DavidHammerstein : Différence entre versions

De La Quadrature du Net
Aller à la navigationAller à la recherche
(Positions : Telecoms Package Plenary Speeches)
Ligne 66 : Ligne 66 :
  
 
''Thanks to improve this part with opinions from David HAMMERSTEIN about Squaring the Net concerned issues (see page [[Help:Political_Memory]] to know how to do it).''
 
''Thanks to improve this part with opinions from David HAMMERSTEIN about Squaring the Net concerned issues (see page [[Help:Political_Memory]] to know how to do it).''
* 02/09/2008 - Brussels [[http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+CRE+20080902+ITEM-010+DOC+XML+V0//EN&language=EN Telecoms Package Plenary Speeches]](Verts/ALE)
+
* 02/09/2008 [http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+CRE+20080902+ITEM-010+DOC+XML+V0//EN&language=EN Telecoms Package Plenary Speeches]
<blockquote>It is obvious that only a light shadow is what remains of the
 
ambitious project that the European Commission introduced one year
 
ago. It is a pity by many reasons, since consumers need an
 
independent european management and not a club of national regulators
 
strongly influenced by the national champions.
 
 
The Greens are against turning the European Agency for the Regulation
 
of the Telecommunication Market in a simple club of regulators funded
 
by themselves, lacking transparency and with not enough control or
 
capacity of veto by the European Commission. The independence of this
 
new body is in question.
 
 
It is also a pity that, because of the pressure of the big
 
telecommunication operators, it is not provided the access to the big
 
telecommunications infrastructures to the new innovative bussiness,
 
thus forcing doubling the infrastructures.
 
  
The Greens defend technological neutrality and functional
+
<blockquote>It is obvious that only a light shadow is what remains of the ambitious project that the European Commission introduced one year
disaggregation to end with the dominant positions of the national big
+
ago. It is a pity by many reasons, since consumers need an independent european management and not a club of national regulators strongly influenced by the national champions.</blockquote>
telecommunciations operators. However, the European Parliament has
+
<blockquote>The Greens are against turning the European Agency for the Regulation of the Telecommunication Market in a simple club of regulators funded by themselves, lacking transparency and with not enough control or capacity of veto by the European Commission. The independence of this
showed itself too shy, influenced by the lobbies, avoiding the
+
new body is in question.</blockquote>
interest of the new and more innovative enterprises, which are
+
<blockquote>It is also a pity that, because of the pressure of the big telecommunication operators, it is not provided the access to the big
already providing a big part of the wireless services in Europe and
+
telecommunications infrastructures to the new innovative business, thus forcing doubling the infrastructures.</blockquote>
which favor the citizens.
+
<blockquote>The Greens defend technological neutrality and functional disaggregation to end with the dominant positions of the national big
+
telecommunications operators. However, the European Parliament has showed itself too shy, influenced by the lobbies, avoiding the
I regret to tell that, in general, a big opportunity to give much
+
interest of the new and more innovative enterprises, which are already providing a big part of the wireless services in Europe and
more european value added to the telecommunications market has been
+
which favor the citizens.</blockquote>
lost. We are worried particularly by some dangerous proposals of
+
<blockquote>I regret to tell that, in general, a big opportunity to give much more european value added to the telecommunications market has been
Harbour report which clearly infringe the Net Neutrality principle as
+
lost. We are worried particularly by some dangerous proposals of Harbour report which clearly infringe the Net Neutrality principle as
a communication media, threaten the users' privacy, threatens feedom
+
a communication media, threaten the users' privacy, threatens freedom on the Net and above all, clearly exceed the legal scope of the
on the Net and above all, clearly exceed the legal scope of the
+
telecommunication package when it talks about content, when talking about what is lawful or unlawful, legal or illegal, of intelectual
telecommunication package when it talks about content, when talking
+
property, when talking of information filtering.</blockquote>
about what is lawful or unlawful, legal or illegal, of intelectual
+
<blockquote>This package deals with market infrastructure, deals with consumers and not about turning the Internet servers into digital policemen.</blockquote>
property, when talking of information filtering.
 
