Lettre sauvez-le-138-monsieur-le-ministre/en : Différence entre versions

De La Quadrature du Net
Aller à la navigationAller à la recherche
(Page créée avec « Letter save-am138-mister-minister »)
 
(Page créée avec « Mr or Mrs Minister of <function>, On November 27th, the Council of the European Union will examine the project reforming electronic communications, also known as “Telec... »)
 
Ligne 1 : Ligne 1 :
 
<languages/>
 
<languages/>
  Monsieur le ministre,
+
  Mr or Mrs Minister of <function>,
 +
 
 +
On November 27th, the Council of the European Union will examine the project reforming electronic communications, also known as “Telecoms Package”, as amended by the European Parliament in its first reading last September 24th.
 +
 
 +
Protection of fundamental rights of European citizens using internet has become one of the major issues at stake of this law proposal.
 +
 
 +
After lengthy debates in the referred committees, and after the intervention of the EDPS, the independant European authority in charge of the protection of personal data, the European Parliament adopted a series of amendments to the Commission proposal. The MEPs wanted to guarantee that the current level of protection of the european citizens will be at least maintained by the Member States in the future.
 +
 
 +
But the main safeguard introduced by the Parliament − amendment 138 adopted by 88% of the MEPs − might be removed by the Council on November 27th, following a request from the French government. The French economic newspaper La Tribune has announced that French government has already managed to convince every other Member State to refrain from voting or to vote in favor of the removal of this amendment.
 +
 
 +
Nevertheless, as the European Commission underlined in an official memo, this amendment is “an important restatement of key legal principles of the Community legal order, especially of citizens' fundamental rights. It leaves Member States sufficient scope for reaching a fair balance between different fundamental rights, in particular the right to respect for private life, the right to protection of property, the right to an effective remedy and the right to freedom of expression and information.”
 +
 
 +
In its memo, the Commision stated that it would not ask for its removal, contrary to Nicolas Sarkozy's request to the President of the Commission.
 +
 
 +
The only reason for France to request the removal of this amendment is that it is opposed head on to the French law proposal “Creation and Internet” that aims at creating a special court for the Internet users whose account has been used to make unauthorised copies of music and movies1. It is also for France about legalising a posteriori an administrative decision authorising private companies to carry out some police missions on Internet, thus opposing the European policy on personal data.
 +
 
 +
Therefore, we ask you to oppose the removal of amendment 138 in order to respect, as the European Commision has done, the democratic vote of the European Parliament who has insisted on underlining that fundamental democratic principles, such as the principle of separation of powers or the principle of proportionality, also apply on Internet, at a time where the Member State assuming the presidency of the European Union seems to have forgotten it.
 +
 
 +
Failing which, everyone might assess your commitment in the construction of an Europe that protects the fundamental rights of its citizens and the reality of European Democracy.
 +
 
 +
Hoping that you will be able to act upon this issue, citizenly yours,
 +
 
 +
[signature]
 +
 
 
   
 
   
  Le 27 novembre, le Conseil de l'Union européenne examinera le projet
+
  [1] For the record, the purpose of French law proposal “Creation and
  de réforme du droit des communications électroniques, dit Paquet
+
  Internet” is to transfer repressive powers of the judiciary authority
  Télécom, tel que modifié en première lecture par le Parlement européen
+
  concerning copyright litigations to an administrative authority.
le 24 septembre dernier.
+
  Yet, amendment 138 underlines that such transfers could only be
+
  allowed when public security is threatened. Which is certainly not
La question de la protection des droits fondamentaux des citoyens
+
  the case for an alleged copyright infringement.
européens sur internet est devenue au fil des mois l'un des enjeux
 
majeurs de ce dossier.
 
 
Après de longs débats au sein des commissions parlementaires saisies,
 
et suite à l'intervention du CEPD, l'autorité européenne indépendante
 
en charge de la protection des données personnelles, le Parlement
 
européen a adopté une série de modifications à la proposition de la
 
Commission. Les eurodéputés ont voulu garantir que le niveau de
 
protection actuel des citoyens européens serait a minima maintenu à
 
l'avenir par les États membres.
 
 
Mais le principal garde-fou que le Parlement européen a introduit –
 
l'amendement 138 adopté par 88% des eurodéputés  - pourrait être
 
supprimé par le Conseil le 27 novembre prochain, à la demande du
 
gouvernement français. Le journal économique français La Tribune a
 
ainsi annoncé que le gouvernement français aurait réussi à convaincre
 
la totalité des autres États membres de s'abstenir ou de voter pour la
 
suppression de cet amendement.
 
 
Pourtant, comme l'a souligné la Commission européenne dans un
 
mémorandum officiel, cet amendement est « un rappel important des
 
principes fondamentaux de l'ordre juridique communautaire, et
 
notamment des droits fondamentaux des citoyens. Il laisse aux États
 
membres une marge suffisante pour parvenir à un juste équilibre entre
 
différents droits fondamentaux, notamment le droit au respect de la
 
vie privée, le droit à la protection de la propriété, le droit à un
 
recours effectif et le droit à la liberté d'expression et à
 
l'information ».
 
 
Dans son mémorandum, la Commission indiquait qu'elle ne demanderait
 
donc pas sa suppression, contrairement à ce que Nicolas Sarkozy avait
 
demandé au Président de la Commission.
 
 
La seule raison qui fait que la France demande la suppression de cet
 
amendement est qu'il s'oppose frontalement au projet de loi français
 
« Création et Internet » qui vise à créer un tribunal d'exception pour
 
les internautes dont l'accès est utilisé pour réaliser des copies de
 
musiques et de films sans autorisation. Il s'agit également pour la
 
France de légaliser a posteriori une décision administrative
 
autorisant des sociétés privées à se livrer à des missions de police
 
  sur Internet, en contradiction avec la doctrine européenne sur les
 
données personnelles.
 
 
Nous vous demandons donc de vous opposer à la suppression de
 
l'amendement 138 pour respecter, à l'instar de la Commission
 
  européenne, le vote démocratique du Parlement européen qui a tenu à
 
souligner que des principes démocratiques fondamentaux, comme les
 
principes de séparation des pouvoirs ou de proportionnalité,
 
s'appliquent aussi sur Internet, à un moment où l'État membre assurant
 
la présidence de l'Union européenne semble l'avoir oublié.
 
   
 
À défaut, chacun pourra juger de votre engagement dans la construction
 
d'une Europe protectrice des droits fondamentaux des citoyens et de la
 
réalité de la démocratie européenne.
 
 
En espérant que vous saurez vous saisir de ce dossier, veuillez
 
agréer, Monsieur le ministre, mes salutations citoyennes,
 
 
[signature]
 
 
[1]Pour mémoire, le projet de loi français « Création et Internet » a
 
pour objectif de transférer à une autorité administrative les pouvoirs
 
répressifs de l'autorité judiciaire en matière de litiges relatifs au
 
droit d'auteur. Or l'amendement 138 souligne que les seuls motifs
 
permettant un tel transfert sont ceux visant à répondre à une menace
 
pour la sécurité publique, ce qui n'est évidemment pas le cas d'une
 
atteinte présumée à un droit d'auteur.
 
  
 
[[Category:HADOPI]]
 
[[Category:HADOPI]]
 
[[Category:Save_138]]
 
[[Category:Save_138]]

Version actuelle datée du 4 août 2015 à 19:14

Autres langues :
English • ‎français • ‎português
Mr or Mrs Minister of <function>,

On November 27th, the Council of the European Union will examine the project reforming electronic communications, also known as “Telecoms Package”, as amended by the European Parliament in its first reading last September 24th.

Protection of fundamental rights of European citizens using internet has become one of the major issues at stake of this law proposal.

After lengthy debates in the referred committees, and after the intervention of the EDPS, the independant European authority in charge of the protection of personal data, the European Parliament adopted a series of amendments to the Commission proposal. The MEPs wanted to guarantee that the current level of protection of the european citizens will be at least maintained by the Member States in the future.

But the main safeguard introduced by the Parliament − amendment 138 adopted by 88% of the MEPs − might be removed by the Council on November 27th, following a request from the French government. The French economic newspaper La Tribune has announced that French government has already managed to convince every other Member State to refrain from voting or to vote in favor of the removal of this amendment.

Nevertheless, as the European Commission underlined in an official memo, this amendment is “an important restatement of key legal principles of the Community legal order, especially of citizens' fundamental rights. It leaves Member States sufficient scope for reaching a fair balance between different fundamental rights, in particular the right to respect for private life, the right to protection of property, the right to an effective remedy and the right to freedom of expression and information.”

In its memo, the Commision stated that it would not ask for its removal, contrary to Nicolas Sarkozy's request to the President of the Commission.

The only reason for France to request the removal of this amendment is that it is opposed head on to the French law proposal “Creation and Internet” that aims at creating a special court for the Internet users whose account has been used to make unauthorised copies of music and movies1. It is also for France about legalising a posteriori an administrative decision authorising private companies to carry out some police missions on Internet, thus opposing the European policy on personal data.

Therefore, we ask you to oppose the removal of amendment 138 in order to respect, as the European Commision has done, the democratic vote of the European Parliament who has insisted on underlining that fundamental democratic principles, such as the principle of separation of powers or the principle of proportionality, also apply on Internet, at a time where the Member State assuming the presidency of the European Union seems to have forgotten it.

Failing which, everyone might assess your commitment in the construction of an Europe that protects the fundamental rights of its citizens and the reality of European Democracy.

Hoping that you will be able to act upon this issue, citizenly yours,

[signature]


[1] For the record, the purpose of French law proposal “Creation and
Internet” is to transfer repressive powers of the judiciary authority
concerning copyright litigations to an administrative authority.
Yet, amendment 138 underlines that such transfers could only be
allowed when public security is threatened. Which is certainly not
the case for an alleged copyright infringement.