Difference between revisions of "Analysis on JURI Draft Opinion on Single Market Regulation"

From La Quadrature du Net
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
EDRi and La Quadrature du Net welcomes the draft opinion, but would like to make some comments on selected proposed amendments below. The left column repeats the Commission proposal; the right column contains the amendments proposed by the rapporteur, Marielle Gallo. EDRi's comments can be found below. For ease of reading, the headings are highlighted and marked with arrows:  
 
EDRi and La Quadrature du Net welcomes the draft opinion, but would like to make some comments on selected proposed amendments below. The left column repeats the Commission proposal; the right column contains the amendments proposed by the rapporteur, Marielle Gallo. EDRi's comments can be found below. For ease of reading, the headings are highlighted and marked with arrows:  
 
• green for amendments which we welcome;  
 
• green for amendments which we welcome;  
 +
 
• yellow for amendments which pursue good aims, but could benefit from further suggested improvements;  
 
• yellow for amendments which pursue good aims, but could benefit from further suggested improvements;  
 
• red for amendments which in our view should be reconsidered.  
 
• red for amendments which in our view should be reconsidered.  
 
In each case, a short justification is given.
 
In each case, a short justification is given.

Revision as of 17:04, 7 January 2014

EDRi and La Quadrature du Net welcomes the draft opinion, but would like to make some comments on selected proposed amendments below. The left column repeats the Commission proposal; the right column contains the amendments proposed by the rapporteur, Marielle Gallo. EDRi's comments can be found below. For ease of reading, the headings are highlighted and marked with arrows: • green for amendments which we welcome;

• yellow for amendments which pursue good aims, but could benefit from further suggested improvements; • red for amendments which in our view should be reconsidered. In each case, a short justification is given.