Political Memory: Directive on patentability of "computer-implemented inventions" (software patents), Results in Detail for United Kingdom {{#icon:GB.png|United Kingdom}}
MEP |
Final score |
Amendments 52, 54/rév, 68 |
Amendments 29, 41, 59 |
Amendment 69 |
Amendments 55/rév., 97, 108, 1st part |
Amendment 16, 1st part |
Amendment 16, 2nd part |
Amendment 16 (paragraph 2) |
Amendment 70 |
Amendment 60 |
Amendment 72 |
Amendment 76, 1st part |
Amendment 76, 2nd part |
Amendment 71, 1st part |
Amendment 71, 2nd part |
Amendment 81 |
Amendments 34, 115 |
Amendment 74 |
Amendment 75 |
Proposition modifiée |
Résolution
|
Jean LAMBERT |
93.9 |
for |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
against |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
for |
against |
for |
for |
against |
against |
against |
against
|
Caroline LUCAS |
93.9 |
for |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
against |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
for |
against |
for |
for |
against |
against |
against |
against
|
John PURVIS |
81.1 |
against |
against |
for |
for |
against |
against |
for |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
for |
against |
for |
for |
abst. |
against |
for |
for
|
Nigel FARAGE |
59.5 |
for |
- |
against |
abst. |
abst. |
against |
against |
abst. |
for |
abst. |
against |
against |
against |
against |
abst. |
for |
against |
against |
against |
against
|
Martin CALLANAN |
59.1 |
against |
against |
against |
for |
against |
against |
for |
against |
for |
for |
for |
abst. |
for |
against |
against |
for |
abst. |
abst. |
for |
for
|
Jeffrey TITFORD |
56.8 |
for |
against |
against |
abst. |
abst. |
against |
against |
abst. |
for |
abst. |
against |
against |
against |
against |
against |
for |
against |
against |
against |
against
|
Richard CORBETT |
56.1 |
against |
against |
for |
for |
for |
for |
for |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
for |
for |
against |
for |
for |
for |
for |
for
|
Graham BOOTH |
51.1 |
for |
against |
against |
abst. |
abst. |
against |
against |
abst. |
- |
abst. |
against |
against |
against |
against |
against |
for |
against |
against |
against |
against
|
Roger HELMER |
47.3 |
against |
against |
against |
for |
against |
against |
for |
against |
- |
abst. |
abst. |
abst. |
against |
against |
for |
for |
abst. |
abst. |
for |
for
|
Linda McAVAN |
34.8 |
against |
against |
for |
against |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
for |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
for |
for |
for |
for |
for
|
Gary TITLEY |
34.8 |
against |
against |
for |
against |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
for |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
for |
for |
for |
for |
for
|
Chris DAVIES |
31.8 |
against |
against |
against |
against |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
for |
against |
against |
against |
against |
against |
for |
against |
for |
for |
for
|
James NICHOLSON |
31.8 |
against |
- |
against |
against |
for |
- |
for |
against |
against |
for |
for |
for |
against |
against |
against |
for |
abst. |
abst. |
for |
for
|
Glenys KINNOCK |
29.2 |
against |
against |
- |
against |
against |
for |
for |
for |
against |
for |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
against |
for |
for |
for |
for
|
Michael CASHMAN |
28.8 |
against |
against |
for |
against |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
for |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
against |
for |
for |
for |
for
|
Glyn FORD |
28.8 |
against |
against |
for |
against |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
for |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
against |
for |
for |
for |
for
|
Neena GILL |
28.8 |
against |
against |
for |
against |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
for |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
against |
for |
for |
for |
for
|
Mary HONEYBALL |
28.8 |
against |
against |
for |
against |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
for |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
against |
for |
for |
for |
for
|
Richard HOWITT |
28.8 |
against |
against |
for |
against |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
for |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
against |
for |
for |
for |
for
|
Stephen HUGHES |
28.8 |
against |
against |
for |
against |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
for |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
against |
for |
for |
for |
for
|
Arlene McCARTHY |
28.8 |
against |
against |
for |
against |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
for |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
against |
for |
for |
for |
for
|
Claude MORAES |
28.8 |
against |
against |
for |
against |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
for |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
against |
for |
for |
for |
for
|
Brian SIMPSON |
28.8 |
against |
against |
for |
against |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
for |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
against |
for |
for |
for |
for
|
Peter SKINNER |
28.8 |
against |
against |
for |
against |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
for |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
against |
for |
for |
for |
for
|
Catherine STIHLER |
28.8 |
against |
against |
for |
against |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
for |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
against |
for |
for |
for |
for
|
Giles CHICHESTER |
26.5 |
against |
against |
against |
for |
for |
for |
for |
against |
against |
abst. |
abst. |
abst. |
against |
against |
against |
for |
abst. |
for |
for |
for
|
Bill NEWTON DUNN |
26.5 |
against |
against |
against |
against |
for |
for |
for |
against |
against |
for |
against |
against |
against |
against |
against |
for |
against |
- |
for |
for
|
Diana WALLIS |
26.1 |
against |
against |
against |
against |
for |
for |
for |
against |
- |
for |
against |
against |
against |
against |
against |
for |
against |
for |
for |
for
|
Baroness NICHOLSON OF WINTERBOURNE |
25.8 |
- |
against |
against |
against |
for |
for |
for |
against |
against |
for |
against |
against |
against |
against |
against |
for |
against |
for |
for |
for
|
Graham WATSON |
25.8 |
against |
- |
against |
against |
for |
for |
for |
against |
against |
for |
against |
against |
against |
against |
against |
for |
against |
for |
for |
for
|
Struan STEVENSON |
25.0 |
against |
for |
against |
against |
for |
for |
for |
against |
against |
abst. |
abst. |
abst. |
against |
against |
against |
for |
abst. |
for |
for |
for
|
Andrew DUFF |
24.2 |
against |
against |
against |
against |
for |
for |
for |
against |
against |
for |
against |
against |
against |
against |
against |
for |
against |
for |
for |
for
|
Elizabeth LYNNE |
24.2 |
against |
against |
against |
against |
for |
for |
for |
against |
against |
for |
against |
against |
against |
against |
against |
for |
against |
for |
for |
for
|
Christopher BEAZLEY |
23.5 |
against |
against |
against |
against |
- |
for |
for |
against |
against |
abst. |
abst. |
abst. |
against |
against |
against |
for |
abst. |
for |
for |
for
|
Robert STURDY |
23.5 |
against |
against |
against |
against |
for |
for |
for |
against |
against |
for |
abst. |
- |
against |
against |
against |
for |
abst. |
for |
for |
for
|
Daniel HANNAN |
21.2 |
against |
against |
against |
against |
for |
for |
for |
against |
against |
abst. |
abst. |
abst. |
against |
against |
against |
for |
abst. |
- |
for |
for
|
Jonathan EVANS |
20.8 |
against |
against |
- |
against |
for |
for |
for |
against |
against |
abst. |
abst. |
abst. |
against |
against |
against |
for |
abst. |
for |
for |
for
|
Caroline JACKSON |
20.5 |
against |
- |
against |
against |
for |
for |
for |
against |
against |
abst. |
abst. |
abst. |
against |
against |
against |
for |
abst. |
for |
for |
for
|
Sir Robert ATKINS |
18.9 |
against |
against |
against |
against |
for |
for |
for |
against |
against |
abst. |
abst. |
abst. |
against |
against |
against |
for |
abst. |
for |
for |
for
|
John BOWIS |
18.9 |
against |
against |
against |
against |
for |
for |
for |
against |
against |
abst. |
abst. |
abst. |
against |
against |
against |
for |
abst. |
for |
for |
for
|
Philip BRADBOURN |
18.9 |
against |
against |
against |
against |
for |
for |
for |
against |
against |
abst. |
abst. |
abst. |
against |
against |
against |
for |
abst. |
for |
for |
for
|
Philip BUSHILL-MATTHEWS |
18.9 |
against |
against |
against |
against |
for |
for |
for |
against |
against |
abst. |
abst. |
abst. |
against |
against |
against |
for |
abst. |
for |
for |
for
|
Den DOVER |
18.9 |
against |
against |
against |
against |
for |
for |
for |
against |
against |
abst. |
abst. |
abst. |
against |
against |
against |
for |
abst. |
for |
for |
for
|
James ELLES |
18.9 |
against |
against |
against |
against |
for |
for |
for |
against |
against |
abst. |
abst. |
abst. |
against |
against |
against |
for |
abst. |
for |
for |
for
|
Malcolm HARBOUR |
18.9 |
against |
against |
against |
against |
for |
for |
for |
against |
against |
abst. |
abst. |
abst. |
against |
against |
against |
for |
abst. |
for |
for |
for
|
Christopher HEATON-HARRIS |
18.9 |
against |
against |
against |
against |
for |
for |
for |
against |
against |
abst. |
abst. |
- |
against |
against |
against |
for |
abst. |
for |
for |
for
|
Timothy KIRKHOPE |
18.9 |
against |
against |
against |
against |
for |
for |
for |
against |
against |
abst. |
abst. |
abst. |
against |
against |
against |
for |
abst. |
for |
for |
for
|
David SUMBERG |
18.9 |
against |
against |
against |
against |
for |
for |
for |
against |
against |
abst. |
abst. |
abst. |
against |
against |
against |
for |
abst. |
for |
for |
for
|
Charles TANNOCK |
18.9 |
against |
against |
against |
against |
for |
for |
for |
against |
against |
abst. |
abst. |
abst. |
against |
against |
against |
for |
abst. |
for |
for |
for
|
Geoffrey VAN ORDEN |
18.9 |
against |
against |
against |
against |
for |
for |
for |
against |
against |
abst. |
abst. |
abst. |
against |
against |
against |
for |
abst. |
for |
for |
for
|
Neil PARISH |
16.7 |
against |
against |
against |
against |
for |
for |
for |
against |
against |
abst. |
abst. |
abst. |
against |
against |
against |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
|
Show details for all MEPs
- Amendments 52, 54/rév, 68: Reject the directive - recommendation: for, coefficient: 4
- Amendments 29, 41, 59: Stated Purpose of directive: limits of patentability with respect to automated data processing - recommendation: for, coefficient: 4
- Amendment 69: Definition of technical contribution excluding processing, handling, and presentation of information - recommendation: for, coefficient: 5
- Amendments 55/rév., 97, 108, 1st part: Definition of a technical field by the use of controllable forces of nature - recommendation: for, coefficient: 5
- Amendment 16, 1st part: Definition of a computer-implemented invention - recommendation: against, coefficient: 4
- Amendment 16, 2nd part: Definition of inventive step by a technical contribution - recommendation: against, coefficient: 4
- Amendment 16 (paragraph 2): Requirement of a technical contribution to meet the inventive step requirement - recommendation: against, coefficient: 4
- Amendment 70: Definition of a technical contribution by constitution of a a new teaching on cause-effect relations in the use of controllable forces of nature - recommendation: for, coefficient: 5
- Amendment 60: Exclusion of computer-implemented solutions from patentability when they improve efficiency in the use of resources within the data processing system - recommendation: for, coefficient: 5
- Amendment 72: Inadmissibility of patent claims on a computer program, alone or on a data medium - recommendation: for, coefficient: 4
- Amendment 76, 1st part: No infringement when a patented technique is used for the purpose of interoperability - recommendation: for, coefficient: 4
- Amendment 76, 2nd part: Limitation of the absence of infringement by the three-steps test when a patented technique is use for the purpose of interoperability - recommendation: against, coefficient: 4
- Amendment 71, 1st part: Monitoring of directive with regard to SMEs' innovation - recommendation: for, coefficient: 1
- Amendment 71, 2nd part: Research of solutions to ease access to patents for SMEs - recommendation: against, coefficient: 2
- Amendment 81: Parlementary control of EPO - recommendation: for, coefficient: 3
- Amendments 34, 115: Delete a recital allowing patentability of algorithms - recommendation: for, coefficient: 4
- Amendment 74: Recital requiring that source code be include in a patent description - recommendation: against, coefficient: 2
- Amendment 75: Recital recalling patentability principles that exclude inventions belonging to public domain, implying that some software can be considered in this way and therefore could be patentable - recommendation: against, coefficient: 2
- Proposition modifiée: Proposition as amended - recommendation: none
- Résolution: Position of the European Parliament in first reading as stated in the previously amended proposition - recommendation: none
Back to results for United Kingdom