Difference between revisions of "ACTA: to keep in mind"

From La Quadrature du Net
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Infobox Version|en=ACTA:_to_keep_in_mind|fr=ACTA :_à_retenir|it=ACTA:_da_tenere_a_mente}}
 
{{Infobox Version|en=ACTA:_to_keep_in_mind|fr=ACTA :_à_retenir|it=ACTA:_da_tenere_a_mente}}
  
This page lists key points to remember in any discussion about ACTA
+
<big>This page lists key points to remember in any discussion about ACTA</big>
  
=Main arguments=
+
 
==Against ACTA in general==
+
{{ACTA how to act|lang=en}}
 +
 
 +
 
 +
==Main arguments==
 +
===Against ACTA in general===
 
*ACTA turns Internet companies (ISPs, service providers) into a private copyright police by forcing to take legal responsibility for what their users do online.
 
*ACTA turns Internet companies (ISPs, service providers) into a private copyright police by forcing to take legal responsibility for what their users do online.
 
*ACTA brings broad and dangerous criminal sanctions in a loosely defined way.
 
*ACTA brings broad and dangerous criminal sanctions in a loosely defined way.
 
*ACTA bypasses democracy and opens the door to a parallel legislative process, which the European MPs should be particularly angry about.
 
*ACTA bypasses democracy and opens the door to a parallel legislative process, which the European MPs should be particularly angry about.
 +
 +
===Specific arguments for each committee===
 +
*[[Civil Liberties Arguments Against ACTA|LIBE]]
 +
*[[Industrial Policy Arguments Against ACTA|ITRE]]
 +
*[[Development Arguments Against ACTA|DEVE]]
 +
*[[Legal Arguments Against ACTA|JURI]]
  
 
<!-- ===Arguments against an interim report===
 
<!-- ===Arguments against an interim report===
Line 29: Line 39:
 
Main arguments against a Parliamentarian referral to the ECJ and an interim report: [[File:20120323_ACTA_EC_Referral_Interim_Report.pdf]]
 
Main arguments against a Parliamentarian referral to the ECJ and an interim report: [[File:20120323_ACTA_EC_Referral_Interim_Report.pdf]]
 
  -->
 
  -->
 +
==The procedure in the European Parliament==
 +
For detailed information about the ACTA procedure in the European system, please see this page '''[[ACTA: Procedure in the European Parliament]]'''.
  
=The procedure in the European Parliament=
+
==How to act?==
For detailed information about the ACTA procedure in the European system, please see this page [[ACTA: Procedure in the European Parliament]].
+
To help us fight ACTA, visit our page '''[[How_to_act_against_ACTA|How to act against ACTA]]'''.
 
 
=How to act?=
 
To help us fight ACTA, visit our page [[How_to_act_against_ACTA|How to act against ACTA]]
 
  
=Learn more=
+
==Learn more==
 
* You can learn more about ACTA and it's dangers to our freedom at http://www.laquadrature.net/en/ACTA
 
* You can learn more about ACTA and it's dangers to our freedom at http://www.laquadrature.net/en/ACTA
  

Revision as of 11:32, 6 April 2012


This page lists key points to remember in any discussion about ACTA




Main arguments

Against ACTA in general

  • ACTA turns Internet companies (ISPs, service providers) into a private copyright police by forcing to take legal responsibility for what their users do online.
  • ACTA brings broad and dangerous criminal sanctions in a loosely defined way.
  • ACTA bypasses democracy and opens the door to a parallel legislative process, which the European MPs should be particularly angry about.

Specific arguments for each committee

The procedure in the European Parliament

For detailed information about the ACTA procedure in the European system, please see this page ACTA: Procedure in the European Parliament.

How to act?

To help us fight ACTA, visit our page How to act against ACTA.

Learn more

  • You should also read our counter-arguments to the Commission's disinformation about ACTA, it answers most arguments that you might encounter by those defending ACTA.

The following resources are also helpful in better understanding ACTA: