Analysis on JURI Draft Opinion on Single Market Regulation : Différence entre versions

De La Quadrature du Net
Aller à la navigationAller à la recherche
Ligne 1 : Ligne 1 :
EDRi and La Quadrature du Net welcomes the draft opinion, but would like to make some comments on selected proposed amendments below. The left column repeats the Commission proposal; the right column contains the amendments proposed by the rapporteur, Marielle Gallo. EDRi's comments can be found below. For ease of reading, the headings are highlighted and marked with arrows:  
+
EDRi and La Quadrature du Net welcomes the draft opinion, but would like to make some comments on selected proposed amendments below. The left column repeats the Commission proposal; the right column contains the amendments proposed by the rapporteur, Marielle Gallo. EDRi's comments can be found below. For ease of reading, the headings are highlighted and marked with arrows :
green for amendments which we welcome;  
+
 
 +
* green for amendments which we welcome;  
 +
* yellow for amendments which pursue good aims, but could benefit from further suggested improvements;
 +
* red for amendments which in our view should be reconsidered.
  
• yellow for amendments which pursue good aims, but could benefit from further suggested improvements;
 
• red for amendments which in our view should be reconsidered.
 
 
In each case, a short justification is given.
 
In each case, a short justification is given.

Version du 7 janvier 2014 à 18:05

EDRi and La Quadrature du Net welcomes the draft opinion, but would like to make some comments on selected proposed amendments below. The left column repeats the Commission proposal; the right column contains the amendments proposed by the rapporteur, Marielle Gallo. EDRi's comments can be found below. For ease of reading, the headings are highlighted and marked with arrows :

  • green for amendments which we welcome;
  • yellow for amendments which pursue good aims, but could benefit from further suggested improvements;
  • red for amendments which in our view should be reconsidered.

In each case, a short justification is given.