembourg {{#icon:LU.png|Luxembourg}}== | ||
Line 7: | Line 10: | ||
! Rank !! MEP !! Final score !! ams. 1+2/1/1 !! ams. 1+2/2/2 | ! Rank !! MEP !! Final score !! ams. 1+2/1/1 !! ams. 1+2/2/2 | ||
|-id='RobertGoebbels' style='display:none' | |-id='RobertGoebbels' style='display:none' | ||
− | | 94 || [[RobertGoebbels|Robert GOEBBELS]] {{#icon: | + | | 94 || [[RobertGoebbels|Robert GOEBBELS]] {{#icon:PSE.png|PSE|11|Cultural_industries_resolution_details_PSE}} || style="background:#00FF00" | 100.0 || style="background:#00ff00" | for || style="background:#00ff00" | for |
|-id='JeanSpautz' style='display:none' | |-id='JeanSpautz' style='display:none' | ||
| 249 || [[JeanSpautz|Jean SPAUTZ]] {{#icon:PPE.png|PPE-DE|11|Cultural_industries_resolution_details_PPE}} || style="background:#00FF00" | 100.0 || style="background:#00ff00" | for || style="background:#00ff00" | for | | 249 || [[JeanSpautz|Jean SPAUTZ]] {{#icon:PPE.png|PPE-DE|11|Cultural_industries_resolution_details_PPE}} || style="background:#00FF00" | 100.0 || style="background:#00ff00" | for || style="background:#00ff00" | for | ||
Line 15: | Line 18: | ||
| 427 || [[ErnaHennicotSchoepges|Erna HENNICOT-SCHOEPGES]] {{#icon:PPE.png|PPE-DE|11|Cultural_industries_resolution_details_PPE}} || style="background:#ffb200" | 33.3 || style="background:#00ff00" | for || style="background:#ff0000" | against | | 427 || [[ErnaHennicotSchoepges|Erna HENNICOT-SCHOEPGES]] {{#icon:PPE.png|PPE-DE|11|Cultural_industries_resolution_details_PPE}} || style="background:#ffb200" | 33.3 || style="background:#00ff00" | for || style="background:#ff0000" | against | ||
|-id='AstridLulling' style='display:none' | |-id='AstridLulling' style='display:none' | ||
− | | 468 || [[AstridLulling|Astrid LULLING]] {{#icon:PPE.png|PPE|11|Cultural_industries_resolution_details_PPE}} || style="background:#ffb200" | 33.3 || style="background:#00ff00" | for || style="background:#ff0000" | against | + | | 468 || [[AstridLulling|Astrid LULLING]] {{#icon:PPE.png|PPE-DE|11|Cultural_industries_resolution_details_PPE}} || style="background:#ffb200" | 33.3 || style="background:#00ff00" | for || style="background:#ff0000" | against |
|-id='LydiePolfer' style='display:none' | |-id='LydiePolfer' style='display:none' | ||
| 628 || [[LydiePolfer|Lydie POLFER]] {{#icon:ALDE.png|ALDE|11|Cultural_industries_resolution_details_ALDE}} || style="background:#ff0000" | 0.0 || style="background:#ff0000" | against || style="background:#ff0000" | against | | 628 || [[LydiePolfer|Lydie POLFER]] {{#icon:ALDE.png|ALDE|11|Cultural_industries_resolution_details_ALDE}} || style="background:#ff0000" | 0.0 || style="background:#ff0000" | against || style="background:#ff0000" | against | ||
Line 31: | Line 34: | ||
[[Cultural_industries_resolution_LU|Back to results for Luxembourg]] | [[Cultural_industries_resolution_LU|Back to results for Luxembourg]] | ||
− | [[Category: | + | [[Category:Cultural Industries Resolutions]] |
Latest revision as of 17:06, 26 September 2011
Political Memory: Rapport Bono on cultural industries in Europe, Results in Detail for Luxembourg {{#icon:LU.png|Luxembourg}}
Rank | MEP | Final score | ams. 1+2/1/1 | ams. 1+2/2/2 |
---|
- ams. 1+2/1/1: Recognition of the benefits of Internet for cultural expression, access to knowledge, democratic participation in European creativity, bringing generations together - recommendation: for, coefficient: 1
- ams. 1+2/2/2: Rejection of three-strikes approach (graduated response) - recommendation: for, coefficient: 2