 
This package deals with market infrastructure, deals with consumers
 
and not about turning the Internet servers into digital policemen.
 
</blockquote>
 

Version du 5 octobre 2008 à 13:57

Political Memory: David HAMMERSTEIN, MEP

David HAMMERSTEIN

General Data

Contact

  • Parlement européen
    Bâtiment Altiero Spinelli 08G257
    60, rue Wiertz, 1047 Bruxelles
    Tel.: +32 2 28 45 754/+32 2 28 47 754
    Fax: +32 2 28 49 754
  • Parlement européen
    Bâtiment Louise Weiss T05046
    1, avenue du Président Robert Schuman - CS 91024, 67070 Strasbourg Cedex
    Tel.: +33 3 88 175 754/+33 3 88 177 754
    Fax: +33 3 88 179 754

Functions in European Parliament

  • Committee on Industry, Research and Energy (Member)
  • Committee on Petitions (Member)
  • Delegation for relations with Israel (Member)
  • Delegation to the Euro-Mediterranean Parliamentary Assembly (Member)
  • Committee on Foreign Affairs (Substitute)
  • Delegation for relations with the Palestinian Legislative Council (Substitute)
  • Graduate in sociology (University of California, 1973-1978) (Curriculum vitae)
  • Natural economy and geography teacher at secondary level (Godella, 1991-1999). Environmental adviser (1999-2003). (Curriculum vitae)
  • Spokesman for Els Verds del País Valencià (Valencian Greens), 1998-2003. International spokesman for Los Verdes (Spanish Greens), 2000-2004. Spanish delegate to the European Federation of Green Parties/European Green Party (2000-2004). (Curriculum vitae)

Curriculum Vitae

  • Graduate in sociology (University of California, 1973-1978) Natural economy and geography teacher at secondary level (Godella, 1991-1999)
  • Environmental adviser (1999-2003)
  • Spokesman for Els Verds del País Valencià (Valencian Greens), 1998-2003
  • International spokesman for Los Verdes (Spanish Greens), 2000-2004
  • Spanish delegate to the European Federation of Green Parties/European Green Party (2000-2004)

Votes


Opinions

Sources

Positions

Thanks to improve this part with opinions from David HAMMERSTEIN about Squaring the Net concerned issues (see page Help:Political_Memory to know how to do it).

It is obvious that only a light shadow is what remains of the ambitious project that the European Commission introduced one year ago. It is a pity by many reasons, since consumers need an independent european management and not a club of national regulators strongly influenced by the national champions.

The Greens are against turning the European Agency for the Regulation of the Telecommunication Market in a simple club of regulators funded by themselves, lacking transparency and with not enough control or capacity of veto by the European Commission. The independence of this new body is in question.

It is also a pity that, because of the pressure of the big telecommunication operators, it is not provided the access to the big telecommunications infrastructures to the new innovative business, thus forcing doubling the infrastructures.

The Greens defend technological neutrality and functional disaggregation to end with the dominant positions of the national big

telecommunications operators. However, the European Parliament has showed itself too shy, influenced by the lobbies, avoiding the interest of the new and more innovative enterprises, which are already providing a big part of the wireless services in Europe and

which favor the citizens.

I regret to tell that, in general, a big opportunity to give much more european value added to the telecommunications market has been

lost. We are worried particularly by some dangerous proposals of Harbour report which clearly infringe the Net Neutrality principle as a communication media, threaten the users' privacy, threatens freedom on the Net and above all, clearly exceed the legal scope of the telecommunication package when it talks about content, when talking about what is lawful or unlawful, legal or illegal, of intelectual

property, when talking of information filtering.

This package deals with market infrastructure, deals with consumers and not about turning the Internet servers into digital policemen.